Core Viewpoint - Beijing Tongrentang Group expresses deep concern and regret over recent public attention regarding "Antarctic Krill Oil," and has initiated a zero-tolerance brand management action to address consumer rights violations [2]. Group 1: Immediate Actions Taken - A special task force has been dispatched to Sichuan to conduct a thorough investigation of the involved products [2]. - The company has ordered and is supervising the immediate removal of the implicated products from the market, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements for consumer compensation [2]. - Legal actions will be pursued against Sichuan Health, Habao Pharmaceutical, and related e-commerce platforms for trademark infringement and misleading consumers [2]. Group 2: Brand Protection Measures - A comprehensive investigation into illegal and irregular brand usage across all levels of the group is being conducted [4]. - A brand cleanup initiative is underway to eliminate improper use of the "Tongrentang" name and ensure strict brand management [4]. - The company is standardizing the branding of authorized e-commerce stores to ensure the correct use of the "Tongrentang" double-dragon logo, guiding consumers to identify legitimate purchasing channels [4].

与此同时，《 BUG》栏目发现，作为影片投资方，博纳影业的股价因《阿凡达3》上映预 期坐上"过山车"，12月2日至12日，公司总市值从97.73亿元飙升至183.5亿元，而截至12 月19日收盘，其总市值回落至138.41亿元，一周时间市值蒸发45亿元。 值得一提的是， 博纳影业集团创始人、董事长兼总经理于冬曾在去年年底提到，博纳影业依旧会做 "超级大 片"，他还认为"喜剧电影票房高、成本低，但这类同质化严重的作品很快会消耗观众对电 影的耐心和热情"。 首日票房疲软 ， 今日 排片下滑 12月19日，《阿凡达3》正式登陆内地院线，根据灯塔专业版数据，截至12月19日24时， 《阿凡达3》内地首日票房（含点映及零点场）定格在1.21亿元。若剔除点映收入，实际首 日票房不足1亿元。这一表现与前作《阿凡达：水之道》2022年12月16日上映时斩获的 1.62亿元（含点映）相比，同比跌幅达25.3%；即使对比不含点映的1.26亿元，降幅仍超 过20%。 文 | 《BUG》栏目 罗宁 据网络平台数据，截至 12月20日11时28分，影片《阿凡达3》票房突破2亿元。 作为 2025年 最重磅的 超级 IP续作 之一 ，这 ...

摩尔线程今日发布新一代GPU架构花港，具备新一代指令集，算力密度提升50%，能效提 升10倍，集成全精度端到端加速技术，支持10万卡以上规模智算集群， 搭载第一代AI生成 式渲染架构和第二代光线追踪硬件加速引擎。 来源：财联社 更多财经视频，请关注视频号"新浪财经" 往期回顾 (3) 连 接 财 富 下 载 新 浪 财 经 客 户 端 ...

Group 1 - Multiple navigation software systems in Nanjing experienced sudden failures, displaying "driving on a road with no data" [2] - Users reported erratic location displays, with one user stating they were shown in various incorrect locations, including a lake and a cake shop [5] - Delivery drivers faced issues with navigation leading to penalties for perceived route deviations, impacting service efficiency [4] Group 2 - Delivery riders reported that navigation issues caused delays in food delivery, leading to complaints about the inability to see navigation [6] - Shared bike users encountered problems with incorrect location data, resulting in operational issues such as being unable to lock bikes [6] - Major mapping services like Baidu and Gaode acknowledged the issues, attributing them to signal interference affecting multiple navigation apps [6]

此消息发布后，接近中国电信的人士对《 BUG 》栏目透露，罗永浩提到的问题，已经妥善 处理了。据消息人士称，罗永浩之后也删除了这条朋友圈。而有消费者却在网络社交平台感 慨，"终于有人说这事了，感觉要发疯的不止老罗，但凡拉过千兆宽带的大多都跑不 满……" 文 | 《BUG》栏目 刘丽丽 罗永浩再次发飙，吐槽电信千兆宽带名不副实。罗永浩 12 月 18 日发朋友圈表示，"有人 认识上海电信宽带的人吗？我搬到上海开了电信的独享千兆宽带半年多来，绝大多数时候只 有不到一百兆，每次找来客服，不管是官方的还是非官方的还是疑似在官方吃里扒外的，都 是管用三五天，然后又回到九十多兆。" 罗永浩称，"如果没有朋友能介绍上海电信宽带的人帮忙解决，我就要在网上发疯了 ...... 希 望上海电信宽带多保重。" 千兆宽带是不是虚标？ "我家 2000 兆，基本都跑不到，只有 300 兆左右"，"运营商的人来了也只是连接光猫测 速给你看，剩下的一律不管，要么说是你的路由器问题，要么就说电脑有问题，很多人买最 贵的路由器，套餐开到 2000 兆都不会有用"，"电信 209 元每月 1000 兆下载速度 20mb/s ，换了另外一家 10 ...

东方证券研究所宏观与战略团队表示，在这个全球充满不确定性的时代，中国政策的稳定 性、连续性、务实针对性和规划前瞻性是一条突出的比较优势，这正在成为更多全球投资者 的共识。展望明年，由科技突破、风险下降等叙事力量推动的资金再配置预计仍将延续，关 注"十五五"时期政策新理念推动经济走向再平衡。海外宏观环境将继续有利于中国资产表 现，美国政策宽松未完待续，全球"政策偏松 + 经济不差"的组合为风险资产提供温和"顺 风"。 同时，本次策略会精心设置了十二大分会场，聚焦不同投资主线，覆盖了科技、人工智能、 新能源、消费、多元资产配置等热点话题，深度探讨了行业前沿技术及投资机遇，展现了东 方研究团队的专业锐度。 东方证券表示，未来将继续搭建高质量的思想交流平台，汇聚智慧，致力于"金融报国、金 融为民"，持续服务国家战略和实体经济，助力新质生产力和现代化产业体系发展壮大。 12 月 18 日，东方证券 2026 年度投资策略会在上海拉开帷幕。本次策略会以"潮涌东方 满江红"为主题，汇聚了专业学者、行业专家同东方证券核心研究团队共同擘画新一年的投 资蓝图，为千余名各界机构投资者带来了一场思想与远见的盛宴。 东方证券党委副书记 ...

国盾量子12月18日公告，公司董事长吕品先生不幸逝世。 国盾量子董事长吕品 公告称，吕品先生于2025年5月起担任公司董事长，并担任战略与投资委员会主任委员、 薪酬与考核委员会委员。公司及公司董事会对吕品先生的逝世表示沉痛哀悼并向其家属表达 深切慰问。 截至公告披露日，吕品先生不持有公司股票，亦不存在应当履行而未履行的股份锁定承诺。 公司表示，吕品先生的逝世不会导致公司董事会成员人数低于法定人数，不会影响公司董事 会的正常运作。公司经营管理团队正常履职，公司将根据有关法律法规和《公司章程》的规 定，尽快完成董事补选及董事长选举的相关工作，并及时履行信息披露义务。 此前报道： 12月18日，财联社记者从知情人士处获悉，国盾量子董事长吕品今日去世。资料显示， 2024年3月， 中国电信 通过旗下中电信量子集团斥资17.75亿元入主国盾量子。国盾量子 2025年5月30日召开第四届董事会第十三次会议，选举吕品担任公司第四届董事会董事 长。 18日晚，合肥警方通报：2025年12月18日13时许，我局接报警称，吕某(男，46岁)在望 江西路与孔雀台路交口某公司一办公室内失去意识。接警后，民警立即到场处置。经120现 ...

Core Viewpoint - The bidding for duty-free shops at Shanghai airports has concluded, with China Duty Free Group (CDFG) and foreign-owned Dufoor winning the contracts, marking the exit of Japan Duty Free (JDF) from the Shanghai airport duty-free business [2][3]. Group 1: Bidding Outcome - CDFG won the rights to operate duty-free shops at Shanghai Pudong International Airport's T2 terminal and Hongqiao International Airport's T1 terminal, while Dufoor secured the T1 terminal and S1 satellite hall at Pudong [9]. - The bidding process saw JDF being blocked from participating due to opposition from CDFG's board members, leading to JDF's eventual withdrawal from the bidding [4][6]. Group 2: Financial Implications - CDFG's decision to operate the duty-free shops is seen as a strategy to address its declining performance, with a reported revenue of 39.862 billion yuan in Q3, down 7.34% year-on-year, and a net profit of 3.052 billion yuan, down 22.13% [10]. - The overall revenue for CDFG is projected to decline further in 2024, with expected revenues of 56.474 billion yuan and a net profit of 4.267 billion yuan, representing year-on-year declines of 16.38% and 36.44% respectively [10]. Group 3: JDF's Future Prospects - JDF, once a dominant player in China's duty-free market, is now facing challenges, especially with the potential loss of its presence at Beijing Capital International Airport if it fails to secure the upcoming tender [15]. - JDF is exploring new avenues for growth, including a focus on online operations and the introduction of a new membership system on its platform "CDFG JDF," which is separate from CDFG's membership system [16][19].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the donation of paintings to the Nanjing Museum, particularly the case of the painting "Jiangnan Spring," which was later found at an auction, raises questions about the museum's handling of donated artworks and its obligations to the donors [2][5][11]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On December 17, Nanjing Museum stated that five disputed paintings had been identified as forgeries over 60 years ago and had been "disposed of" [2][5]. - The Jiangsu Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism has formed a task force to investigate the matter, promising to release formal statements based on the findings [2][4]. - The museum confirmed that all procedures regarding the identification of the disputed paintings were legally compliant and documented [2][4]. Group 2: Legal Implications - Lawyers argue that even if the paintings are deemed forgeries, the museum cannot unilaterally revoke the donation or dispose of the artworks without the donor's consent [10][11]. - According to the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Cultural Relics, donated cultural relics belong to the state, and the museum has ownership rights, which include the right to manage and display the items [11][12]. - The museum must follow specific procedures for handling items deemed not to meet collection standards, including obtaining approval from relevant authorities before disposal [12][14]. Group 3: Donor Rights - If the museum fails to fulfill its obligation to properly care for the donated items, the donor or their heirs may have the right to revoke the donation and reclaim the artworks [13][15]. - The absence of a written agreement does not negate the implied conditions of proper display and care that accompany the donation [13][15]. - The museum's inability to provide the original forgeries for verification raises further concerns about the handling of the donated artworks and potential misconduct [15].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent shareholding changes in Huayi Brothers, highlighting the reduction of shares held by Alibaba's investment arm and Jack Ma, which may impact the company's control structure and financial stability [2][5]. Shareholding Changes - On December 17, Alibaba's investment arm, Hangzhou Alibaba Entrepreneurship Investment Co., Ltd. (阿里创投), reduced its stake in Huayi Brothers from 3.467799% to 2.403580%, while the combined stake of Alibaba and Jack Ma fell from 6.064215% to 4.999996% [2][3]. - The reduction was based on Alibaba's commercial arrangements, and there is a possibility of further reductions in the next 12 months [3]. Company Stability and Control - Huayi Brothers stated that this reduction in shareholding would stabilize the company's equity structure and would not adversely affect its normal operations [5]. - Following this change, Alibaba and Jack Ma are no longer considered major shareholders (holding over 5%) in Huayi Brothers, which may lead to concerns about control stability [5]. Financial Performance - Huayi Brothers has faced significant financial challenges, reporting a cumulative loss of over 8 billion yuan (approximately 1.1 billion USD) over the past seven years, with a revenue drop of 46% year-on-year to 215 million yuan (approximately 29 million USD) in the latest quarter [12][13]. - The company is currently experiencing a debt crisis, with overdue debts totaling 52.5 million yuan (approximately 7 million USD) and all shares held by the controlling shareholder being frozen [13]. Historical Context - Huayi Brothers, founded in 1994 and known as a major player in the Chinese entertainment industry, has seen its market value decline significantly, with its stock price dropping to 2.17 yuan, valuing the company at 6.021 billion yuan (approximately 800 million USD), less than one-tenth of its peak value [12][18]. - The company has a history of close ties with Alibaba, which has previously provided loans and acquired assets from Huayi Brothers [6][7].