Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of public funds has led to a diverse range of fund products, making it challenging for investors to select suitable options. FOF funds, acting as "professional buyers," reflect market risk preferences and strategy adjustments, providing valuable insights for investors [2][3]. Group 1: FOF Fund Preferences - The top three actively managed equity funds favored by FOF funds in Q1 include Dachen Gaoxin C managed by Liu Xu (37 FOF funds), Fuguo Stable Growth C managed by Fan Yan (26 FOF funds), and Huaxia Innovation Frontier managed by Tu Huanyu (21 FOF funds) [5][6]. - Liu Xu is characterized as a value investor focusing on safety margins and long-term stock selection, while Fan Yan is known for her diversified holdings and strong drawdown control, earning her the title of "earthquake master" [7]. - Tu Huanyu adopts a technology growth style, focusing on TMT and new energy sectors, resulting in higher volatility compared to Liu Xu and Fan Yan [7]. Group 2: Fund Performance and Characteristics - Fuguo Stable Growth C and Jing Shun Chang Cheng Quality Evergreen C saw significant institutional buying in Q1, with shares increasing by 18.0373 million and 9.6018 million, respectively [10]. - Jing Shun Chang Cheng Quality Evergreen C, managed by Fan Yan, has consistently outperformed benchmarks and peers, achieving a year-to-date return of 8.17% and a total return of 44.39% over three years [13][12]. - The fund's strategy shifted towards technology sectors, significantly increasing allocations to electronics and communications, which contributed to a net value increase of over 40% in 2024 [15][14]. Group 3: Institutional Preferences - The top ten actively managed equity funds by FOF fund holdings, excluding those with high self-company holdings, include Huaxia Innovation Frontier with a market value of 4 billion yuan and 21 FOF funds [28][29]. - The fund manager Tu Huanyu focuses on long-term investment returns in TMT, new energy, and pharmaceuticals, achieving a cumulative return of 48% since he began managing the fund in March 2020 [30][31]. - The maximum drawdown for Huaxia Innovation Frontier during Tu Huanyu's tenure reached -44.5%, indicating a high level of volatility [33].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant information provided 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The market overestimates the proportion of active equity funds underperforming their benchmarks. Selecting a benchmark that matches the fund manager's style can significantly reduce the proportion of funds with performance 10% lower than the benchmark [3][19] - The S&P 500 is the most widely - chosen benchmark for active equity funds in the US, and Russell style indices are also highly recognized [24][25] - In the short - term, banks, non - banks, and food and beverage are under - allocated industries, while electronics, media, and machinery are over - allocated industries. Active equity funds in Hong Kong still prefer growth - oriented industries [3][38][43] - When selecting a performance comparison benchmark, factors such as index style suitability, market recognition, stability, investment opportunities, and long - term viability should be considered [3] 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Market Overestimates the Proportion of Active Equity Funds Underperforming Their Benchmarks 3.1.1 Problems of Directly Selecting Broad - based Indices as Benchmarks - The two simple calculation methods currently used in the market may not have reference value for the future. The data on the proportion of funds underperforming benchmarks in the past has randomness and cannot reflect the true ability of active equity funds [10][11] - If fund managers choose broad - based indices as benchmarks without changing their investment strategies, the probability of their performance being more than 10% lower than the benchmark in three years is uncontrollable. Selecting a benchmark that matches the investment style is more important [16][19][20] 3.1.2 Benchmarks Used by Overseas Active Equity Funds - In the US, the S&P 500 is the most widely - chosen benchmark, with a scale proportion of over 40% in all active products investing in the US. Russell style indices such as Russell 1000 Growth and Russell 1000 Value are also highly recognized [24][25] - Different types of US active funds have different benchmark selection preferences. For example, the S&P 500 is commonly chosen for large - cap core products, while Russell 2000 is dominant in small - cap core products [26] 3.2 Short - term Market Transaction Expectations 3.2.1 Industry and Stock Dimensions: Under - allocation of Finance and Traditional Consumption, Over - allocation of Technology and Growth - Balanced style funds under - allocate non - banks, banks, and food and beverage, and over - allocate media, automobiles, and machinery. Growth style funds under - allocate food and beverage, transportation, and public utilities, and over - allocate electronics, power equipment, and machinery. Value style funds under - allocate banks, non - banks, and building decoration, and over - allocate power equipment, real estate, and pharmaceutical biology [33][34][35] - Different industry - themed funds also have different over - and under - allocation situations. Overall, banks, non - banks, and food and beverage are industries with large under - allocation amounts, while electronics, media, and machinery are industries with large over - allocation amounts [38] 3.2.2 Hong Kong Stock Allocation: Over - and Under - allocation Relative to the Hang Seng Index - In Hong Kong stocks, under - allocated industries include banks, non - banks, and commerce and retail, while over - allocated industries include pharmaceutical biology, media, and electronics. Active equity funds in Hong Kong still prefer growth - oriented industries [43] 3.3 How to Select Performance Comparison Benchmarks for Active Equity Funds 3.3.1 Indices Currently Issued by Mainstream Index Companies - Active equity funds commonly choose broad - based indices, industry - themed indices, and SmartBeta products as performance comparison benchmarks. The top 5 most - tracked indices are usually broad - based indices such as the CSI 300, CSI 800, Hang Seng Index, CSI 500, and CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Composite [46] - Mainstream index companies issue three types of indices: broad - based indices, SmartBeta indices, and industry - themed indices, covering multiple markets and strategies [49] 3.3.2 Indices More Likely to Generate Excess Returns - Three factors affect a fund's excess returns: investment ability, investment breadth, and investment opportunities. Indices with wider coverage and more investment opportunities can generate higher excess returns, but their Beta may be weaker [53][57] 3.3.3 How to Select Broad - based Indices - From multiple perspectives such as industry allocation deviation, standard deviation of component stock returns, and stock - selection tolerance, the CSI A500 index is more in line with the investment styles of most fund managers [61]

金融工程丨深度报告 [Table_Title] 科技主题行情催化下， 部分相关绩优基金规模快速增长 %% %% %% %% research.95579.com 1 丨证券研究报告丨 报告要点 [Table_Summary] 与 2024 年四季报相比，今年一季度主动权益基金增持最多的四个行业为金属材料及矿业 （1.16pct）、汽车（1.05 pct）、机械设备（0.69 pct）和电子（0.69 pct）。从主动调仓角度来看， 主动加仓最多的四个行业分别是机械设备（0.70 pct）、金属材料及矿业（0.69 pct）、汽车（0.62 pct）和电子（0.59 pct）。剔除行业主题基金影响后，主动加仓最多的四个行业分别是金属材料 及矿业（0.98pct）、食品饮料（0.64pct）、电子（0.58pct）和传媒互联网（0.54pct）。 分析师及联系人 [Table_Author] 覃川桃 杨凯杰 SAC：S0490513030001 SFC：BUT353 请阅读最后评级说明和重要声明 2 / 31 %% %% %% %% research.95579.com 2025 年一季度主动权益基金净值规模加权 ...

本报告的风险等级为中高风险。 本报告的信息均来自已公开信息，关于信息的准确性与完整性，建议投资者谨慎判断，据此入市，风险自担。 请务必阅读末页声明。 市场概览:2025Q1除了纯债型基金外，主要基金指数均录得正收益，主动 权益基金跑出超额。从总规模上来看，今年一季度公募基金总规模保持 稳定，主动权益基金规模微涨，结构上变化不大。类固定收益基金仍然 占比较重，达68.8%，而主动权益基金规模占比仅11%，有较大的发展空 间。 SAC 执业证书编号： 主动权益基金持仓分析：共重仓持有2638家上市公司，持股总市值约为 2.96万亿元，增长2.18%，股票仓位略有提高，重仓持有港股市场的市值 大幅增加。重仓行业方面，通信行业在本季度退出了前十大重仓行业， 而有色金属则新晋跻身前十大重仓行业之列，与内需消费息息相关的商 贸零售和轻工制造板块在行业下跌时市值在逆市增长，或指向基金逆市 增持。重仓持有的个股方面，腾讯控股跃升为第一大重仓个股，美的集 团和立讯精密出现逆市减仓。 基 金 专 题 集中度分析：行业和个股集中度更高，具体来看前十大重仓个股占比从 18.41%提升至20.14%，前十大重仓行业占比从70.19%提 ...

Core Insights - Despite a volatile overall market in the first quarter of 2025, public funds demonstrated strong resilience, with a notable recovery in the performance of actively managed equity funds [3][4] - The report indicates that 74.97% of the 8097 funds achieved positive returns, with 166 funds exceeding a 20% return and 989 funds surpassing a 10% return [3] - Growth style funds outperformed in the first quarter, with median returns of 14.49% for mid-cap growth and 13.31% for small-cap growth, while large-cap value funds lagged with a median return of approximately 1.50% [3] Fund Performance - The first quarter saw a strong correlation between fund performance and changes in fund size, with better-performing funds attracting more investment [4] - As of the end of the first quarter, the total market fund management scale reached 31.61 trillion yuan, a 9.60% increase year-on-year, while the scale of actively managed equity funds decreased by 5.16% to 3.49 trillion yuan [4] Billion Club Changes - The number of actively managed equity funds with assets exceeding 100 billion yuan decreased from 27 to 26 in the first quarter, with new entrants replacing some previous members [5] - Notable new members include the Yongying Advanced Manufacturing Select and Penghua Carbon Neutrality Theme funds, which have shown strong performance [5][8] Top Performing Funds - The Penghua Carbon Neutrality Theme fund achieved a remarkable return of 60.26%, leading the performance rankings, while the Yongying Advanced Manufacturing Select fund recorded a return of 52.32% [8][10] - The net subscription amounts for these funds were estimated to exceed 7 billion yuan, with significant increases in their total assets [10] Fund Manager Rankings - The top ten fund managers in the actively managed equity fund sector maintained relative stability, with slight internal ranking changes [14] - As of the end of the first quarter, the largest actively managed equity fund was the E Fund Blue Chip Select, managed by Zhang Kun, with a total asset value of 389.08 billion yuan [10][14] Scale Growth - Several fund managers, including those from Fortune Fund and China Europe Fund, reported significant net increases in fund management scale, indicating a positive trend in the sector [15][16] - The scale of the China Europe Medical Health fund, managed by Ge Lan, reached 311.79 billion yuan, making it one of the largest actively managed equity funds [16]

Core Viewpoint - The performance of fund companies in 2024 shows significant divergence, with leading firms maintaining stable earnings due to diversified product lines, while smaller firms face substantial declines due to their reliance on single business models and the impact of fee reductions from the previous year [2][3]. Summary by Sections Performance of Leading Fund Companies - Leading fund companies have experienced minimal changes in their operating performance in 2024, benefiting from strong growth in fixed income and passive investment sectors, which helped offset challenges in active equity fund businesses [3]. - For instance, 招商基金 reported total assets of 15.498 billion yuan and a net profit of 1.65 billion yuan, a decrease of 5.87% compared to 2023 [4]. - 华夏基金 achieved a net profit of 2.158 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 7.20%, largely driven by explosive growth in its ETF business, which saw a 63.8% increase in scale [4]. Performance of Small and Medium-sized Fund Companies - Small and medium-sized fund companies have faced severe declines in performance, primarily due to their reliance on single business models and the adverse effects of market conditions [5]. - For example, 信达澳亚基金 reported a net profit of 101 million yuan, down 41.95% from the previous year [7]. - 交银施罗德基金's net profit fell by 26.81%, continuing a trend of declining performance over three consecutive years [7]. Industry Trends and Future Outlook - The total net asset value of public funds reached 32.83 trillion yuan by the end of 2024, reflecting an 18.93% increase from the beginning of the year, indicating ongoing expansion in the public fund management scale [10]. - Companies are focusing on optimizing their business structures to adapt to market changes, with 招商基金 enhancing its investment research capabilities and diversifying its product offerings [10]. - Looking ahead to 2025, 万家基金 plans to improve its investment research capabilities and expand its product line to enhance competitiveness [11].