2025年以来，企业结汇意愿显著抬升，银行结售汇顺差快速走阔，并在年末攀升至历史高位。结汇究竟是在"放水"，还是在"抽水"？央行会不会被动宽松？ 国海证券在最新固定收益点评中给出的核心判断是： 第一，结汇高增并非向银行体系"放水"，相反会通过消耗超额准备金，对流动性形成阶段性挤压； 第二，在当前政策框架下，央行并不会通过外汇占款被动对冲结汇压力，外汇渠道已不再是主要投放工具； 第三，即便结汇维持高位，其对流动性的影响仍总体可控，是否触发降准、降息，关键仍取决于国内经济金融形势，而非结汇本身。 国海证券认为，这意味着外汇结汇潮更像是一种可被管理的结构性扰动，而非货币政策转向的信号，对债市的影响也不宜被高估。 结汇"抬M1"，但在消耗银行超储 国海证券指出，2025年在人民币汇率持续走强的背景下，企业结汇意愿显著增强，银行结售汇规模快速增长，年末结售汇顺差一度升至约1000亿元的历史高 位。 高结汇≠外汇占款回归，央行不会"被动投放" 针对市场关心的"央行是否会通过外汇占款对冲结汇压力"，国海证券给出了明确否定判断。 研报指出，在2015年汇改之前，央行外汇占款与银行结售汇高度同步，承担了基础货币投放的重要职能； ...

美国政府仍将贸易摩擦视为重要筹码，对金融市场的扰动可能重复上演。但 外部政策扰动背景客观上有利于国内保持流动性充裕。 相关研究报告 《房贷利率仍是长期利率焦点》20240225 《新旧动能与利率定价》20240407 《特朗普交易：预期与预期之外》20241124 《低通胀惯性仍是主要矛盾》20250105 《如何看待美国通胀形势》20250119 《美国的赤字、储蓄率与利率》20250216 《美国经济：失速还是滞胀？》20250330 《美债成为贸易摩擦焦点》20250413 《贸易摩擦将迎关键数据》20250427 《美国财政前景的变数》20250609 《财政、司法、货币、贸易纠缠中的关税摩擦》 20250701 固定收益 | 证券研究报告 — 周报 2026 年 1 月 25 日 外部政策扰动与国内流动性 高频数据扫描 固定收益 《从通胀形势看美联储"换帅"可能性》20250720 《美国就业数据爆冷、财政变数增加》20250908 《如何看长期收益率后续走势》20251013 《美联储的暗示与基本面的趋势》20251103 《关税辩论、就业降温、美债震荡》20251110 《AI 效益与美债》20 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong Stock Connect High Dividend Total Return Index is expected to experience its strongest calendar effect from December to mid-January, with a high probability of absolute and excess returns during this period [1]. Group 1: Performance Metrics - The absolute return probability is 90.9%, with median and average gains of 3.4% and 4.6% respectively [3][19]. - The probability of excess returns compared to the CSI 300 Total Return Index is 81.8%, with median and average excess returns of 5.6% and 2.1% respectively [3][19]. - The probability of excess returns compared to the CSI Dividend Total Return Index is also 81.8%, with median and average excess returns of 3.6% and 3.2% respectively [3][19]. - The probability of excess returns compared to the Hang Seng Index Total Return is 81.8%, with median and average excess returns of 1.0% and 1.6% respectively [3][19]. Group 2: Reasons for Calendar Effect - A key reason for the strong year-end effect is the rebalancing of assets by public funds seeking relative returns, leading to a shift from high-valuation growth stocks to high-dividend, high-safety Hong Kong stocks [4]. - December to January is a peak period for insurance premiums, prompting some insurance funds to quickly build positions in high-dividend assets to match liability costs, creating a rigid buying pressure [4]. - Year-end policy catalysts or announcements may also stimulate the Hong Kong dividend market, especially if supportive dividend policies are implemented or if growth stabilization policies fall short of expectations [4]. Group 3: Historical Context - The Hong Kong Stock Connect High Dividend Total Return Index has shown strong performance from December to mid-January since 2014, with a win rate of 82% compared to the CSI 300 Total Return, CSI Dividend Total Return, and Hang Seng Index Total Return [15][19]. - The index's trading volume currently represents only 6.1% of the market, indicating a relatively low level of crowding and potential for reallocation [15].

Market Performance - The Shanghai Composite Index rose by 1.04% to close at 3766.21, marking a ten-year high [1][2] - The Shenzhen Component Index increased by 0.89% to 11926.74, while the ChiNext Index saw a smaller gain of 0.23% [1][2] - The STAR Market 50 Index surged by 3.23%, reaching a two-and-a-half-year high [1] Trading Volume - The total trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets was 2.41 trillion yuan, a decrease of over 100 billion yuan compared to the previous trading day [4] Sector Performance - Sectors such as liquor, semiconductors, automotive, AI glasses, and insurance showed significant gains, while sectors like film and television, medical services, diversified finance, and software development experienced declines [6] - Notable performances included liquor stocks, with Wuliangye and Shede Liquor hitting the daily limit, and semiconductor stocks like Cambrian Technology rising over 8% [6] Fund Flow - Main funds saw net inflows into sectors like electronics, automotive, non-ferrous metals, and food and beverage, while there was a net outflow from the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors [8] - Specific stocks with net inflows included Inspur Information, ZTE Corporation, and Haiguang Information, attracting 2.12 billion yuan, 1.47 billion yuan, and 1.10 billion yuan respectively [9] - Conversely, stocks like Sichuan Changhong, Dongfang Wealth, and Huasheng Tiancheng faced net outflows of 1.54 billion yuan, 1.45 billion yuan, and 1.38 billion yuan respectively [10] Institutional Insights - Dongfang Securities noted signs of upward revision in overseas inflation data, raising concerns about potential hawkish remarks from Powell at the Jackson Hole central bank meeting, while domestic liquidity remains ample [11] - CITIC Securities highlighted that the liquor industry is rapidly bottoming out, with leading companies likely to benefit from channel adjustments and market expansion opportunities as consumption gradually improves [12]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that sufficient domestic liquidity is reducing refinancing risks for non-bank financial institutions in emerging markets in the Asia-Pacific region [1] Group 2 - The article highlights that the availability of domestic liquidity is a key factor in stabilizing the financial environment for these institutions [1] - It notes that this liquidity support is crucial for maintaining investor confidence and ensuring smooth operations within the sector [1] - The report suggests that the current economic conditions are favorable for non-bank financial institutions, allowing them to navigate refinancing challenges more effectively [1]