今天（5月2 2日）1 0点，微信公众号"网信中国"发文称，中央网信办持续加强信息推荐算法治 理。 全文如下 ↓ ↓ "清朗·网络平台算法典型问题治理"专项行动开展以来，针对网民反映强烈的算法推荐加热低 俗信息、加剧"信息茧房"、加重观点极化等问题风险，中央网信办督促指导重点平台针对性 优化信息推荐算法功能、调整信息推荐算法规则。 重点平台积极响应，签署"算法向善"南宁宣言，完善算法推荐内容审核，开设专门网站、频 道或账号集中公开算法规则原理，开发上线"茧房评估" "一键破茧"等创新功能，完善用户兴 趣偏好管理服务，提升算法推荐内容多样性。 近 日 ， 抖 音 、 小 红 书 、 微 博 、 快 手 、 微 信 视 频 号 、 哔 哩 哔 哩 等 平 台 围 绕 正 能 量 内 容 加 权 推 荐、用户自主选择权保障、推荐内容多样性优化、提升算法透明度等核心环节，系统性优化 完善多项功能。 来 源 | 微信公众号"网信中国" 在完善推荐内容审核方面。不断健全推荐内容审核机制，加强正能量内容推送，防范算法推 荐低俗不良信息。微信视频号完善"好友推荐"和"算法推荐"双重机制，不断迭代升级识别打 击模型，严禁低俗恶 ...

Core Insights - Kuaishou has launched new algorithm recommendation optimization features aimed at enhancing user experience and preventing "information cocoons" [2] Group 1: New Features - The platform has introduced two personalized recommendation optimization features: "Information Cocoon Self-Assessment" and "One-Click Breakthrough" [2] - The "Information Cocoon Self-Assessment" allows users to visualize the distribution of content types, preferences, and recommendation intensity on their recommendation page [2] - The "One-Click Breakthrough" feature enables users to adjust the types of recommended content, interest tags, and push intensity based on their preferences [2] Group 2: User Control - Users can access these features by navigating to the "Content Preference" module in the app, where they can view their interest tag distribution and content type [2] - After assessment, users can choose to maintain their current personalized recommendations or add more content type tags to their recommendation page [2] - Users have the option to turn off personalized recommendations entirely if they find the content uninteresting by adjusting settings in the app [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges of finding common cultural texts in a fragmented media landscape, emphasizing the importance of shared artistic works for collective imagination and values [2][4][6]. Group 1: Reasons for Fragmentation - The phenomenon of fragmented cultural consumption is attributed to three main limitations: model limitations, scale limitations, and speed limitations [3]. - Model limitations arise from echo chamber effects and algorithmic recommendations that reinforce existing preferences, leading to cognitive closure [3]. - Scale limitations refer to the exponential growth of cultural production, making it impossible for individuals to engage with a significant portion of available content [3]. - Speed limitations highlight the accelerated cultural consumption cycles, where works quickly fade from popularity, reducing the likelihood of lasting cultural impact [3]. Group 2: Positive Aspects of Fragmentation - The diversification of artistic creation and dissemination is a result of advanced technology, allowing for a wider variety of content that resonates with individual tastes [4]. - This fragmentation fosters creativity and provides space for personalized expressions, contributing to the flourishing of various art forms [4]. Group 3: Strategies for Rebuilding Common Texts - To rebuild common cultural texts, a rich and vibrant cultural environment is essential, encouraging diverse and grassroots creative expressions [5]. - Engaging with technology is crucial for understanding the broader cultural landscape, as creativity increasingly intersects with technological advancements [5]. - Promoting cultural connections and understanding across different genres and forms can help bridge the gaps between isolated cultural "islands" [5]. Group 4: Future Directions - The focus should be on creating new classics that resonate with contemporary emotions while being rooted in cultural traditions [6]. - Educators play a vital role in facilitating connections and understanding among students, helping them explore a broader cultural world [6]. - The future of common texts may consist of a network of diverse works that create a shared emotional map, enriching the collective cultural experience [6].

Group 1 - The internet has the potential to expand knowledge but fails to enhance individual cognitive levels, leading to the formation of information cocoons that reinforce existing beliefs [3][4] - The current online environment is filled with opposing viewpoints, resulting in a breakdown of interpersonal relationships, as individuals struggle to understand each other's perspectives [4][5] - Many people are inclined to accept only those viewpoints that align with their own, which diminishes their ability to empathize and engage in constructive dialogue [6][10] Group 2 - High-traffic videos often reflect real societal issues, showcasing the existence of both irresponsible men and materialistic women, thus validating diverse perspectives [6][7] - The confusion between macro perspectives and micro interpersonal strategies leads individuals to misapply broad concepts to specific relationships, causing further misunderstandings [7][8] - Effective relationship management requires a balance of emotional understanding and rational analysis, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches to individual situations [8][9] Group 3 - Discussions around topics like bride price should be approached with mutual understanding and respect, rather than rigid expectations or societal pressures [9][10] - The internet should serve as a tool for broadening perspectives and enhancing cognitive abilities, rather than reinforcing biases and judgments [10]

Core Insights - The article discusses the rise of AI companions among young users, highlighting their emotional needs and the potential risks associated with virtual interactions [3][4][5] Market Overview - The market size for AI companions in China is projected to reach 38.7 billion yuan in 2024 and exceed 120 billion yuan by 2027, with a service coverage of 80 million people [3] - Approximately 65% of AI companion users are aged between 18-24, indicating that young people are the primary users of this market [3] User Motivations - Young users choose AI companions for various reasons, including alleviating loneliness, providing emotional support, and offering personalized experiences [4] - AI companions help address social anxiety and the desire for emotional connection, as many young individuals find it challenging to engage in real-life social interactions [4] Risks and Challenges - There are significant risks associated with AI companions, including data privacy concerns, the potential for creating echo chambers, and unrealistic expectations regarding human relationships [5][6] - Over-reliance on AI companions may lead to a distorted perception of real-life relationships and emotional connections [6][7] Governance and Mitigation Strategies - The article suggests implementing strict data protection measures and age verification for AI companion applications to mitigate risks [8] - It emphasizes the need for clear labeling of AI interactions as "non-real emotional relationships" to guide user expectations [9] - The development of assessment tools to evaluate dependency on AI companions and provide personalized interventions is recommended [9]

坚持以人民为中心的价值取向，是金融工作的出发点和落脚点。今年初，中国证监会主席吴清在调研投 资者教育基地中指出，"投资者是市场之本，保护投资者合法权益是证券监管的首要任务"。近年来，在 监管部门持续深入推动下，投教工作内容与形式不断创新，投教服务方式更加丰富，但投教的精准触达 率与长效影响力仍有提升空间。在一年一度的"5·15全国投资者保护宣传日"来临之际，南都湾财社推 出"对话投教护航人"系列报道，以深度展现行业机构在投教领域的创新实践、典型经验。 广东博众智能科技投资有限公司（以下简称"广东博众"）作为一家证券投资咨询机构，一直深耕在投教 一线。今年，该公司将人工智能技术引入投教工作，通过AI生成内容、算法推荐和智能投教助手，为 投资者提供个性化、智能化、陪伴式投教服务。AI投教有哪些优势和劣势？AI投教与人工投教如何协 同互补？如何平衡投教内容的专业性和传播性？围绕上述问题，近日，南都湾财社记者专访了广东博众 党支部书记兼分管投教负责人蔡永嘉。 广东博众党支部书记兼分管投教负责人蔡永嘉。受访者供图 总的来说，人工智能技术的跃迁，为投教行业带来了全新的机遇和变革。我们也将继续探索和深化人工 智能在投教领域 ...

Core Insights - The rise of AI technology is significantly transforming the landscape of cognitive warfare, making it increasingly difficult to discern truth from falsehood, lowering operational thresholds, and enhancing dissemination efficiency [1][5][11] Group 1: AI's Impact on Information Production and Dissemination - The number of websites generating false articles increased by over 1000% from May to December 2023, covering 15 languages [1][5] - AI's self-learning and optimization capabilities have led to the intelligent and customized spread of misinformation, making it harder to distinguish between true and false information [5][6] - AI-generated false images spread on social media at a rate six times faster than real content, demonstrating the destructive chain reaction of rapid misinformation dissemination [8] Group 2: Changes in Cognitive Warfare Dynamics - Cognitive warfare is evolving into a "big market" model where non-state actors, social media, and individuals can participate, shifting the dynamics of influence [7][15] - The operational threshold for engaging in cognitive warfare has decreased, allowing individuals to conduct large-scale information attacks with minimal resources [6][7] - The efficiency of information dissemination has increased dramatically, with AI's exponential capabilities enabling rapid global engagement on specific topics [7][8] Group 3: Systemic Risks and Challenges - AI's deep involvement in data collection, content production, and distribution creates a more systemic and covert value penetration model, posing multidimensional impacts on societal value systems [1][11] - The reliance on biased AI models can mislead users and distort their value judgments, as seen in the training data of AI models that may reflect inherent biases [12][13] - The recommendation algorithms can reinforce "information echo chambers," leading to a loss of awareness of diverse information and increasing societal fragmentation [12][14] Group 4: Governance and Regulatory Frameworks - Experts suggest the need for a comprehensive governance framework addressing technical defenses, talent reserves, legal regulations, and international collaboration to safeguard against AI-related risks [2][15] - The establishment of a "cognitive immune system" is essential to counteract the rapid spread of false information, with recent regulations mandating identification for AI-generated content [18][19] - International cooperation is crucial for creating a unified AI governance framework, which is not only a matter of technical ethics but also a strategic opportunity for enhancing global influence [19]

技术进步日新月异，但人类的整活能力总在领先一步。 2025年至今简中互联网最火的流行语，一是"国运论"，这篇透过deepseek看未来的雄文，后来被证实是AI生 成的内容； 二是"手机爹又把我干哪来了"，表达一种下滑刷到陌生内容的诧异感，延伸出来还有大量表情包，甚至短视 频滤镜。 每一条火爆全网的内容下，都有一群仿佛走错房间的网友，拘谨又嚣张地带着"手机爹"的迷茫表情包，光速 加入互动：上一秒还在看中科院院士讲解黑洞合并，下一秒就被甲亢哥带着欣赏广场舞；刚看了两集《450 分钟深度解读红楼梦》，转头就迷失在修驴蹄子的白噪音中。 硅基大脑能俯仰古今畅聊国运，但将"手机"和"爹"排列组合到一起，是只有碳基大脑能整出的绝活。这背 后，是技术与人的关系正在悄然改变。 当快速更迭的推荐算法，向我们展现出一个更多面的世界，大部分人都愿意放下刻板成见，借助代码踏进 未曾想象过的广阔天地。 贝索斯在后来给股东的信中写道：" 我们的愿景是，让世界上每一本书，无论语言如何，都能在60秒内获取 [1]。 " 这位前世界首富的出发点显然没那么简单。对电商平台来说，图书是不可多得的标品品类，电子书更完美 解决了唯一不足的库存负担。 但 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent updates in apps like Xiaohongshu and Weibo allow users to visualize and adjust their content preferences, addressing concerns about algorithm transparency and user control over recommendations [1][4]. Group 1: User Control Features - Xiaohongshu introduced a "content preference adjustment" feature that displays a pie chart of users' browsing preferences over the past week, allowing them to adjust recommendation intensity across categories such as fashion, food, and travel [2][3]. - Users can choose from three levels of recommendation intensity: "reduce recommendation," "default intensity," and "increase intensity," and can also delete or add content tags [2][3]. - Similar features have been implemented in Weibo and Bilibili, where users can manage their content preferences through a pie chart and adjust recommendation settings [2][3]. Group 2: Algorithm Governance and Concerns - There are growing concerns about algorithmic issues such as "killing familiarity" and "information cocooning," prompting users to call for more control over algorithmic recommendations [4]. - The implementation of the "Internet Information Service Algorithm Recommendation Management Regulations" in 2022 mandates that platforms provide options for users to opt-out of personalized recommendations and manage their user tags [4]. - In response to these concerns, major platforms have introduced options for users to toggle personalized recommendations, aligning with regulatory requirements [5]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions - A joint initiative by four ministries launched in November aims to address issues like "information cocooning" and algorithmic manipulation, with a focus on user rights and algorithm transparency [5]. - The initiative requires platforms to conduct self-assessments and report on their compliance with the regulations, which has led to various governance measures being announced by platforms like Douyin, Weibo, and Xiaohongshu [5].

以下文章来源于笔记侠 ，作者苏德超 笔记侠 . 点我关注，与260万读者一起看透新商业本质。笔记侠，中国新商业知识干货共享社区，8000多篇干货 笔记，宏观趋势、组织管理、商业模式等28个主题可精准搜索。 来 源丨笔记侠（ID：Notesman） 作者丨苏德超，武汉大学哲学院教授 图源丨midjourney DeepSeek的爆红，仿佛一夜之间让我们全民都进入了AI时代。 在享受AI带来的生活便利和工作效率提升的同时，我们也发现了一些问题：例如AI会编造不存在的案 例、名人名言和数据，或者对回答张冠李戴甚至"胡说八道"。 这说明AI在价值观、道德能力和真假辨别上，还有完备空间，而我们又必然面对这个类人意识与类人智 能进入我们的工作和生活。 那么，我们要怎样适应AI时代？ 如果苏格拉底来到今天，他会怎样看待AI？ 我们怎样通过用好AI，来做好企业管理？ 为什么说梁文锋等企业家身上体现出的"近代精神"是非常可贵的？ 带着这些问题，笔记侠团队于2月27日邀请了武汉大学哲学院教授，知名哲学学者苏德超与中国人工智能 学会心智计算专委会副主任委员，武汉大学计算机学院教授蔡恒进进行了一次题为"AI时代，如何用哲学 提问和范 ...