ETF
Search documents
2月4日哪些ETF上涨且净流入?哪些ETF下跌获逆势净流入?
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2026-02-05 02:54
另外也关注连续下跌时,资金逆势净流入的方向:恒生科技指数ETF(513180)、恒生互联网ETF (513330.SH)、港股通科技ETF基金(159101.SZ)。港股相关ETF上一次逆势大幅净流入出现在11 月。 2月4日,上证指数连续第二天上涨,并站上关键点位4100点。当日上涨板块集中在低位板块,显示 资金在节前相对谨慎、不追高的偏好。 当日上涨且净流入品种减少,并主要集中在防御风格,如自由现金流ETF、黄金ETF、旅游ETF、 地产ETF等,以及低位反弹的光伏ETF。场外资金积极追涨,或看好后续上涨延续。 【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点,与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立,不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考,并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱: news_center@staff.hexun.com 每日经济新闻 (责任编辑:董萍萍 ) 导致港股市场杀跌的主因,还是"税收"相关市场消息。不过,华创证券认为,上述市场消息属于过 度推演,并没有切实的依据。同时,互联网企业加税或直接传导至C端消费者,这与目前促进消费的大 方针相悖,逻辑不可外推。 ...
石油石化ETF上涨;1月14只ETF扩容逾百亿丨ETF晚报
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2026-02-04 12:00
ETF Industry News - The Shanghai Composite Index has returned to 4100 points, with multiple ETFs in the oil and petrochemical sector experiencing significant gains, including the Energy ETF Guangfa (159945.SZ) up by 5.99% and the Energy ETF (159930.SZ) up by 5.33% [1] - On February 3, the A-share market saw a reversal with a net inflow of nearly 10 billion yuan into stock ETFs, marking one of the few days of net inflow since January. Major ETFs tracking the CSI 500, CSI 300, and STAR 50 indices saw significant inflows, while thematic ETFs in sectors like non-ferrous metals and photovoltaics experienced net outflows [2] - As of January 31, 2026, 14 ETFs have expanded by over 10 billion yuan, with a notable shift towards industry-themed ETFs and commodity ETFs, indicating a consensus among investors on sectors supported by industrial policies and positive fundamentals [3] Market Overview - On February 4, the A-share market showed mixed performance, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 0.85% to close at 4102.2 points, while the ChiNext Index fell by 0.4%. The top performers among major indices included the CSI 300 and CSI 800 [4] - In terms of sector performance, coal, building materials, and real estate sectors led the gains with daily increases of 7.58%, 3.48%, and 2.97% respectively, while media, communication, and computer sectors lagged behind [7] ETF Market Performance - The average daily return for commodity ETFs was the highest at 3.70%, while stock-themed index ETFs had the lowest average return at -0.08% [10] - The top-performing ETFs included the Coal ETF (515220.SH) with a return of 9.07%, followed by the Energy ETF Guangfa (159945.SZ) and the Energy ETF (159930.SZ) with returns of 5.99% and 5.33% respectively [13] - The top three ETFs by trading volume were the A500 ETF Southern (159352.SZ) with a trading volume of 7.732 billion yuan, the CSI 500 ETF (159338.SZ) with 6.968 billion yuan, and the A500 ETF Fund (512050.SH) with 14.236 billion yuan [16]
ETF日报2026.02.04-20260204
Hongxin Security· 2026-02-04 09:09
Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core View of the Report - On February 4, 2026, the Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.85% to 4102.20 points, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 0.21% to 14156.27 points, and the ChiNext Index fell 0.40% to 3311.51 points. The trading volume of A-shares in the two markets was 2503.5 billion yuan. The top-performing industries were coal (7.58%), building materials (3.48%), and real estate (2.97%), while the worst-performing industries were media (-3.12%), communication (-2.73%), and computer (-1.70%) [2][6] Summary by Relevant Catalogs Market Overview - On February 4, 2026, the Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.85% to 4102.20 points, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 0.21% to 14156.27 points, and the ChiNext Index fell 0.40% to 3311.51 points. The trading volume of A-shares in the two markets was 2503.5 billion yuan. The top-performing industries were coal (7.58%), building materials (3.48%), and real estate (2.97%), while the worst-performing industries were media (-3.12%), communication (-2.73%), and computer (-1.70%) [2][6] Stock ETF - The top-traded stock ETFs on February 4, 2026, were Huaxia CSI A500 ETF, which rose 0.73% with a discount rate of 0.73%; Huatai-PineBridge CSI A500 ETF, which rose 0.69% with a discount rate of 0.65%; and Southern CSI 500 ETF, which rose 0.26% with a discount rate of 0.28% [3][7] Bond ETF - The top-traded bond ETFs on February 4, 2026, were Haifutong CSI Short-term Financing ETF, which rose 0.01% with a discount rate of 0.01%; Bosera CSI Convertible and Exchangeable Bond ETF, which fell 0.12% with a discount rate of -0.20%; and Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-making Treasury Bond ETF, which fell 0.05% with a discount rate of -0.08% [4][9] Gold ETF - On February 4, 2026, gold AU9999 rose 3.86%, and Shanghai Gold rose 4.40%. The top-traded gold ETFs were Huaan Gold ETF, which rose 4.27% with a discount rate of 3.66%; Bosera Gold ETF, which rose 4.43% with a discount rate of 3.67%; and E Fund Gold ETF, which rose 4.40% with a discount rate of 3.65% [12] Commodity Futures ETF - On February 4, 2026, Dacheng Nonferrous Metals Futures ETF rose 0.85% with a discount rate of 2.42%; Jianxin Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF rose 1.33% with a discount rate of 1.20%; and Huaxia Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF rose 0.20% with a discount rate of 4.52% [13] Cross-border ETF - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.34%, the Nasdaq Composite fell 1.43%, the S&P 500 fell 0.84%, and the German DAX fell 0.07%. On February 4, 2026, the Hang Seng Index rose 0.05%, and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index fell 0.05%. The top-traded cross-border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF, which rose 2.10% with a discount rate of 1.75%; Huatai-PineBridge CSI KRX Korea-China Semiconductor ETF, which fell 1.18% with a discount rate of 13.24%; and Huaxia Hang Seng Tech ETF, which fell 1.39% with a discount rate of -1.20% [16] Money ETF - The top-traded money ETFs on February 4, 2026, were Yin Hua Ri Li ETF, Hua Bao Tian Yi ETF, and Money ETF Jianxin [18]
美东时间 2 月 3 日比特币现货 ETF 总净流出 2.72 亿美元
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-04 06:05
(来源:吴说) MACD金叉信号形成,这些股涨势不错! 吴说获悉,据 SoSoValue 数据,昨日(美东时间 2 月 3 日)比特币现货 ETF 总净流出 2.72 亿美元,富 达 FBTC 净流出 1.49 亿美元居首。以太坊现货 ETF 昨日总净流入 1405.51 万美元,过去 3 日净流出后 首次净流入。Solana 现货 ETF 总净流入 124 万美元,XRP 现货 ETF 总净流入 1946 万美元。 ...
FOF开年热度不减!底层投资逻辑生变,“新玩家”入局,什么信号?
证券时报· 2026-02-04 04:19
| 基金募集申请获中国证监会 | | 证监许可[2025]3043 号 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 核准的文号 | | | | | | 基金募集期间 | | 2026年1月29日 | | | | 验资机构名称 | | 安永华明会计师事务所(特殊普通合伙) | | | | 募集资金划入基金托管专户 | | 2026年2月2日 | | | | 的目期 | | | | | | 募集有效认购总户数(单位: | | 20, 671 | | | | 户) | | | | | | | | 博时盈泰臻选6个 | 博时盈泰臻选6个 | 博时盈泰臻选6个 | | 份额类别 | | 月 持 有 期 混 合 | 月 持 有 期 混 合 | 月 持 有 期 混 合 | | | | (FOF) A | (FOF) C | (FOF) 合计 | | 募集期间净认购金额(单位: | | 3,694,920,889.30 | 2.148.905,777.25 | 5.843.826.666.55 | | 元) | | | | | | 认购资金在募集期间产生的 | | 0. 00 | 0. 0 ...
黄金价格剧烈波动,谁是背后推手?
3 6 Ke· 2026-02-04 04:06
此次行情剧烈波动的背景是贵金属的金融商品化的加强。2000年代初出现了以黄金现货为支撑的ETF 等,个人和机构投资家以低成本投资黄金的手段越来越多。资金在短时间内流入流出,这使得价格更容 易剧烈波动。 与此同时,将行情波动放大至2倍的杠杆型ETF的存在感也在增强。美国ETF巨头ProShares运营 的"ProShares Ultra Gold"的目标是,相对于与黄金期货连动的指数波动达到2倍。 该ETF在黄金期货创出历史新高的1月29日,交易额与1周前相比增至9倍以上。经由杠杆ETF等纸黄金 的资金的流动,已成为加剧价格波动的因素之一。 黄金的伦敦现货价格2月2日一度比最高点最多下跌21%。行情下跌后,等待时机的日本和中 国投资者等的买入集中出现。大阪交易所的黄金期货交易连日触发熔断机制。3日亚洲交易 时段金价重新大幅反弹。在此次行情剧烈涨跌的背后,存在ETF等交易的扩大…… 黄金价格2月3日快速反弹。相比前一天的大幅下跌明显反转,逢低买入的需求迅速升温。在日本大阪交 易所的黄金期货交易中,暂时中断交易的熔断机制(circuit breaker)继前一天之后再次被触发。在贵金 属市场出现的行情剧烈涨跌的背后 ...
ETF午评 | 金价连续第二日反弹,黄金ETF易方达、黄金ETF博时涨3.92%
Ge Long Hui· 2026-02-04 03:57
港股继续下跌,港股通科技ETF、港股通互联网ETF易方达和港股科技30ETF分别跌3.73%、3.73% 和3.57%。新经济ETF银华跌2.83%。 A股三大指数早盘表现不一,截至午盘,沪指平收,深成指跌0.92%,创业板指跌1.74%,北证50指 数跌1.19%,沪深京三市半日成交额16297亿元,较上日放量127亿元。全市场超2900只个股下跌。 板块 题材上,煤炭开采加工、机场航运、光伏设备、房地产、天然气、港口航运、建筑材料、银行、氢能 源、零售板块涨幅居前;贵金属、AI应用、算力租赁、半导体、CPO概念股跌幅居前。 ETF方面,金价连续第二日反弹,重返5000美元上方,黄金ETF易方达、黄金ETF博时均涨3.92%。 国际油价上涨,标普油气ETF嘉实涨3.22%。港股红利策略ETF表现活跃,港股红利ETF博时涨1.67%。 (责任编辑:刘静 HZ010) 【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点,与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立,不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考,并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱: news_center@staff.hexun ...
金工ETF点评:宽基ETF本周净流出3890.81亿元,食饮、农林牧渔拥挤变幅较大
Tai Ping Yang Zheng Quan· 2026-02-04 00:25
Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry [43]. Core Insights - The total number of ETFs listed in mainland China is 1,419, with a total scale of 5.46 trillion yuan. Among these, stock ETFs account for the largest share, both in number (1,111) and scale (3.23 trillion yuan) [2][7]. - The A-share market indices showed varied performance, with the Shanghai Composite Index closing at 4,117.95, reflecting a decline of 0.44%. Notably, the petrochemical, communication, and coal sectors experienced significant gains, while military, power equipment, and automotive sectors faced substantial declines [11][12]. - The wide-based ETFs experienced a net outflow of 3890.81 billion yuan this week, with the top three inflows being A500 ETF (+11.23 billion yuan), Double Innovation Leader ETF (+9.27 billion yuan), and Shanghai Index ETF (+5.42 billion yuan). Conversely, the top three outflows were from the CSI 300 ETF by E Fund (-747.27 billion yuan), CSI 300 ETF by Huatai-PB (-742.00 billion yuan), and CSI 300 ETF by Huaxia (-547.13 billion yuan) [30][31]. - The industry crowding degree monitoring indicated that sectors such as non-ferrous metals, oil and petrochemicals, and agriculture are currently crowded, while automotive, home appliances, and pharmaceuticals have lower crowding levels, suggesting potential investment opportunities [35]. Summary by Sections ETF Market Overview - As of January 30, 2026, the total number of ETFs in mainland China is 1,419, with a total scale of 5.46 trillion yuan. Stock ETFs dominate both in quantity (1,111) and scale (3.23 trillion yuan), representing 78.29% and 59.11% of the total respectively [2][7][9]. Domestic and International Equity Market Index Performance - The A-share market indices showed mixed results, with the Shanghai Composite Index down 0.44%. The petrochemical sector saw a rise of 7.95%, while the military sector dropped by 7.69% [11][12][19]. - In the Hong Kong market, the Hang Seng Index rose by 2.38%, while the Hang Seng Technology Index fell by 1.38% [20][21]. Stock ETF Fund Flows - The wide-based ETFs saw a net outflow of 3890.81 billion yuan, with significant inflows into A500 ETF and Double Innovation Leader ETF, while the CSI 300 ETFs faced the largest outflows [30][31][34]. Industry Crowding Degree Monitoring - The monitoring model indicates that sectors like non-ferrous metals and oil and petrochemicals are crowded, while automotive and pharmaceuticals are less crowded, suggesting areas for potential investment focus [35][36]. ETF Product Attention Signals - The report highlights potential arbitrage opportunities in specific ETFs, including a focus on gold and non-ferrous metal ETFs, while cautioning about potential pullback risks [41][42].
Beyond HODL: Why the Capital One-Brex Deal Validates Black Titan's DAT+ Vision
Accessnewswire· 2026-02-03 15:30
Core Viewpoint - The year 2026 marks a significant shift in the investment landscape, indicating the end of infrastructure wars and the beginning of an era focused on utilization [1] Group 1 - 2024 was characterized as the year of the ETF, highlighting a surge in exchange-traded funds [1] - 2025 experienced increased regulatory friction, suggesting challenges faced by the industry [1] - January 2026 has been identified as a turning point, signaling a transition to a focus on utilization rather than infrastructure development [1]
Why BITO Is A Broken Way To Own Bitcoin
Seeking Alpha· 2026-02-03 09:57
Core Insights - The ProShares Bitcoin ETF (BITO) is viewed as a viable option for investors seeking a balance between direct Bitcoin investments and income generation from the ETF [1] Group 1: Company Overview - The article discusses the ProShares Bitcoin ETF (BITO) and its role in the investment landscape, particularly as a middle ground for investors [1] Group 2: Analyst Background - The analyst has over 20 years of experience in quantitative research, financial modeling, and risk management, with a focus on equity valuation and market trends [1] - The analyst previously held a Vice President position at Barclays, leading teams in model validation and stress testing, indicating a strong background in both fundamental and technical analysis [1] Group 3: Research Approach - The research approach combines rigorous risk management with a long-term perspective on value creation, focusing on macroeconomic trends, corporate earnings, and financial statement analysis [1]