Core Viewpoint - The ongoing competition among major food delivery platforms like Meituan, Taobao, and JD has led to aggressive promotional activities, significantly impacting both riders and restaurant businesses. While riders benefit from increased earnings, restaurant operators express concerns over their dependency on these platforms and the sustainability of such promotional strategies [1][5][6]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The food delivery platforms are engaged in a fierce promotional battle, with offers such as "free milk tea" and substantial discounts driving consumer interest and sales [1][5]. - Recent promotions have resulted in record-high daily orders, with figures reaching 80 million, 120 million, and 150 million for various platforms [5]. - The market regulatory authorities have intervened, mandating platforms to cease "zero-yuan purchase" promotions and to implement stricter monitoring and price control measures [2][6]. Group 2: Impact on Stakeholders - Delivery riders have emerged as unexpected beneficiaries of the promotional war, with reports of hourly wages exceeding 100 yuan and potential monthly earnings surpassing 10,000 yuan [5]. - Restaurant operators, however, are facing challenges, as they feel their businesses are overly reliant on the platforms, which control the market dynamics [5][6]. - Regulatory bodies have emphasized the need for platforms to adhere to laws governing e-commerce and fair competition, aiming to create a balanced ecosystem for consumers, merchants, riders, and platforms [6]. Group 3: Long-term Implications - Experts warn that while the current promotional strategies may boost short-term visibility and sales for the restaurant industry, they could lead to long-term issues such as food safety risks and the emergence of opportunistic businesses [6]. - The sustainability of such aggressive discounting practices is questioned, with concerns that they may ultimately harm the overall market health [6].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that while extreme discounts like "0 yuan purchase" have disappeared, the price war among food delivery platforms is not over, with significant discounts still being offered by platforms like Taobao, JD, and Meituan [1][2] - Industry experts predict that the price war will continue for at least 1-2 months due to new platforms entering the market, creating a competitive environment that will not resolve quickly [1][2] - The external pressure from regulatory bodies has led to a tightening of subsidies, but substantial discounts remain prevalent, indicating ongoing competition among major e-commerce platforms for market share in instant retail [2][6] Group 2 - During the height of the subsidy war, delivery riders experienced a surge in income, with reports of daily earnings exceeding 500 yuan, and some even reaching over 1,000 yuan [3][4] - As the subsidy war winds down, rider incomes have begun to decline, with many reporting daily earnings dropping to around 300-500 yuan [4] - The competitive landscape has shifted, with businesses now facing multiple layers of competition, including from other merchants on the same platform and across different platforms, leading to thinner profit margins [9] Group 3 - The reliance on subsidies has created a challenging environment for small and medium-sized businesses, as they struggle to compete with larger chains benefiting from significant funding [6][7] - The long-term sustainability of the benefits gained from the subsidy wars is questioned, as the price distortions created may not be recoverable once subsidies are removed [8] - Experts emphasize the need for businesses to balance profit margins with customer base growth, suggesting that selectively withdrawing from low-margin activities could be a viable strategy [5][9]

Group 1 - Zero One Technology launched an enterprise-level Agent AI, positioning it as a "super employee" with deep thinking and task planning capabilities [1] - The Agent AI can be customized based on specific business scenarios, addressing complex business needs [1] - The company aims to enhance application breadth and cost control in the future [1] Group 2 - Meituan's "Pinh Hao Fan" initiated the "Ten Thousand Brands" plan, providing support to over 10,000 well-known restaurant brands [2] - The platform has surpassed 5,000 restaurant brands and achieved a peak daily order volume of over 35 million [2] - This strategy aims to attract more users and differentiate Meituan from competitors in the fiercely competitive food delivery market [2] Group 3 - Taobao Flash Sale denied rumors of launching a "1 cent takeaway self-pickup" product, emphasizing the importance of protecting merchants' profits [3] - The platform has no internal targets for order volume, focusing instead on market-driven operations [3] - This approach may attract more quality merchants and build a sustainable competitive advantage [3] Group 4 - JD.com announced a "Dish Partner" recruitment plan, aiming to establish 10,000 "Seven Fresh Kitchens" within three years [4] - The company will invest 10 billion yuan to find partners for 1,000 signature dishes, offering a guaranteed minimum revenue share of 1 million yuan per dish [4] - This initiative leverages JD's strong supply chain and financial resources to compete in the food delivery sector [4] Group 5 - Didi launched a summer discount campaign for rides, offering fares starting at 30% off in nine countries, including South Korea and Singapore [5][6] - The campaign targets domestic tourists traveling abroad, with popular destinations including Tokyo and Seoul [6] - Didi aims to attract more users by addressing travel cost concerns, while facing competition from other ride-hailing services [6]

Core Insights - Goldman Sachs predicts that the fierce competition in the food delivery sector will continue for a longer period, estimating a total loss of 92 billion yuan among three major players, with Alibaba accounting for nearly half of that loss at 41 billion yuan [1][27] - The report gained traction following Alibaba's announcement of a 50 billion yuan subsidy to stimulate consumer demand and business growth, which added credibility to Goldman Sachs' forecast [1] Group 1: Regulatory Environment - Prior to regulatory actions, Meituan called for rational competition, citing that the subsidies leading to inflated order volumes were unsustainable [2] - On July 18, major platforms including Ele.me, Meituan, and JD were summoned for discussions, focusing on the need to regulate promotional activities and engage in rational competition [2][18] Group 2: Continued Subsidy Strategies - Despite the regulatory discussions, platforms continued aggressive promotional strategies, with significant discounts and offers still prevalent over the weekend following the talks [3][4] - Taobao's promotional activities included "super Saturdays" with extreme discounts, such as meals priced as low as 1.9 yuan, which gained significant social media attention [4][6] Group 3: Market Dynamics and Consumer Behavior - The ongoing subsidy war has led to a surge in consumer engagement, with platforms employing various tactics to attract users, including social sharing incentives and substantial cash-back offers [9][11] - The intense competition has resulted in a temporary spike in order volumes, but concerns about the sustainability of such growth remain, as many orders are perceived as inflated and lacking long-term value [25][26] Group 4: Future Outlook - The regulatory stance indicates a shift towards more sustainable practices, with expectations that the aggressive subsidy strategies will taper off, leading to a more balanced competitive environment [18][21] - Companies are now faced with the challenge of maintaining market share without relying on unsustainable subsidies, as the window for such promotional tactics is closing [19][21]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing food delivery war has intensified competition among platforms, leading to significant consumer engagement through promotions, but also raising concerns about market practices and sustainability [1][2][4]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The food delivery market has shifted from a stagnant to a growing market due to aggressive subsidies, with platforms like Meituan, Ele.me, and JD.com actively participating in this competition [1][2]. - The recent opening of JD.com's first self-operated delivery store indicates a new phase in the delivery competition, potentially altering market dynamics further [1]. - Regulatory bodies have urged platforms to adhere to existing laws and promote healthy competition, highlighting the need for a balanced ecosystem among consumers, merchants, delivery personnel, and platforms [1][4]. Group 2: Merchant Perspectives - Merchants have seen a 20% to 30% increase in delivery orders during the recent promotional period, but they express concerns about the long-term impact on in-store dining experiences [2][3]. - The intense competition has led some merchants to compromise on food quality to maintain lower delivery prices, which could harm their reputation and customer trust in the long run [3][4]. - Merchants are also facing operational challenges as they allocate resources to manage delivery orders, potentially detracting from in-store service quality [3][4]. Group 3: Industry Concerns - Industry associations have raised alarms about the negative effects of the subsidy wars, calling for an end to irrational price competition that could lead to systemic damage in the restaurant sector [4][5]. - The ongoing promotional activities, despite regulatory warnings, reflect a "subsidy inertia" where platforms continue to offer discounts to retain users, risking a potential drop in order volumes if subsidies are suddenly withdrawn [5][6]. - Analysts predict that while extreme subsidies may taper off, competition will evolve towards efficiency and service quality, leading to a healthier profit model in the long term [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing competition in the food delivery market should not devolve into a price war but should focus on healthy competition that benefits consumers, merchants, platforms, delivery personnel, and society as a whole [1][2] Regulatory Concerns - The State Administration for Market Regulation has emphasized the need for platforms to adhere to their responsibilities, standardize promotional behaviors, and engage in rational competition to foster a win-win ecosystem [2] - Recent issues during the subsidy war, such as waste from "0 yuan purchases" and delivery delays, highlight the need for a more thoughtful examination of the competition's nature [2][3] Need for Competition - Competition is essential for market vitality, and subsidies can be a legitimate means to attract users, but the method of implementation is crucial [3] - The waste caused by simplistic subsidy methods and the delivery capacity crisis indicate that a rough subsidy war is unsustainable and may harm multiple stakeholders [3] Innovative Competitive Strategies - Taobao Shanguo has introduced a differentiated approach through a "platform direct subsidy" model, investing 500 billion yuan without pressuring merchants to lower prices, focusing instead on store, product, and delivery subsidies [4] - This strategy has led to significant growth, with over 3,074 merchants and more than 260,000 stores seeing order volume increase by over 100% since its launch, particularly benefiting small and medium-sized businesses [4] Market Expansion and Positive Cycles - The subsidy war has resulted in rapid market expansion, with daily order volumes increasing from over 1 billion to 2 billion, and Taobao Shanguo contributing 60% of the new orders [7] - The competition has activated a segment of non-frequent delivery users, demonstrating the positive impact of competition on market scale [7] Differentiated Competitive Landscape - The competitive landscape is diversifying, with Taobao Shanguo leveraging its e-commerce user base and delivery capabilities, while JD.com and Meituan are seeking their own differentiation strategies [7][8] - This shift from homogeneous price wars to diverse value competition marks a significant evolution in the industry [8] Conclusion - The evolution of the competition from "who subsidizes more" to "who can create incremental value" is crucial for achieving a multi-win scenario for consumers, merchants, delivery personnel, platforms, and the broader economy [8]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing competition among food delivery platforms has led to a surge in order volumes, but this has not translated into significant profits for merchants, raising concerns about the sustainability of the current business model [1][7][10]. Group 1: Order Volume and Platform Performance - Food delivery platforms have reported record-breaking order volumes, with Meituan exceeding 1.5 billion daily orders and Taobao Flash Sale and Ele.me surpassing 80 million daily orders [5][10]. - The number of orders at some beverage stores has doubled, with weekend orders reaching over a thousand, creating chaotic scenes in stores [3][4]. - Delivery riders have seen significant income increases, with average daily earnings rising by 111% and some riders earning over 12,500 yuan monthly [5][8]. Group 2: Merchant Challenges and Profitability - Despite the surge in orders, merchants are struggling with profitability, often experiencing only thin margins and increased operational pressures [7][8]. - The influx of orders has led to a rise in negative customer experiences, with complaint rates increasing by 10% due to delays and order mismanagement [8][9]. - Merchants are facing a dilemma: participating in subsidy programs to gain visibility on platforms or risking reduced order volumes and exposure [9][12]. Group 3: Industry Concerns and Future Outlook - Industry experts warn that the current subsidy-driven competition may harm traditional dining businesses and create a challenging environment for sustainable growth [9][10]. - The reliance on heavy subsidies to drive sales could lead to long-term consumer behavior changes that undermine the viability of the restaurant industry [11][12]. - There is a call for platforms to adopt more balanced practices, reducing unreasonable fees and supporting merchants in improving service quality to foster a healthier market ecosystem [12].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing food delivery war, characterized by massive subsidies, is primarily harming small and medium-sized businesses, as they bear the brunt of the costs while platforms benefit from increased customer engagement [2][6]. Group 1: Industry Dynamics - The food delivery market has seen aggressive subsidy campaigns initiated by major players like JD, Alibaba, and Meituan, with significant financial commitments, including a 500 billion yuan subsidy plan from Taobao [3][4]. - As of July 2023, daily order volumes have surged, with JD surpassing 25 million, Meituan exceeding 15 million, and Taobao and Ele.me reaching over 8 million [4][6]. - Analysts predict that the three major platforms will incur substantial losses in the coming years, with Ele.me projected to lose 41 billion yuan, JD 26 billion yuan, and Meituan's EBIT decreasing by 25 billion yuan [4]. Group 2: Merchant Concerns - Merchants are voicing their frustrations, highlighting that they are forced to participate in subsidy programs that lead to unsustainable business practices, with one example showing a merchant absorbing 27.9 yuan of a 42.9 yuan order [6][7]. - The call for regulatory measures to prevent platforms from coercing merchants into participating in subsidy wars is growing, emphasizing the need for a healthier market environment [7][8]. Group 3: Company Strategies - JD has taken a more cautious approach, emphasizing sustainable growth rather than aggressive spending, and focusing on quality offerings rather than merely increasing order volume [12]. - The absence of JD in the latest round of subsidy wars has raised questions about its strategy, with some speculating that it may be unable to compete with the established networks of Meituan and Ele.me [10][12]. - JD continues to offer subsidies but is shifting its focus towards high-quality food categories to enhance user engagement and drive growth [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The recent "takeout war" has intensified, with major platforms like Meituan and Taobao Flash Sale engaging in aggressive subsidy strategies to attract consumers, reminiscent of the early days of food delivery services [1][3][10]. Group 1: Current Promotions and Strategies - Meituan has launched a "0 yuan purchase" campaign, allowing users to redeem drinks for free if they pick them up, or pay a minimal delivery fee if ordered online [6][15]. - Taobao Flash Sale has introduced a "Super Saturday" promotion, offering substantial discount coupons, leading to a surge in orders and longer delivery times [8][11]. - Other platforms like JD.com are also participating, with promotions such as "one price 16.18" for popular dishes, indicating a competitive landscape [14][21]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and User Engagement - The competition has led to significant increases in user engagement, with Taobao Flash Sale reporting over 80 million daily orders and 200 million active users [19][24]. - Meituan's daily order count peaked at over 1.2 billion, with a significant portion being food delivery orders [21][28]. - The aggressive subsidy strategies have resulted in a notable rise in active users across major platforms, reversing previous declines [24]. Group 3: Future Outlook and Industry Implications - Analysts predict three potential outcomes for the ongoing competition: Meituan maintaining its lead, a duopoly between Meituan and Alibaba, or a three-way competition including JD.com [26][28]. - The financial implications are significant, with projected losses for platforms reaching hundreds of billions in the coming quarters due to ongoing subsidies [28]. - The sustainability of these subsidy strategies is questioned, as they may lead to long-term challenges for merchants and delivery personnel, impacting overall profitability [29][33]. Group 4: Regulatory Environment and Market Challenges - Regulatory bodies have begun to intervene, urging platforms to adhere to e-commerce laws and ensure fair competition, highlighting the need for responsible business practices [34]. - The competition has revealed deeper issues within the industry, such as the pressure on merchants to lower prices and the high workload on delivery personnel, raising concerns about long-term viability [37].

来源|每日经济新闻 编辑 | 程鹏 易启江 杜波 又来了！新一轮周末的"外卖战"开打。7月12日下午， #免费奶茶 冲上热搜第一。 7月12日，美团、淘宝闪购等平台再次分别发放外卖大额券，有网友一大早就晒出"零元购 "的瑞 幸咖啡："已经喝上了，早起的鸟儿有虫吃。" U. II.II _U 25-7-12 08:14 来自 iPhone 客户端 发布于 上海 十关注 #美团外卖红包#已经喝上了,早起的鸟儿有虫吃 野 快 宜 用 it TE luc 每经小编打开美团App，随即收到"0元外卖已到账"的弹窗 ，点开即领取了 消暑奶茶/圣代兑换 券、古茗鲜活柠檬水兑换券各1张。 据了解，从 "0元外卖"宣传页面进入后点击领券，即可收到瑞幸咖啡、蜜雪冰城、沪上阿姨、喜 茶、茶百道等商家的饮品兑换券。若到店自取，该订单无需支付任何费用即可0元带走，如果选择 外卖配送，则需支付一定配送费用，通常价格不超过5元。 随后，每经小编打开淘宝闪购，又收到满28元减18.8元、满20元减10元等多张满减力度不等的 大额优惠券。 天天必爆18.8 + ¥18.8 去使用 恭喜爆涨成功 据说每一次的爆涨,都能让你运气爆棚~ ¥18.8 ...