李成钢表示，瑞典是首个与新中国建交的西方国家，也是首个与中国签订双边投资保护协定的国家。今 年是两国建交75周年，中方愿与瑞方一道，推动中瑞经贸合作翻开新的篇章。中国对外开放的大门只会 越开越大，愿进一步扩大瑞典优质商品进口，欢迎瑞典担任今年进博会主宾国，也欢迎瑞典企业继续投 资中国、深耕中国，希望瑞方为中国企业提供开放、公平、非歧视的营商环境。同时，希望瑞方在欧盟 内发挥积极作用，推动欧方与中方共同落实好中欧领导人会晤达成的共识，坚定维护以世贸组织为核心 的多边贸易体制，并妥善解决经贸摩擦。 杜萨表示，瑞典支持多边主义和自由贸易，视中国为重要经贸伙伴，鼓励瑞中双方企业进一步深化绿色 转型、创新研发等领域合作，支持欧盟与中国通过协商解决经贸摩擦，推动欧中、瑞中经贸关系迈上新 台阶。 7月30日，李成钢国际贸易谈判代表兼副部长在斯德哥尔摩会见瑞典对外援助与外贸大臣杜萨，双方就 中瑞、中欧经贸关系等议题进行交流。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between China's Vice Minister of International Trade Negotiations, Li Chenggang, and Sweden's Minister for Foreign Aid and Trade, Johan Forssell, emphasizes the importance of strengthening economic and trade relations between China and Sweden, particularly in light of the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations [1] Group 1: Economic Cooperation - China expresses willingness to expand imports of high-quality Swedish goods and welcomes Sweden as the guest country for this year's China International Import Expo [1] - Both parties aim to deepen cooperation in areas such as green transformation and innovative research and development [1] Group 2: Trade Environment - China requests Sweden to provide an open, fair, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises [1] - Sweden supports multilateralism and free trade, viewing China as an important economic partner [1] Group 3: EU Relations - China hopes Sweden will play a positive role within the EU to facilitate the implementation of agreements reached during China-EU leadership meetings [1] - Both sides agree on the importance of resolving trade frictions through consultation and maintaining a multilateral trade system centered around the WTO [1]

Group 1 - The EU has agreed to a trade deal with the US, accepting a 15% tariff on goods exported to the US, which is seen as a capitulation under the threat of US tariffs [1][2] - The deal includes a commitment from the EU to increase investments in the US by $600 billion and to purchase $750 billion worth of US energy products [1] - French officials have expressed strong criticism of the agreement, labeling it as a "sombre day" and arguing that it undermines European unity and values [2][3] Group 2 - German Chancellor Merz acknowledged that while the agreement avoids a trade conflict that could severely impact Germany's export-driven economy, he expressed dissatisfaction with the 15% tariff [6] - Many EU countries share a similar sentiment, recognizing the deal as imbalanced but supporting it to avoid escalating trade tensions [6][7] - The agreement is expected to be finalized in a joint statement by August 1, with further negotiations to establish a comprehensive deal [7] Group 3 - European stock markets reacted positively to the news, with the Stoxx 600 index reaching a four-month high, indicating a mixed sentiment among European companies regarding the deal [7] - Economists noted that while the 15% tariff is better than expected, there are concerns about the long-term competitiveness of European exports and the costs that US customers will incur due to the tariffs [7]

Group 1 - The meeting between Swedish Prime Minister Kristersson and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng highlights the strengthening of China-Sweden relations, marking the 75th anniversary of diplomatic ties [1] - Both parties expressed a commitment to deepen cooperation in various fields, emphasizing mutual respect, trust, and benefits [1] - China is keen to enhance communication and collaboration with Sweden to support multilateralism and free trade [1] Group 2 - Sweden's government remains focused on fostering cooperation with China and supports economic globalization and free trade [1] - The 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations is seen as an opportunity to achieve more positive outcomes in China-Sweden relations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between Swedish Prime Minister Kristersson and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng highlights the strengthening of bilateral relations between China and Sweden, marking the 75th anniversary of diplomatic ties and emphasizing cooperation in various fields [1] Economic Cooperation - China and Sweden are committed to enhancing economic and trade cooperation, with a focus on mutual respect, trust, and benefit [1] - The two countries aim to support multilateralism and free trade, indicating a positive outlook for future economic collaboration [1] Strategic Leadership - The strategic guidance from the leaders of both nations is seen as a driving force for expanding cooperation across different sectors [1] - The anniversary of diplomatic relations is viewed as an opportunity to deepen practical cooperation and achieve more positive outcomes [1]

Core Viewpoint - Chicago corn and soybean futures prices have declined due to market expectations that Argentina will increase sales after reducing export tariffs [1] Group 1: Policy Changes - Argentina's President Milei announced a reduction in export tariffs for soybeans from 33% to 26% and for corn from 12% to 9.5% [1] - The policy aims to appease domestic farmers who are looking for the fulfillment of free trade commitments [1] Group 2: Market Impact - The reduction in tariffs is expected to enhance Argentina's export capacity, intensifying market competition amid already sufficient global supply [1] - This increased competition may exert greater pressure on U.S. farmers [1]

Core Points - The European Union and the United States have reached a new trade agreement, with the U.S. imposing a 15% tariff on products imported from the EU [1] - French Prime Minister François Bérou criticized the agreement as a "surrender" by the EU, indicating dissatisfaction among French officials regarding the "imbalance" of the deal [1] - French officials express concerns that the current trade situation is unsustainable and highlights a structural change in U.S. trade policy, which they believe disregards World Trade Organization rules [1] Group 1 - The new trade agreement aims to provide temporary stability for economic participants threatened by U.S. tariff escalations [1] - French Minister for European Affairs Benjamin Haddad emphasized the need for a reevaluation of the trade relationship, stating that the current situation is not satisfactory and poses risks of being completely undermined [1] - Minister for Foreign Trade Laurent Saint-Martin pointed out the imbalance in trade, particularly in the digital services sector, and called for efforts to achieve a balance in trade relations [1] Group 2 - Saint-Martin advocates for a stronger and more assertive stance against the U.S., suggesting that the final agreement may differ if the EU demonstrates its counter-capacity [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of stable and mutually beneficial relations between China and South Korea, highlighting the need for both countries to act as genuine strategic partners [1] - Wang Yi stressed the necessity of maintaining policy stability, with China prioritizing the development of China-South Korea cooperation and expecting similar stability from South Korea's policies towards China [1] - The relationship should be independent and not influenced by any third party, focusing on mutual interests that benefit both nations [1] Group 2 - Economic ties between China and South Korea are highlighted as being closely linked, with a highly integrated supply chain, necessitating deepened cooperation for mutual development [1] - Both countries are encouraged to oppose "decoupling" and to work together to maintain the stability and smooth operation of global supply chains [1] - South Korea expressed a strong commitment to enhancing high-level exchanges and advancing the strategic partnership with China, particularly in economic cooperation and free trade negotiations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The conversation between Wang Yi and South Korean Foreign Minister Park Jin emphasizes the importance of stable and mutually beneficial relations between China and South Korea, aiming to elevate their partnership to a higher level [1] Group 1: Policy Stability - Wang Yi stressed the need for policy stability in China-South Korea relations, highlighting that China values the development of cooperation and expects South Korea to maintain a consistent and predictable policy towards China [1] - The call for avoiding policy fluctuations is crucial for fostering a stable bilateral relationship [1] Group 2: Independence and Autonomy - The relationship between China and South Korea should be based on mutual interests, benefiting both nations without targeting or being influenced by any third parties [1] - Emphasizing independence in foreign policy is vital for both countries to strengthen their partnership [1] Group 3: Mutual Benefits and Economic Cooperation - The economic ties between China and South Korea are described as close, with highly intertwined supply chains, necessitating deeper cooperation for mutual development [1] - Both countries are encouraged to jointly oppose "decoupling" and "disruption" to maintain the stability and smooth operation of global supply chains [1]

Group 1 - The third round of tariff negotiations between China and the US will take place in Stockholm from July 27 to 30, facing multiple challenges including significant differences in core demands and the inclusion of non-tariff sensitive issues by the US [1] - China has a wealth of experience in responding to strategies from the Trump era and recognizes the importance of independent research and development [1][2] - Huang Renxun stated that China possesses 50% of the world's AI researchers, indicating an unstoppable technological advancement [1] Group 2 - Gao Zhikai emphasized that China's path to independent innovation is a necessary choice as a major power, rather than a passive response to US sanctions [2] - He highlighted the need for China to take market initiative and not view "lifting sanctions" as the core negotiation demand [2] - The construction of an innovation system should include financial restructuring, AI strategy upgrades, and enhanced security measures to create a sustainable independent innovation ecosystem [2] Group 3 - The term "trade war" is deemed inaccurate; it is characterized as a unilateral tariff war initiated by the US against over a hundred countries since April 2, 2025 [3][4] - The US has intensified its trade measures against China during Biden's administration, with increasingly complex restrictions on high-tech products [4] - The extreme measures taken by the US are seen as a push for China to pursue an independent and self-reliant technological development path [6] Group 4 - The US's sanctions and embargoes are viewed as attempts to demonize China, portraying it as a violator of international norms [8] - The recent easing of restrictions on certain products, such as chips, is interpreted as a response to China's advancements in technology, particularly by companies like Huawei [9] - The suggestion is made for China to assert its market power by establishing a principle that if the US refuses to sell, it is their fault, thus prompting China to develop alternatives [11][12] Group 5 - The tariffs imposed by the US have led to a significant increase, with tariffs on Chinese exports reaching 145% and Chinese tariffs on US exports at 125% [12] - The ongoing negotiations have not resulted in a restoration of purchases of US oil and gas products by China, nor a quick resumption of agricultural product purchases [13] - The need for a balanced and constructive relationship between China and the US is emphasized, with a call for mutual respect in trade practices [14]