Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Xi Bei and Luo Yonghao regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes has escalated, prompting a call for a live dialogue to clarify the situation and promote healthy development in the pre-prepared food industry in China [2][4]. Group 1 - Luo Yonghao suggested a live dialogue on a major online platform to address the controversy and clarify whether Xi Bei uses pre-prepared dishes [2][5]. - Xi Bei's founder, Jia Guolong, acknowledged his previous handling of the situation was incorrect and stated that Xi Bei will adopt a transparent approach moving forward, learning from Pang Donglai [3][5]. - Jia Guolong referred to Luo Yonghao as a "network black mouth" and "network underworld," but also recognized that Luo's actions have inadvertently helped Xi Bei improve [3][5].

Core Viewpoint - The internal document from Wahaha indicates that the company, led by Zong Fuli, plans to launch a new brand "Wah Xiaozong" starting from the 2026 sales year, following the founder's passing and to address historical issues related to the brand [2] Group 1 - The internal notice mentions that since the founder's death, the company has been working to resolve various historical issues [2] - The decision to change to the new brand "Wah Xiaozong" is aimed at maintaining compliance in the use of the "Wahaha" brand [2] - The document states that under the current shareholding structure, the use of the "Wahaha" trademark requires unanimous consent from all shareholders, and any party cannot use it without such agreement [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the use of pre-prepared dishes in the restaurant industry, particularly focusing on the statements made by Luo Yonghao regarding the pricing and transparency of pre-prepared dishes at Xibei restaurants [2]. Group 1: Xibei's Response to Controversy - Xibei announced the launch of the "Luo Yonghao Menu" on September 12, allowing customers to choose from dishes previously ordered by Luo Yonghao, with a commitment to refund if the food is unsatisfactory [2]. - Customers are invited to visit the kitchen and observe the cooking process, emphasizing transparency in food preparation [2]. Group 2: Kitchen Operations - The kitchen at the Xibei restaurant in Shanghai is divided into different cooking areas, including grilling, steaming, pressure cooking, and frying [3]. - Staff clarified that the restaurant does not use pre-prepared dishes; instead, raw ingredients are cooked on-site after delivery [8]. Group 3: Definition of Pre-prepared Dishes - The article references a 2024 notification from various government departments that defines pre-prepared dishes and outlines what constitutes simple processing versus fully prepared meals [9]. - It specifies that items like pre-cut vegetables and semi-finished products made in central kitchens do not fall under the category of pre-prepared dishes [10].

Core Viewpoint - The founder of Xibei, Jia Guolong, has announced a strong intention to sue Luo Yonghao, citing significant harm caused by Luo's actions following a recent incident involving "pre-made dishes" [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Action - Jia Guolong emphasized his determination to proceed with legal action against Luo Yonghao, stating "we will definitely sue him" multiple times to underline his commitment [2]. - The lawsuit is a response to perceived damage caused by Luo's public comments, which Jia believes have exceeded acceptable consumer behavior [4]. Group 2: Consumer Behavior - Jia differentiated between Luo's role as a consumer and his actions as a public figure, arguing that Luo's behavior has crossed the line of normal consumer feedback [4]. - He highlighted that Xibei has a robust feedback and compensation mechanism for dissatisfied customers, which Luo did not utilize before making his comments [4]. Group 3: Ongoing Impact - Jia noted that Luo's continuous posts on social media are exacerbating the situation, indicating that the issue is still developing and causing ongoing harm to the brand [4].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Jinshiyuan, has experienced a significant slowdown in revenue and profit growth, marking a departure from its previous trajectory as a "dark horse" in the liquor industry, with expectations for a decline in overall performance in 2025 [4][21]. Revenue and Profit Performance - In the first half of 2025, Jinshiyuan reported revenue of 6.95 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 4.8%, and a net profit of 2.23 billion yuan, down 9.5% [4][5]. - The second quarter saw a sharp decline, with revenue of 1.85 billion yuan, a 29.7% drop year-on-year, and a net profit of 590 million yuan, down 37.1% [4][5]. - This marks only the second instance of mid-year revenue and profit decline since 2015, excluding 2020, with forecasts indicating a potential annual decline for the first time in a decade [4][7]. Product Performance - The high-end product segment is under pressure, with the premium category (特A+类) experiencing a revenue drop of 7.37% in the first half of 2025 [10]. - The product structure shows a heavy reliance on high-end offerings, with 62% of revenue coming from the premium category, which has been adversely affected by recent policy changes [10][11]. Market Expansion - Jinshiyuan's revenue is heavily concentrated in Jiangsu province, accounting for approximately 90% of total revenue, with a slight increase in revenue from outside the province [11][12]. - The company is focusing on expanding its presence in surrounding markets, particularly in the Yangtze River Delta region, while facing challenges in the provincial market [13][14]. Financial Indicators - The company set an ambitious revenue target of 15 billion yuan by 2025 but has adjusted its expectations due to market conditions, now aiming for a growth rate of 5%-12% [15][16]. - Key financial metrics indicate pressure, with a significant reduction in contract liabilities and an increase in inventory turnover days, suggesting sales difficulties [17]. Strategic Responses - In response to market challenges, Jinshiyuan plans to adjust its marketing strategies, increase promotional efforts, and potentially introduce lower-alcohol products to meet changing consumer preferences [19][20]. - The company aims to balance its product structure and enhance its market presence while navigating the current industry adjustment period [21].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a three-month special rectification action initiated by six government departments in China to address online chaos in the automotive industry, focusing on illegal profit-making, exaggerated and false advertising, and malicious attacks against companies [2][3][4]. Group 1: Illegal Profit-Making Issues - The action targets illegal profit-making through the creation of false images and videos, fabricating stories, and spreading negative topics about automotive companies to gain online traffic and commercial benefits [2][3]. - It also addresses the misuse of influence under the guise of "news supervision" to extort automotive companies for "protection fees" and the use of new technologies to create fake online content [3]. Group 2: Exaggerated and False Advertising - The initiative aims to combat misleading advertising regarding the performance, functionality, quality, and sales status of vehicles and batteries, which deceives consumers [3]. - It includes the manipulation of evaluation accounts to produce false or irregular assessments and the selective disclosure of sales data to mislead the public [3]. Group 3: Malicious Attacks - The rectification action seeks to eliminate malicious attacks aimed at discrediting competitors, including orchestrated campaigns to spread false information and incite public sentiment against rival companies [3][4]. - It highlights the role of executives in leveraging their influence to engage in online disputes that harm the reputation of competing firms [3]. Group 4: Implementation and Coordination - The notification emphasizes the need for self-inspection by automotive companies and the establishment of reporting channels to address online chaos effectively [4]. - It calls for collaboration among various government departments and the automotive industry to create a cleaner online environment and prevent the spread of false information [4].

一是非法牟利问题。例如，通过制作虚假图片、视频，捏造故事，炒作和散布涉车企负面话 题，恶意解读汽车企业销量波动，攻击汽车企业经营发展战略等，赚取网络流量，获取商业利 益等。 二是夸大和虚假宣传问题。例如，对汽车、动力电池的性能、功能、质量、销售状况等作虚假 或者引人误解的宣传，欺骗误导消费者等。 三是恶意诋毁攻击问题。例如，以遏制、打压竞争对手为目的，诋毁攻击汽车企业或者汽车产 品，抹黑企业声誉或者商品声誉，对企业进行恶意投诉等。 通知强调，要通过组织企业自查、畅通举报渠道、深入分析研判，根据有关问题线索，强化汽 车行业网络乱象处置力度。建立快速处置渠道，依法依约关闭并公开曝光一批参与汽车行业网 络乱象的媒体账号。深挖网络乱象背后的公关公司、营销公司等代理方团队及购买其服务的汽 车企业，依法打击惩治。 通知要求，各地工业和信息化、社会工作、网信、发展改革、公安、市场监管等部门要加强组 织领导和协调联动。网络平台企业要深入开展自查自纠，加强对采用生成式人工智能技术等的 网络水军、"黑嘴"的甄别管控，健全平台涉企侵权信息投诉举报、争议标签、一键关联辟谣内 容等产品功能，防止虚假信息误导公众。行业协会要引导行业加强 ...

AI配图。 公募基金2025中期答卷：震荡市场周期的突围样本 2025年A股市场显著走强，上证指数更是刷新近十年新高 。 随着股市的持续上涨，权益类基金 受益匪浅。中基协的最新数据显示，截至今年 7月末，公募基金管理规模首次突破35万亿元大 关。 纵观上半年公募基金公司业绩表现，净利润规模在 2亿元以上的基金公司共有19家，其中，净 利润增速超过40%的仅有广发基金、中欧基金、兴业基金。 在 今年股市上涨 行情中，一批 出色的 基金经理 为市场提供了 "多元适配" 的投资解法，偏好 短期收益的投资者可追随科技、医药赛道的产业红利，追求稳健的投资者能依托价值策略把握 低估机遇，擅长周期布局的投资者也能找到资源品领域的轮动机会。 其中， 汇添富 的 马翔、 张韡，中欧的蓝小康、冯炉丹， 易方达 的 祁禾、嘉实 的 王贵重、大 成 的 韩创等 在今年均表现不俗 ，在 2025 年结构性行情中展现出强大投研实力。 今年 8月，算力板块强势发力，科创50指数大涨推动沪指站上 3800 点。截至9月2日，马翔管理 的汇添富科技创新混合精准把握 AI 机遇，任职回报超240%；蓝小康以 136亿元在管规模，凭 借中欧红利优 ...

资料图。本文来源：三言Pro 人走茶凉？王腾刚被辞退，母校就撤掉校友资料页 面 9月8日， 小米发布内部公告：中国区市场部员工王腾，泄露公司机密信息，且存在利益冲突等 严重违规违纪行为。根据《小米集团员工违规违纪行为处理办法》《小米集团诚信廉洁守则》 等制度规定，公司决定给予王腾辞退的处分。 此事随即引发大量关注。 对此，王腾回应称，自己没有窃取公司机密出售，没有收人钱财。有失职行为，在深刻反省 中，但没有做违法行为。 华科大的此次操作，本质上是名校与明星校友之间一种"荣誉共生"关系。 校友的成就是高校教育质量的活体广告，而名校的光环也为校友的职业生涯持续赋能。这种互 惠互利的关系，在风平浪静时坚不可摧。然而，一旦一方，尤其是校友方出现"失范"行为，这 种共生体就会变得异常脆弱。高校的第一反应往往是保护机构声誉，进行"风险隔离"。 | | 華中科技大學 生命科学与技术学院 College of Life Science and Technology, HUST | | 字校主页 | ENGLISH | 访问旧版 | O | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- ...

资料图。 " 马拉松长谈 " 是因为罗永浩太松了 徐爱之 " 罗永浩的十字路口 " 是一档罗永浩主持的访谈视频播客。截至目前，已上线三期。第一期嘉 宾是理想汽车 CEO 李想，这一期对外宣传的噱头，是： " 四小时马拉松长谈 " 。尽管节目对外 宣传冠以 " 访谈马拉松 "" 四小时谈长谈 " ，其实罗永浩挤一挤水分，就不会有这么冗长了。 以李想这期播客为例，聊一下罗永浩访谈中存在的问题。并非刻意挑刺而是觉得如果规避这 些，老罗的节目一定会做得更好。 01. 喜欢打断嘉宾的话头和思路 罗永浩在整个对谈中，时常打断李想的讲述。此类的打断在整个访谈中非常多。 打断有几种情况，有一种是发问，追问是有必要的但罗永浩面对的是一个非常善于讲话，发表 见解并且有自己闭环逻辑的嘉宾。所以当有些时候罗永浩追问，李想说的是： " 我在接着讲 " 或者是你听我讲完这种情形。还有一种打断是插话，表示认同或者迎合，譬如李想： "MEGA 的用户其实开过很多好的车了 ……" 罗永浩： " 其实越是开过好的车，越知道这车有多好 " 。 还有一种情况的打断是 " 补充 " ，譬如李想在汽车之家上市时谈到当时约定 " 95% 的股东同意 才能 ...