支付公司开启增资潮 据悉，在2024年5月1日，《非银行支付机构监督管理条例》（以下简称《条例》）正式施行，此后，多 家支付机构开启密集的增资潮。 6月10日，中国人民银行深圳市分行公布的非银行支付机构变更行政许可决定信息公示表显示，准予财 付通支付科技有限公司（以下简称财付通）增加注册资本至223亿元。 再次增资70亿元获批 据悉，这是财付通自2024年以来的第二次增资。2024年3月15日，中国人民银行深圳分行更新的非银行 支付机构重大事项变更许可信息公示显示，同意财付通增加注册资本至153亿元人民币，此次增资前， 财付通的注册资本为10亿元。 时隔约一年后，财付通再次增资获批。财付通本轮增资金额为70亿元，依然为市场上注册资本最高的非 银行支付机构。 对于本次增资，财付通表示，此次增资的批复，体现了主管部门对于财付通发展的认可，该公司将积极 加大在科技创新、提升支付服务质量、保障支付安全稳定等方面的投入，进一步促进业务稳健发展。 公开资料显示，财付通成立于2006年8月，大股东为深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司，微信支付、QQ钱 包所需的支付牌照和银行通道的技术支持由财付通提供，该公司于2011年5月3日成 ...

Group 1: Regulatory Response to Private Markets - The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is expected to clarify its approach to the rapid growth of private market assets, particularly private credit, and the declining IPO market [1][3] - ASIC Commissioner Simone Constant will address these issues at an investor symposium, highlighting the importance of the health of Australia's economic and financial systems [3][4] - ASIC is balancing the need for increased transparency and disclosure obligations with the necessity of not overburdening the industry with compliance costs [3][5] Group 2: Initial Reform Measures - ASIC is anticipated to announce an early reform initiative as a "quick win" and will continue to explore other rapid reform suggestions [3][5] - A discussion paper released by ASIC in February analyzed structural issues in private and public markets, receiving around 90 feedback submissions, with over half to be disclosed this week [5] Group 3: Global Context and Systemic Risks - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has identified the rising role of non-bank financial institutions (NBFI) in the financial system, with banks' exposure to private credit exceeding $500 billion (approximately 777 billion AUD) [5] - The IMF emphasizes the need for improved regulation of NBFIs due to their increasing influence on systemic financial stability [5] Group 4: Industry Perspectives on Regulation - Industry opinions on ASIC's regulatory approach vary, with some advocating for caution in new regulations to avoid disadvantaging private asset managers compared to banks [6] - Others argue for stronger governance and transparency standards in private credit [6] Group 5: IPO Market Reform - There is significant interest in how ASIC will revitalize the IPO process, as the number of new listings on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) has been low in recent years [7][8] - ASIC does not view the decline in IPO numbers as a structural issue but acknowledges that streamlining the process could attract more companies to list [8] Group 6: Ongoing Initiatives and Market Dynamics - Virgin Australia and GemLife are planning IPOs, and their pricing and market performance will influence the IPO window [9] - Investment banks, including JPMorgan, are pushing for reforms to optimize the IPO process, recognizing the need for a competitive capital market in Australia [10] - The ASX has also acknowledged the necessity for reform and has proposed several optimization suggestions for the IPO process [10]

Core Insights - The overall profit growth of listed insurance companies in Q1 2025 shows significant divergence, primarily influenced by base effect differences, while the liability side remains stable. The equity market is identified as a critical factor for performance, with regulatory policies fostering a recovery in market confidence, presenting opportunities in the non-bank sector [1] Group 1: Financial Performance - Q1 2025 net profit on a comparable basis increased by 1.4% year-on-year, with non-annualized ROE slightly declining from 4.2% in Q1 2024 to 4.0% in Q1 2025, which is better than previously pessimistic expectations [1] - The average net assets attributable to shareholders of A-share listed insurance companies remained flat compared to the beginning of the year, with life insurance showing the highest growth at 4.5%, while Xinhua reported a decline of 17.0% [1] - The ratio of other comprehensive income to net profit was -98.0%, with life insurance having the smallest difference at -20.9% [1] - Underwriting profit in Q1 2025 grew by 27.3% year-on-year, mainly due to a low base in the same period last year, with life insurance performing well and property insurance seeing a significant increase in underwriting profit [1] - The average annualized net investment return rate for listed insurance companies in Q1 2025 was 3.08%, slightly down from 3.19% in Q1 2024, while the average annualized total investment return rate was 4.06%, down from 4.08% [1] Group 2: Life Insurance Business - The average NBV growth rate for listed insurance companies in Q1 2025 was approximately 20%, with value rate improvement being the core reason [2] - NBV year-on-year growth rates from high to low were: Xinhua (67.9%), Ping An (34.9%), PICC (31.5%), Taikang (11.3%), and China Life (4.8%) [2] - New single premium growth showed significant divergence, with individual insurance affected by the "opening red" period, while the structure of bank insurance new single premiums improved [2] - The improvement in value rates is attributed to: 1) a reduction in scheduled interest rates leading to a stable decline in overall liability costs; 2) optimization of product and term structures; 3) active cost reduction and efficiency enhancement [2] Group 3: Property Insurance Business - In Q1 2025, listed insurance companies achieved property insurance service revenue of 249.635 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 4.0%, with a significant decrease in the combined underwriting cost ratio to 95.7%, down 2.8 percentage points [3] - Underwriting profit under the new standards reached 10.653 billion yuan, nearly doubling year-on-year, primarily due to a low base in the previous year and challenges from adverse weather conditions [3] - The total premium income from auto insurance grew by 3.2% year-on-year, with effective cost control contributing to improved underwriting profits [3] - Data from the Ministry of Emergency Management indicated that natural disasters in Q1 2025 primarily involved geological disasters, with direct economic losses of approximately 10.16 billion yuan, significantly lower than 23.76 billion yuan in Q1 2024, leading to improved claims ratios, especially in February [3]

本报记者李冰 5月份以来，中国人民银行多地分行披露非银行支付机构行政许可决定信息公示表，涉及支付宝（中 国）网络技术有限公司（以下简称"支付宝"）、上海程付通支付有限公司（以下简称"程付通"）、东方 付通信息技术有限公司（以下简称"东方付通"）等机构，变更内容包括机构更名、管理层调整等事项。 在管理层调整方面，中国人民银行上海市分行同意支付宝变更蔡年余为该公司副总经理（合规负责 人）、变更林朗为公司财务负责人；东方付通变更郭俊锐为该公司副总经理；程付通变更孙兆波为该公 司董事兼总经理。 在更名方面，东方付通变更公司名称为"东方付通支付科技有限公司"；中国人民银行江苏省分行同意双 乾网络支付有限公司变更公司名称为"乐在支付有限公司"。此外，程付通变更注册资本为2亿元。 中国邮政储蓄银行研究员娄飞鹏对《证券日报》记者表示："年内支付机构密集调整，是行业新规、市 场竞争以及机构高管人员个人职业发展等多重因素共同作用的结果。从机构自身来看，通过高管团队调 整可以优化公司治理结构，有助于机构更稳定运营和合规发展。" 多位受访者认为，支付机构高管调整也受到行业新规影响。2024年7月份，中国人民银行发布的《非银 行支付机 ...

文 | 赵伟、贾东旭 联系人 | 贾东旭 摘要 事件： 5月14日，央行公布2025年4月中国金融数据，信贷余额同比下行0.2个百分点至7.2%，社融存量同 比上行0.3个百分点至8.7%，M2同比上行1.0个百分点至8.0%。 核心观点：随内部政策加力、外部冲击缓释，后续微观主体预期或趋于稳定 4月M2同比增速突然跳升主因非银存款快速回补，或和我国宏观政策有力应对关税冲击，资金加速回补 资本市场有关。 4月存款数据中非银存款新增达1.6万亿，同比多增达1.9万亿，是M2同比回暖的主要来 源。考虑到3月非银存款同比多减1.3万亿，以及资本市场3月中下旬偏弱现象，部分资金或选在4月2日 前"避险"。随着稳市场政策密集出台，部分观望资金或加速回流资本市场，形成M2增速超预期回升的重 要推手。 4月企业信用呈现"贷款回落而债券融资回升"格局，其中短贷的回落或因前期"冲量"，而中长贷少增或与 化债推进和关税冲击企业预期有关。 4月企业信贷和债券融资和3月呈现"镜像"，其中短期贷款的回落或 和3月"冲量"有关。中长贷同比少增2500亿或和两大因素有关，是关税冲击压制企业预期（与4月PMI走弱 形成印证），二是化债进程持 ...

Core Viewpoint - The financial sector, particularly the banking sector, has shown strong performance recently, with a continuous rise over six trading days, although there was a slight pullback in early trading today [1] Group 1: Differences Between Indices - The CSI 300 Non-Bank Financial Index consists of 27 stocks selected from the CSI 300 Index, focusing on capital markets, other financial sectors, and insurance, with an average market capitalization of approximately 842 billion [2][3] - The CSI 800 Securities and Insurance Index includes 50 stocks from the CSI 800 Index, concentrating on the securities and insurance sectors, with an average market capitalization of about 538 billion [4] - The weight distribution in the CSI 300 Non-Bank Financial Index is heavily concentrated in large-cap stocks, with the top five stocks accounting for 64.06% and the top ten for 78.25% [5] - In contrast, the CSI 800 Securities and Insurance Index has a more diversified weight distribution, with the top five stocks exceeding 50% and the top ten at 63.58% [7] Group 2: Performance and Volatility - Over the past year, both indices have performed well, with returns exceeding 20%, but the CSI 300 Non-Bank Financial Index has outperformed the CSI 800 Securities and Insurance Index [9] - In the last three years, the CSI 300 Non-Bank Financial Index has also shown slightly better performance, while the CSI 800 Securities and Insurance Index has outperformed over the last five years [9] - The volatility of the CSI 800 Securities and Insurance Index has been higher than that of the CSI 300 Non-Bank Financial Index across all time frames from one to five years, although the difference is not significant [9] Group 3: Valuation Levels - Despite both indices having increased by over 20% in the past year, their price-to-earnings ratios (TTM) remain below the historical 5% threshold, indicating attractive valuation levels [11] Group 4: Suitable Investor Types - The CSI 300 Non-Bank Financial Index is suitable for investors looking to invest in large-cap non-bank financial stocks and seeking stable allocations, or as part of an enhancement strategy for the CSI 300 Index [14] - The CSI 800 Securities and Insurance Index is more appropriate for investors optimistic about the overall development of the securities and insurance industries, who can tolerate slightly higher volatility and wish to capture opportunities in mid- and large-cap stocks [14] Group 5: Similarities Between Indices - Both indices focus on non-banking sectors, primarily concentrating on securities and insurance [15] - Historically, the overall trends of both indices have been relatively consistent [15] - There is a significant overlap in the top ten constituent stocks of both indices [17]

文 | 赵伟、贾东旭 联系人 | 贾东旭 摘要 事件： 5月14日，央行公布2025年4月中国金融数据，信贷余额同比下行0.2个百分点至7.2%，社融存量同 比上行0.3个百分点至8.7%，M2同比上行1.0个百分点至8.0%。 核心观点：随内部政策加力、外部冲击缓释，后续微观主体预期或趋于稳定 4月M2同比增速突然跳升主因非银存款快速回补，或和我国宏观政策有力应对关税冲击，资金加速回补 资本市场有关。 4月存款数据中非银存款新增达1.6万亿，同比多增达1.9万亿，是M2同比回暖的主要来 源。考虑到3月非银存款同比多减1.3万亿，以及资本市场3月中下旬偏弱现象，部分资金或选在4月2日 前"避险"。随着稳市场政策密集出台，部分观望资金或加速回流资本市场，形成M2增速超预期回升的重 要推手。 4月企业信用呈现"贷款回落而债券融资回升"格局，其中短贷的回落或因前期"冲量"，而中长贷少增或与 化债推进和关税冲击企业预期有关。 4月企业信贷和债券融资和3月呈现"镜像"，其中短期贷款的回落或 和3月"冲量"有关。中长贷同比少增2500亿或和两大因素有关，是关税冲击压制企业预期（与4月PMI走弱 形成印证），二是化债进程持 ...

高弹性+显著低配，关注非银板块的估值修复机会 20250514 摘要 • 非银金融板块配置比例有望提升，主动权益基金相对欠配约 9.68%，存在 约 1,300 亿人民币增配空间，但内部个股表现分化，中国平安等权重股存 在显著欠配。 • 公募基金新规对市场风格切换的影响是中长期性的，短期市场波动不改变 整体配置比例，长期将引导投资者重新评估并调整资产配置。 • 非银金融行业基本面强劲，券商一季度业绩同比增长 86%，环比增长近 20%，保险公司如新华保险、中国人寿、中国人保等也显示出良好增长势 头。 • 非银金融行业估值修复空间较大，券商指数估值中枢低于历史平均水平， 新规有望降低市场波动性，提高盈利稳定性，提升头部机构估值水平。 • 新规将降低权益市场波动率，提升券商和保险公司盈利稳定性，促使欠配 逐步回补，提高整体盈利稳定性，并推动相关公司估值上升。 • 头部公司市场份额预计提升，券商欠配比例高于保险，投资者对券商盈利 稳定性存在担忧，未来非银金融机构可能增配券商和保险。 • 推荐关注中信证券、广发证券和中国银河证券。中信证券作为龙头券商， 广发证券基本面显著改善且估值较低，中国银河证券资产配置前瞻性及零 ...

2025 年 4 月金融数据点评 4 月金融数据：三个不寻常信号 2025 年 05 月 14 日 ➢ 事件：5 月 14 日，中国人民银行公布 4 月金融数据，新增社融 1.16 万亿 元、预期 1.26 万亿元，新增人民币贷款 2800 亿元、预期 7644 亿元，M1 同比 1.5%、前值 1.6%、预期 3.0%。 ➢ 4 月金融数据有三个不寻常信号值得关注：一是存量财政政策的落地加速， 既对二季度经济形成支撑，也降低了短期内出台增量政策的必要性。二是金融数 据结构上出现了"财政化"的趋势，这不仅体现在政府债对于社融的明显带动， 也体现在政府相关项目对于信贷投向的"主导"。三是股市上涨带动非银存款多 增，进而推升 M2。具体来看： ➢ 一是存量财政政策的落地加速。这既对二季度经济形成支撑，也降低了短期 内出台增量政策的必要性。 存量财政政策的加速一方面体现在特别国债发行的"快速启动"，今年两会确定 发行规模后，特别国债于 4 月底就开始发行，较去年节奏更快（去年 5 月中旬开 始）。相应地，今年以来国债发行规模更高、发行进度更快，是支撑政府债融资同 比多增的核心力量。 另一方面体现在支出端的"发力"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report from Kaiyuan Securities highlights that amidst external uncertainties, domestic macroeconomic policies aimed at stabilizing growth and the stock market are continuously being implemented, benefiting the non-bank financial sector, particularly the brokerage and insurance industries [1][2]. Non-Bank Financial Sector - The brokerage sector is expected to benefit from increased market activity and high earnings, with a projected net profit for listed brokerages of 144.8 billion in 2024 and 51.7 billion in Q1 2025, representing year-on-year growth of 16% and 85% respectively [3]. - The insurance sector is seeing stable growth in liabilities, with an increasing proportion of dividend insurance and declining liability costs, which enhances the sector's investment appeal [2][5]. Brokerage and Multi-Financial Sector - The brokerage sector's performance is supported by strong retail advantages and high dividend yields, with leading brokerages expected to outperform in the current environment [3]. - The trading volume remains high, and the personal investor activity is on an upward trend, which is likely to continue benefiting brokerages with strong retail capabilities [3]. Stock Selection Recommendations - Three main investment themes are recommended: a. High beta financial information service providers such as Zhina Compass and Dongfang Wealth [4] b. Leading brokerages with strong retail advantages and high dividend yields, including Guosen Securities and China Merchants Securities [4] c. Companies benefiting from the recovery of the Hong Kong stock market, such as Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing [4]. Insurance Sector - The insurance sector is experiencing a divergence in performance, with the asset side under pressure from long-term interest rates and increased market volatility [5]. - The liability side is expected to see stable growth, with a focus on improving the quality of new business value (NBV) and a reduction in interest rate risk [5]. - The sector's valuation remains low, and there are structural opportunities, particularly in property and casualty insurance, with a positive outlook for profitability improvements [5].