上世纪六十年代，美国和苏联在石油这件事上撕破脸，谁都不愿意在"油权"上退让半步。 美国不光自己油不够用，还要千方百计去中东、非洲"找油"；苏联看着油多心里却慌，因为设备老旧、人才外流，油田一天不出事都算运气好。两大强国明 里谈合作，暗地里全是算计，反倒是那个当时还"没多少存在感"的中国，低头干事、不声不响地把门道摸清了。 这场看似激烈的博弈，最终谁赢了？ 可能你想不到，最后笑得最稳的，不是喊得最响的。 上世纪六十年代，美国已经感觉到油要不够用了，国内的常规油田产量到顶，页岩油又贵得离谱，开采成本高得让人咂舌。于是，一边在国会里跟石油公司 你来我往，一边把外交触角伸向中东北非。 嘴上说是"互利合作"，实则协议里藏着一堆条件：开发权、价格控制、美元结算，样样不落。当时的很多中东国家表面答应得挺痛快，背后也清楚——美国 不是来交朋友的，是来算账的。 冷战时期，谁控制了石油，谁就能左右世界。 而苏联，石油储量吓人，光西西伯利亚油田就能顶美国好几个州。但问题是技术跟不上，管理也乱套，跟别人签的合同经常干不到一半就黄了。 比如当年答应给伊拉克一整套钻井系统，结果设备送过去后没有人懂维修，几个月内坏了好几台，伊拉克政府气得 ...

Group 1 - Canada has imposed high tariffs on Chinese goods, including a 100% tariff on electric vehicles and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, in an attempt to appease the United States [1][3] - The Chinese market is crucial for Canada, with over half of its canola exports relying on China, amounting to nearly 26 billion RMB last year [3] - In response to Canada's actions, China has implemented significant countermeasures, including a 75.8% deposit on canola and anti-dumping investigations on other products [3][5] Group 2 - The U.S. has increased tariffs on Canadian imports, raising the stakes for Canada as it tries to align with U.S. interests while facing backlash from China [3][5] - China's response is framed as a legitimate action under its trade laws, contrasting with the U.S. approach of unilateral tariff increases [5] - The situation highlights the risks of relying on a single market, as Canada may struggle to find alternative buyers like China in the future [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for a healthy ecosystem in the food delivery industry, advocating for the cessation of aggressive promotional practices like "0 yuan purchase" and promoting a focus on quality and service over subsidies [1][2] Group 1: Commitment to Industry Standards - The company commits to regulating subsidy practices, rejecting unfair competition, and eliminating harmful promotional tactics [1] - A transparent subsidy mechanism will be established, ensuring that marketing activities are publicly disclosed to merchants and consumers [1] Group 2: Quality and Service Enhancement - The company aims to resist vicious competition by focusing on differentiated products and improving service quality, thereby shifting the industry focus from "subsidy competition" to "quality and service competition" [1] - Continuous efforts will be made to uphold food safety and integrity in operations, enhancing the overall consumer experience [1] Group 3: Promoting Mutual Benefits - The company will provide various incentives to merchants, including commission incentives, advertising support, and delivery fee subsidies, to foster better business operations [2] - There will be an emphasis on improving the welfare of delivery riders, enhancing their professional dignity and sense of gain [2] - The goal is to create a win-win ecosystem involving consumers, merchants, riders, and the platform [2]

人民财讯7月31日电，7月30日，中国广核集团有限公司党委书记、董事长杨长利在呼和浩特拜会内蒙古 自治区党委书记、人大常委会主任孙绍骋，双方就深化新能源、氢能、核技术应用等领域合作进行座谈 交流。孙绍骋说，希望双方在持续扩大新能源合作的同时，进一步拓展合作空间、深挖合作潜力，围绕 核能、储能、绿氢等领域探索推出一批合作项目，实现更高水平的互利共赢。杨长利指出，中广核高度 重视在内蒙古的投资和发展，下一步，中广核将在自治区党委坚强领导下，进一步发挥技术、管理、资 金等方面优势，在电力外送通道及配套大基地开发建设、防沙治沙、输氢管网建设、新能源及关联产业 发展、核医疗设备应用等方面加强与内蒙古的务实合作，推动更多优质项目在内蒙古落地实施。 转自：证券时报 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes the importance of ongoing dialogue and cooperation between China and the U.S. in trade relations, highlighting the recent meeting in Stockholm as a continuation of efforts to reach consensus and reduce misunderstandings [1][2][3] - The meetings in Geneva, London, and Stockholm are seen as steps towards stabilizing the economic relationship, which is crucial not only for the two countries but also for the global economy [1][2] - Both sides have expressed a commitment to mutual respect and cooperation, with an emphasis on the principle of win-win outcomes, indicating a shared understanding of the benefits of a stable economic relationship [2][3] Group 2 - China has reiterated its firm stance against unilateral tariffs imposed by the U.S., describing them as contrary to WTO rules and emphasizing the need for equal dialogue to resolve differences [3] - The deep economic integration between China and the U.S. is highlighted, with both countries benefiting from a complementary economic relationship that is difficult to disrupt through artificial barriers [2][3] - The articles suggest that while some structural issues in the trade relationship may take time to resolve, the ongoing dialogue is a positive step towards restoring a healthy and stable economic partnership [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes the importance of stable Sino-U.S. economic relations, which are crucial not only for the two countries but also for the global economy [1][2][3] - The recent economic talks in Stockholm represent the third meeting in three months, indicating a commitment to dialogue and consensus-building between the two nations [1] - Both sides agreed to extend the suspension of U.S. tariffs and China's countermeasures for an additional 90 days, signaling a willingness to work towards mutual understanding [1] Group 2 - The discussions reflect a mutual recognition of the need for a cooperative approach, with both sides acknowledging that a stable economic relationship benefits both countries and the global economy [2] - China emphasized its commitment to protecting its core interests while expressing a willingness to engage in dialogue to resolve differences [3] - The articles highlight the deep economic integration between China and the U.S., suggesting that their economic interdependence creates a strong foundation for cooperation that cannot be easily disrupted by tariffs [2][3]

Group 1 - A high-level U.S. trade delegation is visiting China, organized by the U.S.-China Business Council, including executives from Boeing and FedEx, marking the highest-level business visit since the imposition of tariffs in April [2] - The visit reflects a collective choice by the U.S. business community amidst uncertainties in U.S.-China trade relations, indicating a more pragmatic attitude towards cooperation with China [2][3] - The U.S. business representatives emphasize that cooperation with China is not an option but a necessity, driven by the need for business opportunities and a positive outlook on the future of U.S.-China economic relations [3][4] Group 2 - The attractiveness of the Chinese market is highlighted by consumption upgrades and institutional openness, providing U.S. companies with significant opportunities for growth and innovation [4] - The resilience of Chinese supply chains offers valuable operational stability for businesses, reinforcing the notion that U.S.-China economic cooperation is based on deep structural complementarity rather than a zero-sum game [4][5] - Recent surveys indicate that nearly all U.S. companies believe that maintaining business in China is crucial for their global competitiveness, underscoring the importance of the Chinese market [4]

Core Viewpoint - The healthy development of China-Europe economic and trade relations is crucial not only for the two major economies but also for global economic stability, emphasizing the importance of mutual benefits and dynamic balance in cooperation [1][4]. Group 1: Historical Development - Over the past 50 years, China-Europe bilateral trade and investment have rapidly developed, with trade volume increasing from $2.4 billion at the time of diplomatic relations to $785.8 billion in 2024, and bilateral investment stock growing to $260 billion [2]. - The China-Europe Railway Express has surpassed 100,000 trips, establishing a vital connection between Asia and Europe, reflecting strong market mechanisms and confidence in cooperation [2]. Group 2: Economic Structure and Cooperation - The vitality of China-Europe economic relations is rooted in the natural complementarity of their economic structures, with Europe excelling in high-end manufacturing and China offering a vast market and complete supply chains [2]. - The collaboration has created millions of jobs and allowed consumers in both regions to share in the development dividends [2]. Group 3: Opportunities for Growth - There is significant potential for further cooperation in areas such as service trade, technological innovation, green economy, and third-party cooperation, which can cultivate new growth points [2]. - China's large and growing middle-income group presents unprecedented market opportunities for European companies, with high demand for premium products [3]. Group 4: Regulatory Environment and Challenges - The China-EU Geographical Indications Agreement marks a milestone in intellectual property cooperation, enhancing market access for quality products from both sides [3]. - Despite existing differences and friction, it is essential to maintain cooperation through open communication and to resist protectionism and unilateralism [4]. Group 5: Future Directions - Both sides must recognize their complementary advantages and work together to counter global economic headwinds, thereby injecting more momentum into the world economy [4].

Group 1 - The third China International Supply Chain Promotion Expo was held in Beijing, with over 6,000 cooperation agreements signed and more than 210,000 attendees, reflecting a 5% increase from the previous year [1] - The expo aims to enhance connections among upstream, midstream, and downstream enterprises, promoting collaboration between large and small businesses, and facilitating international cooperation in supply chains [1][2] - The China International Import Expo has been held for seven sessions since 2018, attracting over 180 countries and regions, with a total intended transaction amount exceeding $500 billion, serving as a platform for high-level opening up [1][2] Group 2 - China is committed to maintaining a stable and open global supply chain, emphasizing the importance of multilateral trade systems and international cooperation [2][7] - Companies like COFCO and Cargill are leveraging these expos to strengthen their connections with global agricultural trade and enhance cooperation with upstream and downstream enterprises [2] - The "chain master enterprise + supporting cluster" cooperation model proposed at the expo aims to promote the digital, intelligent, and green transformation of global supply chains [6] Group 3 - China has signed 23 free trade agreements with 30 countries and regions, providing zero-tariff treatment for 100% of products from least developed countries with which it has diplomatic relations [3] - The country is recognized as a leading force in promoting trade and investment liberalization and facilitation globally [4] - China's manufacturing sector continues to lead globally, with over 200 major industrial products holding the highest production volume worldwide, reinforcing its role in the global supply chain [6] Group 4 - Various agricultural projects and industrial parks initiated by China are helping improve local development and living conditions in countries across Asia, Africa, and Latin America [9] - China is actively reducing foreign investment restrictions and expanding visa-free access to enhance international cooperation and tourism [10] - The commitment to building a community with a shared future for mankind emphasizes mutual respect, equality, and win-win cooperation [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of the China-U.S. economic relationship, highlighting that despite challenges, both countries remain significant economic partners and that cooperation is essential for mutual benefit [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Current State of China-U.S. Economic Relations - Since 2018, the U.S. has engaged in unilateralism and protectionism, leading to trade tensions, yet bilateral trade has remained stable, with projected goods trade reaching $688.3 billion and service trade $155.8 billion in 2024, reflecting increases of 18% and 34.7% respectively since 2017 [6]. - The relationship is characterized by mutual dependency, with both nations benefiting from trade and investment, creating numerous job opportunities and profits for businesses [7]. Group 2: Approach to Disputes and Cooperation - Disagreements and friction are normal in the economic relationship, and dialogue and negotiation are the best methods for resolution, emphasizing the need for respect for each other's core interests [7]. - Recent dialogues in Geneva and London have led to agreements that help stabilize relations, demonstrating that through equal dialogue, conflicts can be managed effectively [7]. Group 3: China's Stance and Economic Outlook - China is committed to defending its national interests and maintaining international fairness, asserting that trade wars yield no winners and that it is prepared to protect its rights vigorously [8]. - Despite external pressures, China's economy has shown resilience, with exports increasing by 7.2% year-on-year, indicating a strong long-term economic foundation [8].