Core Insights - Stellantis is reviving the V-8-powered Ram 1500 SRT TRX pickup truck, which will be available late in 2026 for approximately $100,000, as part of a U.S. sales turnaround plan [1][2][5] Group 1: Product Details - The 2027 Ram 1500 SRT TRX features a supercharged 6.2-liter "Hellcat" engine producing 777 horsepower and 680 foot-pounds of torque, making it the "fastest and most powerful production gas pickup truck in the world" with a 0-60 mph time of 3.5 seconds and a top speed of 118 mph [2][4] - The starting price for the TRX is $99,995, excluding a $2,595 destination fee, bringing the total to $102,590, compared to the initial TRX price of $71,690 in 2020 [4] Group 2: Strategic Direction - The return of the TRX aligns with CEO Tim Kuniskis's turnaround strategy, which includes over 25 announcements aimed at revitalizing Stellantis's U.S. sales, which have declined significantly in recent years [3][5] - Kuniskis has shifted the company's focus back to V-8 engines, reversing previous plans to phase them out due to stricter fuel economy regulations that have since been relaxed [5][6] Group 3: Sales Performance - Stellantis's U.S. sales fell from the fourth to the sixth position among automakers from 2021 to 2024, with a 6% decrease in sales through the third quarter of the previous year, and an expected total of 1.25 million sales for the year, down 4.4% from 2024 [6][7] - The company aims to capture market share in a challenging environment, as auto sales are projected to remain flat or decline in 2026 [7][8] Group 4: Other Brand Strategies - Jeep is also undergoing a turnaround strategy, with plans to reposition pricing, models, and features to address years of declining sales since 2018 [9][10] - The Jeep reset plan aims to streamline the product lineup and improve profitability, with new models like a resurrected Cherokee and an all-electric Recon expected to contribute to growth [11][12]

Group 1: Funding and Financials - Zhejiang Leapmotor has raised over $530 million in funding from State-owned automaker FAW through the sale of over 74,832,245 Domestic Shares priced at HK$55.29 ($7.11) each, totaling approximately $532 million [1][2]. Group 2: Sales Targets - Leapmotor's CEO Zhu Jiangming has set a target of achieving 4 million annual sales by the next decade, with an interim goal of reaching one million vehicles sold annually by 2026 [3]. Group 3: Industry Expansion - Chinese EV companies, including Leapmotor, are expanding into Europe as part of their global growth strategies, with notable competitors like BYD and Xpeng also targeting this market [4][5].

Core Viewpoint - Leapmotor, a Chinese electric vehicle maker, aims to sell over 4 million vehicles annually within the next decade, as stated by CEO Zhu Jiangming [1] Company Summary - Leapmotor is positioning itself for significant growth in the electric vehicle market, with ambitious sales targets set for the next ten years [1]

These ten large-cap stocks were the worst performers last week. Are they a part of your portfolio?Brown Forman Inc (NYSE:BF) decreased 9.64% this week. In the recent past, Citigroup analyst Filippo Falorni downgraded the stock from Neutral to Sell, lowering the price forecast from $30 to $27.Carvana Co. (NYSE:CVNA) fell 5.73% this week. However, Evercore ISI Group analyst Michael Montani maintains an In-Line rating, raising the price forecast from $420 to $425.Also Read: AST SpaceMobile, Nike, Nvidia And Mo ...

We recently published 10 Stocks Struggling to Shine Ahead of Christmas. Stellantis NV (NYSE:STLA) is one of the worst performers on Monday. Stellantis dropped for a fifth consecutive day on Monday, shedding 3.99 percent to close at $11.08 apiece as investor sentiment was dampened by the company’s cautious investment outlook in Europe. This followed Stellantis NV (NYSE:STLA) CEO Antonio Filosa’s interview with the Financial Times, saying that the European Commission’s revised vehicle emission rules were ...

The all-new SIXPACK-powered Dodge Charger is the Detroit News 2025 Vehicle of the Year. AUBURN HILLS, Mich., Dec. 23, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Continue Reading For 111 years, the Dodge brand has carried on the spirit of brothers John and Horace Dodge. Their influence continues today as Dodge, America's performance brand, shifts into high gear with a lineup that delivers unrivaled performance in each of its segments. The new, next-generation Dodge Charger multi-energy lineup is led by the 670-horsepower Dodge Ch ...

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration's decision to halt the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards marks a significant shift in U.S. automotive regulation, impacting energy, environmental, and industrial policies [1]. Group 1: Policy Changes - The new regulations set the fuel efficiency target for 2031 vehicles at 34.5 miles per gallon (mpg), a substantial decrease of 31.5% from the previous target of 50.4 mpg [4]. - The elimination of the CAFE standards means automakers will no longer need to invest heavily in research and development to meet stringent fuel efficiency requirements, allowing them to focus on producing more profitable traditional fuel vehicles and larger models [5]. Group 2: Economic Implications - The policy change is expected to save consumers at least $1,000 when purchasing new vehicles, with potential for even greater savings [3]. - Under the Trump administration, $700 billion has been invested in the U.S. automotive industry, with significant investments announced by major automakers such as Ford and Stellantis [3]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The automotive industry has largely welcomed the decision, with industry leaders stating that the previous CAFE standards were unrealistic and burdensome [5]. - The oil industry has expressed optimism that higher fuel consumption vehicles will boost gasoline demand and support traditional energy sectors [6]. Group 4: Environmental Concerns - The cessation of CAFE standards is anticipated to lead to stagnation or regression in vehicle fuel efficiency, resulting in increased fuel costs for consumers [6]. - Critics argue that the rollback of these standards could hinder technological advancements in the automotive sector, which have historically been driven by the need to meet fuel efficiency regulations [6].

格隆汇12月23日｜欧洲汽车制造商协会：丰田11月在欧盟的新车注册量下降9.2%，斯泰兰蒂斯 (STLA.US)注册量增长0.3%，特斯拉注册量下降34%，比亚迪注册量增长235%。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Union's plan to relax the ban on fuel vehicles has faced opposition from Stellantis, which argues that the revised policy lacks a clear growth roadmap for the automotive industry [1] Group 1: Stellantis' Position - Stellantis CEO, Carlos Tavares, criticized the EU's proposal, stating it does not provide necessary measures for the automotive industry to return to growth [1] - Tavares emphasized that without growth, it is difficult to consider additional investments, which are crucial for building a resilient supply chain vital for European employment and prosperity [1] Group 2: EU's Proposal Details - The EU Commission proposed to adjust the 2035 "ban on fuel vehicles" by changing the new car "zero emissions" target to a "90% reduction" from 2021 levels, allowing a 10% reduction gap to be compensated through low-carbon steel and sustainable fuels [1] - The proposal allows manufacturers to continue emitting 10% of 2021 levels and to sell some fuel and hybrid vehicles, but concerns have been raised about the feasibility and cost of these measures for automakers [1] Group 3: Industry Reactions - The response from the European automotive industry is divided, with Renault welcoming the proposal while the German automotive industry association described it as "disastrous" due to excessive implementation barriers [2] - EU officials maintain that the new emissions offset mechanism preserves the ambition of the original 2035 ban, asserting that the automotive industry is not questioning its climate goals [2] - German Finance Minister Lars Kleinbai warned manufacturers against relying on internal combustion engines, urging a faster transition to electric vehicles as the future of mobility [2]

Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry is facing significant challenges due to tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, which are affecting small and medium-sized manufacturers like AlphaUSA, potentially threatening their existence without relief or the ability to pass costs on to consumers [2][3][11]. Group 1: Impact of Tariffs on Manufacturers - AlphaUSA, a manufacturer of automotive fasteners, reports that tariffs have increased costs significantly, with some parts seeing price increases from $0.10 to $0.15 due to a 50% tariff [6]. - The company has paid approximately $1.3 million in tariffs through November, with ongoing costs estimated at $225,000 to $250,000 per month [9]. - The auto industry has lost around 58,000 manufacturing jobs this year, with over 15,000 of those in the automotive sector specifically [11]. Group 2: Responses from the Automotive Sector - Some manufacturers are returning to the U.S. to avoid tariffs, but the overall job loss in manufacturing raises concerns about the effectiveness of these policies [4][23]. - Stellantis, a major automotive company, initially planned to cut jobs at its Warren assembly plant but reversed this decision following the announcement of automotive tariffs, indicating a potential positive impact on job retention and expansion [13][19]. - Union representatives express optimism about the tariffs leading to new investments and job creation, with expectations of 900 new jobs linked to upcoming production shifts [17][18]. Group 3: Future Outlook and Challenges - There is a belief among some industry stakeholders that the tariffs could lead to a resurgence in American manufacturing, although the actual outcomes remain uncertain [23]. - The Supreme Court's skepticism regarding the broad authority of tariffs may pose risks to some of Trump's tariff policies, but those under Section 232, affecting manufacturers like AlphaUSA, are not directly impacted by this case [24]. - Manufacturers emphasize the importance of keeping their workforce employed and the challenges they face in expanding their operations due to financial constraints caused by tariffs [25].