Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and strategies related to resource allocation and efficiency optimization in large organizations, emphasizing the importance of a well-defined governance framework and top-level design to address redundancy and improve operational efficiency [1][60][62]. Group 1: Organizational Structure and Efficiency - As business complexity increases, efficiency issues become prominent, and a common solution is to break down operations into smaller units such as subsidiaries or project teams [2][3]. - While this approach can lead to focused goals and manageable team sizes, it also creates overlapping responsibilities and areas of neglect, which can grow significantly as team sizes increase [5][6]. - The emergence of a governance framework that combines human and legal aspects is essential to address these efficiency challenges [6][8]. Group 2: Maintenance Costs and Resource Allocation - As companies grow, maintenance costs from redundant resources and outdated projects become a significant concern, leading to regular cost optimization efforts [14][19]. - Companies may not lack funds but still impose restrictions on headcount and costs to address perceived inefficiencies [20][21]. - Identifying and managing redundant resources is crucial, as excessive maintenance costs can lead to systemic issues that hinder overall performance [22][23]. Group 3: Top-Level Design and Resource Distribution - Effective resource distribution requires a macro perspective to understand where resources should be allocated, especially during restructuring or layoffs [36][38]. - Adjusting resource allocation ratios, such as shifting from maintaining old businesses to investing in new initiatives, is vital for long-term sustainability [41][42]. - A structured approach to identifying redundancies and prioritizing key business areas can lead to a dynamic balance and improved operational efficiency [42][64]. Group 4: Implementation Challenges - Implementing new mechanisms and processes often faces resistance, necessitating a strategic approach to promote acceptance and effectiveness [50][56]. - Creating successful pilot cases within influential departments can facilitate broader adoption of new systems across the organization [51][54]. - Continuous monitoring and adjustment of resource allocation and operational strategies are essential to maintain alignment with organizational goals and address emerging challenges [63][64].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of research and public consultation in formulating long-term development strategies, highlighting Xi Jinping's approach in developing the "3820" strategy for Fuzhou and its implications for future planning [4][10]. Group 1: Historical Context - In 1992, Xi Jinping led the development of the "3820" strategy for Fuzhou, involving extensive research and public input [4]. - Over 1,600 officials conducted research on 581 topics, resulting in 367 reports to inform the strategy [4][6]. - The strategy was shaped by numerous consultations with experts and citizens, including a significant public survey that garnered nearly 30,000 responses [5][6]. Group 2: Impact of the "3820" Strategy - The implementation of the "3820" strategy over 20 years marked a period of rapid growth in Fuzhou's overall strength, urban transformation, and public benefits [7]. - The strategy's success is attributed to collective wisdom and thorough research, which are seen as foundational to effective governance [6][11]. Group 3: Current and Future Planning - The article discusses the ongoing relevance of research and public engagement in the context of the "14th Five-Year Plan" and the upcoming "15th Five-Year Plan" [8][10]. - Xi Jinping's emphasis on integrating top-level design with public input is highlighted as a key principle for future planning [10][11].

Group 1: Reform and Economic Development - Reform is a driving force for development, and as reforms deepen, the complexity of interest conflicts increases, making progress challenging [1][2] - The combination of top-level design and practical exploration has been a key reason for the success of reforms over the past 40 years [2][3] - The overall economic scale of China ranks second globally, with GDP expected to exceed 130 trillion yuan in 2024, and manufacturing value added accounting for about 30% of the global total [2] Group 2: Systematic Approach to Reform - Further comprehensive reform is a complex system project that requires both a "design blueprint" and a "construction blueprint" [3] - The core of top-level design is the goal system, which includes both long-term and short-term objectives that must be dynamically adjusted [3][4] - The 20th Central Committee's Third Plenary Session proposed over 300 important reform measures, focusing on institutional and systemic changes [4] Group 3: Addressing Economic Challenges - To address insufficient effective demand, macroeconomic regulation should be strengthened, establishing a long-term mechanism to encourage consumption, investment, and export growth [5] - Improving the scientific and standardized level of planning is crucial for enhancing the macroeconomic governance system [5] Group 4: Rural and Agricultural Modernization - The modernization of agriculture and rural areas lags behind industrial and urban modernization, necessitating the breaking down of the urban-rural dual structure [6] - The 20th Central Committee's Third Plenary Session emphasized the need for integrated development of new industrialization, urbanization, and rural revitalization [6] Group 5: Innovation and Technology - Education, technology, and talent are foundational supports for Chinese-style modernization, requiring comprehensive reforms in these areas [7] - The focus is on enhancing the national innovation system's overall effectiveness and promoting technological innovation to drive industrial upgrades [7]