17年前爆发的"三鹿奶粉三聚氰胺事件"是中国食品安全史上 最严重的危机之一。简光洲正是该事件的吹哨人，也是中国首 批调查记者之一。 作者： 郑淯心 封图：受访者供图 简光洲如今的办公室在一所大学里，很安静。办公室没有任何装饰，书柜最显眼的位置摆放着中国新闻奖的奖杯。奖杯很亮，落了些灰尘。今年8月， 中华全国新闻工作者协会《历史上的名篇》点名三鹿奶粉的报道入选。但简光洲自己早已找不到当年的纸质报纸，手里只留存了电子版。 编者按：2025年，经济观察报以"我们的四分之一世纪"为年终特刊主题，旨在通过数十位时代亲历者的故事，共绘一幅属于这段岁月的集体记忆图 谱。 2008年9月11日，《东方早报》A20版以半版篇幅，刊登了简光洲的调查报道《甘肃14婴儿同患肾病 疑因喝"三鹿"奶粉所致》。由此，当时的中华人民 共和国卫生部查出三鹿奶粉里含有三聚氰胺，随之也改写了中国奶业的发展进程，推动了《中华人民共和国食品安全法》（下称《食品安全法》）的提 前出台。 12月的上海还没有入冬，简光洲穿着西装白衬衫，商务装成了他转行后的标配。在做媒体人时，他常穿的是T恤。相比做记者时，他的身材有些发 福，"各种应酬太多了，为了生活"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the prevalence of pseudoscience in online content, particularly in health and wellness, and highlights the challenges in distinguishing credible scientific information from misleading claims [2][3]. Group 1: Pseudoscience Overview - Pseudoscience is particularly rampant in health-related topics, with statistics indicating that approximately 35% of debunked claims pertain to health, 30% to food safety and nutrition, and 15% to beauty and skincare [3]. - Emerging pseudoscience in technology, such as claims about "quantum" products and exaggerated AI capabilities, is also noted, which can mislead the public and undermine respect for genuine science [3]. Group 2: Common Tactics of Pseudoscience - Fear-based marketing is a common tactic, using alarming terms like "cancer-causing" to attract attention and encourage sharing among users [4]. - The use of complex jargon to confuse the audience is prevalent, as seen in claims about "quantum" products that lack scientific basis [4]. - False authority is often invoked, with claims of research from reputable institutions that are later found to be unsubstantiated [4]. Group 3: Challenges in Combating Pseudoscience - The low cost of spreading misinformation contrasts sharply with the resource-intensive process of debunking false claims, which requires thorough investigation and scientific explanation [5]. - Economic incentives drive the production of pseudoscientific content, with a growing gray industry that leverages social media for profit [5]. - The advancement of AI technology has lowered the barriers for creating and disseminating pseudoscientific content, complicating efforts to identify and counteract it [5]. Group 4: Recommendations for Public Awareness - Individuals are encouraged to verify the sources of information, as credible scientific content typically cites authoritative studies and data [6]. - Skepticism towards absolute claims is advised, as legitimate scientific research often uses tentative language [6]. - Consulting authoritative platforms for verification of claims is recommended, such as the scientific debunking platforms established by national organizations [7].

0:00 编者按： 2025 年，经济观察报以 " 我们的四分之一世纪 " 为年终特刊主题，旨在通过数十位时代亲历者的故事，共绘一幅属于这段岁月的集体记忆图谱。 12月的上海还没有入冬，简光洲穿着西装白衬衫，商务装成了他转行后的标配。在做媒体人时，他常穿的是T恤。相比做记者时，他的身材有些发福，"各 种应酬太多了，为了生活"。 17年前爆发的"三鹿奶粉三聚氰胺事件"是中国食品安全史上最严重的危机之一。简光洲正是该事件的吹哨人，也是中国首批调查记者之一。 2008年9月11日，《东方早报》A20版以半版篇幅，刊登了简光洲的调查报道《甘肃14婴儿同患肾病 疑因喝"三鹿"奶粉所致》。由此，当时的中华人民共和 国卫生部查出三鹿奶粉里含有三聚氰胺，随之也改写了中国奶业的发展进程，推动了《中华人民共和国食品安全法》（下称《食品安全法》）的提前出台。 报道刊发当年，简光洲被《新周刊》评为年度新锐人物。评委会的颁奖词如是写道：真相因良知而显露，黑幕因勇气而洞开。他打破媒体"某"规则，直接说 出了"三鹿"两个字，引发了中国奶制品行业的地震，间接挽救了无数婴幼儿的生命健康。在蝼蚁撼大象的背后，他和他所供职的《东方早报》的诚实和勇 ...

根据《中华人民共和国食品安全法》有关规定，现将我局近期中央转移支付食品安全监督抽检信息予以公布。 本次公示涉及粮食加工品、酒类、食用农产品、速冻食品、饮料、罐头等十四大类中的89批次食品，其中合格85批次、不合格4批次。不合格食品分别为餐 饮食品2批次、食用农产品2批次。具体情况详见附件。 对本次公布的不合格食品，相关监管部门已开展核查处置。 特此公告。 丹东市市场监督管理局 2025年12月18日 | 附件1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | 丹东市市场监管局2025年中央转移支付食品监督抽检合格信息（三） | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 任 | | | 标称 | | | | | | | | | | | 务 检 来 | 检 | | | | | | | | 生产 | | | | | | | | 序 | 生产 | 标称生产 | 被抽样单 | 食品名称 | 规格型号 ...

（撰稿人：恭城县市场监管局--唐艳华） 为深入防范区域性食品安全风险，推动地方特色食品产业健康持续发展，2025年12月18日，恭城瑶族自 治县、平乐县、阳朔县市场监管局在恭城召开食品安全（柿饼产业）风险预警交流区域协作联席会议。 会议通报了近两年来与会各县柿饼抽样检测、日常监督检查、投诉举报中发现的风险隐患点，分享了在 柿饼小作坊整治提升、标准化加工龙头企业示范基地、追溯体系建设等方面监管服务探索做法。通过数 据共享和案例剖析，对共性问题和潜在风险讨论研判，建立完善了区域风险预警清单。 会议旨在针对柿饼水果干制品、柿饼蜜饯等产品在生产、加工、销售环节中可能存在的区域性、系统性 风险，强化严密高效跨县域的协同监管。强调要严格落实属地管理责任、部门监管责任和企业主体责 任，形成齐抓共管格局。坚持问题导向紧盯风险清单，实施精准治理，持续消除安全隐患。加强政府、 行业、企业、社会多方联动，加大科普宣传力度，提升消费者辨识能力，营造食品安全社会共治良好氛 围，守牢产业金字招牌，护好安全底色，推动产业可持续发展。 ...

专题：聚焦ESG舆情 新浪财经ESG评级中心提供包括资讯、报告、培训、咨询等在内的14项ESG服务，助力上市 公司传播ESG理念，提升ESG可持续发展表现。点击查看【 ESG评级中心服务手册】 事件关联主体：中粮家佳康 事件类型：负面 ESG事件议题：S——食品安全、G——供应链管理 ESG影响等级：严重 近日，澳门市政署一则关于"梅林牌"榨菜肉丝罐头检出过量残留兽药磺胺二甲嘧啶的公告，引发市场对 中粮集团旗下品牌中粮梅林食品安全的关注。 12月5日，澳门市政署发布公告，称在一批经香港分拆至澳门的榨菜肉丝罐头食品样本中，检出过量残 留兽药磺胺二甲嘧啶。市政署即时暂缓涉事产品的进口申请，并已通报香港有关部门。同时，呼吁若持 有涉事产品的业界及市民应立即停止出售及食用。两天后，食物环境卫生署食物安全中心正式发布新闻 通稿，呼吁市民不要食用该批进口罐装榨菜肉丝。 | 首頁 新聞 固片 視頻 国文包 男題新聞 専題特寫 GOV.MO +更多 | | --- | 据了解，磺胺二甲嘧啶是一种磺胺类抗菌药，在养殖业中应用广泛。涉事产品样本检测结果显示，罐头 中磺胺二甲嘧啶含量达204μg/kg，超出澳门及内地相关标准规定的 ...

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint The Iron Ridge Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, testing 189 batches of edible agricultural products, with 188 passing and 1 failing the national food safety standards. The administration has initiated verification and disposal procedures for the non-compliant sample [1][2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 189 batches of edible agricultural products were tested, with 188 deemed compliant and 1 non-compliant [1][2]. - The non-compliant sample was determined based on individual project failures according to national food safety standards [1][2]. Group 2: Follow-up Actions - The Iron Ridge Market Supervision Administration has commenced verification and disposal procedures for the reported non-compliant sample [1][2]. Group 3: Attachments and Details - Detailed information regarding the inspection projects, compliant products, and non-compliant products is available in the attached documents [2].

Core Viewpoint - The suspension of Japanese seafood imports by China has led to a surge in Indian seafood stocks, with Indian media claiming a potential market opportunity in China, despite significant consumer resistance in China against Indian seafood products [1][2]. Group 1: Indian Seafood Market Potential - India is the second-largest seafood producer globally, with a rich variety of products including farmed shrimp, sea fish, crabs, squid, and lobsters, particularly excelling in shrimp exports [2]. - Following China's ban on Japanese seafood, Indian seafood companies experienced an 11% increase in stock prices, indicating optimism about entering the Chinese market [1]. Group 2: Food Safety Concerns - Indian food safety issues are a major concern, with data showing that from 2008 to 2018, food poisoning accounted for 31.5% of illnesses in certain regions, and 8.7% of deaths were attributed to foodborne illnesses [2]. - The leading cause of foodborne illnesses in India is food chemical contamination, which has a death rate of 70%, highlighting severe food safety challenges [2]. Group 3: Environmental and Hygiene Issues - India's climate, characterized by high temperatures and humidity, fosters bacterial growth, leading to rapid food spoilage [3]. - Poor sanitation practices, including the direct discharge of waste into water bodies, have resulted in severe water pollution, with 70% of surface water in India deemed unsafe for consumption [4]. Group 4: Alternatives to Indian Seafood - China has viable alternatives to Indian seafood, such as Ecuadorian shrimp and increasing domestic shrimp production, which reached 1.66 million tons last year [5]. - The decline in imported frozen shrimp from 1.17 million tons to 1.04 million tons indicates a shift towards domestic sources, as consumer preferences lean towards quality and safety over origin [5].

Core Points - The Guizhou Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, sampling 722 batches of food products across 21 categories, with 25 batches found to be non-compliant [3]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 722 samples were collected, covering categories such as biscuits, tea, nuts, egg products, starch, condiments, and beverages [3]. - 25 batches were identified as non-compliant, with issues related to indicators such as coliform bacteria, anionic synthetic detergents, and pesticide residues [3]. Group 2: Compliance Actions - The local market supervision departments have been instructed to investigate and manage the non-compliant products, including tracing product distribution and recalling defective items [3]. - The administration emphasized strict legal actions against violations and committed to publicly disclose the risk control measures taken by the companies involved [3].

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, revealing that out of 1,053 samples across 26 categories, 35 samples were found to be non-compliant with safety standards, indicating potential risks in food safety in the region [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 1,053 samples were collected from various food categories including biscuits, tea, and meat products [2]. - 35 samples were identified as non-compliant, with issues related to contaminants such as cadmium, lead, and various pesticide residues [2]. - Specific non-compliance examples include cadmium levels exceeding the limit in chili peppers (0.0891 mg/kg vs. ≤0.05 mg/kg) and the presence of banned substances like malachite green in fish [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The local market supervision departments have been instructed to investigate and manage the non-compliant products, including product recalls and risk control measures [2]. - The administration emphasized strict legal actions against any violations and committed to publicizing the risk control measures taken by the companies involved [2]. Group 3: Categories of Non-compliance - Non-compliance issues were found in various food categories, including: - Vegetables: Cadmium and pesticide residues [3]. - Dairy Products: Issues with acid value in dairy products [3]. - Processed Foods: Presence of harmful substances like sulfur dioxide and various pesticides [4][5]. Group 4: Public Health Implications - The findings highlight ongoing concerns regarding food safety and public health in Guizhou, necessitating increased vigilance and regulatory oversight [2]. - The administration's proactive approach aims to mitigate risks and enhance consumer confidence in food safety [2].