Core Viewpoint - The unconventional collision test conducted by Li Auto for its newly launched i8 has sparked significant public debate regarding marketing ethics, industry standards, and brand competition, leading to a joint statement from Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor to advocate for self-regulation and integrity in the automotive industry [1][2][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The incident originated from a video shown at Li Auto's new car launch on July 29, where a collision test between the 2.6-ton Li i8 and an 8-ton Dongfeng Liuzhou truck was presented, showcasing the i8's passenger cabin integrity [2][3]. - Following the video release, Dongfeng Liuzhou issued a statement on July 31, criticizing the test for being misleading and damaging to its brand image [3]. - On August 3, both China Automotive Engineering Research Institute and Li Auto responded, clarifying that the test was not intended to evaluate the safety of other brands [3]. Group 2: Joint Statement and Industry Response - On August 6, a joint statement was released by the three parties to clarify facts, eliminate misunderstandings, and maintain a healthy industry environment [1][3]. - Li Auto apologized for the unintended negative impact on Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand and committed to taking measures to prevent similar controversies in the future [3][4]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasized its commitment to high-quality products and compliance with legal standards, rejecting unfair competition [4]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident highlighted the need for industry-wide cooperation for high-quality development, with experts acknowledging the importance of the joint statement in addressing the controversy [2][5]. - The collision test raised questions about the appropriateness of comparing vehicles across different categories, as standard testing typically does not include such comparisons [5]. - The event unexpectedly increased visibility for Dongfeng Liuzhou, leading to a surge in social media engagement and brand awareness [6]. Group 4: Market Performance - The commercial vehicle market, particularly heavy trucks, showed strong performance in July, with sales reaching 83,000 units, a 42% year-on-year increase [6][7]. - The overall commercial vehicle production and sales for the first half of the year were 2.099 million and 2.122 million units, respectively, reflecting growth of 4.7% and 2.6% year-on-year [6].

Core Viewpoint - The recent collision test videos involving Li Auto and other companies have sparked discussions about the effectiveness and presentation of crash tests, raising questions about their role in promoting safety and maintaining public trust in the automotive industry [1][8]. Group 1: Importance of Crash Tests - Crash tests are increasingly becoming a focal point for consumers and regulatory bodies, with companies investing more in showcasing their safety performance [1]. - The original purpose of crash tests is to drive safety improvements, as evidenced by the rigorous standards set by organizations like E-NCAP, NHTSA, and IIHS, which have historically pushed manufacturers to enhance vehicle safety designs [5][6]. Group 2: Recent Developments in Crash Testing - NIO's Firefly achieved six G+ ratings in a recent test, becoming the smallest model to receive such recognition, while other companies like Lado and Avita have also made significant strides in safety evaluations [2]. - Various automakers are conducting more impactful safety demonstrations beyond standard tests, such as Audi's Q6L e-tron and Tesla's Cybertruck, showcasing their vehicles' performance in extreme conditions [3]. Group 3: Concerns Over Testing Practices - The rise of non-standard crash tests has led to concerns about their validity and the potential for misleading marketing, as seen in the controversial collision videos released by companies like Li Auto and Avita [8][9]. - There is a call for regulatory bodies to enforce stricter guidelines on crash test disclosures, ensuring that all testing parameters and original data are made public to maintain transparency and accountability [9]. Group 4: The Need for Standardization - The automotive industry is urged to establish a standardized testing ecosystem, with industry associations and leading companies taking the initiative to create self-regulatory agreements that define marketing boundaries [9]. - The introduction of independent oversight and clear penalties for misleading practices is recommended to ensure that safety testing remains a genuine assessment of vehicle performance rather than a marketing tool [9].

Core Viewpoint - The collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and design of the truck, particularly focusing on the locking mechanism of the truck's cabin and the test conditions [1][6][8]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test was conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [1][4]. - The truck involved was a second-hand Dongfeng Liuqi M3, which had been modified for the test, including weight adjustments and the installation of an autonomous driving system [8][9]. - The test speed was noted to be higher than conventional standards, with the SUV traveling at 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h, resulting in a relative speed of 100 km/h [8][9]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of the Truck - The truck's cabin is designed with a locking mechanism that can be either mechanical or hydraulic, with the hydraulic system being more reliable but costlier [3][4]. - If the locking mechanism is not engaged properly before a collision, the cabin can detach from the chassis, which raises questions about the truck's structural integrity [4][5]. - The test's outcome, where the truck's cabin appeared to detach, suggests that the locking mechanism may not have been engaged, which is atypical for such vehicles [4][5]. Group 3: Industry Reactions and Implications - Dongfeng Liuqi, the manufacturer of the truck, has expressed concerns over the test's execution and the subsequent public perception, emphasizing the need for transparency in the testing process [1][13]. - Li Auto's recent statements indicate a desire to distance itself from the controversy, acknowledging the unintended consequences of the test on Dongfeng Liuqi's reputation [14]. - The incident highlights the ongoing challenges in the commercial vehicle sector regarding safety standards and public trust, especially in the context of competitive marketing strategies [12][14].

Group 1 - The article discusses the public relations responses from three parties involved in a collision test incident, focusing on their strategies and actions in managing the situation [2][11] - The three parties include Li Auto, Dongfeng Truck, and China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, each with significant industry backgrounds [4][6][8] - Li Auto launched its i8 electric SUV on July 29, showcasing a collision test video with a Dongfeng Truck, which sparked public debate and scrutiny [13][14] Group 2 - The collision test video showed significant damage to the truck while Li Auto's i8 remained structurally intact, leading to mixed public reactions regarding the validity of the test results [15][19] - Public sentiment was divided into three main perspectives: belief in the test results, skepticism about the authenticity, and interest in further testing [19][20][21] - Dongfeng Truck's official social media responses included dismissive comments about the test's credibility, indicating a defensive stance against Li Auto's claims [25][26][27] Group 3 - Li Auto's public relations strategy involved continued promotion of the i8, despite the controversy, and they emphasized the role of a third-party testing agency to validate their claims [41][42][124] - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute responded to the incident by asserting the integrity of their testing process, although they were vague about specific standards used [43][129] - Dongfeng Truck issued a formal statement accusing Li Auto of infringement and misrepresentation, highlighting the potential legal implications of the incident [55][60][64] Group 4 - The ongoing public discourse has led to increased visibility for both Li Auto and Dongfeng Truck, with both companies actively engaging in social media to address concerns and promote their products [68][75] - Dongfeng Truck's marketing efforts included live streams and promotional content emphasizing their safety features, aiming to counteract negative perceptions [69][81] - The incident has highlighted the competitive dynamics within the automotive industry, particularly in the electric vehicle and commercial truck sectors, as companies navigate public relations challenges [98][104]

Core Viewpoint - The collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and quality of the truck, particularly questioning the locking mechanism of the truck's cab and the circumstances leading to the truck being lifted off the ground during the impact [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - A 1 minute and 30 seconds video of the collision test has gone viral, prompting responses from both Li Auto and China Automotive Research, yet they have not addressed the most controversial aspects of the test [1]. - The truck's cab reportedly collapsed during the collision, raising questions about whether the cab was properly locked [2]. - The truck, weighing 8 tons, was lifted off the ground by a collision with a much lighter SUV, which is a significant point of concern [1]. Group 2: Company Responses - Insiders close to the truck manufacturer, Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, indicated that the company has not received detailed data from the collision test, which hampers their ability to assess the situation [2]. - The test was reportedly designed by Li Auto and executed by China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [2]. - Li Auto stated that the test was conducted according to standards, but further details from China Automotive Research were not available at the time of reporting [2].

Core Viewpoint - The recent collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and design of the truck, particularly focusing on the locking mechanism of the truck's cabin and the test conditions [1][6][7]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test was conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [1][3]. - The truck involved was a second-hand Dongfeng Liuqi M3, which had undergone modifications, including weight adjustments and the installation of an autonomous driving system, potentially affecting the test results [7][8]. - The test speed was noted to be higher than conventional standards, with the SUV traveling at 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h, resulting in a relative speed of 100 km/h [7][8]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of the Truck - The truck's cabin is designed with a locking mechanism that can be either mechanical or hydraulic, with the hydraulic system being more reliable but costlier [3][4]. - If the locking mechanism is not engaged properly before a collision, it can lead to the cabin detaching from the chassis, which is a significant safety concern [4][5]. - The incident has raised questions about the structural integrity of the truck, as it is unusual for a truck cabin to detach from the chassis during a collision with a passenger vehicle [4][6]. Group 3: Industry Reactions and Implications - Dongfeng Liuqi, the manufacturer of the truck, has expressed concerns over the lack of detailed data from the collision test, which hampers their ability to assess the situation accurately [1][2]. - The incident has sparked a public relations challenge for both Li Auto and Dongfeng Liuqi, with the latter issuing a statement emphasizing its commitment to quality and safety [11]. - The automotive industry is witnessing a trend where collision tests are used as marketing tools, which may lead to misinterpretations of vehicle safety [10][11].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the safety collision tests of the Li Auto i8 and the subsequent controversy involving Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's Chenglong trucks [1][2] - Li Auto stated that the tests were designed based on common traffic accident scenarios and were conducted by China Automotive Research Institute (CARI) [2][11] - CARI clarified that the tests were solely to verify the safety of the Li Auto i8 and did not evaluate the safety performance of other brands [3][9] Group 2 - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor responded to the controversy, claiming that their brand was misrepresented and that the testing video was used without authorization [5][4] - The company emphasized adherence to a "real-world protection" principle in their safety systems and condemned any actions that undermine industry integrity [5][4] - Both Li Auto and CARI confirmed that the i8's passenger compartment showed no significant deformation during the tests, with airbags deploying normally and no leakage or fire from the battery pack [12][16] Group 3 - Concerns were raised regarding the testing methods, with experts noting that collisions between lighter and heavier vehicles typically result in more damage to the lighter vehicle [10][20] - CARI and Li Auto maintained that the tests were conducted under scientifically rigorous standards, with CARI being a state-owned enterprise and a recognized authority in automotive testing [13][16] - There is a suggestion from industry professionals that third-party testing should be subject to public notarization to enhance credibility [19][20]

Group 1 - The core message of the news is that Li Auto clarifies the purpose of its collision test involving the Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor brand used trucks, emphasizing that it was not intended to evaluate the quality of other brands [1][3] - Li Auto aims to address misunderstandings and misinterpretations arising from the test process, asserting that it does not have a direct competitive relationship with Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor [1][3] - The test was conducted solely to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, and the results should not be interpreted as judgments on the quality of other brands [3] Group 2 - Zhang Xiang, Secretary-General of the International Intelligent Transport Technology Association, commented that the collision video presented by Li Auto lacks significance due to the absence of national standards [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the collision safety testing of the Li Auto i8, emphasizing the company's commitment to user safety and the innovative design features that enhance the vehicle's passive safety performance [2][3]. Group 1: Purpose of the Testing - Li Auto prioritizes user safety and aims to create a secure travel environment for families, which led to the decision to conduct collision tests to validate the safety of the i8 model [2]. - The testing was executed by a third-party authority, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, to ensure transparency and reliability in the results [2]. - The testing scenario simulated real-life collision situations, particularly the risks associated with smaller vehicles colliding with larger ones, which is a significant concern for consumers [2]. Group 2: Performance in Collision Testing - The i8's innovative short front suspension safety structure includes three longitudinal force transmission paths and 11 energy-absorbing structures, effectively mitigating impact forces during frontal collisions [3]. - During the tests, critical components such as the A, B, and C pillars, as well as door beams, showed no significant deformation, and all nine airbags deployed correctly [3]. - The battery pack remained intact without leaks or fire, and the vehicle's doors automatically unlocked post-collision, showcasing the i8's safety features [3][6]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Industry Impact - The testing aimed solely to enhance the i8's safety performance and was not intended to evaluate other brands, despite the involvement of a Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile's truck in the test [4]. - Li Auto clarified that there is no direct competition with Dongfeng Liuzhou, as they focus on passenger vehicles while the latter specializes in trucks [4]. - The company expressed a commitment to fostering a fair industry environment and supporting the high-quality development of the Chinese automotive sector [4]. Group 4: Safety Standards and Future Commitment - The i8 was developed in accordance with the latest national safety standards and has undergone rigorous testing to ensure its safety credentials [5]. - Li Auto is confident in the i8's ability to pass stringent safety evaluations and is committed to continuous innovation in automotive safety technology [5].

Core Viewpoint - The collision test conducted by China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (China Auto Research) on the Li Auto i8 has sparked significant discussion online, particularly regarding the methodology and implications of the test results [1] Group 1: Test Details - The collision test was performed on June 27, 2025, at the Sino-German Intelligent Connected Vehicle Testing Base in Sichuan, focusing solely on the safety of the Li Auto i8 vehicle [1] - The test involved a randomly purchased second-hand truck as a mobile barrier, with the truck's weight set to 8 tons after modifications [1] - The collision speeds were set at 60±2 km/h for the Li Auto i8 and 40±2 km/h for the mobile barrier truck [1] Group 2: Test Outcomes - Post-collision, the passenger compartment of the Li Auto i8 showed no significant deformation, with airbags deploying normally and no leakage or fire from the battery pack [1] - The mobile barrier truck's cabin structure remained intact, with no significant deformation, and the doors were operable after the collision [1] Group 3: Industry Response - China Auto Research has not released any test data, reports, or video materials related to the collision test prior to this statement and has not made any official comments on the incident [1] - The organization calls for objective and rational discourse from the industry, media, and public to maintain a healthy industry ecosystem and a clear online environment [1] - China Auto Research emphasizes its commitment to scientific rigor and objectivity in conducting evaluations and welcomes supervision from all sectors of society [1]