Group 1 - The Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering announced the list of valid candidates for the 2025 academician election, with 639 candidates from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and 660 from the Chinese Academy of Engineering [1][5] - The total number of academicians to be elected in 2025 is capped at 100 for both academies, with specific allocations for various engineering disciplines [1][2] - The election process includes external peer evaluations and an election conference to select the new academicians [1] Group 2 - The 2025 election guidelines include special provisions for candidates from private technology enterprises, those working in remote western regions, and a special channel for certain candidates [2] - A "silent period" has been established for candidates, prohibiting participation in meetings or activities that could influence the election's fairness [3][4] - Violations of election discipline can lead to permanent disqualification and lifelong accountability for candidates [4] Group 3 - Notable young candidates include Liu Yifeng and Wang Shuao, both born in 1985, representing a new generation of scholars [6][8] - Other candidates include "80s" scholars like Chang Chao and Fu Qiaomei, who have previously been nominated [10][12] - The list features candidates from emerging fields such as solar energy, lithium-ion batteries, and artificial intelligence, highlighting the focus on innovative industries [16][20] Group 4 - The presence of candidates from new research universities like Westlake University and Ningbo Oriental Institute of Technology indicates a trend towards recognizing contributions from these institutions [22][24] - The election process emphasizes the importance of academic integrity and the need for objective evaluations of candidates [4][3]

Group 1 - The total import and export value of Qinghai Province reached 4.18 billion yuan in the first seven months of 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 49.3% [1] - Exports amounted to 3.69 billion yuan, showing a significant year-on-year growth of 90.3%, while imports were 490 million yuan, down 43.2% [1] - Qinghai Province has maintained the highest growth rate in imports and exports for seven consecutive months nationwide [1] Group 2 - The number of foreign trade entities in Qinghai Province has steadily increased, with private enterprises being the main driving force behind foreign trade growth [1] - Key export products include solar cells, lithium-ion batteries, and electric passenger vehicles, contributing significantly to export growth [1] - Exports of salt lake chemical products surged, reaching 1.79 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 11.8 times, accounting for 48.4% of the province's total exports and contributing 94.2% to export growth [1] Group 3 - Qinghai Province's "Qing" branded specialty agricultural products have shown strong export momentum, totaling 450 million yuan to 46 countries and regions, a year-on-year increase of 47.6% [1] - The variety of exported agricultural products reached 95, with 56 new types added compared to the same period last year, maintaining the highest growth rate in exports for six consecutive quarters [1] - Notable agricultural exports include goji berries at 14.79 million yuan (up 34.8%), frozen trout at 3,875.7 tons (up 120%), and vegetables at 2,119.6 tons (up 170%) [1] Group 4 - Qinghai Province's market diversification continues to advance, with steady growth in trade with countries involved in the Belt and Road Initiative [2] - In the first seven months, trade with 100 countries and regions was conducted, with 75 being Belt and Road countries, resulting in a total import and export value of 3.45 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 66% [2] - Among the Belt and Road countries, trade with 17 countries doubled, with Hungary, Russia, and Vietnam being the top three trading partners, achieving import and export values of 1.68 billion, 330 million, and 270 million yuan, respectively, with year-on-year growth rates of 1,390%, 150%, and 460% [2]

Core Insights - Chinese ports continue to dominate the global cargo throughput rankings, showcasing their critical role in international trade [1][3] - In the first half of 2025, major Chinese ports achieved a cargo throughput of 8.9 billion tons, marking a 4.0% year-on-year increase, despite global trade challenges [3][4] - The "new three items" (electric vehicles, lithium batteries, and solar cells) have emerged as key drivers for the optimization and upgrading of China's foreign trade, with exports growing by 12.7% [4][5] Port Performance - Ningbo-Zhoushan Port led the nation with a cargo throughput of 71.375 million tons, followed by Tangshan Port and Shanghai Port with 43.357 million tons and 42.559 million tons, respectively [3] - The top ten ports by container throughput include Shanghai, Ningbo-Zhoushan, Shenzhen, Qingdao, Guangzhou, Tianjin, Xiamen, Suzhou, Beibu Gulf, and Rizhao [3] Infrastructure Development - During the 14th Five-Year Plan period, China added 379 berths of over 10,000 tons, bringing the total to 2,971 [6] - Major ports are enhancing their infrastructure, with Tianjin Port Group investing approximately 19.5 billion yuan in 21 key construction projects [6] Technological Advancements - The application of technologies such as 5G, artificial intelligence, and big data in Chinese ports has significantly improved the efficiency of handling complex cargo [8] - The integration of coastal ports with the China-Europe Railway Express and the Western Land-Sea New Corridor is creating a multi-dimensional logistics system [8] Trade Dynamics - The robust port network and improved efficiency are facilitating the export of "new three items," contributing to a trillion-yuan level foreign trade ecosystem [8]

Group 1 - The National Taxation Administration has exposed two tax evasion cases in the "new three samples" sector, marking the first disclosure of illegal activities in this area [1][2] - The first case involves Jiangxi Nanshi Lithium Battery New Material Co., Ltd., which fraudulently claimed tax benefits by misclassifying non-research personnel's salaries as research expenses, resulting in a tax penalty of 5.719 million yuan [1] - The second case involves a tax fraud gang led by Lin Jiayang, which falsely exported non-refundable "lead-acid batteries" as refundable "lithium batteries," leading to a recovery of 149 million yuan in export tax refunds and a prison sentence for the main perpetrator [2] Group 2 - Recent years have seen the implementation of various tax incentives to support the rapid development of the "new three samples" sector, but some entities have abused these policies to evade taxes [3] - These entities not only exploit tax benefits but also engage in practices like issuing false invoices and overstating expenses, which distorts market competition and harms compliant businesses [3] - Experts emphasize the importance of adhering to legal boundaries in the rapidly growing "new three samples" industry, advocating for a focus on innovation and market expansion rather than tax evasion [3]

Core Viewpoint - The National Taxation Administration of China has exposed two tax evasion cases in the "New Three Types" sector, highlighting the need for compliance and integrity in emerging industries [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Evasion Cases - The first case involves Jiangxi Nan's Lithium Battery New Materials Co., Ltd., which fraudulently claimed tax benefits by including non-research personnel's salaries, amounting to 6.6822 million yuan, in R&D expenses from 2021 to 2023 [2][3]. - The second case involves a criminal gang led by Lin Jiayang, which fraudulently obtained export tax refunds totaling 149 million yuan by issuing false invoices for "lead-acid batteries" disguised as "lithium batteries" from 2019 to 2022 [3][4]. Group 2: Tax Policy and Industry Impact - The Chinese government has implemented various tax incentives to support the rapid development of the "New Three Types" sector [5]. - However, some companies have exploited these incentives, undermining fair competition and disrupting the economic tax order, which poses a barrier to high-quality industry development [6]. - Strict enforcement against tax evasion in the "New Three Types" sector is essential to ensure that tax benefits reach companies focused on innovation and quality improvement, thereby promoting a healthier industry environment [6].

从披露的案例看，有的企业将非直接从事研发工作的人员工资费用纳入研发支出进行申报，违规享受研 发费用加计扣除税费优惠。有的则是骗税团伙通过操控多家新能源企业，虚开发票并虚构生产加工假 象，将不能退税的产品，以可退税的"新三样"产品名义出口，骗取国家出口退税款。 "近年来，国家对'新三样'部署实施一系列税费优惠政策，有力支持了相关经营主体快速发展。"国家税 务总局相关部门负责人说，但仍有少数"新三样"领域经营主体在本身缴税较少的情况下，仍违规骗享税 费优惠甚至偷税骗税，既违背了税费优惠激励创新发展的初衷，又破坏了法治公平的税收环境，还助长 了低价低效无序"内卷式"竞争，加剧产能过剩，破坏全国统一大市场建设。 据新华社电国家税务总局18日对外发布"新三样"(电动汽车、锂电池、光伏产品)领域两起偷骗税案件， 这是税务部门首次披露该领域的违法案件。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The National Taxation Administration has exposed two tax evasion cases in the "new three samples" sector, emphasizing that any attempts to undermine tax fairness and disrupt market order through tax fraud will be severely punished [1][2][3] Group 1: Case Summaries - The first case involves Jiangxi Nanshi Lithium Battery Materials Co., Ltd., which fraudulently claimed tax benefits by improperly including non-research personnel's salaries as R&D expenses, resulting in a tax penalty of 5.719 million yuan [1] - The second case involves a tax fraud gang led by Lin Jiayang, which manipulated invoices to falsely claim export tax refunds for 1.49 billion yuan by misrepresenting non-refundable "lead-acid batteries" as refundable "lithium batteries" [2] Group 2: Industry Context - Despite the implementation of tax incentives to support the rapid development of the "new three samples" sector, some entities have engaged in tax fraud, undermining the intended benefits of these policies [3] - The actions of these entities not only harm compliant businesses but also distort market mechanisms and disrupt fair competition, leading to overcapacity in the industry [3] - Experts emphasize the importance of adhering to legal boundaries and focusing on innovation and market expansion rather than exploiting tax compliance loopholes [3]

Core Viewpoint - The National Taxation Administration has exposed two tax evasion cases in the "New Three Samples" sector, marking the first disclosure of illegal activities in this area, emphasizing that any attempts to undermine tax fairness and market order through tax fraud will face severe penalties [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Evasion Cases - The first case involves Jiangxi Nanshi Lithium Battery New Materials Co., Ltd., which fraudulently claimed tax benefits by improperly including non-research personnel's salaries as research expenses, resulting in a tax penalty of 5.719 million yuan [1]. - The second case involves a tax fraud gang led by Lin Jiayang, which manipulated invoices to falsely claim export tax refunds for non-refundable products, resulting in a recovery of 149 million yuan in fraudulent export tax refunds and a penalty of 700 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Tax Policy and Compliance - The tax authorities emphasize that lawful tax payment is a legal obligation for businesses, and tax benefits must be enjoyed in compliance with the law [3]. - The tax department is committed to supporting compliant business operations and ensuring that tax policy benefits reach companies focused on technological innovation and quality improvement, while also preventing low-price and disorderly competition [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the illegal tax evasion activities in the "New Three Samples" sector (new energy vehicles, lithium batteries, and photovoltaic products), emphasizing the need for strict enforcement of tax regulations to ensure fair competition and promote innovation in the industry [1][2][3] Group 1: Tax Evasion Cases - Case 1 involved a tax fraud scheme led by Lin Jiayang, where a group manipulated 11 companies to export non-refundable "lead-acid batteries" as refundable "lithium batteries," resulting in a fraudulent claim of 149 million yuan in export tax refunds [1] - Case 2 involved Jiangxi Nanshi Lithium Battery New Materials Co., which improperly included 6.6822 million yuan of non-research personnel salaries in R&D expenses to claim tax deductions, leading to a total penalty of 5.719 million yuan [2] Group 2: Impact on Industry - The illegal tax activities undermine the original intent of tax incentives aimed at fostering innovation and disrupt the fair tax environment, contributing to chaotic competition and harming the unified national market [2] - Some companies are misusing tax benefits to engage in price-cutting competition, distorting market mechanisms and disrupting fair competition [2] Group 3: Expert Opinions - Experts emphasize that tax incentives should be used to enhance R&D and product quality, and companies should focus on legal compliance rather than exploiting loopholes [3] - The enforcement of tax laws in the "New Three Samples" sector is crucial for creating a fair tax environment, enhancing industry competitiveness, and curbing chaotic competition [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has implemented a series of tax and fee preferential policies to support the development of the "new three items" (electric passenger vehicles, lithium batteries, and solar batteries), but recent tax fraud cases in this sector highlight the need for compliance and integrity in tax practices [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Fraud Cases - The State Taxation Administration disclosed two tax fraud cases in the "new three items" sector, marking the first public exposure of such violations, emphasizing that any attempts to undermine tax fairness will face severe penalties [1]. - Jiangxi Nanshi Lithium Battery New Materials Co., Ltd. fraudulently claimed tax benefits by improperly including non-research personnel's salaries (totaling 6.6822 million yuan) as research expenses from 2021 to 2023 [1]. - Another case involved a tax fraud gang that obtained 149 million yuan in illegal export tax refunds by misrepresenting lead-acid batteries as refundable lithium batteries [1]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The crackdown on tax fraud in the "new three items" sector is expected to create a fair tax environment, enhance market rules, and promote healthy industry growth, ultimately improving overall competitiveness and curbing excessive competition [2]. - The misuse of tax incentives by some companies not only disrupts economic order but also hinders high-quality development in the industry, necessitating a shift from policy-driven to innovation-driven growth [2][3]. - Experts suggest that optimizing tax policies and adjusting fiscal subsidies based on industry development stages and cost changes is essential for fostering sustainable growth in the "new three items" sector [2].