转自：北京日报客户端 今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年。正当国际社会铭记历史、珍视和平之际，日 本长崎原子弹爆炸资料馆却拟将"南京大屠杀"的表述改为"南京事件"，甚至有声音主张删除相关展示。 这是日本多地"和平"纪念馆悄然集体转向的缩影。一段时间以来，诸多展现日本对外侵略历史、介绍历 史真相的展陈内容被有意弱化、缩减甚至删除，能够完整、客观呈现日本对外殖民侵略历史的展馆已寥 寥无几。 军国主义遗毒不仅影响日本政治走向，更在荼毒日本民众的思想认知。战后的日本没有彻底清算军国主 义，导致历史修正主义长期泛滥，这本身就是亚洲地区和平稳定的重大隐患。国际社会，尤其是曾遭受 日本军国主义侵略的亚洲各国，必须对日本国内蠢蠢欲动的军国主义动向、对其"装无辜、骗同情"的舆 论操弄伎俩保持高度警惕。我们要准确识别地区安全面临的现实风险，坚决阻击任何企图歪曲历史、破 坏战后国际秩序、威胁地区和平的行径，共同捍卫用鲜血与生命换来的和平成果。 来源：解放军报 作者: 卢 响 历史事实不容篡改。日本军国主义曾多次将其境外侵略行径包装为"打破绝境"的荒谬叙事，对中国、朝 鲜半岛及东南亚，实施惨无人道的殖民侵略，给亚洲 ...

（来源：光明日报） 当下高市政府炒作"台湾议题"的逻辑与战前一脉相承。高市早苗不仅在上台前窜访台湾，推动建立 所谓"准安全联盟"，上台后更以台海、独岛、南千岛群岛为抓手，炒作"危机关联"与"主权争议"。其在 国会答辩中将"台湾有事"与行使集体自卫权挂钩，这种锁定周边敏感地缘议题、突破秩序红线的做法， 与战前日本的扩张策略具有高度同质性。 转自：光明日报 当前日本虽面临不同的中日力量对比与国际局势，却以历史修正主义为思想铺垫、危机叙事为动员 工具、军备扩张为物质支撑、地缘冒险为政策指向，复刻战前扩张路径，对此必须高度警惕。 日本首相高市早苗在11月7日的国会答辩中，将"台湾有事"与行使集体自卫权挂钩，暗示武力介入 台海局势。这与战前日本军国主义扩张逻辑如出一辙。 （作者：孙继强，系苏州大学外国语学院教授） 1937年日本全面侵华前夕，日本军队主导集权统治，建立战时经济与军事体系，外交沦为侵略工 具，形成"舆论造势—矛盾转移—战略试探—权力协同"的扩张链条。日本的强权逻辑根深蒂固，炒 作"中国威胁论"，均以"强弱对比"为国家关系核心标尺，将对外掠夺与军事征服视为实现民族利益的正 当途径，为侵略扩张提供精神支撑。而 ...

一段时间以来，日方在军事安全问题上错误言行不断，大幅调整安保政策，自我松绑集体自卫权，图谋 以强化"延伸威慑"合作、寻求"核共享"、修改"无核三原则"等种种手段推动盟国核武器重返日本。现在 日方一些势力又放风要拥有核武器，反映出日本右翼保守势力复活军国主义、摆脱国际秩序约束、加 速"再军事化"的野心膨胀。 高市上台后，就有日本政府消息人士透露，高市内阁正探讨在修订《国家安全保障战略》等"安保三文 件"时，抛弃"无核三原则"中不运进核武器的原则。高市本人在国会答辩时，对于日本政府是否坚持"无 核三原则"，也回避了明确表态。此番，高市政府官员有关"拥有核武器"的恶劣言论，被认为是为未来 进一步破坏"无核三原则"试探和造势。 可想而知，一旦高市政府使"无核三原则"沦为废纸，日本将在危险的军事扩张道路上加速暴走，届时国 际核不扩散体系将遭到严重破坏。日本多个政党、多名政要和民间团体机构对此动向表示警惕，呼吁日 本必须坚持"无核三原则"，避免战争惨祸重演。 新华社东京12月20日电 题："核武装论"？！高市政府官员在冒天下之大不韪 新华社记者冯武勇 日本原子弹氢弹受害者团体协会19日发表谈话，抗议高市早苗政府官员宣扬" ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing rightward shift in Japan's politics and the significance of former Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama's legacy in addressing historical issues related to Japan's wartime actions [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The rise of right-wing political forces in Japan is attempting to downplay war responsibilities and revise historical narratives, with current Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi making controversial statements regarding historical issues [1]. - Murayama's 1995 statement, which acknowledged Japan's wartime aggression and colonial rule, is highlighted as a critical moment in Japan's historical reckoning [1][2]. Group 2: Murayama's Contributions - Murayama's 1995 speech marked a paradigm shift in Japan's official historical narrative, moving from a victim-centric view to acknowledging the suffering caused to other nations [2]. - His commitment to Japan's pacifist constitution and the institutionalization of historical reflection through cabinet resolutions established a bipartisan baseline for Japan's historical stance [2][3]. Group 3: Legacy and Impact - Murayama's lifelong dedication to peace and reconciliation is emphasized, showcasing his efforts to foster Sino-Japanese friendship and historical understanding [3][4]. - His actions, including visiting memorials and advocating for historical awareness among younger generations, reflect his belief that understanding history is essential for peace [4]. Group 4: Current Political Climate - The article critiques the current political climate under Takaichi, who embodies a revisionist approach to history, contrasting sharply with Murayama's legacy [2][5]. - It argues that a nation unwilling to confront its historical truths cannot earn respect and trust on the global stage, urging current leaders to reflect on their historical narratives [5].

Group 1 - Japan's recent diplomatic actions, particularly regarding Taiwan, reveal a pattern of deception and manipulation, as evidenced by the Defense Minister's contradictory statements about radar incidents and the subsequent backlash from China [1][3] - Historical context shows that Japan has a history of using deceitful diplomacy, as highlighted by former U.S. Secretary of State Hull's remarks on Japan's dishonesty leading up to the Pearl Harbor attack [2][3] - The current Japanese government's narrative, which includes promoting the "China threat" theory, is seen as a strategy to escape post-war international constraints and pursue military expansion [3][4] Group 2 - The Japanese right-wing's tendency to fabricate narratives and engage in strategic opportunism poses a significant concern for the international community, especially given Japan's unresolved war crimes and historical denial [4] - Recent actions by Japanese politicians, such as commemorating the Pearl Harbor attack while claiming victimhood, indicate a troubling regression in historical understanding and a willingness to provoke tensions [4] - The international community is urged to remain vigilant against the resurgence of Japanese militarism, which could threaten global order and stability [4]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's diplomatic actions, characterized by deception and manipulation, pose significant implications for regional and global stability, reflecting a historical pattern of dishonesty in its foreign relations [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Historical Context - Historical examples illustrate Japan's tendency to engage in deceitful diplomacy, notably during World War II when it misled the United States while preparing for war [2] - The attack on Pearl Harbor exemplified Japan's strategic use of deception, leading to a profound sense of betrayal in American society [3] Group 2: Current Implications - Japan's current political maneuvers, including the promotion of "China threat" narratives, suggest a desire to escape post-war constraints and pursue military expansion [3][4] - The actions of Japanese right-wing politicians indicate a persistent refusal to confront historical war crimes, raising concerns about their strategic intentions and potential provocations [4] Group 3: International Response - The international community is urged to remain vigilant against Japan's strategic opportunism and revisionist tendencies, as historical grievances remain unaddressed [4] - There is a call for a long-term perspective to prevent the resurgence of Japanese militarism, which could disrupt the existing international order [4]

当前，日本政界右倾化趋势加剧，军国主义死灰复燃的风险令人警惕。日本首相高市早苗延续右翼 政策，企图让军国主义复活。这种历史修正主义行径危害深远：从法理层面，违背了《开罗宣言》《波 茨坦公告》等国际法律文件精神，破坏战后国际秩序的根基；从情感层面，严重伤害了包括中国在内的 受害国人民的感情；从地区安全层面，日本扩大武器出口，防卫政策由守转攻，成为危害和平稳定的风 险源。 （作者为侵华日军第七三一部队罪证陈列馆馆长金成民） 正视历史、深刻反省，是日本作为二战战败国应尽的国际义务，更是维护地区和平稳定的必要前 提。伯力审判与东京审判、纽伦堡审判等国际战争审判，是二战后建立世界秩序的重要基石，731部队 的反人类暴行早已被伯力审判在法律层面确立，日本东京地方法院2002年作出的一审判决，也已认定侵 华日军在侵华战争中违反国际法，使用细菌武器，造成中方大量人员伤亡的事实。这些司法定论与海量 铁证，都要求日本正视历史罪责。 从苦难中走出的中国人民深知和平的可贵。当下的中国已非积贫积弱之国，绝不允许日本右翼势力 开历史倒车，绝不允许军国主义死灰复燃。中方愿与所有爱好和平的人士一道，捍卫二战胜利成果、维 护国际秩序、守护世界 ...

历史的真相从不因岁月流转而褪色，罪证的层次叠加让侵略暴行更无所遁形。1949年12月在苏联伯力 （今称哈巴罗夫斯克）设立的军事法庭，在人类历史上首次针对细菌战罪行进行公开审判，以无可辩驳 的铁证揭露了侵华日军第七三一部队（以下简称"731部队"）的反人类暴行，为建立战后国际秩序立下 正义标杆。近日，俄方向中方转交的731部队罪行档案，以伯力审判档案为主体，跨越审判前、中、后3 个历史阶段，与1950年出版的多语种《前日本陆军军人因准备和使用细菌武器被控案审判材料》相互补 充，全景式展现了伯力审判的情况。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年12月17日 03 版） 俄方转交伯力审判档案主要包括战犯审讯记录、证人取证记录、战犯亲笔自供书、医学鉴定报告等关键 证据，这与我国保存的731部队遗址、731部队罪行档案相互印证，形成环环相扣的证据链闭环，再次固 化了731部队进行人体实验、研制细菌武器、实施细菌战的战争罪行，再度证实日本细菌战犯罪是自上 而下、有组织、有预谋、成体系的国家犯罪。伯力法庭上首次公开的"特别移送"、人体实验和细菌战史 证，更系统揭示了战时日本的医学犯罪及战争责任。据731部队原军医梶冢隆二供述，部 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recently declassified Soviet archives reveal the atrocities committed by the Japanese Unit 731, highlighting the systematic and organized nature of their war crimes against humanity [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Evidence - The newly released documents cover a period from May 1939 to December 1950 and include testimonies from over 200 individuals associated with Unit 731, confirming the unit's involvement in biological warfare aimed at mass destruction [1]. - The archives complement existing evidence from China regarding Unit 731's crimes, creating a comprehensive evidence chain that implicates various levels of Japanese military personnel in these organized crimes [1]. Group 2: Ongoing Historical Revisionism - Despite the overwhelming evidence, some political factions in Japan continue to engage in historical revisionism, attempting to distort the narrative through textbook modifications and portraying Japan as a victim on the international stage [2]. - The actions of Japanese right-wing groups, including visits to the Yasukuni Shrine and attempts to increase military spending, signal a troubling resurgence of militarism that challenges post-World War II international order [3]. Group 3: Importance of Historical Memory - The release of these documents serves not only as a reminder of past atrocities but also as a call to uphold historical truth and prevent the recurrence of such crimes [3]. - The commemoration of historical events, such as the Nanjing Massacre, emphasizes the need to preserve the memory of victims and ensure that the lessons of history are not forgotten [3].

Core Viewpoint - Japan's "peace" memorial museums are increasingly downplaying the country's wartime aggression, with significant alterations to historical narratives, particularly regarding events like the Nanjing Massacre, reflecting a rise in historical revisionism [2][3][5]. Group 1: Changes in Exhibitions - Nagasaki's atomic bomb museum plans to change references to the Nanjing Massacre to "Nanjing Incident," with some advocating for the removal of related displays entirely, sparking strong criticism [2]. - The Osaka International Peace Center has removed references to "aggression" and significant historical events like the Nanjing Massacre, focusing instead on narratives of victimhood from American bombings [2][3]. - The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum has minimized its portrayal of the Second Sino-Japanese War, replacing terms like "occupation" with vague language and omitting the historical death toll of the Nanjing Massacre [3]. Group 2: Resistance and Advocacy - The Ritsumeikan University International Peace Museum has faced internal pressure to remove displays on wartime atrocities, but academic staff successfully opposed these changes, highlighting the importance of confronting historical truths [3][4]. - Citizen groups in Nagasaki are advocating for the preservation of accurate historical representations, emphasizing the need to communicate the realities of wartime atrocities to the world [4]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The trend of historical revisionism is linked to a broader rightward shift in Japan's government and society, with increased pressure from right-wing groups influencing museum narratives [5][6]. - The lack of historical education in Japan is contributing to a younger generation's ignorance of the country's wartime actions, exacerbated by government interference in educational content [5][6]. - There is a growing concern that narratives glorifying Japan's wartime actions, such as the portrayal of kamikaze pilots, are legitimizing past aggressions and further entrenching revisionist views [5].