真是病急乱投医，欧盟开始胡整了，为了治好自己的"中国稀土依赖症"，竟筹划着对咱们的稀土玩加税的把戏，这是要自掘坟墓？中方与冯德莱恩见了一 面，两句话意味深长，欧盟慢慢品去吧！ 在中美关税战中，中国一手"稀土断供"大招，直接戳中了美国的"七寸"，不光让特朗普对咱们退避三舍，欧盟也汗流浃背了。 咱们都知道，美欧产业以高科技为主，而绝大部分高科技产业又离不开稀土。 不管是和防务安全直接挂钩的军工产业，还是当前大热的新能源汽车以及AI产业，都是稀土需求的大户，没有稳定充足的稀土供应，即便你技术再强也玩 不转。 眼下美欧用的稀土基本被中国包了，一旦中国稀土断供，美欧的高科技产业基本就要歇菜。 所以当前美欧都在想办法，特朗普选择暂停中美关税战，换取咱们的稀土。而欧盟竟想着对咱们的稀土加税，另外还准备对稀土的最低价格加以限制。 看得出来，欧盟这是想先围个保护圈，然后发展自己的稀土产业，最后摆脱对中国稀土的依赖。 说实话，欧盟理想很丰满，现实很骨感。 在稀土上"去中国化"，美欧并不是眼下才开始的，已经搞了好几个年头了，几乎把能想到和能用的招数都用上了，可结果还是不理想。 要知道，中国能成为全球稀土产业的领头羊，那也是辛辛苦苦 ...

新华社记者周文其、齐湘辉 每年9月28日孔子诞辰纪念日，台湾众多孔庙都会举行祭祀大典。今年的这一天，也不例外。 记者参加了台北市孔庙的释奠典礼。约一个半小时内，仪式依据台湾目前保存最完整的"三献古礼"进行，先后完成启扉、瘗毛血、迎神、进馔、 上香等37道程序。参与典礼的礼生、乐生、佾生中，不少是台北市中小学的学生。他们有的演奏古韵悠长的音乐，有的展现优雅整齐的佾舞队 形，表现出色。 据不完全统计，台湾各地有超过40座大小孔庙。其中，兴建于1666年的台南孔庙是台湾第一座孔庙，被誉为"全台首学"。27日，记者在台南孔庙 看到，释奠典礼前一日，不少人顶着太阳，一丝不苟地清洁器具、洒扫庭院，将典礼现场打扫洁净。 今年的台湾祭孔大典如往常一样，吸引了大批民众观礼。凌晨五点，距离典礼开始还有一小时，台北市孔庙外等候进场的民众已经排起长龙。不 时还有新到的民众询问："还能不能排队？"工作人员只能抱歉地说："观礼人数已经满了，不好意思。" 孔子是中国古代伟大的思想家、教育家。尊崇历史、重视文教，是孔子思想的重要组成部分。 对于历史和传统文化，人们可以突出感受到当下台湾社会存在着的矛盾现象：在民间社会，众多百姓对中华历史文化 ...

Core Insights - Rare earth elements are crucial for modern technology, including smartphones, air conditioners, and electric vehicles, due to their unique electronic structures and stability under extreme conditions [2][4] - The U.S. is seeking alternatives to Chinese rare earth supplies, with recent claims about iron nitride as a potential substitute, although its performance is significantly inferior to rare earth materials [6][9] Industry Overview - The importance of rare earth elements in high-tech products like neodymium-iron-boron magnets and catalysts highlights their role as essential components in modern industry [4] - The U.S. heavily relies on China for rare earth imports, with over 80% of its supply coming from China and a staggering 97% for heavy rare earths, indicating a critical dependency [8] Technological Challenges - Iron nitride, while marketed as a breakthrough, is primarily used in low-performance applications and cannot meet the stringent requirements of high-tech industries [6][9] - Previous U.S. attempts to find substitutes for rare earth elements have failed due to high costs and inadequate performance, suggesting that the current push for iron nitride is more of a psychological reassurance than a viable solution [9]

Core Viewpoint - The G7 and EU's recent decision to impose minimum prices, tariffs, and carbon taxes on rare earth exports from China reflects a strategic anxiety and a misguided approach to reducing dependency on Chinese resources, which may ultimately harm their own industries rather than China’s [1][3][19] Group 1: Background and Context - The G7 and EU's actions are a response to a series of challenges over the past year, including renewed trade tensions between the US and China and stricter Chinese export controls on rare earths [3][5] - European companies are already feeling the pressure, with some resorting to depleting their inventories due to fears of supply shortages, particularly in the automotive sector [3][5] Group 2: Policy Implications - The G7's plan to set minimum prices and impose tariffs on rare earths is seen as an attempt to force domestic companies to source non-Chinese rare earths, but this could lead to increased costs and operational challenges for these companies [5][11] - The European Union's rare earth reserves account for less than 1% of global supply, making it difficult for them to achieve self-sufficiency in the short term [7][9] Group 3: Industry Impact - Industries heavily reliant on rare earths, such as renewable energy, electronics, and automotive, are likely to face significant cost increases, which could undermine their competitiveness [11][13] - The imposition of minimum prices may disrupt market dynamics, potentially leading to black market activities and further complicating supply chains [11][13] Group 4: China's Position - China remains in a strong position as it controls over 80% of global rare earth supply and is actively seeking to expand its market presence in Asia and Africa [15][19] - The G7 and EU's actions may inadvertently strengthen China's market position by pushing other countries to develop their rare earth resources, which will take time and investment [15][19] Group 5: Future Considerations - The G7 and EU's approach may exacerbate internal structural issues within their industries rather than effectively countering China's dominance in the rare earth market [17][19] - A collaborative approach with China to stabilize supply chains and promote mutual development may be a more effective strategy than isolationist policies [19]

玩火者必自焚，倒行逆施、居心叵测的伎俩注定失败。任何"去中国化"的行径，都改变不了深植于台湾 社会的中华文化认同和中华民族认同，割裂不了两岸的历史联结和两岸同胞的血脉联系，更改变不了两 岸同属一个中国、台湾是中国一部分的事实。凡是数典忘祖的人，从来没有好下场；凡是背叛祖国的 人，必将遭到人民的唾弃和历史的审判。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年09月21日 06 版） (责编：赵欣悦、袁勃) 地理科中，明示暗示"台湾地位未定论"；历史科中，商周到隋唐2000多年的历史仅以1600字草草交代， 甚至将中国史纳入东亚史……近期，为因应所谓"大陆威胁"，民进党当局要求教育部门完成13篇所 谓"识读中国威胁"补充教材，准备在新学期投入使用，这是继"台独"课纲之后，民进党当局图谋"文化 台独"的新动向，将进一步毒害台湾青少年。 民进党当局出于谋"独"私利，大搞"去中国化"，再度把政治黑手伸进本应传道授业、立德树人的教育事 业，目的就是要借教材、课堂"洗涤人心"，煽动"反中抗中"，散播"台独"主张，妄图割断两岸历史文化 联结，为其挑动两岸对立对抗培植社会基础。此举不但会让台湾同胞成为精神和文化上的无根浮萍，还 为台海形势紧 ...

Group 1 - The EU is facing significant challenges due to its reliance on Chinese rare earth exports, which has led to production halts in major automotive and high-tech companies [1][3][5] - The EU is considering two approaches to sanctions against China: a limited scope targeting a few companies or a broad-based sanction that could provoke a strong retaliatory response from China [1][3] - China's strict control over rare earth exports is aimed at preventing other countries from stockpiling resources that could be used against China, complicating the EU's supply chain dynamics [3][5][9] Group 2 - The EU's dependency on rare earths, particularly for electric vehicles, poses a critical risk to its automotive industry, as rare earth permanent magnets are essential for high-performance motors [5][7] - China's share of global rare earth production has surged from 48% to 95%, with refining capacity controlling about 90% of the market, creating a long-standing supply chain dependency [5][9] - The EU's attempts to diversify its rare earth supply sources are hindered by the limited capacity of alternative suppliers, with Australia being the only significant option, but its production levels are far below China's [5][7][9] Group 3 - The ongoing geopolitical tensions between the EU and China highlight the strategic dilemma faced by the EU in balancing economic relations with China and political alignment with the US [11] - The EU's efforts to reduce reliance on China may be undermined by the reality that without a complete restructuring of the supply chain, dependency will persist and could even intensify under restrictions [9][11] - The current situation indicates that if China maintains its export controls, the production of high-tech and electric vehicles in Europe will face significant disruptions [9][11]

Core Insights - The article highlights the increasing interactions and exchanges between Taiwanese youth and mainland China, showcasing a vibrant scene of cultural and educational engagement during the summer [1][2]. Group 1: Youth Engagement - Various events such as the Cross-Strait Youth Summit and the National Taiwan Federation's Summer Camp have facilitated visits of Taiwanese youth to mainland China, fostering mutual learning and understanding [1]. - Taiwanese youth express a common sentiment of discovering a "real and three-dimensional" mainland, contrasting sharply with the negative portrayals they have been exposed to in Taiwan [2]. Group 2: Cultural Discovery - The journey serves as a cultural exploration, allowing Taiwanese youth to connect deeply with Chinese heritage, as they experience historical sites and cultural landmarks firsthand [3]. - The shared cultural background leads to a sense of belonging and connection between Taiwanese and mainland youth, as they find common ground in contemporary cultural references and social media trends [3]. Group 3: Changing Perceptions - The firsthand experiences of Taiwanese youth challenge the narratives propagated by the Taiwanese government, promoting a more accurate understanding of mainland China [3][4]. - The return of these youth, enriched with new perspectives and positive sentiments towards the mainland, encourages them to invite others to experience it for themselves [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing interaction and understanding between Taiwanese youth and mainland China, emphasizing the transformative experience of visiting the mainland and witnessing its rapid development firsthand [1][2][3]. Group 1: Youth Exchange and Perception - Various events such as the Cross-Strait Youth Summit and forums have facilitated the visit of Taiwanese youth to the mainland, leading to a vibrant exchange and mutual learning [1]. - Many Taiwanese youth expressed that their preconceived notions of the mainland, shaped by political narratives and media, were shattered upon their actual visit, revealing a dynamic and modern society [2]. Group 2: Cultural Resonance and Connection - The journey is not only about modernization but also about cultural roots, as Taiwanese youth find a deep connection with Chinese culture during their visits, enhancing their sense of belonging [2]. - Interactions between Taiwanese and mainland youth reveal shared interests and cultural references, fostering a sense of unity and understanding [2]. Group 3: Impact on Narratives and Relationships - The collective experiences of Taiwanese youth visiting the mainland challenge the narratives propagated by the Taiwanese authorities, promoting a more accurate understanding of the mainland [3]. - The return of these youth with enriched perspectives and positive sentiments towards the mainland encourages them to invite others to experience it for themselves, potentially altering perceptions across generations [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the contrasting fates of two AI companies, HeyGen and Manus, highlighting how regulatory compliance and strategic decisions have led to HeyGen's success and Manus's struggles amid U.S. scrutiny [1][2][3]. Group 1: Company Backgrounds - HeyGen, founded by Chinese entrepreneurs, is an AI video generation platform that allows users to create professional videos quickly, supporting 175 languages and serving 85,000 global clients [3][4][26]. - Manus, also founded by Chinese entrepreneurs, operates in the AI space but has faced challenges due to U.S. regulatory investigations, particularly the Reverse CFIUS inquiry [1][2][22]. Group 2: Strategic Decisions and Compliance - HeyGen successfully relocated its headquarters from Shenzhen to Los Angeles in 2022 and completely divested from Chinese investors by 2023, effectively distancing itself from potential regulatory issues [20][23]. - Manus, in contrast, has retained its Chinese corporate structure and investors, which has drawn increased scrutiny from U.S. regulators, especially after its recent high-profile marketing efforts [25][28][29]. Group 3: Financial Trajectories - HeyGen raised approximately $9 million in seed funding from notable investors like Sequoia China and IDG Capital, followed by a $5.6 million round in 2023, leading to a valuation of $500 million [15][19][20]. - Manus's financial activities have been less clear, with its recent fundraising efforts occurring under the shadow of regulatory concerns, potentially limiting its growth prospects [25][28]. Group 4: Market Positioning and Risks - HeyGen has positioned itself as a "low-profile leader" in the AI video generation market, focusing on marketing and education applications, which appear to be less sensitive to regulatory scrutiny [26][27]. - Manus's high-profile marketing and attempts to enter the Chinese market have raised alarms among U.S. regulators, complicating its operational landscape and leading to mixed perceptions in both the U.S. and China [29][30]. Group 5: Lessons and Future Considerations - The experiences of HeyGen and Manus illustrate the importance of strategic positioning in the face of geopolitical tensions, emphasizing the need for companies to choose between markets rather than attempting to operate in both simultaneously [30][31]. - The article suggests that future AI entrepreneurs must carefully consider their corporate structures and compliance strategies to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape [36][37].

Core Viewpoint - The future of global technology and energy may hinge on the Eniba mining area in Australia, which holds rare earth resources valued at hundreds of billions, becoming a geopolitical "ticking time bomb" [1] Group 1: Geopolitical Context - Australia is investing $1 billion to challenge China's dominance in the rare earth sector, aiming to establish an independent supply chain for the West [1][5] - The U.S. Department of Defense has warned that critical defense equipment relies heavily on rare earth magnets, making supply chain disruptions a national security issue [1] - The dependency of the U.S. (80%), EU (98%), Japan, and South Korea on Chinese rare earth imports highlights the vulnerability of global manufacturing [3] Group 2: Industry Challenges - Iluka Resources has accumulated $650 million worth of rare earths as a byproduct of zircon mining, but refining poses significant challenges due to the complex and costly processes involved [3][5] - The Australian government is prioritizing national strategy over commercial logic, providing low-interest loans to support the establishment of a refining facility expected to be operational in two years [5] Group 3: Market Dynamics - The International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that global rare earth demand will double by 2030, driven by the growth of electric vehicles and wind energy [7] - Market speculation is already occurring despite the Australian refining plant not yet being operational, raising concerns about the ability to withstand potential price wars initiated by China [7] - The U.S. is also increasing investments in rare earth resources, with plans for new facilities and expansions in various regions, indicating a competitive race for rare earth resources [7] Group 4: Long-term Implications - The ultimate control in the rare earth sector lies not in mining but in refining and magnet manufacturing, where China currently holds a complete supply chain advantage [8] - The outcome of this geopolitical gamble will significantly impact global energy transition and high-end manufacturing, suggesting a complex and uncertain future for all involved [8]