Group 1: Company Performance - Citigroup's stock closed at $76.40, reflecting a slight decrease of -0.17% from the previous day, underperforming the S&P 500's gain of 0.01% [1] - Over the past month, Citigroup's shares have increased by 10.16%, outperforming the Finance sector's gain of 3.54% and the S&P 500's gain of 5.2% [1] - Analysts expect Citigroup to report earnings of $1.71 per share on July 15, 2025, indicating a year-over-year growth of 12.5% [2] - The full-year Zacks Consensus Estimates predict earnings of $7.32 per share and revenue of $83.72 billion, representing year-over-year changes of +23.03% and +3.18%, respectively [3] Group 2: Analyst Projections and Estimates - Recent shifts in analyst projections for Citigroup are important to monitor, as positive estimate revisions can indicate a favorable business outlook [4] - The Zacks Rank system, which integrates estimate changes, currently ranks Citigroup at 3 (Hold), with a recent upward shift of 0.46% in the EPS estimate [6] Group 3: Valuation Metrics - Citigroup is trading at a Forward P/E ratio of 10.46, which is below the industry average of 14.5, indicating a discount compared to its peers [7] - The company has a PEG ratio of 0.6, significantly lower than the Financial - Investment Bank industry's average PEG ratio of 1.24 [8]

Core Insights - Citigroup Inc. is undergoing a transformation to streamline operations and reduce expenses, including a significant job cut plan of 20,000 positions by 2026, which represents about 8% of its global workforce [1][10] - The bank is focusing on growth in core businesses by exiting consumer banking in 14 markets across Asia and EMEA, reallocating capital to higher-return segments like wealth management and investment banking [2] - Citigroup has successfully exited consumer banking in nine countries and is winding down operations in Korea and Russia while preparing for an IPO of its consumer banking operations in Mexico [3][4] Financial Performance and Projections - The company anticipates a compounded annual growth rate of 4-5% in revenues by the end of 2026, with expected annualized run rate savings of $2-2.5 billion [5] - Management projects a return on tangible common equity of 10-11% by 2026 [5] - Citigroup's shares have increased by 10.4% year-to-date, outperforming the industry growth of 9.6% [8] Valuation Metrics - Citigroup trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 9.42X, which is below the industry average of 13.70X [12] - Earnings estimates for 2025 and 2026 have been revised upward, indicating a year-over-year rise of 23% and 25.9%, respectively [14]

Core Viewpoint - Citigroup is revising its policies regarding banking services for retail clients selling firearms and clarifying its stance on political affiliation discrimination, aiming to enhance fair access to banking services amid regulatory scrutiny [1][2][11]. Group 1: Policy Changes - Citigroup is removing its U.S. Commercial Firearms Policy established in 2018, which restricted services to retail clients and partners involved in firearms sales [6]. - The company is updating its employee Code of Conduct and Global Financial Access Policy to explicitly state that it does not discriminate based on political affiliation, similar to its non-discrimination stance on race and religion [9]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - The changes are in response to increasing scrutiny from federal lawmakers regarding allegations of banks denying services to certain industries or political groups, particularly since the return of President Trump [5][11]. - Citigroup's Head of Enterprise Services and Public Affairs emphasized the need to balance fair access to banking products while managing risks appropriately [2][3]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The banking industry has faced accusations of discrimination, with banks arguing that outdated regulations complicate their ability to provide services or justify denials [5]. - Citigroup expressed hope that communities and lawmakers will continue to seek solutions to prevent gun violence while adhering to best sales practices [8].

英国前首相特拉斯的经济政策曾引发"股债汇三杀"，全球市场心有余悸。如今日债大跌、日元疲软，日本会重蹈覆辙吗？ 据追风交易台消息，花旗银行6月3日最新研报认为，日本国债体系无崩溃风险，但今年夏天（未来2-3个月），日本市场可能遭 遇短暂的"股债汇"三市齐跌的动荡局面。 日本近期基本不可能面临类似英国"特拉斯时刻"的债券市场崩溃情景。不过，由于短期投资者可能平仓日元多头头 寸，加上日企海外并购需求，未来2-3个月日元兑美元可能跌至150水平。如果日元利率持续上升并导致日本股市同时 调整，市场可能出现暂时性的"股债汇三杀"现象。花旗判断，日元中长期将走强，预计第四季度日元兑美元将升破 140，任何日元抛售期间都可能为投资者提供建立战略性日元多头头寸的良机。 花旗警告，尽管日债本身无崩盘之忧，但未来2-3个月（大致在夏季），日本金融市场可能出现一个短暂的"困难时期"。 在7月参议院选举期间，市场可能日益担心日本政府实施更加扩张性的财政政策，意味着财政状况进一步恶化。对日本央行落后 于形势的担忧继续在市场中酝酿。因此，未来几个月日本市场可能比平时更加脆弱。 花旗之前认为，日本寿险等长期投资者会在2.0%-2.5%收益率 ...

智通财经APP获悉，由于特朗普政府不断变化的政策对经济的影响仍然存在疑问，交易员们正在加大押注，以对冲美 联储利率路径剧烈变化的风险。 总体而言，掉期市场仍在消化美联储今年将从10月开始降息两次的预期。然而，围绕美国经济前景的不确定性，已促 使交易员购买期权以应对更广泛的降息结果，从完全不降息到2025年底前连续降息50个基点。高盛和花旗集团对美联 储何时开始降息持相反观点。 迄今为止，美国4月份职位空缺增加和招聘回升等强劲的经济数据，支撑了美联储将维持利率不变的观点。但美国总统 唐纳德·特朗普的贸易政策可能会扰乱劳动力市场并加剧通胀，从而迫使美联储采取行动。 以William Marshall为首的高盛策略师表示："关税波动再持续一周，使利率仍然保持不变，未来的走势仍不明朗。"高 盛预计，到2026年，降息幅度将比今年更大。 未平仓合约继续增加，目前规模已达到约25万份，相当于大约2500万美元的溢价。这一持仓与掉期市场目前预期的年 底前降息约50个基点的立场相反。 交易员预计美联储将推迟降息 另一方面，最近几个交易日也出现了一些极端鸽派的对冲操作，包括瞄准年底前一系列降息50个基点的政策。花旗银 行预计今 ...

6月2日，花旗任命张文杰为花旗集团中国区总裁及花旗银行（中国）有限公司行长、执行董事，该任命将在监管批准 后正式生效。 张文杰将于2025年7月正式加入花旗，成为花旗在华的首席对外代表，就任于上海。他向日本、北亚及澳洲区域总裁龙 明睿（Marc Luet）汇报。 张文杰在企业和机构银行领域拥有30年的工作经验。在加入花旗前，他曾担任美国银行中国区执行总裁兼上海分行行 长。此外，他还曾担任汇丰中国总行副行长及环球银行中国联席主管，并在摩根大通，法国农业信贷银行任职。与此 同时，他亦有在花旗的工作经历。 张文杰拥有约克大学舒立克商学院的工商管理硕士学位和北京对外经济贸易大学经济学学士学位。 "张文杰在银行业务方面历练极具深度和广度，他的实战经验和对本地市场的洞见将促进我们在这个重要市场的增长， 我们将继续支持机构客户的跨境银行需求。"龙明睿评价道。 （花旗集团中国区总裁张文杰，供图：花旗银行（中国）有限公司） 张文杰就任花旗集团中国区总裁，正值该机构变革之际。花旗集团正撤出亚洲部分地区零售银行业务，聚焦于机构业 务。 这一变化与花旗集团全球战略调整息息相关。早在2021年4月，花旗集团告诉投资者，其将调整亚洲战略 ...

V i e w p o i n t | Brian Levine +1-212-816-6896 brian.levine@citi.com Osamu Takashima +81-3-6776-3251 osamu.takashima@citi.com 29 May 2025 13:15:24 ET │ 10 pages Global FX Strategy Uncertainty is the only certainty CITI'S TAKE FX markets have been quick to fade the overnight USD rally after President Trump's IEEPA tariffs were struck down in court; we see this as a market recognition that this ruling will be appealed and that there are other tools available for the Trump administration (such as Section 122 ...

Group 1 - The article announces the appointment of Zhang Wenjie as the new President and CEO of Citibank China, effective upon regulatory approval [1] - Zhang Wenjie has extensive experience in the financial sector, with 30 years in corporate and institutional banking, and has previously worked at Citibank [1] - The appointment is seen as a strategic move to enhance Citibank's operations and client relationships in China, which is one of its largest markets globally [2] Group 2 - Zhang Wenjie will report to Marc Luet, the regional president for Japan, North Asia, and Australia, and will be responsible for coordinating market resources and overseeing compliance [1] - The previous president, Lu Xuan, resigned for personal reasons after approximately nine months in the role, prompting the search for a successor [1] - Zhang holds an MBA from York University and a bachelor's degree in economics from the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing [1]

Core Viewpoint - Citigroup, while a well-known bank, has a history of poor performance during economic downturns, particularly during the Great Recession, leading to concerns about its current investment potential [1][4]. Group 1: Company Overview - Citigroup provides a range of financial services, including consumer and business banking, investment banking, and wealth management, positioning itself similarly to its largest peers [2]. - The bank's historical challenges, including a government bailout during the Great Recession and a cut in dividends, have left shareholders with significant losses, as neither share price nor dividends have returned to pre-recession levels [4]. Group 2: Current Financial Position - Citigroup has improved its financial security and operational prudence since the Great Recession, yet its stock price has struggled to surpass the $76 level over the past decade [5]. - The current dividend yield for Citigroup is approximately 3%, which is higher than the average bank yield of 2.7%, but lower than Toronto-Dominion Bank's yield of 4.4% [8]. Group 3: Comparative Analysis - Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank) did not cut its dividend during the Great Recession, benefiting from stricter regulations in Canada, which has led to a more conservative business model [9]. - Despite facing challenges due to regulatory issues in its U.S. operations, TD Bank has maintained its dividend growth, signaling resilience and potential for recovery [11]. - Citigroup's investment appeal is diminished compared to TD Bank, which offers a higher yield and better prospects for income and capital appreciation [13].

Core Viewpoint - Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has been a net seller of stocks for 10 consecutive quarters, including a complete exit from Citigroup [1][9] Group 1: Investment Actions - In Q1 2025, Berkshire Hathaway reduced its holdings in six stocks and fully exited its position in Citigroup [1][7] - Buffett initially bought approximately 55.2 million shares of Citigroup in Q1 2022, viewing it as a potential turnaround play [4][6] - Despite a decline in Citigroup's shares throughout much of 2022 and 2023, Berkshire continued to invest, purchasing an additional 89,000 shares in Q1 2023 [6][7] Group 2: Market Reaction - Wall Street analysts largely disagree with Buffett's decision to sell Citigroup, with 16 out of 22 analysts rating the stock as a buy or strong buy [9][10] - The consensus 12-month price target for Citigroup suggests an upside potential of nearly 12%, with the most optimistic analyst predicting a 46% increase [10][12] Group 3: Financial Performance - Analysts view Citigroup as a solid financial services company with rising revenue and profits, trading at only 10.3 times forward earnings estimates [12][14] - Citigroup's share price remains over 25% below its book value, and it offers an attractive forward dividend yield of nearly 3% [12][10] Group 4: Diverging Perspectives - Buffett's decision to sell may reflect a broader concern about bank stocks and the impact of tariffs on the U.S. economy, despite having made a profit on the investment [14][15] - The situation illustrates that different investors can have valid reasons for buying or selling the same stock based on their individual circumstances and goals [15]