Core Viewpoint - Arbitration plays a crucial role in resolving commercial disputes, promoting international economic cooperation, and enhancing the market-oriented legal environment, supported by the Supreme People's Court's commitment to modernizing governance capabilities [1] Group 1: Arbitration Judicial Review - In 2024, national courts adjudicated 18,566 commercial arbitration judicial review cases, including 5,475 cases for confirming the validity of arbitration agreements and 11,016 cases for revoking arbitration awards [1] - The revocation rate for arbitration awards was maintained at a low 2.22%, with only 245 cases being revoked or partially revoked, while the preservation rate for arbitration cases was high at 98.90%, with 26,770 cases supported by the courts [1] Group 2: Cross-Strait Judicial Cooperation - In 2024, national courts reviewed 62 cases for recognizing and enforcing arbitration awards from Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, with 53 cases approved, indicating strong support for cross-border commercial dispute resolution [2] Group 3: Multilateralism and International Arbitration - National courts adjudicated 42 cases for recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitration awards in 2024, with no cases rejected, reflecting a commitment to multilateralism and the accurate application of the New York Convention [2] - The report emphasizes the importance of supporting international commercial arbitration, providing a solid judicial guarantee for the development of international arbitration centers [2] Group 4: Principles of Judicial Review - The report outlines principles for judicial review of arbitration, including favoring the validity of arbitration agreements and maintaining the finality of arbitration awards [3] - Courts are encouraged to interpret arbitration agreements in a manner that supports their effectiveness, while strictly applying grounds for revocation and non-enforcement of arbitration awards [3] - The principle of good faith in treaty performance is emphasized, with courts adopting a stance that favors the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes the strict application of circumstances for the annulment and non-enforcement of arbitration awards to maintain the finality of arbitration decisions [3]. Group 1: Arbitration Judicial Review Cases - In 2024, national courts adjudicated 18,566 commercial arbitration judicial review cases, including 5,475 cases for confirming the validity of arbitration agreements and 11,016 cases for annulling arbitration awards [1]. - Among the annulment cases, 245 were fully or partially annulled, representing a low annulment rate of 2.22%, while 8,335 cases were rejected [2]. - The report indicates that 27,069 cases of arbitration preservation were concluded, with a high support rate of 98.90% [3]. Group 2: Characteristics of Judicial Review - The report highlights the creation of a "arbitration-friendly" judicial environment, maintaining a low annulment rate and a high preservation rate [3]. - It also notes the continuous improvement of inter-regional judicial assistance, particularly in supporting arbitration in cross-border commercial disputes with Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan [3]. - The courts processed 62 cases for recognizing and enforcing arbitration awards from Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, with 53 cases approved [3]. Group 3: International Arbitration Support - In 2024, national courts concluded 42 cases for recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitration awards, with no cases rejected, reflecting a commitment to multilateralism and the accurate application of the New York Convention [4]. - The recognized foreign arbitration awards included those from arbitration institutions in 15 countries, showcasing the courts' support for international commercial arbitration [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes the importance of arbitration as an effective method for resolving commercial disputes, promoting international economic cooperation, and enhancing the market-oriented legal environment in China [1] Group 1: Arbitration Judicial Review Report 2024 - In 2024, a total of 18,566 commercial arbitration judicial review cases were concluded by courts nationwide, including 5,475 cases for confirming the validity of arbitration agreements and 11,016 cases for revoking arbitration awards [1] - The revocation rate for arbitration awards was maintained at a low level of 2.22%, with only 245 cases being revoked or partially revoked [1] - The support rate for arbitration preservation cases was high at 98.90%, with 26,770 out of 27,069 cases supported by the courts [1] Group 2: Cross-Strait Judicial Cooperation - In 2024, 62 cases involving the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards from Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan were concluded, with 53 cases being recognized and enforced [2] - This indicates the mainland courts' support for resolving cross-border commercial disputes through arbitration, enhancing economic cooperation with Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan [2] Group 3: Multilateralism and Foreign Arbitration - A total of 42 cases involving the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards were concluded, with no cases rejected [2] - The courts demonstrated a commitment to multilateralism and accurate application of the New York Convention, supporting international commercial arbitration [2] Group 4: Principles of Arbitration Judicial Review - The report outlines principles for judicial review of arbitration, emphasizing the interpretation that favors the validity of arbitration agreements [3] - Courts strictly apply the grounds for revocation and non-enforcement of arbitration awards to maintain the finality of arbitration decisions [3] - The principle of good faith in treaty performance is followed, with a stance that favors the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court released the "Commercial Arbitration Judicial Review Annual Report (2024)", highlighting the importance of arbitration in resolving commercial disputes and promoting international economic cooperation, while emphasizing the need for judicial support and supervision for the healthy development of arbitration [1]. Group 1: Judicial Review of Arbitration Cases - In 2024, national courts adjudicated 18,566 commercial arbitration judicial review cases, including 5,475 cases for confirming the validity of arbitration agreements and 11,016 cases for revoking arbitration awards [1]. - The revocation rate for arbitration awards was only 2.22%, with 245 cases being revoked or partially revoked, indicating a "pro-arbitration" judicial environment [1]. - The court supported 26,770 out of 27,069 cases related to arbitration preservation, achieving a high preservation rate of 98.90% [1]. Group 2: Cross-Strait and International Cooperation - National courts adjudicated 62 cases related to the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards from Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, with 53 cases being recognized and enforced, demonstrating support for cross-border commercial dispute resolution [2]. - In 2024, 42 cases concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards were reviewed, with no cases rejected, reflecting a commitment to multilateralism and adherence to the New York Convention [2][3]. Group 3: Principles of Judicial Review - The report outlines principles for judicial review, including a pro-arbitration interpretation of arbitration agreement validity, encouraging parties to resolve disputes through arbitration [2]. - Courts strictly apply grounds for revocation and non-enforcement of arbitration awards, respecting the finality of arbitration decisions while ensuring fair procedures [3]. - The principle of good faith in treaty performance is emphasized, with courts favoring the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards to create a supportive judicial environment for international commercial arbitration [3].

在当前保护主义抬头的背景下，国际贸易体系比以往任何时候都更需要《公约》这类提升运行效率的全 球规则。全球通用的技术性法律空白长期存在，叠加逆全球化趋势，进一步加剧了进出口企业对降低贸 易成本的迫切需求。对全球贸易体系而言，《公约》是在多边主义面临严峻挑战的形势下，经多方努力 在联合国达成的务实成果，充分证明以规则为基础的国际合作依然有效且不可或缺。 更重要的是，这一国际公共产品凝聚了中国的实践经验与智慧。它将中欧班列等成熟本土实践提炼为全 球贸易规则，标志着中国正从国际规则的被动"接受者"向主动"缔造者"转变。对企业而言，《公约》绝 非新增一张单证那么简单，更是全球中小微企业及广大发展中国家相关企业便捷获取融资的重要工具， 能切实帮助企业在动荡复杂的国际市场竞争中更好生存发展。 王 立 上周，第80届联合国大会正式审议通过《联合国可转让货物单证公约》（以下简称《公约》），并授权 加纳于2026年举办签约仪式。这是自1924年《海牙规则》以来，中国在运输领域引领制定的第一部国际 公约，是中国在涉外法治领域制度性话语权不断增强的一次生动实践，具有划时代意义。 中国是该《公约》的主要提案国与核心推动方。《公约》的顺 ...

千川江海阔，风好正扬帆。中非合作论坛北京峰会为中非关系发展指明了方向。不久前，中国共产党二 十届四中全会成功召开，会议通过了"十五五"规划建议，擘画了中国式现代化的光明前景，必将为中非 共逐现代化之梦注入新动能。中方愿同马方携手努力，落实两国元首达成的重要共识，进一步深化政治 互信、充实务实合作、丰富人文交流，在构建新时代全天候中非命运共同体的进程中，续写中马友好新 篇章。 (作者为中国驻马里大使) 中马政治互信历久弥坚。两国在涉及彼此核心利益和重大关切的问题上相互支持，共同维护多边主义和 国际公平正义。马里政府长期恪守一个中国原则，为恢复中华人民共和国在联合国的合法席位作出重要 贡献，坚定支持中方维护国家主权和领土完整的努力。中方以实际行动支持马方在主权、安全、发展方 面的合理诉求，支持马里人民致力于国家统一、民族振兴的正义事业。 中马务实合作硕果累累。在马里独立初期，中国克服困难为马里援建了纺织厂、糖厂、皮革厂、制药厂 等工业和民生项目，为马里经济发展和工业体系奠定良好基础。中国援建的巴马科国际会议中心、巴马 科第三大桥、马里医院、卡巴拉大学城、3·26体育场等项目在马里经济社会发展中发挥着重要作用，是 ...

年终岁末，总台海内外团队携手打造《记者世界·2025》系列报道。在这系列报道中，我们的记者将带您穿越硝烟与谈判桌，回望这个动荡之年。从巴以的 古老伤痕到伊朗上空的导弹，从美国内部的撕裂到欧洲的迷惘，从联合国的外交博弈到世界各个角落的危机与抉择——我们探寻叩问，在2025年的全球图景 上，希望与绝望如何交织，裂痕与共识如何角力。 第五期节目，我们跟随央视记者徐德智将目光锁定纽约曼哈顿东河沿岸的联合国总部。2025年，在这个没有硝烟的战场上，我们见证了一场又一场针锋相对 的外交博弈——为战火中绝望的人们寻找曙光，为多边主义的现实困境探索出路与共识。 安理会年内36次会议： 巴以决议两度遭美国否决 央视记者 徐德智：大家好，我是徐德智。2025年即将落幕。回望这一年，可以用两个词概括："动荡"与"重构"。在联合国的舞台上，各国不断为动荡的世 界与失序的格局寻找解方，而矛盾最为集中的焦点之一，便是巴以冲突。 截至12月的第三周，安理会在今年举行了36次关于巴以问题的会议，三次就加沙停火相关的决议草案表决，其中有两次遭到美国的一票否决。 美国驻联合国副大使 奥特加斯：预见之内，美国反对这项决议，因为它未能谴责哈马斯，也 ...

特朗普下达全面封锁令，没收中国香港油轮，威胁到了我国能源命脉 美国这波对委内瑞拉的石油封锁，真是够狠，完全不留情面。 特朗普政府直接把"选择性制裁"升级成了准战时的海上封锁，等于公开宣告：只要你跟委内瑞拉石油沾边，不管你是哪国的船，都 有可能被美国人拦下来，查你、扣你、甚至直接把你的油拉走。 这操作，简直明抢，披着"制裁"的外衣，实际上就是资产掠夺。 要说美国是为了所谓的"民主自由"，这理由谁信？明眼人都看得出来，最根本的还是想掐断马杜罗政权的经济命脉，逼着对方撑不 下去，然后顺手把委内瑞拉全球最大那摊石油储量收进自己口袋，顺带还能打击一下和委内瑞拉合作最深的中国，真是一箭三 雕。 这次美国的行动比以往狠多了。 特朗普签的行政命令，直接授权海岸警卫队和海军在公海上拦截船只，连第三方国家的船也不放过。 你说你是香港的船，或者挂别的旗？没用，只要你运的是委内瑞拉的石油，美国就敢上来扣。 比如"世纪号"这种中国香港的大型油轮，明明是正常商业运输，结果还是被美方以各种理由直接带走，油也被转运到美国炼油厂， 或者干脆充当战略储备。 说白了，这就是系统性洗白劫掠，谁还信什么"自由贸易"？现在美国把马杜罗政权直接定性为"外 ...

成员增至111个，覆盖全球81%的人口和65%的国内生产总值；累计批准项目360个，批准融资总额近 700亿美元……成立10年来，亚投行坚守初心、创新进取，不断发展壮大，树立了专业务实高效的良好 形象，为各成员共同发展注入了新动能，为全球金融治理探索了新模式，为国际多边合作树立了新典 范，为促进亚洲和世界经济繁荣作出了新贡献。 践行多边主义—— "构建更加公平与充满韧性的国际合作体系" 习近平主席在亚投行组建之初提出，将亚投行打造成专业、高效、廉洁的新型多边开发银行。作为中国 倡议发起的新型多边开发银行，亚投行自诞生起就承载着践行多边主义、完善全球治理的期待。 立足亚洲，面向世界。亚投行聚焦全球六大洲各成员发展需求，同多边开发机构、金融机构等建立100 多项合作关系，与其他多边开发银行联合融资项目超130个，搭建起多边合作的有效平台。 平等参与，共同协商。亚投行发展中成员股份占比约七成，发达成员约三成。发展中成员与发达成员、 大股东和小股东协力共事，以共识为导向开展合作，汇聚起完善全球治理的强大合力。 "哥伦比亚的加入，就是亚投行积极拓展全球合作的最新例证。"哥伦比亚埃斯特尔纳多大学国际关系学 教授毛里西奥· ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the significant role of Global South countries in global governance amidst challenges posed by unilateralism from Western nations and ongoing global conflicts, highlighting their proactive engagement in trade, climate, and artificial intelligence as a new driving force for governance reform [1][2]. Global Governance Challenges - The year 2025 is marked by heightened uncertainty in the global economy, intensified geopolitical rivalries, and an increase in regional conflicts, leading to a growing "governance deficit" [2]. - The return of Trump to power has seen the U.S. adopt a protectionist "America First" policy, undermining multilateralism and sparking a global trade war, which disrupts the post-World War II free trade framework [2]. - Ongoing conflicts, such as the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Palestine situation, have led to a record high in global armed conflicts, while the UN Security Council's effectiveness is being questioned [2]. Global South's Role in Governance - In contrast to the retreat of Western nations, Global South countries are stepping up to take on governance responsibilities, becoming staunch defenders of free trade and enhancing cooperation among themselves and with other developed economies [4]. - Significant progress is noted in trade agreements, such as the African Continental Free Trade Area and free trade agreements between Latin America and Europe, alongside China's initiatives to eliminate tariffs on products from 53 African nations [4]. - The Global South is also taking the lead in climate governance, reaffirming commitments to the Paris Agreement and establishing new frameworks for climate funding, such as the "Tropical Forest Permanent Fund" [4]. Artificial Intelligence Governance - The Global South is actively proposing governance frameworks for artificial intelligence, with the BRICS summit in 2025 marking a significant step in this direction [5]. - Initiatives include the establishment of a World AI Cooperation Organization, showcasing the commitment of Global South countries to responsible AI development and sustainable growth [5]. Collective Action and Reform Initiatives - The Global South is uniting to demand changes to the unfair international order and enhance their international voice, with China proposing a comprehensive governance narrative centered on a "community of shared future for mankind" [6]. - Various agreements and action plans have been reached in areas such as political security, economic cooperation, and sustainable development, demonstrating a collective commitment to reform [7]. - The Global South is advocating for reforms in the United Nations and other international institutions to ensure fair representation and adapt to current political and economic realities [7].