1月26日，陕鼓动力涨5.15%，截至发稿，报11.03元/股，成交2.50亿元，换手率1.37%，总市值190.10亿 元。 易方达中证红利低波动ETF（563020）基金经理为宋钊贤。 截至发稿，宋钊贤累计任职时间5年145天，现任基金资产总规模598.17亿元，任职期间最佳基金回报 68.14%， 任职期间最差基金回报-27.57%。 声明：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。 本文基于第三方数据库自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但 不限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。受限于第三方数据库质量等问题，我们无法对数据的真实性及完整性进行分辨或核验，因此本文内 容可能出现不准确、不完整、误导性的内容或信息，具体以公司公告为准。如有疑问，请联系 biz@staff.sina.com.cn。 资料显示，西安陕鼓动力股份有限公司位于陕西省西安市高新区沣惠南路8号，成立日期1999年6月30 日，上市日期2010年4月28日，公司主营业务涉及透平压缩机组、工业流程能量回收装置和透平鼓风机 组等各种透平机械及系统的开发、制造、成套销售和服务。主营业务收入构成为：能量转 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news highlights the strong performance of sectors such as gold, banking, and oil, with the CSI Dividend Index and the Hang Seng High Dividend Low Volatility Index both rising by 0.8% as of midday [1] - The CSI Dividend Low Volatility ETF managed by E Fund has seen a continuous net inflow of funds for 42 trading days, accumulating over 2.3 billion yuan [1] - E Fund is currently the only fund company that implements low fee rates for all its dividend ETFs, with management fees set at 0.15% per year for various products [1] Group 2 - The CSI Dividend Low Volatility Index consists of 50 stocks that are liquid, have a history of continuous dividends, moderate dividend payout ratios, positive growth in earnings per share, and low volatility, reflecting the overall performance of A-share listed companies with high dividend levels and low volatility [3] - The banking, construction decoration, and pharmaceutical industries collectively account for 65% of the index [3] - The Hang Seng High Dividend Low Volatility ETF also follows a similar structure, comprising 50 liquid stocks within the Hong Kong Stock Connect that have continuous dividends and low volatility, with financial, industrial, and energy sectors making up over 65% of the index [5]

Core Viewpoint - The new fund issuance market in China remains robust, with 43 new funds launched in the last week of January 2026, primarily driven by equity funds, while FOF and "fixed income+" products also show positive trends [1][9]. Fund Issuance Overview - A total of 43 new funds were issued during the week from January 26 to January 30, 2026, with 31 funds launched on January 26 alone, accounting for over 70% of the total [2][10]. - The average subscription period for new funds was 12.84 days, with the longest being approximately three months for the "Zhongjia Balanced Return" fund [2][10]. - The shortest subscription periods were for three funds, each planned for just one day, while several others had periods of 2-3 days [2][10]. Fund Target Goals - Out of the 43 new funds, 20 specified their fundraising targets, with 11 aiming for over 5 billion units. Notably, six funds, including "Guotai Consumer Leadership" and "Boshi Yingtai Zhenxuan," targeted 8 billion units each [3][11]. - Other targets included 6 billion units for "Jianxin Resource Selection" and 5 billion units for "Ping An Semiconductor Leadership Selection," which had the lowest target [3][11]. Fund Types and Themes - Equity funds dominated the new issuance, with 18 active equity funds making up over 40% of the total. This included 5 stock funds and 13 mixed funds, primarily focused on equity [4][12]. - The new equity funds covered a range of themes such as resources, cycles, consumption, semiconductors, and digital economy, with notable products like "Guotai Consumer Leadership" and "Boshi Digital Economy" [4][12]. - There were also 16 index funds, including 6 stock ETFs and 6 ordinary index funds, focusing on sector-specific indices [4][12]. FOF and QDII Funds - Five new FOF products were launched, primarily targeting risk-adjusted returns with holding periods of 3 to 6 months [5][13]. - Two new QDII funds were introduced, focusing on the Hong Kong stock market, namely "Zhongou Hong Kong Consumer" and "Xingye Hang Seng Technology Index" [6][14]. Fixed Income Products - The issuance of bond funds continued to decline due to poor performance in the bond market, with no pure bond funds launched this week. However, two mixed secondary bond funds were introduced [6][14].

- The report does not contain any quantitative models or factors for analysis[1][2][3]

Group 1 - The core focus of the article is on the performance and strategic adjustments of funds managed by Zhang Kun of E Fund, highlighting the significant differentiation in fund performance and his outlook on domestic consumption and investment opportunities [1][2][3] Group 2 - In Q4 2025, Zhang Kun's managed fund size decreased to 48.3 billion yuan, with a quarterly reduction exceeding 8 billion yuan [2][3] - The largest fund, E Fund Blue Chip Selection Mixed Fund (005827.OF), experienced a nearly 9% loss in Q4, underperforming its benchmark by over 6%, while the E Fund Asia Select Stock Fund (118001.OF) achieved a 4.5% positive return, outperforming its benchmark by over 2% and recording a nearly 42% increase for the entire year [2][3][4] Group 3 - Zhang Kun continued to reduce holdings in the liquor sector, albeit at a slower pace compared to Q3 2025, maintaining a near 10% position in leading liquor stocks like Kweichow Moutai and Wuliangye [4][5][6] - Significant reductions were also noted in pharmaceutical and media stocks, with JD Health seeing a cut of about half in holdings, alongside Tencent Holdings and Focus Media [5][6][7] Group 4 - In overseas investments, Samsung Electronics replaced Tencent Holdings as the top holding in the E Fund Asia Select, with Zhang Kun opting to take profits as stock prices surged [6][7][8] Group 5 - Zhang Kun expressed a strong belief in the future of domestic consumption, arguing that current consumer weakness is not a permanent state and will improve, supported by government goals for income growth and stabilization of housing prices [8][9][10] - He emphasized that a robust domestic consumption market is crucial for technological innovation, suggesting that increased consumer spending will benefit domestic AI companies and accelerate their development [10][11][12] - Zhang Kun remains optimistic about the long-term potential of Chinese consumption and economic growth, viewing current market valuations of quality companies as attractive for long-term investors [10][11][12]

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints - The median weekly return of equity ETFs last week was 0.95%. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 500 ETF had the highest return; among sector ETFs, the cyclical ETF had the highest return; among hot theme ETFs, the photovoltaic ETF had the highest return. Equity ETFs had a net redemption of 338.098 billion yuan last week. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 500 ETF had the least net redemption; among sector ETFs, the cyclical ETF had the most net subscriptions; among theme ETFs, the chip ETF had the most net subscriptions. As of last Friday, Huaxia, E Fund, and Huatai-PineBridge ranked in the top three in terms of the total scale of listed non-monetary ETFs. Six ETFs will be issued this week [1][2][58]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs ETF Performance - The median weekly return of equity ETFs from January 19 to January 23, 2026, was 0.95%. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 500, CSI 1000, Science and Technology Innovation Board, A500, ChiNext, CSI 300, and SSE 50 ETFs had median returns of 4.34%, 2.88%, 2.46%, 0.78%, -0.34%, -0.60%, and -1.55% respectively. Commodity, bond, money market, and cross-border ETFs had median returns of 7.51%, 0.11%, 0.02%, and -0.67% respectively. By sector, the median returns of cyclical, technology, large finance, and consumer sector ETFs were 3.52%, 0.62%, -0.73%, and -0.95% respectively. By hot theme, the median returns of photovoltaic, military, and chip ETFs were 6.87%, 5.30%, and 2.34% respectively, showing relatively strong performance, while the median returns of bank, liquor, and pharmaceutical ETFs were -2.65%, -1.66%, and -1.53% respectively, showing relatively weak performance [12][15]. ETF Scale Changes and Net Subscriptions/Redeemptions - As of last Friday, the scales of equity, cross-border, and bond ETFs were 352.9 billion yuan, 104.47 billion yuan, and 73.46 billion yuan respectively, while the scales of commodity and money market ETFs were relatively small, at 30.76 billion yuan and 15.35 billion yuan respectively. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 300 and A500 ETFs had relatively large scales of 85.38 billion yuan and 28.23 billion yuan respectively, while the Science and Technology Innovation Board, CSI 500, ChiNext, SSE 50, and CSI 1000 ETFs had relatively small scales of 20.23 billion yuan, 19.8 billion yuan, 14.47 billion yuan, 12.89 billion yuan, and 11.2 billion yuan respectively. By sector, the technology sector ETF had a scale of 55.15 billion yuan, followed by the cyclical sector ETF with a scale of 31.76 billion yuan. The consumer and large finance ETFs had relatively small scales of 19.71 billion yuan and 19.69 billion yuan respectively. By hot theme, the chip, securities, and pharmaceutical ETFs had the highest scales of 19.25 billion yuan, 14.05 billion yuan, and 11.16 billion yuan respectively. Last week, equity ETFs had a net redemption of 338.098 billion yuan, and the total scale decreased by 309.829 billion yuan; money market ETFs had a net subscription of 199.5 million yuan, and the total scale increased by 200.9 million yuan. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 500 ETF had the least net redemption of 8.427 billion yuan, and its scale decreased by 302 million yuan; the CSI 300 ETF had the most net redemption of 237.252 billion yuan, and its scale decreased by 243.481 billion yuan. By sector, the cyclical ETF had the most net subscriptions of 29.338 billion yuan, and its scale increased by 42.211 billion yuan; the large finance ETF had the least net subscriptions of 1.979 billion yuan, and its scale increased by 230 million yuan. By hot theme, the chip ETF had the most net subscriptions of 12.774 billion yuan, and its scale increased by 15.931 billion yuan; the new energy vehicle ETF had the most net redemptions of 240 million yuan, and its scale decreased by 85 million yuan [18][25][27]. ETF Benchmark Index Valuation - As of last Friday, the price-to-earnings ratios of the SSE 50, CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, ChiNext, and A500 ETFs were at the 80.28%, 84.90%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 68.32%, and 97.45% quantiles respectively, and the price-to-book ratios were at the 54.08%, 72.03%, 100.00%, 85.48%, 68.81%, and 97.70% quantiles respectively. Since December 31, 2019, the price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios of the Science and Technology Innovation Board ETFs are currently at the 95.38% and 83.91% quantiles respectively. As of last Friday, the price-to-earnings ratios of the cyclical, large finance, consumer, and technology sector ETFs were at the 90.35%, 22.77%, 33.17%, and 98.27% quantiles respectively, and their price-to-book ratios were at the 93.65%, 41.50%, 37.21%, and 99.01% quantiles respectively. Compared with the previous week, the valuation quantiles of consumer ETFs decreased significantly. As of last Friday, the price-to-earnings ratio quantiles of military, photovoltaic, and chip ETFs were relatively high, at 99.83%, 99.83%, and 99.09% respectively; the price-to-book ratio quantiles of robot, AI, and military ETFs were relatively high, at 99.83%, 99.42%, and 93.23% respectively. Compared with the previous week, the valuation quantiles of bank ETFs decreased significantly. Overall, among broad-based ETFs, the valuation quantiles of ChiNext and SSE 50 ETFs were relatively low; by sector, the valuation quantiles of large finance and consumer ETFs were relatively moderate; by sub-theme, the valuation quantiles of liquor and new energy vehicle ETFs were relatively low [33][35][45]. ETF Margin Trading and Short Selling - Overall, the margin balance and short selling volume of equity ETFs have both increased in the past year. As of last Thursday, the margin balance of equity ETFs decreased from 53.91 billion yuan in the previous week to 53.456 billion yuan, and the short selling volume increased from 2.276 billion shares in the previous week to 2.303 billion shares. Among the top 10 ETFs with the highest average daily margin purchases and short selling volumes from last Monday to Thursday, the Science and Technology Innovation Board ETF and the CSI 500 ETF had relatively high average daily margin purchases, and the CSI 1000 ETF and the CSI 500 ETF had relatively high average daily short selling volumes [46][47][51]. ETF Managers - As of last Friday, Huaxia Fund ranked first in the total scale of listed non-monetary ETFs and had a relatively high management scale in multiple sub-fields such as scale index ETFs, theme, style, and strategy index ETFs, and cross-border ETFs; E Fund ranked second in the total scale of listed non-monetary ETFs and had a relatively high management scale in scale index ETFs and cross-border ETFs; Huatai-PineBridge Fund ranked third in the total scale of listed non-monetary ETFs and had a relatively high management scale in scale index ETFs and theme, style, and strategy index ETFs. Nine new ETFs were established last week, and six ETFs will be issued this week [52][55].

Group 1 - The core point of the news is that GuoBo Electronics experienced a decline of 5.19% in its stock price, reaching 136.51 yuan per share, with a trading volume of 1.93 billion yuan and a turnover rate of 0.24%, resulting in a total market capitalization of 813.62 billion yuan [1] - GuoBo Electronics, established on November 27, 2000, and listed on July 22, 2022, is primarily engaged in the research, production, and sales of active phased array T/R components and RF integrated circuits [1] - The main revenue composition of GuoBo Electronics includes T/R components and RF modules at 88.19%, RF chips at 8.49%, other chips at 2.04%, and other revenues at 1.28% [1] Group 2 - From the perspective of the top ten circulating shareholders, E Fund's ETF, the E Fund SSE STAR 50 ETF (588080), reduced its holdings by 349,600 shares in the third quarter, now holding 2.8561 million shares, which accounts for 0.48% of the circulating shares [2] - The estimated floating loss for E Fund's ETF today is approximately 21.36 million yuan [2] - The E Fund SSE STAR 50 ETF was established on September 28, 2020, with a latest scale of 70.597 billion yuan, and has achieved a year-to-date return of 15.56% [2]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided in the content. 2. Core View The report summarizes the performance, scale changes, net subscriptions/redemptions, valuation, margin trading, and fund managers of ETFs in the past week. It also mentions recent market events and new fund issuances [1][2][5]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs ETF Performance - Last week (January 19 - 23, 2026), the median weekly return of equity ETFs was 0.95%. Among broad - based ETFs, the median return of CSI 500ETF was 4.34%, the highest. By sector, the median return of cyclical ETFs was 3.52%, the highest. By theme, the median return of photovoltaic ETFs was 6.87%, the highest [1][12][15]. ETF Scale Changes and Net Subscriptions/Redemptions - Last week, equity ETFs had a net redemption of 338.098 billion yuan, with the overall scale decreasing by 309.829 billion yuan. Among broad - based ETFs, CSI 500ETF had the least net redemption of 8.427 billion yuan; by sector, cyclical ETFs had the most net subscriptions of 29.338 billion yuan; by theme, chip ETFs had the most net subscriptions of 12.774 billion yuan [2][27][30]. ETF Benchmark Index Valuation - In broad - based ETFs, the valuation quantiles of ChiNext and SSE 50ETF were relatively low. By sector, the valuation quantiles of large - finance and consumer ETFs were relatively moderate. Among sub - themes, the valuation quantiles of liquor and new energy vehicle ETFs were relatively low. Compared with the previous week, the valuation quantiles of consumer and bank ETFs decreased significantly [3][33][45]. ETF Margin Trading - From Monday to Thursday last week, the margin trading balance of equity ETFs decreased from 53.910 billion yuan to 53.456 billion yuan, and the short - selling volume increased from 2.276 billion shares to 2.303 billion shares. Among the top 10 ETFs in terms of average daily margin purchases and short - selling volume, Science and Technology Innovation Board ETFs and CSI 500ETF had relatively high average daily margin purchases, while CSI 1000ETF and CSI 500ETF had relatively high average daily short - selling volumes [4][46][51]. ETF Managers - As of last Friday, Huaxia, E Fund, and Huatai - PineBridge ranked in the top three in terms of the total scale of listed non - monetary ETFs. This week, 6 ETFs will be issued, including Huaan CSI Non - ferrous Metal Mining Theme ETF, ICBC Credit Suisse CSI All - Index Electric Power and Utilities ETF, etc. [5][52][55].

行业规范发展再添 "核心支撑" 近年来，公募基金行业实现快速发展，公募管理总规模超过37万亿元。但在规模扩张与业态升级的进程中，一 系列长期困扰行业高质量发展的核心痛点日益凸显，比如"基准模糊""风格漂移""基金盲盒"等问题。这些痛点 直接导致投资者在"选基"过程中面临严重的信息不对称，难以清晰判断基金产品的真实投资方向、风险收益特 征及管理人主动管理能力，进而使得投资者整体投资获得感不佳，部分投资者甚至对基金行业产生信任裂痕。 与此同时，行业内部分机构及从业人员存在短期博弈导向的投资行为，过度追求短期业绩排名，忽视了长期价 值创造的核心逻辑，进一步制约了行业生态的良性发展与投资者信任度的提升。 针对行业发展过程中存在的上述弊病，此次公募基金业绩比较基准新规聚焦四大核心要点，构建起全方位的规 范体系：一是提升基准的表征精准度，确保基准与产品实际投资方向、风格高度匹配；二是健全基准全流程内 控管理机制，强化机构合规运作责任；三是树立长期价值导向的行业评价体系，引导机构摒弃短期投机导向； 四是完善多维度协同监督体系，推动监管、机构、市场形成监督合力。 业内人士普遍认为，新规的落地将实现多方共赢。基准的规范化要求将 ...

上天天基金APP搜索777注册即可领500元券包，优选基金10元起投！限量发放！先到先得！ 受访业内机构表示，这场围绕业绩基准"锚"与"尺"的制度革新， 是公募基金行业高质量发展 进程中的重要里程碑， 一场聚焦长期价值的行业生态重塑正式启幕。 通过制度化"硬约束" 筑牢 公募基金投资之"锚" 业绩比较基准是基金的"投资坐标"，新规围绕"表征、约束、考核、监督"四大维度构建全流 程管控体系，同时配套过渡期与基准库建设，筑牢"锚尺"制度防线。 易方达基金副总裁王骏表示，此次《指引》及《操作细则》的发布，是贯彻落实《推动公募 基金高质量发展行动方案》（ 以 下 简 称《行动方案》）的重要举措，通过对公募基金选取 和使用业绩比较基准加强指引和规范，有助于切实发挥业绩比较基准表征产品投资风格、约 束投资和衡量业绩等方面的功能作用，更好地保护投资者合法权益。 近日 ，中国证监会与中国基金业协会同步发布《公开募集证券投资基金业绩比较基准指引》 （ 以 下 简 称《指引》）及《公开募集证券投资基金业绩比较基准操作细则》（ 以 下 简 称 《操作细则》），直指"基准模糊""风格漂移""基金盲盒"等行业痛点。 富国基金表示， 本 ...