生猪基本面数据 | | | 单 位 | 价 格 | | 同 比 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 价 格 | 河南现货 | 元/吨 | 12080 | | 250 | | | | 四川现货 | 元/吨 | 12250 | | 150 | | | | 广东现货 | 元/吨 | 11760 | | -200 | | | 期 货 | | 单 位 | 价 格 | | 同 比 | | | | 生猪2601 | 元/吨 | 11300 | | 95 | | | | 生猪2603 | 元/吨 | 11645 | | 185 | | | | 生猪2605 | 元/吨 | 12090 | | 115 | | | | | 单 位 | 成交量 | 较前日 | 持仓量 | 较昨日 | | | 生猪2601 | 手 | 7448 | 2289 | 15509 | -3509 | | | 生猪2603 | 手 | 117211 | 53885 | 171508 | 8077 | | | 生猪2605 | 手 | 26673 | 12218 | 86130 | 1472 | ...

| 生猪：投机需求兑现 | | --- | | 周小球 | 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0001891 | zhouxiaoqiu@gtht.com | | --- | --- | --- | | 吴昊 | 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0018592 | wuhao8@gtht.com | | 【基本面跟踪】 | | | 生猪基本面数据 | | | 单 位 | 价 格 | | 同 比 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 河南现货 | 元/吨 | 11780 | | 50 | | | 价 格 | 四川现货 | 元/吨 | 11900 | | 100 | | | | 广东现货 | 元/吨 | 11960 | | 0 | | | 期 货 | | 单 位 | 价 格 | | 比 同 | | | | 生猪2601 | 元/吨 | 11300 | | 55 | | | | 生猪2603 | 元/吨 | 11480 | | 65 | | | | 生猪2605 | 元/吨 | 11985 | | 50 | | | | | 单 位 | 成交量 | 较前日 | 持仓量 | ...

文 | 顾远山 编辑 | 顾远山 该来的，终究还是来了。 从美国政府释放出对华恶意开始，那个试图讨好美国的欧盟便心甘情愿的当起了美国的对华马前卒。 从2024年以各种上不得台面的借口，对我国电车征收不合道理的临时反补贴税；到2025年中旬又以无耻 的理由限制我国企业参与超500万欧元医疗器械的公共招标；等到了2025年12月更是以所谓的网络攻击 为由，对无辜中企展开制裁…… 一次又一次充满恶意的针对，已然让中欧关系紧张到了一种前所未见的地步。 而在这一次，我方也不会再对欧洲有半点的手软。 本文信源来自权威报道【外交部】【农业部】【央广网】【中国新闻网】【长江云新闻】 【京报网】（详细信源附在文章末尾）。为提升文章可读性，细节可能存在润色，请理智阅 读，仅供参考! 中方对欧加税，绝非表面那么简单 随着欧洲联盟对我国的所作所为愈发的得寸进尺，忍无可忍的我国，也终于开始对整个欧洲重拳出击。 就在12月16日，我国商务部官宣了一则重磅消息，从12月17日开始，我国将合理合法且合情地依照法律 法规，对那些原产于欧洲的进口猪肉和副产品征收4.9%——19.8%范围内的反倾销税，持续时间更是长 达五年。 纵然我国的反倾销税 ...

投资咨询业务资格：证监许可【2011】1778 号 期货研究报告 资讯早班车-2025-12-18 一、 宏观数据速览 | 发布日期 | 指标日期 | 指标名称 | 单位 | 当期值 | 上期值 | 去年同期值 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 20251020 | 2025/09 | GDP:不变价:当季同比 | % | 4.80 | 5.20 | 4.60 | | 20251130 | 2025/11 | 制造业 PMI | % | 49.20 | 49.00 | 50.30 | | 20251130 | 2025/11 | 非制造业 PMI:商务活 动 | % | 49.50 | 50.10 | 50.00 | | 20251212 | 2025/11 | 社会融资规模增量:当 | 亿元 | | 24885.00 8161.00 | 23288.00 | | | | 月值 | | | | | | 20251212 | 2025/11 | M0(流通中的现金):同 比 | % | 10.60 | 10.60 | 12.70 | | 202512 ...

Core Viewpoint - The EU is intensifying its sanctions against Russia by targeting countries that engage in energy trade with Russia, indicating a commitment to increase pressure amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict [1][2] Group 1: EU's Sanction Strategy - The EU plans to expand sanctions to include secondary sanctions against countries trading with Russia, reflecting a shift in its approach to the geopolitical landscape [1] - The EU has previously implemented multiple rounds of sanctions focused on Russia's energy revenues and has strengthened anti-circumvention clauses, paving the way for exploring secondary sanctions [2][4] - The EU's decision to coordinate with the US on secondary sanctions highlights its desire to play a more active role in international discourse, rather than remaining a passive observer [2][6] Group 2: Challenges and Internal Dynamics - The implementation of the EU's ambitious sanctions plan faces significant hurdles, including the need for unanimous agreement among member states and the capacity of industries to absorb the impact [4][11] - Slovakia's Prime Minister has publicly stated conditions for supporting new sanctions, emphasizing the need for solutions that balance industrial development and energy prices [4][11] - The complexity of the energy market, including price fluctuations and long-term contracts, poses additional challenges for enforcing sanctions against third countries [7][11] Group 3: US-EU Coordination - There is a notable divergence in the approach between the EU and the US, with the EU moving quickly to implement secondary sanctions while the US remains cautious, focusing on urging the EU to phase out Russian oil and gas by 2028 [6][12] - The US has not prioritized punishing China for purchasing Russian oil, which adds uncertainty to the EU's plans for secondary sanctions [6][12] Group 4: China's Response and Trade Dynamics - China has adopted a more targeted approach in its trade responses, such as imposing temporary anti-dumping duties on EU pork products, which could significantly impact the European pork industry [8][10] - The EU's trade tensions with China have escalated beyond single product disputes to broader trade friction, particularly in the electric vehicle sector [10][11] Group 5: Economic Considerations and Strategic Choices - The EU must weigh the potential economic costs of secondary sanctions against the benefits, particularly in light of China's possible retaliatory measures in key sectors [11][17] - The EU's strategy should involve a more nuanced approach, focusing on high-evidence cases for sanctions while avoiding broader trade disruptions [14][18] - A more pragmatic internal assessment is necessary for the EU to align its energy transition goals with its sanctions strategy, ensuring cost stability and reducing the risk of economic backlash [16][17]