昔日的废弃矿坑上竖起了成片的光伏板，荒坡间架起了迎风转动的风电场。从生态痛点的精准破解到绿 色图景的生动呈现，兴业银行大庆分行以金融创新为生态保护注入持久动力。未来，兴业银行大庆分行 将探索"绿色信贷+碳金融"融合模式，让每一笔资金都成为守护自然的力量，持续书写生态修复与绿色 发展的新篇章。 编辑：穆皓 转自：新华财经 近年来，兴业银行大庆分行将绿色理念深度融入业务实践，针对本地风电装备制造、光伏电站建设等环 保企业创新推出"绿色审批通道"，定向支持清洁能源项目落地，为生态修复提供金融支撑。 在生态修复与绿色能源融合发展的实践中，兴业银行大庆分行先后通过银团贷款、项目置换等方式为辖 内6户风电能源企业提供金融支持，截至2025年7月末，贷款余额1.92亿元，让金融力量成为生态修复 的"助推器"。 ...

锻造绿色资本枢纽平台 证券时报记者 孙翔峰 做好科技金融、绿色金融、普惠金融、养老金融、数字金融"五篇大文章"，是贯彻落实党中央关于金融强国建设 决策部署的核心任务和关键路径。"五篇大文章"不仅是对金融行业功能定位的深刻升华，更是对金融助力经济社 会高质量发展的殷切期许。其中，绿色金融不仅是经济转型的内在要求，更是践行生态文明思想、服务人与自然 和谐共生的中国式现代化的政治责任和时代担当。 "服务绿色发展不仅是履行金融国企政治责任、社会责任的必答题，更是推动公司经营模式向高质量跃升的主动选 择。"兴业证券有关负责人表示，该公司始终将绿色金融视作践行"国之大者"的战略支点。近年来，兴业证券已将 绿色基因融入研究、融资、投资、环境权益等全业务链条，将绿色金融升格为集团层级的战略支柱。 构建绿色金融"强根基" 在国家"双碳"目标引领下，兴业证券一直以实际行动践行绿色金融理念，打造了"顶层设计—中台赋能—前台实 践"的管理实践路径。 兴业证券成立了集团"绿色证券金融领导小组"，设立一级部门"绿色金融部"，负责推动集团绿色金融业务发展，统 筹制定《兴证集团持续推进绿色证券金融业务发展的行动方案》，明确"2025年绿色投 ...

Core Viewpoint - China People's Insurance Group aims to enhance its role in green finance by innovating insurance products and establishing standards to support disaster risk resilience, environmental governance, and long-term investment in green economic transformation [2][3][4]. Group 1: Disaster Risk Management - The company is focused on improving catastrophe insurance policies and product systems to become a resilient recoverer from climate risks [2]. - In response to increasing economic losses from natural disasters, the company has expanded its catastrophe insurance coverage to include multiple disaster causes such as earthquakes, typhoons, floods, and landslides, now covering 4.1 billion people across 20 provinces and 118 cities in China [3]. - The company plans to further strengthen the operational mechanism of the catastrophe insurance community and develop a catastrophe risk quantification model tailored to China's disaster realities [3]. Group 2: Environmental Governance - The company is working on both positive incentives and negative constraints to become a significant environmental externality governance entity [3]. - Positive incentives include developing insurance products for new energy vehicles and green buildings, while negative constraints involve environmental pollution liability insurance to increase operational costs for high-emission enterprises [3]. - In 2024, the company signed the United Nations Principles for Sustainable Insurance and established a unified green insurance statistical system and ESG risk assessment system for insurance clients [4]. Group 3: Green Economic Transformation - The company aims to be a long-term investor in green economic transformation, leveraging its long-term insurance funds to support green productivity development [4]. - It has created ESG-themed asset management products, including carbon finance and green bond indices, with investments exceeding 100 billion yuan in support of green development [4][5]. - The company plans to conduct carbon emission assessments of its investment portfolio and explore carbon performance-based financing evaluations to gradually reduce the carbon intensity of its asset mix [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the challenges and inconsistencies in ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) information disclosure among banks, emphasizing the need for improved data quality, standardization, and a shift from formal reporting to substantive management practices [1][2][9]. Group 1: ESG Disclosure Challenges - Different ESG disclosure frameworks lead to fragmented and less comparable information among banks, with data quality issues, particularly in carbon emissions, relying heavily on self-reported data from corporate clients [1][2]. - The lack of unified standards and comparability in disclosure metrics remains a significant issue, with many banks showing improvement in their 2024 ESG reports but still needing enhancements [3][4]. - The absence of consistent reporting on Scope 3 emissions, which includes indirect emissions from the value chain, is prevalent, with several banks not disclosing this data at all [4][5]. Group 2: Data Collection and Management Issues - The collection of ESG data is complicated by the involvement of multiple business systems, and smaller banks face challenges due to insufficient technology investments [2][7]. - There is a high cost of cross-departmental coordination for ESG management, and the traditional risk management systems of banks do not effectively integrate with ESG practices [2][8]. - The scarcity of professional talent with expertise in both finance and ESG is a barrier to effective data collection and analysis, as understanding ESG requires knowledge across various disciplines [8][10]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Banks are encouraged to enhance their ESG information disclosure by establishing standardized data collection and processing systems, aligning with both international and domestic ESG standards [10][11]. - It is essential for banks to integrate ESG goals into their business strategies and performance evaluation systems, fostering a culture of participation and collaboration across all levels [10][11]. - Utilizing advanced technologies such as big data and AI can improve the collection, monitoring, and risk assessment of ESG information, while also focusing on building a skilled workforce in this area [11].