本文首发于公众号"私募排排网"。 （点击↑↑ 上图查看详情 ） 2025年第三季度，A股市场迎来系统性慢牛，市场震荡上行。在此期间，量化私募基金成绩亮眼，据私募排排网数据，截至2025年8月底，在私 募排排网有3只以上产品有今年来业绩展示的量化私募共有173家，今年来收益均值约为22.36%，跑赢了同期的上证指数、深证成指（涨幅分别 为15.10%、21.91%）。其中，收益不低于10%的量化私募有148家。 | 排名 | 产品简称 | 公司简称 | 三级策略 | 實要经猛 | 8月超额 | 今年来超额 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | T | 磐松微盘股指数增强1号 额 | 磐松资产 | 其他指增 | 吴确 高云翔,曹靖康 | 应合规要求 | | | | 倍漾量化选股二期A类份 | 筒蒙量化 | 量化选股 | 蔡其志 | | | | | 正瀛骐骥指数增强17号 | 正演资产 | 其他指增 | | | | | | 大道崔苇 | 大道投资 | 量化选股 | 朱明强 | | | | ട് | 大岩量化选股1号B类份额 | 大岩资本 | 量化选股 | 黄 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of stock strategy products in the context of increased market volatility due to tariffs, policy shifts, and geopolitical conflicts, emphasizing the importance of the Sharpe ratio as a measure of risk-adjusted returns [1][18]. Summary by Sections Overall Market Performance - Over the past three years, the average Sharpe ratio for stock strategy products was 0.69, with an average return of 64.17%. Among 1,723 products, 333 had a Sharpe ratio greater than 1, representing 19.33% of the total [1]. Top Products by Size Categories - **100 Billion and Above**: - The top product was "Junzhijian Junxin" managed by Zhang Youjun and Zhang Yichi, achieving a Sharpe ratio of *** and a return of ***% [4]. - Seven out of ten top products were subjective long strategies, with Junzhijian Investment holding half of the top spots [4]. - **50-100 Billion**: - "Pingfanghe Caiying Balanced No. 1 B Class" from Pingfanghe Investment topped this category with a return of ***% and a Sharpe ratio of *** [6][7]. - Six out of ten products were subjective long strategies, with two products each from Qianhai Bopu Asset and Kaishi Private Equity [6]. - **20-50 Billion**: - "Anzi Geek Multi-Strategy No. 1 A Class" managed by Li Jing was the top performer with a return of ***% and a Sharpe ratio of *** [10]. - Four subjective long and four quantitative long products made the top ten list [10]. - **10-20 Billion**: - "Jilu No. 11" from Jilu Asset achieved the highest return of ***% and a Sharpe ratio of *** [12]. - The top three products were all quantitative long strategies [12]. - **5-10 Billion**: - "Beiheng No. 2" managed by Zhou Yixing led this category with a return of ***% and a Sharpe ratio of *** [14]. - All top eight products were subjective long strategies [13]. - **0-5 Billion**: - The highest entry threshold was noted in this category, with "Saisuo Stable Profit No. 1" leading with a return of ***% and a Sharpe ratio of *** [15][16]. - Seven out of ten products were subjective long strategies [15].

Core Viewpoint - Market style rotation is a typical characteristic of A-shares, where no single style can consistently outperform the market. This rotation significantly impacts quantitative long strategies, influencing their excess returns directly [2][3]. Group 1: Impact of Style Rotation - Style rotation serves as a double-edged sword for quantitative long strategies, affecting performance and sustainability. When market style aligns with historical preferences of quantitative models (e.g., small-cap style), strategies can capture significant stock selection alpha, leading to outstanding performance [3]. - In the first half of 2023 and the small-cap market in 2024, many quantitative products achieved considerable returns. However, when market styles reverse sharply (e.g., collective pullback of small-cap stocks in early 2024), quantitative strategies face significant challenges, often resulting in noticeable drawdowns [3]. - Quantitative models rely on historical data to identify patterns. If a particular style (like small-cap) remains dominant, models will increase exposure to that style. A sudden style reversal can lead to the short-term failure of factors based on historical data, causing stock selection alpha to vanish or even turn negative [3]. Group 2: Performance Disparity Among Strategies - Style rotation exacerbates performance disparities among different quantitative products. Funds focusing on different tracks (e.g., 300 index enhancement vs. 1000 index enhancement) or employing varying style constraints or risk control capabilities will exhibit significant performance differences during style shifts [3]. - The average excess return of over 200 quantitative long strategy products under billion-yuan private equity was approximately -1.69%, with only 22.67% showing positive excess returns, indicating a high exposure to small-cap and growth styles [7]. Group 3: Market Conditions and Future Outlook - The market exhibited significant style switching from August to September 2025, driven by macroeconomic changes, capital flows, and policy expectations. The relative performance of broad-based indices reflects the rotation between large-cap and small-cap styles [7]. - The small-cap factor's return volatility has increased, and the average excess drawdown during rapid style transitions typically ranges from 1-4%, with the potential for a higher average excess drawdown of 8-9% in February 2024. However, subsequent recovery trends are generally smooth [11].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market showed strong performance in August, with major indices rising significantly, yet the excess returns of stock strategy private equity products were disappointing, marking the worst monthly performance of the year [1][2]. Group 1: Market Performance - In August, the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 7.97%, the Shenzhen Component Index increased by 15.32%, and the ChiNext Index surged over 24% [1]. - Despite the strong market, the average excess return of 3,122 stock strategy private equity products was -1.97%, the worst monthly performance this year [1]. Group 2: Quantitative vs. Subjective Strategies - Quantitative private equity products experienced a notable decline, with an average excess return of -3.94% in August, while subjective private equity products had an average excess return of -1.00% [1]. - The significant decline in quantitative products is attributed to a reversal in style, particularly the outperformance of large-cap stocks over small-cap stocks, and severe sector differentiation due to rapid growth in financing scale [1][2]. Group 3: Consistent Performers - As of August 2025, only 95 stock strategy private equity products achieved positive excess returns for eight consecutive months, representing about 3% of the total [2]. - Among private equity firms with over 10 billion in assets, 46 products achieved positive excess returns for eight consecutive months, all of which were quantitative products, with an average excess return of 0.63% in August and 17.91% year-to-date [3]. Group 4: Top Performers by Asset Size - In the 20-100 billion category, 14 products achieved positive excess returns for eight consecutive months, with an average excess return of 1.83% in August and 22.48% year-to-date [7]. - The top three products in this category were "New Thinking Multi-Strategy 3", "Pansong Micro-Cap Index Enhanced 1", and "Giraffe 7", with year-to-date excess returns of ***% [11]. Group 5: Small and Emerging Firms - In the 5-20 billion category, 13 products achieved positive excess returns for eight consecutive months, with an average excess return of 5.34% in August and 57.58% year-to-date [13]. - The leading product in the 0-5 billion category was "Zijin Yunsong", achieving a year-to-date excess return of ***% [18].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant role of billion-yuan public fund managers in the capital market, especially during the structural rise of A-shares in 2025, where active equity funds have shown strong absolute returns [3]. Group 1: Fund Manager Performance - As of the end of Q2 2025, 15 fund managers have surpassed a management scale of 10 billion yuan, with notable firms including China Europe Fund, Huatai-PineBridge Fund, and Yongying Fund [3]. - The top three fund managers by management scale are Zhang Wei from Huatai-PineBridge Fund (167.64 billion yuan), Yan Siqian from Penghua Fund (161.36 billion yuan), and Lan Xiaokang from China Europe Fund (155.58 billion yuan) [4][6]. - The average tenure of these top fund managers is approximately 4 years, with 4 managers having over 10 years of experience [3]. Group 2: Top Holdings and Returns - The top holdings among these fund managers include stocks like Victory Technology, Tencent Holdings, and CATL, which are favored by at least three managers [3]. - Zhang Wei leads the performance rankings with a return of 75.67% in 2025, managing 167.64 billion yuan across six funds [7]. - Yang Dong from Fortune Fund has a return of 61.18% with a management scale of 103.66 billion yuan, focusing on growth stocks and industry trends [8]. Group 3: Scale Growth and Rankings - The threshold for the top 10 fund managers by scale growth in 2025 is set at 31.02 billion yuan, with Yongying Fund's Zhang Lu and Gao Nan taking the top two spots [9]. - Zhang Lu achieved a net growth of 133.88 billion yuan, bringing his management scale to 154.13 billion yuan, with a return of 69.39% [10][11]. - Gao Nan's management scale increased by 107.79 billion yuan to 153.26 billion yuan, with a return of 36.20% [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market has been performing strongly, but there is a noticeable divergence in sector performance. Quantitative investment products, previously favored by the market, are now struggling to outperform the market index, while subjective products are experiencing a resurgence in net value [1]. Group 1: Market Performance - As of September 14, 2025, among the top 20 fund managers, 15 are from subjective private equity, dominating the rankings [1]. - The top 8 positions in the popularity rankings are all held by subjective fund managers, indicating a shift in investor preference [1]. Group 2: Fund Manager Rankings - The top fund manager is Dan Bin from Dongfang Gangwan, with a significant number of products achieving high returns this year and over the past three years [5]. - Xu Qionna from Bamai Private Equity ranks 8th, with her products showing strong performance due to strategic investments in undervalued financial sectors [9]. - Li Jianfei and Shi Jianghui from Guoyuan Xinda are notable for being the only firm with two fund managers in the top rankings, both demonstrating solid average returns [10]. Group 3: Investment Strategies - Dan Bin emphasizes the importance of technology stocks, with major holdings in companies like Nvidia and Google, which recently surpassed a market cap of 3 trillion [6]. - Xu Qionna focuses on identifying undervalued growth opportunities rather than following market trends, contributing to her funds' strong performance [9]. - Chen Yu from Shennong Investment believes the market is currently in a bullish phase and anticipates a long-term bull market driven by technological advancements [17]. Group 4: Fund Performance Insights - Dan Bin's products have shown significant returns, with the "Marathon Global A Class" achieving a high cumulative net value [5]. - Xu Qionna's "Jinzhu Capital No. 5" has also performed exceptionally well, reflecting her investment strategy's effectiveness [7]. - Cai Yingming from Longhang Asset highlights the importance of selecting undervalued, high-quality stocks, which has led to impressive performance in recent market conditions [21].

Core Viewpoint - The total scale of asset management products in China reached 75.38 trillion yuan as of Q2 2025, with significant contributions from securities companies and their subsidiaries [1][2]. Group 1: Asset Management Product Overview - The total scale of asset management products managed by securities companies and their subsidiaries is approximately 6.14 trillion yuan, with 10,903 collective asset management plans totaling about 30,866.67 billion yuan [1][2]. - As of September 17, 2025, 22 securities firms disclosed their collective asset management plan scales, with nine firms, including CITIC Securities and Guotai Junan, managing over 100 billion yuan each [2]. Group 2: Performance of Securities Asset Management Products - The average return for collective asset management products that have been established for over a year is 9.78%, with a median return of 3.53% [5]. - Among the various types of collective asset management products, stock-type products have the highest average return of 42.03%, while bond-type products have the most significant number at 1,930, with an average return of 3.89% [5][11]. Group 3: Top Performing Products - The top-performing mixed-type asset management products include "Guotai Junan Junxiang Yuanjian" and "Shiji Tianyi No. 1," with significant returns over the past year [6][7]. - The leading stock-type product is "CITIC Securities Zhisheng 500 Index Enhanced No. 1," which has shown impressive returns [11][13]. - The top FOF product is "Guojin Xinxiang Citaong No. 9 FOF," which has also demonstrated strong performance [14][20]. - The best-performing bond-type product is "Diyi Chuangye Convertible Bond Flexible Allocation No. 1," which has achieved notable returns [21][22].

Core Viewpoint - The article analyzes the performance of mutual fund managers based on their educational backgrounds, revealing that higher educational qualifications correlate with better fund performance in 2023 [3][5][8]. Summary by Sections Doctorate Fund Managers - There are 377 doctorate fund managers, with an average return of 20.39% this year, and only 14 have negative returns [3][5]. - The top three performing doctorate fund managers are Liang Furui from Great Wall Fund, Dan Lin from Yongying Fund, and Qi Nong from Huabao Fund, with returns of 115.48%, 96.43%, and 93.12% respectively [5][6]. - Liang Furui's representative product, Great Wall Medical Industry Selected Mixed Fund A, achieved a return of 113.60% against a benchmark of 22.49% [6][7]. Master's Fund Managers - There are 3,375 master's fund managers, with an average return of 16.93% this year [8]. - The top three performing master's fund managers are Ren Jie from Yongying Fund, Leng Wenpeng from CITIC Construction Investment Fund, and Zhou Shanshan from Jiao Yin Shi Luo Fund, with returns of 183.67%, 119.41%, and 116.55% respectively [9][10]. - Ren Jie's representative product, Yongying Technology Selected Mixed Fund A, achieved a return of 186.12% against a benchmark of 37.38% [10]. Bachelor's Fund Managers - There are 105 bachelor's fund managers, with an average return of 11.40% this year [11]. - The top three performing bachelor's fund managers are Bao Jianwen from Caitong Asset Management, Sa Weixu from Guoshou Anbao Fund, and Ye Yong from Wanjia Fund, with returns of 54.48%, 53.80%, and 40.45% respectively [12][13]. - Bao Jianwen's representative product, Caitong Asset Management Digital Economy Mixed Fund A, achieved a return of 71.41% against a benchmark of 21.01% [12].

Core Viewpoint - Tot (Sanya) Private Fund is a technology-driven quantitative private fund company that has achieved significant performance in the quantitative investment field, utilizing deep learning techniques for trading strategies [2][3]. Group 1: Company Overview - Tot (Sanya) Private Fund was founded in September 2021 and obtained its private fund license in March 2022, with its first product registered in April 2022. The company has grown from 1.8 billion yuan in assets under management in 2022 to 5 billion yuan by August 2025 [6][7]. - The core strategy team consists of graduates from Peking University, specializing in computer science and intelligent science, with a strong background in machine learning and software engineering [2][10]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - As of August 2025, the average return of Tot (Sanya) Private Fund's products reached ***%, ranking in the top 10 of quantitative private funds for the year [2]. - The product "Tot CSI 300 Index Enhanced 2" achieved a return of ***% in 2025, placing it among the top 10 for excess returns in the category of private funds with over 500 million yuan in scale [2]. Group 3: Core Strategies - The company employs a quantitative stock selection strategy, focusing on market neutrality and commodity CTA, with a strong emphasis on risk control and sustainable excess returns [5][19]. - The multi-cycle and multi-frequency return prediction model allows for decision-making across various time frames, from intraday to quarterly [15][19]. Group 4: Competitive Advantages - The company has a rich experience in machine learning, particularly in developing multi-modal factors, which provides a technical barrier compared to traditional multi-factor models [14][16]. - Strict risk exposure control is maintained, ensuring that the strategy effectively manages market volatility without significant drawdowns [17][19]. - The stability of the research and investment team is high, with a zero turnover rate among core members, who have been collaborating since 2016 [18].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market showed strong performance in August, with major indices rising significantly, while the bond market faced pressure due to the "stock-bond seesaw" effect [2][3]. Market Performance - The Shanghai Composite Index rose 7.97% in August, surpassing 3800 points, marking a nearly 10-year high. The Shenzhen Component Index increased by 15.32%, and the ChiNext Index surged over 24% [2]. - In the bond market, the China Bond Index fell by 0.61%, and the China Government Bond Index decreased by 0.58% [2]. - The commodity market exhibited mixed results, with the Nanhua Commodity Index down 0.62% and the Industrial Products Index down 2.17%. However, the precious metals index rose by 2.85% due to increased expectations of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve [2]. Private Equity Performance - Data from Private Equity 排排网 indicates that among 4936 products with performance data, the average return from January to August was approximately 23.28%. The proportion of products with positive returns increased to 94.43%, up from 91.20% in the previous month [3][4]. - Among various strategies, long equity strategies (both subjective and quantitative) led the returns, with average returns of 35.67% and 30.08% respectively for the first eight months of the year [3]. Strategy Breakdown - The performance of different private equity strategies varied significantly, with the following average returns for the first eight months: - Long Equity: 35.67% (subjective), 30.08% (quantitative) - Composite Strategy: 20.80% - Macro Strategy: 18.68% - Convertible Bond Trading Strategy: 17.16% - Fund of Funds (FOF): 14.20% - Other Derivative Strategies: 14.16% - Market Neutral Equity: 7.81% [3]. Top Private Equity Firms - The top 10 subjective private equity firms by average return this year include: 1. 富延资本 (Fuyuan Capital) 2. 北京禧悦私募 (Beijing Xiyue Private Equity) 3. 同犇投资 (Tongben Investment) 4. 一久私募基金 (Yijiu Private Fund) 5. 能敬投资控股 (Nengjing Investment Holdings) 6. 玖歌投资 (Jiuge Investment) 7. 龙航资产 (Longhang Asset) 8. 榕树投资 (Rongshu Investment) 9. 路远私募 (Luyuan Private Equity) 10. 晨耀私募 (Chenyao Private Equity) [4][6]. Quantitative Private Equity - The average return for the top 100 quantitative private equity firms was 26.69%, with a total of 676 products and a combined scale of approximately 804.91 billion [12][14]. - The top 10 quantitative private equity firms by average return include: 1. 翰荣投资 (Hanrong Investment) 2. 云起量化 (Yunqi Quantitative) 3. 稳博投资 (Wenbo Investment) 4. 橡木资产 (Xiangmu Asset) 5. 阿巴马投资 (Abama Investment) [12][14]. Mixed Strategy Private Equity - The average return for the top 100 mixed strategy private equity firms was 20.78%, with a total of 449 products and a combined scale of approximately 284.03 billion [24][26]. - The top 10 mixed strategy private equity firms by average return include: 1. 深圳泽源 (Shenzhen Zeyuan) 2. 量利私募 (Liangli Private Equity) 3. 中闽汇金 (Zhongmin Huijin) 4. 金塔克资产 (Jintake Asset) 5. 嘉信融成 (Jiaxin Rongcheng) [24][26].