6月24日，商务部新闻发言人就欧盟限制中国企业和产品参与其医疗器械公共采购答记者问。 问：6月20日，欧盟委员会宣称根据《国际采购工具》，限制中国企业和产品参与欧盟医疗器械公共采购。请问商务部对此有何评论？ 答：中方注意到有关情况。今年1月，商务部发布的对欧投资壁垒调查结论显示，欧盟持续在公共采购、投资等领域对中国企业设置壁垒。 此 次，欧方不顾中方多次通过双边对话释放的善意和诚意，一意孤行，利用单边工具，构筑新的保护主义壁垒，不仅损害中国企业利益，而且严重 破坏公平竞争。中方对此强烈不满、坚决反对， 敦促欧方立即纠正错误做法，并将采取措施坚定维护中国企业的合法权益。 今年是中欧建交50周年，中方愿从中欧经贸关系大局出发，落实好双方领导人重要共识， 与欧方继续通过对话磋商，妥善处理经贸摩擦， 稳定 中欧企业合作的信心和预期。 责编：李丹 校对：王蔚 版权声明 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体法律责任的权利。 6月20日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。法新社记者提问，欧盟委员会决定限制中企参与价值超500万欧元的医疗器械招标，欧盟委员会 表示， ...

答：中方注意到有关情况。今年1月，商务部发布的对欧投资壁垒调查结论显示，欧盟持续在公共采 购、投资等领域对中国企业设置壁垒。 此次，欧方不顾中方多次通过双边对话释放的善意和诚意， 一意孤行，利用单边工具，构筑新的保护主义壁垒，不仅损害中国企业利益，而且严重破坏公平竞 争。中方对此强烈不满、坚决反对， 敦促欧方立即纠正错误做法，并将采取措施坚定维护中国企业 的合法权益。 今年是中欧建交50周年，中方愿从中欧经贸关系大局出发，落实好双方领导人重要共识， 与欧方继 续通过对话磋商，妥善处理经贸摩擦， 稳定中欧企业合作的信心和预期。 问：6月20日，欧盟委员会宣称根据《国际采购工具》，限制中国企业和产品参与欧盟医疗器械公共 采购。请问商务部对此有何评论？ 商务部新闻发言人就欧盟限制中国企业和产品参与其医疗器械公共采购答记者问。 ...

商务部新闻发言人就欧盟限制中国企业和产品参与其医疗器械公共采购答记者问。 今年是中欧建交50周年，中方愿从中欧经贸关系大局出发，落实好双方领导人重要共识， 与 欧方继续通过对话磋商，妥善处理经贸摩擦， 稳定中欧企业合作的信心和预期。 问：6月20日，欧盟委员会宣称根据《国际采购工具》， 限制中国企业和产品参与欧盟医疗器 械公共采购。 请问商务部对此有何评论？ 答：中方注意到有关情况。今年1月，商务部发布的对欧投资壁垒调查结论显示，欧盟持续在 公共采购、投资等领域对中国企业设置壁垒。 此次，欧方不顾中方多次通过双边对话释放的 善意和诚意，一意孤行，利用单边工具，构筑新的保护主义壁垒，不仅损害中国企业利益，而 且严重破坏公平竞争。 中方对此强烈不满、坚决反对， 敦促欧方立即纠正错误做法，并将采 取措施坚定维护中国企业的合法权益。 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a 50% tariff on various steel-based household appliances, effective June 23, 2025, impacting products like dishwashers, washing machines, and refrigerators [1] - Eight categories of household appliances and related products are now classified as "steel derivative products," subject to the new tariff based on the value of steel components [1] - An exception is provided for products using domestically sourced steel, which can qualify for tax exemption even if processed overseas [1] Group 2 - According to the China Iron and Steel Association, China is expected to export 110.716 million tons of steel in 2024, a 22.7% increase year-on-year, with only about 890,000 tons (0.8% of total exports) going to the U.S., indicating limited direct impact from the tariffs [2] - The Chinese government criticized the U.S. tariff policy as unilateral and protectionist, arguing it disrupts global supply chains and has faced opposition from multiple countries [2] - The U.S. has a history of imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum, with a previous 25% tariff on steel and 10% on aluminum introduced in 2018, which was later adjusted under domestic pressures [2][3] Group 3 - The expansion of tariffs to include steel-based household appliances is likely to increase the cost of living for American consumers [4]

Group 1 - The article discusses the escalating trade conflict between the US and the EU, initiated by Trump's announcement of a 25% tariff on €30 billion worth of EU goods, including electric vehicle batteries and solar panels [5][19]. - The EU's response includes tariffs on American products such as whiskey and peanut butter, and threats to limit SpaceX's Starlink services, marking a significant shift from previous passive reactions to US trade policies [5][8]. - The historical context of the trade conflict dates back to 2018 when Trump imposed tariffs on EU steel and aluminum, citing national security, which the EU initially accepted with limited retaliation [8][9]. Group 2 - The EU's previous strategy of compromise revealed its dependency on the US market, particularly in the automotive sector, which limited its ability to respond effectively to US tariffs [9][11]. - The situation escalated with the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act, which incentivized US-made products, forcing European automakers to invest in US production facilities to remain competitive [14][15]. - By 2022, the trade deficit between the US and the EU reached €236 billion, with increasing restrictions on technology exports from the US to the EU, further straining relations [18]. Group 3 - The EU's patience reached its limit in 2021, leading to a more aggressive stance against US tariffs, particularly as the economic impact of these tariffs became more pronounced [13][34]. - The article highlights the EU's strategic retaliation, targeting key US industries and products to maximize political impact, such as bourbon from Kentucky and orange juice from Florida [36][37]. - The ongoing trade conflict is characterized by a mutual economic detriment, with both sides suffering from disrupted supply chains and increased costs, illustrating the complexities of global trade relationships [36][38].

Core Viewpoint - The report titled "Promoting the 'China-Central Asia Spirit': Achievements, Opportunities, and Prospects of Regional Cooperation" highlights the significant achievements and challenges of China-Central Asia cooperation in the new era, emphasizing the need for mutual respect, trust, benefit, and assistance to advance high-quality development and modernization [1][2]. Group 1: Achievements and Cooperation - China and Central Asian countries have enhanced their economic and trade exchanges, improved infrastructure connectivity, and collaborated on green energy development, creating a new model of regional cooperation [1]. - The historical ties between China and Central Asia have fostered a spirit of cooperation, contributing to the prosperity of the Silk Road and establishing a foundation for mutual development [1]. Group 2: Challenges and Global Context - The current global landscape is marked by unilateralism and trade protectionism, which pose risks to international supply chains and global trade prospects, impacting China-Central Asia cooperation [1]. - Despite the fruitful outcomes of cooperation, multiple risks and challenges remain, necessitating a strategic approach to navigate the evolving geopolitical environment [1]. Group 3: Future Prospects - China is committed to expanding high-level openness and enhancing cooperation with Central Asian countries, aiming to inject stability into the regional economy and set an example for global cooperation [2]. - The acceleration of technological revolutions and industrial transformations presents new opportunities for innovative collaboration between China and Central Asia, contributing to regional prosperity and a more positive global outlook [2].

人民网罗马6月21日电（记者郑彬）日前，"纪念中意建交55周年，展望联合国成立80周年背景下的 中意关系与国际秩序"研讨会在意大利首都罗马举办。中国驻意大利大使贾桂德在致辞中呼吁，中意两 国应共同携手，致力于促进世界和平与发展。 贾桂德表示，中意建交55年来，树立了不同政治制度、文化背景、发展阶段国家互利共赢的典范。 双方在经贸、科技、文化等各个领域合作硕果累累，人文纽带不断拉紧。与此同时，中意在联合国、二 十国集团等多边舞台保持沟通协调，尊重彼此关切，维护彼此利益，为应对全球性挑战、维护世界和平 稳定与发展繁荣，做出了贡献。 贾桂德表示，中意应共同携手，坚定维护以联合国为核心的国际体系，以国际法为基础的国际秩 序，倡导相互尊重主权和领土完整，倡导共同、综合、合作、可持续的安全观，倡导通过对话协商，以 和平的方式解决国家间的分歧争端，倡导共同走和平发展道路，要践行真正的多边主义，反对冷战思 维。贾桂德强调，台湾回归中国是二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序的重要组成部分。主权原则是联合国宪 章的基石，尊重各国的主权和领土完整就应该支持中国实现完全的统一，就应该反对任何形式的"台 独"。 针对当前贸易保护主义甚嚣尘上，全 ...

Group 1: Trade Policies and Economic Impact - The Trump administration's reliance on tariffs has been described as almost obsessive, with an average tariff rate of 25% on Chinese goods, affecting approximately $550 billion worth of products by June 2025 [4][6] - The U.S. trade deficit is projected to reach $950 billion in 2024, a 12% increase from 2018, indicating that the tariff strategy has not effectively reduced the trade gap [6] - U.S. companies, particularly in the clean energy sector, have seen supply chain costs rise by over 30% due to forced decoupling from China [6][8] Group 2: Technology and Supply Chain Challenges - The U.S. semiconductor industry has faced an 18% decline in sales to China in 2024, with major companies like Intel and Qualcomm experiencing significant profit reductions [12] - China's advancements in technology, particularly in AI and quantum computing, have surpassed those of the U.S., with Chinese firms holding six of the top ten global AI patent rankings in 2024 [12] - The pressure on allies to join the U.S. in technology restrictions has backfired, as companies in Japan and the Netherlands have reported growth in their Chinese market revenues, undermining U.S. efforts [12] Group 3: Military Strategies and Regional Tensions - The U.S. military presence in the Asia-Pacific region has reached its highest level since the Cold War, with significant naval deployments intended to deter China [13] - China's military exercises in response to U.S. actions have intensified, with joint drills with Russia occurring near Taiwan, indicating a growing military collaboration [13][15] - The U.S. military strategy in the Middle East has encountered unexpected resistance, with Iranian capabilities proving more formidable than anticipated, leading to increased regional instability [15][16]

总部设在布鲁塞尔的欧盟中国商会20日发表声明，表示坚决反对欧盟限制中国企业参与欧盟医疗器械公共采 购，严正关切这一扭曲市场公平竞争做法对中欧投资关系发展造成的冲击。 声明表示，6月20日，欧盟委员会依据其《国际采购工具》调查，排除中企参与价值超过500万欧元的欧盟医疗 器械公共采购项目，要求中标项目来自中国的产品及零部件比例不得超过50%。欧盟中国商会对欧盟单边保护 主义做法、公开对中企采取不公平歧视性措施表示坚决反对。 声明指出，欧盟《国际采购工具》调查结果并不公允，其"大部分中国医疗器械公共采购项目排除或歧视欧盟 医疗器械制造商及供应商"结论不符合实际。中国与欧盟长期就世界贸易组织《政府采购协定》及公共采购问 题保持磋商，双方沟通渠道始终畅通。在此背景下，欧盟仓促付诸单边措施，令业界十分失望。 声明强调，欧盟限制中国企业参与欧盟医疗器械公共采购并要求增加本地化，这是对中国企业和产品的公然歧 视。欧盟中国商会坚决反对欧盟这一扭曲市场公平竞争做法，严正关切对中欧医疗器械贸易及投资关系发展造 成的冲击。 校对： 彭其华 百万用户都在看 突然！三大央媒，集体发声！这个板块，全线反攻！ 刚刚！美国，透露最新作战计划 ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China opposes the European Commission's decision to exclude Chinese companies from participating in public procurement for medical devices under the International Procurement Instrument (IPI) [1] Group 1: EU Commission's Decision - On June 20, the European Commission announced the exclusion of Chinese companies from public procurement related to the IPI, stating that products and components from China must not exceed 50% in winning bids [1] - The EU Chamber criticizes this unilateral protectionist measure and claims it is an unfair discriminatory action against Chinese enterprises [1] Group 2: Chamber's Response - The EU Chamber argues that the findings of the IPI investigation are not fair, asserting that the conclusion regarding the exclusion or discrimination of EU-manufactured medical devices in China's public procurement market does not reflect reality [1] - The Chamber expresses disappointment over the EU's hasty unilateral measures, especially given the ongoing discussions between China and the EU regarding the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) and public procurement issues [1] Group 3: Call for Fair Treatment - The EU Chamber condemns the discriminatory and exclusionary measures against Chinese products and suppliers, emphasizing the negative impact on trade and investment relations between China and the EU in the medical field [1] - The Chamber urges the EU to immediately cease these erroneous practices and provide a fair, just, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese companies in the medical sector in Europe [1]