手回集团(02621.HK)发布公告,集团预计将取得截至2025年6月30日止6个月的净利润人民币6.6亿元至人 民币6.8亿元，相比较截至2024年6月30日止6个月的净亏损增加人民币7.35亿元至人民币7.55亿元。董事 会认为，净利润预期变动的主要原因是2025年上半年度取得向投资者发行的金融工具账面值变动收益相 比较2024年上半年度的变动亏损增加人民币7.95亿元至人民币8.15亿元。 本文源自：金融界AI电报 ...

Core Viewpoint - Jane Street has denied all allegations made by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), claiming that its reputation has been tarnished by "erroneous or baseless reports" [1] Group 1: Allegations and Responses - SEBI issued a temporary ban on Jane Street, accusing the firm of "malicious market manipulation" and freezing its funds amounting to 48.4 billion rupees (approximately 4 billion yuan) in India [1] - Jane Street emphasized that its trading activities are based on standard arbitrage and hedging strategies aimed at ensuring price consistency of financial instruments and providing necessary market liquidity [1][2] Group 2: Specific Trading Practices - In a 105-page investigation report, SEBI focused on two controversial trading practices: intraday index manipulation and closing price manipulation, using a specific trading example from January 17, 2024 [2] - Jane Street refuted the intraday index manipulation claims, stating that the questioned trading behavior was a routine index arbitrage operation, aimed at narrowing the price discrepancy between the BANKNIFTY index in the stock and options markets [2][4] Group 3: Risk Management Strategies - Regarding the closing price manipulation allegations, Jane Street argued that due to the unique cash settlement period for options in the Indian market, liquidity providers must hedge their risk exposure before options expiration, which is a globally accepted risk management strategy [4] Group 4: Communication with SEBI - SEBI accused Jane Street of lacking cooperation and ignoring regulatory communications, stating that the firm's actions constituted an "emergency risk" [5] - Jane Street countered that it has been responsive and transparent since SEBI's request for trading information in August 2024, and has actively communicated with exchanges to adjust trading practices [5] - The company expressed disappointment over SEBI's failure to respond to multiple requests for dialogue while issuing reports claiming the firm ignored concerns [5]

Group 1 - Temasek issued a clarification regarding a fraudulent app named "Taibai app" and a WeChat group called "Jing Shang Hui," which falsely claimed to be associated with Taibai Investments Pte. Ltd. [1] - Temasek emphasized that it and Taibai Investments have no connection with the fraudulent app or WeChat group and have not authorized any third party to sell investment products in China [1][2] - Reports indicated that the fraudulent activities could involve up to 500 million RMB [1] Group 2 - In a previous statement, Temasek noted that there were scams in China using its brand to sell fake investment products related to the film industry, without any authorization [2] - Temasek was established in 1974 and is based in Singapore, with a portfolio net worth of 389 billion SGD (approximately 2.08 trillion RMB) as of March 31, 2024 [4] - The estimated market value of Temasek's unlisted assets is 420 billion SGD (approximately 2.25 trillion RMB) [4]