西贝事件折射保障消费者对菜品的知情权十分重要。 你愿意让自己的孩子去餐厅吃保质期24个月的有机速冻西蓝花吗？ 近日，网红企业家罗永浩指责餐饮品牌西贝部分菜是预制菜且贵，希望国家尽早推动立法，强制饭馆注 明是否用了预制菜，保障消费者知情权。而西贝创始人贾国龙则回应称西贝没有一道菜是预制菜。 中国预制菜行业的发展已超20年，且体量还在不断扩大。消费者对预制菜风味、营养和安全存在诸多质 疑，目前国标缺失也加剧了这一质疑，此前一些小学生食堂采用预制菜引起家长强烈反弹，而此次人均 消费100元左右的西贝餐食事件，无疑也折射了公众这一方面的担忧。 此次西贝事件中，西贝采用了预制工艺的原料菜品，或用了预制菜，本身并没有问题，问题出在消费者 对此并不知情。因此此次西贝开放后厨是值得称赞的，让消费者能去了解相关菜品的具体原料、制作工 艺等。在获知这些信息之后，消费者会作出自己的选择，比如是否要带孩子吃保质期24个月的有机速冻 西蓝花，即使它是符合食品安全标准的。 无论西贝事件最终结局如何，这无疑是消费者对保障自身舌尖上知情权的一次大觉醒，既能推动预制菜 标准体系建设，并鼓励越来越多的餐饮企业使用预制菜明示，同时，相信也会有越来 ...

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the pre-prepared dishes of the restaurant chain "Xibei" has gained significant attention, particularly following a live broadcast by Luo Yonghao, who criticized Xibei's marketing and public relations efforts while advocating for transparency in the pre-prepared food industry [1][4][6]. Group 1: Luo Yonghao's Live Broadcast - Luo Yonghao's live broadcast attracted over 100,000 viewers within the first 10 minutes and nearly 5 million views on Weibo by the end of the session [1]. - He criticized Xibei's public relations team for their lack of professionalism and highlighted the importance of consumer awareness regarding pre-prepared dishes [4]. - Luo emphasized that while he supports the concept of pre-prepared dishes, he opposes selling them at prices equivalent to freshly made meals [4][6]. Group 2: Xibei's Response - In response to Luo's accusations, Xibei issued an open letter claiming that his statements were untrue and provided detailed production processes for 13 dishes to clarify their preparation methods [8]. - Xibei announced plans to allow customers to tour their kitchens and production facilities to enhance transparency and consumer trust [8]. Group 3: Definition and Regulation of Pre-prepared Dishes - The definition of pre-prepared dishes has been clarified by regulatory authorities, stating that they must not contain preservatives and should be pre-processed for safe consumption [11][12]. - The distinction between pre-prepared dishes and pre-processing was emphasized, with the latter referring to the preparation of raw ingredients rather than finished products [12].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between entrepreneur Luo Yonghao and the restaurant brand Xibei highlights differing perceptions of "pre-made dishes" and raises questions about consumer rights and industry standards in the pre-made food sector [1][2][5] Group 1: Dispute Overview - Luo Yonghao publicly criticized Xibei for serving pre-made dishes at high prices, emphasizing the importance of consumer awareness regarding the use of pre-made ingredients [2][5] - Xibei's response included a commitment to legal action against Luo and a public disclosure of their food preparation processes, asserting that their dishes are not pre-made but rather pre-processed [2][3] Group 2: Industry Context - The pre-made food industry in China has been developing for over 20 years, primarily known to B-end operators until recent years when consumer awareness increased due to market changes and the pandemic [4][5] - The industry is projected to grow significantly, with estimates suggesting a market size of 5 trillion yuan for B-end and 7 trillion yuan for C-end by 2030, assuming a penetration rate of 15%-20% [4] Group 3: Regulatory Environment - There is currently no national standard for pre-made dishes in China, leading to inconsistencies across regions, although there is a push for clearer labeling to protect consumer rights [4][6][7] - Recent government initiatives aim to promote transparency in the use of pre-made dishes in restaurants, aligning with consumer rights to know the nature of the food they purchase [6][7] Group 4: Consumer Perception and Safety - Consumers often conflate pre-prepared ingredients with pre-made dishes, leading to misunderstandings about what constitutes pre-made food [8][9] - The central kitchen model is increasingly adopted in the restaurant industry, enhancing food safety through standardized production and centralized sourcing, which helps mitigate risks associated with traditional kitchen operations [9]

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the restaurant chain Xibei and its use of overnight dishes has sparked significant public debate, particularly following comments made by public figure Luo Yonghao regarding the quality and preparation of the food served [2][5][8]. Group 1: Company Response - Xibei acknowledged that some dishes may be prepared in advance and served the next day, asserting that this practice does not compromise food quality [2][5]. - Following Luo Yonghao's criticisms, Xibei released a detailed letter to customers, defending its practices and providing a 42-page document outlining the preparation processes for the dishes in question [5][8]. - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, stated that none of the dishes served in their restaurants are classified as pre-prepared meals, and the company plans to open its kitchens to the public for transparency [10][27]. Group 2: Public and Legal Reactions - Luo Yonghao's comments led to a backlash, with legal experts suggesting that if he can substantiate his claims about Xibei's use of pre-prepared meals, it may not constitute defamation [9][10]. - The public has expressed confusion over the definition of pre-prepared meals, with some consumers concerned about the quality and pricing of such dishes [11][13]. - The controversy has highlighted a broader issue regarding consumer rights and the need for transparency in the food industry, particularly concerning the use of pre-prepared ingredients [28][29]. Group 3: Industry Context - The definition of pre-prepared meals was officially established in March 2024 by six government departments, clarifying what constitutes such meals and emphasizing the importance of food safety [16][17]. - The industry is facing challenges related to public perception of pre-prepared meals, with many consumers associating them with lower quality despite their potential benefits in terms of efficiency and safety [15][28]. - The ongoing debate reflects a growing demand for transparency in the food service industry, as consumers increasingly seek to understand the origins and preparation methods of their meals [29].

Core Viewpoint - The discussion centers around the transparency issues related to pre-prepared meals in China, with a focus on consumer rights and the recent controversy involving Luo Yonghao and Xibei [1]. Group 1 - Luo Yonghao conducted a live stream discussing pre-prepared meals, emphasizing that his platform has been transparent about selling them [1]. - He stated that pre-prepared meals are a legitimate product, comparing them to canned food, and highlighted the ongoing consumer frustration regarding the lack of transparency in the industry [1]. - Luo expressed a desire to protect consumer rights, particularly the right to be informed about the products they purchase [1].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the comments made by Luo Yonghao about Xibei's use of pre-prepared dishes highlights the ambiguity in the pre-prepared food industry standards and the legal boundaries of public figures' freedom of speech [1][3][5] Industry Standards and Consumer Rights - The pre-prepared food industry lacks clear standards, leading to consumer confusion regarding the nature of food products [1][2] - The definition of pre-prepared dishes provided by the regulatory authorities emphasizes the need for consumer awareness and the right to know about the food they purchase [2][4] - The recent notification from regulatory bodies calls for transparency in the use of pre-prepared dishes in the restaurant sector, reinforcing consumer rights [2][4] Legal Implications of Public Statements - The legal assessment of Luo Yonghao's statements involves determining whether his comments constitute defamation or are protected as consumer feedback [3][6] - Luo's claim that "Xibei's dishes are almost all pre-prepared" is a factual assertion that requires evidence to support its truthfulness, while his emotional remark about the food being "disgusting" leans towards subjective opinion [4][5] - The burden of proof lies with both parties in the event of a lawsuit, with Xibei needing to demonstrate the falsity of Luo's claims and Luo needing to substantiate his statements [4][6] Balancing Rights and Responsibilities - The incident raises questions about the balance between the rights of public figures to express opinions and their responsibilities to ensure factual accuracy [5][6] - Public figures, while having the right to critique products, must exercise caution in their statements to avoid crossing legal boundaries [5][6] - The controversy reflects broader issues within the pre-prepared food industry, including outdated regulations and the need for clearer standards to protect consumer rights and business interests [6]

"一定会，我们一定会起诉他，一定一定会起诉他！" 近日，罗永浩吐槽西贝全是预制菜事件引发关注。9月11日晚间，西贝创始人贾国龙举行发布会公开回应称，西贝没有预制菜，并会起诉罗永浩。 | 商品名 | 数量 单价 金额 | | | --- | --- | --- | | 草原嫩烤羊排(份) 1 119.0 | | | | 0119.00 | | | | 烟香烤鱼 | 1 | 89.00 89.00 | | 嫩烤DHA大黄色 | 1 | 39.00 39.00 | | 胡麻油调黄瓜 | 14 | 23.00 23.00 | | 一把羊肉串配现烤 | | | | 復(6年) | 1 | 43.00 43.00 | | 西贝面筋 | 1 | 39.00 39.00 | | 葱油号马生菜 | 1 | 29.00 29.00 | | 五种番茄酸汤夜直 | | | | 鱼鱼(婉) | 1 | 29.00 29.00 | | 黄米凉糕(6块) | 1 | 29.00 29.00 | | 小炒草原牛 | 18 | 59.00 59.00 | | 鸡汤白玉山药炖豆 | | | | 国 | 79 | 43.00 43.00 | | ...

昨天，西贝创始人贾国龙在接受媒体采访时表示，"复盘了罗永浩来西贝吃饭时的菜品和接待服 务，我们的总结是，做的饭中规中矩，他点的13道菜里没有一道是预制菜，我们每一道菜都有制 作标准和工艺。"在结束回应"预制菜"风波的新闻发布会后， 西贝创始人、董事长贾国龙表示将 会起诉罗永浩。 西贝创始人、董事长贾国龙在接受采访时，就"是否会起诉罗永浩"一问做出明确且强硬的表态。 "一定会，我们一定会起诉他，一定一定会起诉他！" 贾国龙连用三个"一定"来强调他的决心。 他表示："他对我们的伤害是很大的，一定会起诉。" 来源：综合澎湃新闻、 红星资本局、中国新闻网、新黄河等 连锁餐饮集团"西贝" 陷入的预制菜舆论风波愈演愈烈。 同时，他还 发布10万元悬赏，公开征集西贝使用预制菜的"真凭实据"。 与此同时，为了让消费者亲身体验"值不值"，西贝宣布将从今天起，在全国所有门店上线"罗永 浩菜单"。贾国龙澄清，这不是一个固定的套餐，而是罗永浩点过的菜品列表，消费者可以任意 点选。西贝为此提供了两大承诺：第一， "不好吃，不要钱"， 顾客可以随时退单；第二， 欢迎 顾客随时进入后厨，参观任何一道菜的制作全过程。 "在大家看来，中央厨房 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the controversy initiated by Luo Yonghao's comments on Xibei's dishes, which he claimed were mostly pre-prepared meals [1][2] - Xibei's CEO, Jia Guolong, strongly refuted these claims, asserting that none of the dishes served were pre-prepared and announced that all 370+ Xibei locations would allow customers to observe the cooking process starting September 12 [1][2] - Jia Guolong expressed a firm intention to sue Luo Yonghao for his statements, emphasizing his determination by repeating "definitely" three times [1] Group 2 - Luo Yonghao responded on social media, questioning the quality of Xibei's food and suggesting that if the dishes were not pre-prepared, it would indicate advanced technology [2] - He also called for legislation to ensure restaurants disclose whether they use pre-prepared meals, highlighting the need for consumer rights in the pre-prepared food sector [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Shanxi Consumer Association has issued a warning regarding the misleading practices in live-streamed food sales, highlighting the intentional obscuring of ingredient lists, which infringes on consumer rights to know the true contents of food products [1][2]. Group 1: Issues Identified - Many live-stream hosts either do not mention the ingredient list or display it in a way that makes it difficult for consumers to read, such as using small fonts or quickly switching images [1][2]. - Some products marketed as "healthy" may contain high levels of sugar, salt, or additives, which are not disclosed in the ingredient lists, leading to potential false advertising [2]. - The lack of transparency in ingredient lists is often used to avoid compliance risks related to labeling regulations, such as not disclosing allergens or exaggerated nutritional claims [2]. Group 2: Recommendations for Consumers - Consumers are advised to actively inquire about ingredient lists and retain evidence of their inquiries, such as screenshots or recordings of conversations with hosts or customer service [2][3]. - It is recommended to be cautious of absolute claims like "100% healthy" or "zero additives," as these may indicate potential false advertising if the ingredient list is not provided for verification [3]. - Consumers should prioritize purchasing from sellers who transparently display ingredient lists and be wary of those who do not comply with this practice [3]. Group 3: Suggested Actions for Stakeholders - Live-streaming platforms should enforce rules requiring clear and prominent display of ingredient lists in food-related broadcasts and penalize hosts who evade inquiries about these lists [3][4]. - Regulatory authorities are encouraged to enhance oversight of live-stream sales, focusing on the public disclosure of ingredient lists and imposing strict penalties on businesses that conceal critical information [4]. - The Shanxi Consumer Association emphasizes the importance of transparency and compliance in the food industry to protect consumer rights and maintain fair market competition [5].