Workflow
Dojo
icon
Search documents
特斯拉将重启Dojo并推动FSD付费升级,关注液冷及智驾产业链公司
Orient Securities· 2026-01-25 02:41
核心观点 投资建议与投资标的 从投资策略上看,预计数据中心液冷产业链、高级别自动驾驶产业链及能确定进入特斯 拉、Figure、智元、宇树等机器人配套产业链的汽零将持续迎来催化,具备竞争力的自主 品牌及在智驾技术方面领先的企业将继续扩大市场份额。建议持续关注液冷产业链、人 形机器人链、T 链、智驾产业链公司。 液冷相关标的:英维克、银轮股份、拓普集团、飞龙股份、川环科技等;机器人相关标 的:新泉股份、拓普集团、银轮股份、岱美股份、三花智控、浙江荣泰、旭升集团、嵘 泰股份、斯菱智驱、爱柯迪、精锻科技、博俊科技、沪光股份;智驾相关标的:经纬恒 润、伯特利、德赛西威等。 汽车与零部件行业 行业研究 | 行业周报 特斯拉将重启 Dojo 并推动 FSD 付费升 级,关注液冷及智驾产业链公司 风险提示 宏观经济下行影响汽车需求、上游原材料价格波动影响、车企价格战压力。 国家/地区 中国 行业 汽车与零部件行业 报告发布日期 2026 年 01 月 25 日 中性(维持) | 姜雪晴 | 执业证书编号:S0860512060001 | | --- | --- | | | jiangxueqing@orientsec.com ...
X @Starknet (BTCFi arc) 🥷
Starknet 🐺🐱· 2025-12-17 11:57
Product Development - Dojo 2.0 将采用模块化设计,如同乐高积木,可以分解和构建 [1] - Introspect 功能即将推出 [1] - Torii, Sozo, 和 Katana 模块化程度进一步提高 [1]
烧钱六年,Dojo 被判死刑:马斯克自研超算梦是怎么走进死胡同的?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-30 05:29
Core Insights - The Dojo project, initially envisioned as a cornerstone for Tesla's AI ambitions, has been officially shut down after six years of development and hype, with the team disbanded by August 2025 [1][4][19] - Tesla's focus has shifted towards a new AI supercomputer project named Cortex, which aims to address real-world AI challenges and has already begun deployment [2][19] - The decision to terminate Dojo has sparked mixed reactions, with some viewing it as a necessary response to declining electric vehicle sales and others seeing it as a strategic pivot towards partnerships for chip development [3][4] Dojo Project Overview - Dojo was designed as a custom supercomputer to train Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) neural networks, with the goal of transforming Tesla into an AI company rather than just an automotive manufacturer [1][5] - The project was expected to enhance Tesla's capabilities in autonomous driving, humanoid robots, and semiconductor independence [1][5] Transition to Cortex - Tesla has begun promoting Cortex, a new AI supercomputer that will support FSD and other AI training needs, while Dojo has not been mentioned in recent updates [2][19] - Cortex is being developed at Tesla's Austin headquarters and is intended to have vast storage for FSD and Optimus video training [2] Reactions to Dojo's Closure - The closure of Dojo has been interpreted by some as a response to Tesla's struggles in electric vehicle sales and the slow rollout of autonomous taxi services [3] - Others argue that the dissolution of Dojo does not signify failure but rather a strategic shift towards leveraging external partnerships for chip development [3] Key Personnel Changes - Following the announcement of Dojo's termination, approximately 20 employees left Tesla to establish a new AI chip and infrastructure company, DensityAI, including Dojo project lead Peter Bannon [4] Financial Implications - Tesla signed a $16.5 billion agreement with Samsung for the development of the next-generation AI6 chips, which are crucial for FSD and other AI applications [4] - Analysts suggest that the shift from Dojo to Cortex could impact Tesla's financial outlook, with potential new revenue streams from AI services [15] Future Directions - Tesla's long-term vision includes the possibility of competing directly with Nvidia in the AI space, although challenges remain in adapting existing AI software to work with Tesla's custom chips [15] - The company continues to invest in AI capabilities, with plans for a new supercomputer in Buffalo, albeit under a different name than Dojo [19]
英伟达黄仁勋投资马斯克xAI背后的3点思考
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-10 03:28
Core Insights - Nvidia has invested $2 billion in Elon Musk's AI company xAI, which has reached a valuation of $20 billion in its latest funding round [2][5][6] Group 1: Investment Rationale - Nvidia aims to become the foundational "cornerstone" and "engine" of the AI world, requiring top-tier clients and partners to validate and promote its technology [2][3] - By investing in xAI, Nvidia secures a stable and significant demand for its GPUs, as xAI is developing large-scale AI models that require substantial computational resources [2][3] - A successful AI model from xAI could serve as a benchmark, showcasing Nvidia's hardware and software capabilities, thereby attracting more AI companies to its ecosystem [3][4] Group 2: Competitive Landscape - The investment helps Nvidia build a strong "Nvidia Alliance" to counter competition from AMD, Intel, and major cloud providers who are developing their own chips [3][4] - Access to valuable data from Musk's companies, such as Tesla and X platform, can enhance xAI's model training and optimize Nvidia's AI computing platforms [3][4] Group 3: Strategic Implications - Musk's AI projects are among the most computationally intensive, providing Nvidia with invaluable feedback to design more powerful chips for future AI workloads [4] - The investment signifies a bet on an AI-driven future across various sectors, positioning Nvidia as a key player in this evolving landscape [4][5] - A synergistic ecosystem could emerge if Tesla's autonomous driving, Optimus robot, X platform algorithms, and SpaceX's Starlink all utilize Nvidia's hardware and xAI's software [4][5]
特斯拉 Dojo 为何失败?埃隆・马斯克的 AI,梦想与现实的差距!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-12 05:47
Core Viewpoint - Tesla has officially terminated its AI supercomputer project "Dojo," which was initially seen as a pivotal step in its transformation from an electric vehicle manufacturer to an AI company. This decision reflects a significant shift in strategy and raises questions about Tesla's future direction in AI and autonomous driving [1][6]. Group 1: Project Termination - The Dojo project, aimed at training Tesla's autonomous driving neural networks with self-designed chips, has been disbanded as of August 2025, despite previous ambitions for commercialization by 2026 [1][3]. - The project was intended to create a system independent of Nvidia GPUs, promising faster computation and lower latency, but ultimately failed to deliver on its goals [3][5]. Group 2: Challenges Faced - Tesla struggled to link the outcomes of its autonomous driving efforts directly to Dojo, and the performance of its chips could not keep pace with Nvidia's advancements [6]. - The mainstream AI software ecosystem is primarily optimized for GPUs, which hindered Dojo's development and contributed to its eventual failure [6]. Group 3: Implications of Termination - The dissolution of Dojo highlights the high risks associated with pursuing complete technological independence through self-developed chips and infrastructure, revealing Tesla's limitations in resources and ecosystem [6][8]. - The loss of key personnel from the Dojo team, who have since founded a startup named "DensityAI," indicates a significant talent drain that can jeopardize future projects [8]. - The decision to end Dojo signals a strategic pivot for Tesla from self-reliance to leveraging partnerships, as evidenced by its new collaboration with Samsung for the development of the next-generation AI6 chip [8]. Group 4: Future Outlook - Despite the termination of Dojo, Tesla's ambitions in AI remain intact, with ongoing collaborations with Nvidia, AMD, and Samsung to expand its new supercomputer "Cortex," which is responsible for training the latest version of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology [8][9]. - The failure of Dojo serves as a case study of Tesla's bold attempts in the high-risk fields of autonomous driving and AI, raising the question of whether this setback is merely a conclusion or a necessary sacrifice for larger-scale transformation [9].
Tesla's Dojo, a timeline
TechCrunch· 2025-09-02 16:39
Core Viewpoint - Tesla aims to transition from being solely an automaker to an AI company, focusing on achieving full self-driving capabilities through advanced computing power and data processing [1][2]. Development of Dojo - Dojo was introduced as a custom-built supercomputer designed to train Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) neural networks, which at the time required human oversight despite some automated capabilities [2][3]. - The timeline of Dojo's development includes its first mention in 2019, with Musk highlighting its potential to process vast amounts of video data for training AI [4][5][8]. - By 2021, Tesla officially announced Dojo, introducing its D1 chip and outlining plans for a supercomputer capable of significant AI training [9][10]. Progress and Challenges - Throughout 2022 and 2023, Tesla reported progress on Dojo, including the installation of its first cabinet and plans for a full Exapod cluster by early 2023 [10][12]. - Musk indicated that Dojo could significantly reduce training costs and potentially become a sellable service, similar to Amazon Web Services [11][12]. - However, by mid-2023, Tesla faced challenges with Nvidia hardware supply, prompting a renewed focus on Dojo to ensure adequate training capabilities [16]. Transition to Cortex - In 2024, Tesla began transitioning from Dojo to a new supercomputer called Cortex, which utilizes Nvidia GPUs and aims to enhance AI training for FSD [18][19]. - The Cortex supercomputer was reported to consist of approximately 50,000 H100 Nvidia GPUs, facilitating improvements in FSD performance [19][20]. - By early 2025, the Dojo project was officially shut down, with Tesla consolidating its resources towards the development of the AI6 chip, which is intended to serve multiple AI applications [22][23]. Future Directions - Tesla's future plans include scaling AI capabilities with the AI6 chip, which is designed for both inference and training, indicating a strategic shift in its AI development approach [22][23]. - The company aims to maintain a competitive edge in AI by focusing on integrated chip designs rather than dividing resources across different projects [23].
X @TechCrunch
TechCrunch· 2025-09-02 16:20
Project Overview - Tesla's Dojo is a custom-built supercomputer project initiated by Elon Musk [1] Future Development - The report discusses the original vision for Dojo, its current status, and future plans [1]
Tesla Dojo: the rise and fall of Elon Musk's AI supercomputer
TechCrunch· 2025-09-02 16:18
Core Insights - Tesla has decided to shut down its Dojo AI supercomputer project and disband the associated team, marking a significant shift in its AI strategy [2][10][44] - The decision comes after years of hype and promises from CEO Elon Musk regarding Dojo's potential to revolutionize Tesla's self-driving capabilities and AI initiatives [2][12][13] - The company is now pivoting towards partnerships for chip development, particularly focusing on its new AI6 chips from Samsung, which are intended to support various AI applications [11][31] Group 1: Dojo's Development and Shutdown - Dojo was designed as a custom-built supercomputer to train Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) neural networks, aiming to achieve full autonomy and support the robotaxi initiative [3][4][18] - Despite initial ambitions, Tesla failed to effectively link its self-driving advancements to Dojo, leading to a lack of focus on the project in recent communications [5][8] - The shutdown of Dojo was announced shortly after Tesla signed a $16.5 billion deal for next-generation AI6 chips, indicating a strategic shift away from self-reliant hardware [11][12] Group 2: Implications for Tesla's AI Strategy - The closure of Dojo has sparked mixed reactions, with some viewing it as a failure of Musk's promises, while others see it as a necessary pivot towards a more sustainable AI strategy [8][9] - Analysts have noted that losing key talent from the Dojo team could hinder future AI projects, especially given the specialized nature of the technology [10] - Tesla's future AI efforts will now rely more on partnerships with established chip manufacturers like Nvidia and AMD, moving away from its previous goal of self-sufficiency in chip production [31][32] Group 3: Financial and Market Impact - The initial projections for Dojo included significant financial commitments, such as a $500 million investment for a supercomputer at the Buffalo gigafactory, which will now not be allocated to Dojo [39][44] - Analysts had previously estimated that Dojo could potentially add $500 billion to Tesla's market value by creating new revenue streams through AI and robotaxi services [35] - The shift in strategy may impact investor sentiment, as the ambitious goals set for Dojo were not met, leading to questions about Tesla's long-term AI vision [38][40]
X @Starknet 🐺🐱
Starknet 🐺🐱· 2025-08-25 11:00
12/ For all fully onchain gaming enjoyers, here’s the latest Dojo weekly recap:Dojo (@ohayo_dojo):Week in review from the Dojo.Let's dive in! ⛩️ https://t.co/MtvNBdHmOF ...
特斯拉放弃Dojo对理想的潜在启发
理想TOP2· 2025-08-25 08:18
Core Viewpoint - The discussion highlights the potential of high-performance chips in the automotive and AI sectors, particularly focusing on the capabilities of companies like Li Auto and their ambitions to develop proprietary chip designs and software systems to compete with established players like NVIDIA and Tesla [1][2][3]. Group 1: Chip Development and Ecosystem - Tesla's recent decision to halt its Dojo project suggests a strategic pivot towards utilizing its AI6 chip for both automotive and cloud computing applications, indicating a shift in focus towards high-performance computing needs in the industry [2]. - The conversation emphasizes that the biggest challenge in chip development is not just the hardware itself but creating a robust ecosystem around it, similar to NVIDIA's CUDA platform, which allows for compatibility across various applications [3]. - Li Auto's potential to develop its own chip design and software capabilities could position it similarly to NVIDIA and Tesla, although significant gaps still exist compared to these industry leaders [2][3]. Group 2: Software and System Integration - The integration of software capabilities with hardware is crucial, as demonstrated by Li Auto's efforts to optimize the Orin chip for its specific needs, showcasing its software development capabilities [4]. - The dialogue between Li Auto's leadership indicates that without strong teams in system-on-chip (SoC) development and compiler technology, achieving advanced AI functionalities may be challenging [6][7]. - The necessity for companies to develop their own hardware and software solutions is underscored, as relying on third-party hardware may not yield optimal results in AI and robotics applications [8].