Core Insights - The conference titled "Rebuilding the Global: The Flow of Ideas Globally" was organized by Fudan University's Department of History and the Institute of Global History, focusing on understanding global order and the historical processes of ideas [1][3] Group Summaries Group A - The first panel discussed three specific studies on the global flow of ideas, emphasizing theoretical explorations within solid case studies [3][4] - Richard Reid explored African reform ideas in the 19th and 20th centuries, highlighting the entanglement and fusion of local and global thoughts [4] - Zhang Ke focused on travel writings between China and India at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, analyzing how these narratives reflect Chinese realities [4] Group B - The second panel addressed methodological issues in global intellectual history, with Timothy Baycroft discussing the complexities of nationalism as a constructed concept [5] - Yuan Shang provided a detailed academic history of global intellectual history, identifying three mainstream paradigms and their theoretical dilemmas [5] Group C - The third panel examined key issues in French intellectual history, including the political philosophy of Rousseau and the religious politics of 17th-century France [8] - Wang Yin analyzed the "Four Articles" of 1682, revealing the negotiation between royal authority and church tradition [8] - The discussions on Rousseau's concepts emphasized their dynamic characteristics rather than static interpretations [8] Group D - The fourth panel focused on the evolution of British political thought from the 17th to the 20th century, with Huang Tao reinterpreting Hobbes' theory of passions [9] - Li Haime's research on Voegelin's critique of Burke highlighted the reflections on conservative ideologies [9] - Guan Yiran traced the interdisciplinary journey of the concept of "division of labor," illustrating its influence across various fields [9] Group E - The fifth panel presented diverse studies on the restructuring of modern German thought, with Kubo Eisei focusing on the often-overlooked empirical paths of late Enlightenment thinkers [10] - The discussions also included the tensions between historical consciousness and national identity in 19th-century Germany [10] Group F - The sixth panel explored the tensions between socialism and national identity, with Xiong Yingzhe examining Robert Owen's vision of social reform as a means to achieve permanent peace [10] - Chen Yawen analyzed the debates within the French socialist movement regarding the concept of the nation [10] Group G - The final panel highlighted cross-civilizational dialogues, with Shang Zhaoqi discussing Maruyama Masao's theory of dignity, integrating Eastern and Western philosophical resources [12] - Li Hongtu's research on the formation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights revealed the tensions between Western-centric views and cultural diversity [13] Overall Conference Insights - The conference showcased the vitality and depth of global intellectual history research, revealing complex interactions and local adaptations of ideas [14] - It emphasized the need for nuanced methodologies that focus on contextual analysis and the positioning of intellectual subjects within historical structures [14]

Core Points - Independent candidate Karol Nawrocki won the Polish presidential election with 50.89% of the votes, narrowly defeating Rafal Trzaskowski of the Civic Coalition, who received 49.11% [1] - The election results reflect deep social divisions in Poland, with Nawrocki's victory indicating a potential shift towards a more populist and nationalist direction under U.S. support [1][10] - Nawrocki, a historian and amateur boxer, received backing from the right-wing Law and Justice Party, suggesting a possible collaboration that could challenge the current government led by Prime Minister Tusk [1][5] Election Context - The Polish presidential role holds significant power in influencing foreign policy and legislative vetoes, beyond ceremonial duties [3] - Nawrocki will succeed Andrzej Duda, whose term ends on August 6, 2023, and the presidential term lasts five years with the possibility of one re-election [3] - The first round of voting on May 18 did not yield a majority winner, leading to a runoff between the top two candidates [3] Political Implications - Tusk's coalition government, which took office at the end of 2023, faces challenges in fulfilling campaign promises due to ideological divisions and legislative vetoes from Duda [5] - Nawrocki's election may complicate Tusk's ability to deliver on reforms, particularly in the judiciary, which has faced criticism from the EU [5] - Observers suggest that unfulfilled promises could jeopardize Tusk's government ahead of the next parliamentary elections scheduled for late 2027 [5] Nawrocki's Background - Nawrocki, currently the head of the Polish National Memory Institute, is seen as a new face for the Law and Justice Party, distancing from past scandals [7] - He has been involved in nationalist initiatives, including the removal of Soviet monuments, and is viewed as a protector of traditional values by his supporters [7][9] - Despite controversies regarding alleged criminal ties and past street fights, these issues have not significantly impacted his support among right-wing voters [9] International Relations - Former U.S. President Trump has openly supported Nawrocki, indicating potential strengthening of military relations between Poland and the U.S. if he assumes office [10] - Nawrocki has pledged continued support for Ukraine while criticizing its leadership and addressing concerns about Ukrainian refugees in Poland [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University regarding the admission of international students, highlighting the ideological battle between right and left in the U.S. [1] Group 1: Background - The conflict stems from student protests against U.S. support for Israel, leading the Trump administration to accuse these movements of anti-Semitism and to impose restrictions on universities, including Harvard [4] - The Trump administration froze $2.6 billion in research funding to Harvard, which is significant given that Harvard's total revenue for 2024 is projected at $6.5 billion and its expenses at $6.4 billion [4] - Harvard's international students contribute over $300 million annually in tuition, making the administration's decision to revoke its ability to enroll international students impactful [4] Group 2: Ideological Divisions - The article identifies three core ideological conflicts shaping American society: globalism vs. nationalism, liberalism vs. conservatism, and elitism vs. populism [5][6][11] - Globalists advocate for U.S. involvement in international affairs and multiculturalism, while nationalists prioritize national interests and border control [7] - Liberals focus on individual rights and social justice, contrasting with conservatives who emphasize traditional values and limited government [10] - The rise of populism, exemplified by Trump, challenges the established elite, leading to a polarized information ecosystem where both sides have increasingly divergent views on facts [12] Group 3: Political Dynamics - The article notes that the Democratic Party is reflecting on its disconnect with ordinary citizens, as many feel alienated by the party's focus on diversity and identity politics [14] - Trump's support among Asian and Hispanic voters has increased, indicating a shift in political dynamics as these groups react against extreme policies [15] - The U.S. constitutional system is described as a balancing mechanism that encourages coexistence rather than the complete victory of one side over the other [15][16]