沙利文参加访 近日，美国前国家安全顾问杰克·沙利文参加了"堡垒"网站的播客节目。他在节目中严厉批评特朗普对印度实 施"大规模贸易攻势"，并表示特朗普正在将印度推向中国。 "中国在很多国家的受欢迎程度都超过了美国。现在各国基本上都在说，美国品牌完蛋了，而中国看起来像是一个 负责任的参与者。"沙利文说道。 "当我现在去这些地方与（盟友国家的）领导人交谈时，他们都在谈论对美国去风险。他们现在将美国视为最大的 破坏者，一个不可信赖的国家。" 沙利文指出，印度是特朗普失策的最明显例证。他表示，美国一直以来都在努力与印度建立战略伙伴关系，但特 朗普突然征收巨额关税，迫使印度"与中国坐在一起"。 "看看印度，"沙利文说，"我们原本试图与这个国家建立更深层次、更可持续的关系。现在，特朗普总统却对他们 发起了大规模的贸易攻势。印度人就说：'好吧，我想我们或许应该去北京，与中国人坐在一起，因为我们必须防 范美国。'" 谈节目 在沙利文发表上述言论的几天前，特朗普对印度征收的50%关税于8月27日生效。这项针对印度出口的关税是美国 对全球各国征收的最高关税。特朗普称，这一决定是对印度购买俄罗斯石油的报复。 杰克·沙利文 然而分析人 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques the transactional nature of Trump's foreign policy, portraying him as a businessman prioritizing profit over alliances and ethical considerations [1][3][10] Group 1: Trump's Foreign Policy Approach - Trump's foreign policy is characterized by a lack of genuine alliances, viewing relationships as transactional and based solely on economic benefits [3][5] - He uses military aid and trade tariffs as leverage to extract concessions from countries, treating allies as "paying members" [5][10] - The approach leads to a perception of the U.S. as a self-serving entity, undermining its credibility and long-term relationships with allies [10] Group 2: Specific Incidents and Reactions - Trump's fluctuating stance on Ukraine and Russia illustrates his opportunistic strategy, where he initially supports Ukraine but later uses military aid as a bargaining chip [1][6] - His interactions with global leaders, such as the leniency shown towards China regarding oil purchases, highlight his willingness to adapt based on economic calculations [6][10] - The imposition of high tariffs on companies not manufacturing in the U.S. reflects his aggressive economic strategy aimed at forcing companies to relocate [7][10] Group 3: Broader Implications - The article suggests that Trump's "transactional diplomacy" may yield short-term gains but risks long-term damage to U.S. credibility and international standing [10] - The dual standards in U.S. human rights advocacy are criticized, emphasizing the disconnect between rhetoric and domestic issues [8][10]

要是有国家通过第三地转运商品来规避关税，那就要被征收 40% 的转运税，还会在未来几周实施新的原产地规则来确定转运商品关税税率。 这一系列操作，让全球贸易市场瞬间风声鹤唳。 其实，特朗普搞关税这事由来已久，早在他第一任期，就宣布对进口太阳能电池板、大型家用洗衣机、进口钢和铝征收关税。 到了第二任期，更是频繁挥舞关税大棒，对加拿大、墨西哥、中国等多个贸易伙伴多次加征关税，这背后，是他 "美国优先" 战略的体现，也有着中期选举 前争取选民支持等政治考量。 最近特朗普又在关税问题上搞出大动静，当地时间7月31日，他签署行政令，确定了对多个国家和地区征收 "对等关税" 的税率，从 10% 到 41% 不等。 像叙利亚被征收 41% 的高额关税，巴西、英国最低，是 10%。没在行政令里特别列出的国家，统一适用 10% 的关税税率。 如今这新一轮关税政策，又将带来怎样的影响呢？ 在外交方面，特朗普的 "交易式外交" 和 "美国优先"，已经让美国和盟友之间产生信任危机。加拿大和墨西哥虽是美墨加协定成员，可这次也被纳入加税名 单，这让两国国内保守派极为不满，纷纷质疑美国。巴西被要求 "全面开放市场" 并增加特定商品采购，感觉 ...

Core Points - Indonesia has reached a trade agreement with the United States, which includes a 19% tariff on all imported Indonesian goods, while Indonesian purchases of $15 billion in U.S. energy, $4.5 billion in agricultural products, and 50 Boeing aircraft are promised [1][3] - The agreement is seen as a diplomatic victory for Indonesia, with President Prabowo emphasizing its mutual benefits and potential to enhance local industries [3][7] - The deal may set a concerning precedent for Indonesia's future negotiations with other economic partners, as it could lead to similar demands from other countries [2][10] Trade Impact - The U.S. trade deficit with Indonesia was $17.9 billion in 2024, with bilateral trade amounting to $38.3 billion [4] - Key Indonesian exports to the U.S. include palm oil, coffee, cocoa, textiles, and semiconductors, which may benefit from the tariff reduction [4] - Indonesia's textile and footwear sectors may face challenges due to the new tariffs, while the energy and agricultural sectors could see gains [1][4] Economic Concerns - The agreement's energy procurement commitment of $15 billion raises questions about Indonesia's goals to reduce fossil fuel dependency and promote renewable energy [6] - The removal of localization production requirements may negatively impact local manufacturing, leading to dissatisfaction among companies that have invested significantly to comply with these regulations [6][10] - The deal is perceived to offer more political than economic benefits, as the U.S. remains a less significant trading partner compared to Indonesia's Asian counterparts [7][10] Regional Reactions - Other Asian countries are closely monitoring the U.S.-Indonesia agreement to strategize their own trade negotiations [2][8] - The agreement may influence Indonesia's ongoing trade talks with the EU, as both parties have been at odds over localization policies and environmental regulations [8][9] - Concerns arise that Indonesia's concessions to the U.S. could weaken its negotiating position with other trade partners, including the Eurasian Economic Union and the Southern Common Market [10][12]