王劲松在评论区表示，此前也多次收到网友与朋友分享的AI伪造视频，当时觉得制作粗糙、破绽明 显，而此次造假水准大幅提升，令他措手不及。 PChome 2月27日消息，知名演员王劲松于昨日在微博发文，称个人形象与声音被AI盗用生成视频，画 面、口型、声音高度逼真，完全看不出真假，引发网友对AI侵权、AI诈骗的广泛担忧。 事发后，王劲松立即向平台投诉举报，并在评论区晒出投诉截图，涉事视频现已被平台下架删除。他在 互动中坦言，逼真的AI伪造技术，未来可能会被用于更恶劣的肖像侵权、网络诈骗，风险难以预估， 并呼吁加强平台审核、法律监管等环节。 据我国民法典规定，未经许可使用AI伪造他人肖像、声音，涉嫌侵犯肖像权、声音权，若将其用于诈 骗行为还需承担刑事责任。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal battle initiated by lawyer Huang Guigeng against Baidu for generating false negative information about him through its AI, which he claims has severely damaged his reputation and professional credibility [3][17][20]. Group 1: Legal Action and Claims - Huang Guigeng filed a lawsuit against Baidu in September 2025, claiming defamation due to the AI-generated false information that portrayed him as involved in criminal activities [3][17]. - The AI's generated content included serious allegations such as forgery and bribery, which Huang argues were fabricated and misattributed to him [1][8]. - Huang is seeking compensation of 1.09 million yuan for the damages caused by the AI's actions [17]. Group 2: AI's Impact on Reputation - The article highlights that Huang Guigeng is not alone; many individuals have reported similar experiences where AI-generated content has linked them to negative events or fabricated allegations [21][22]. - The AI's ability to generate misleading information has raised concerns about its potential to cause "indiscriminate harm" to individuals' reputations [16][21]. - Huang discovered that the AI's information was not only incorrect but also misattributed, leading to a significant loss of trust from his clients [12][15]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Considerations - The legal community is grappling with how to address the responsibilities of AI developers and operators in cases of misinformation [5][26]. - There is a debate on whether AI should be treated as a passive information presenter or an active content creator, which affects the liability of the platforms [36][41]. - Experts suggest that platforms should implement stricter verification processes for sensitive information to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future [41][42].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal battle initiated by lawyer Huang Guigeng against Baidu for generating false negative information about him through its AI, highlighting the challenges and implications of AI-generated content on individual reputations and the responsibilities of tech companies [2][3][4]. Group 1: Legal Action and Claims - Huang Guigeng is suing Baidu for defamation, claiming that the AI-generated content has caused significant distress and damage to his reputation, leading to a lawsuit filed in September 2025 [3][10]. - The AI produced false associations linking Huang to criminal activities, which he argues constitutes a "negative information dissemination loop" [2][9]. - Huang is seeking compensation of 1.09 million yuan for the damages incurred due to the AI's actions [9]. Group 2: AI's Impact on Individuals - Multiple individuals have reported similar experiences of being falsely implicated in criminal activities by AI-generated content, indicating a broader issue of "indiscriminate harm" caused by AI [12][13]. - The AI's errors often stem from misattributing information from other individuals with similar names, leading to reputational damage for innocent parties [9][12]. - The article highlights that the AI's actions can lead to severe consequences for individuals, including public distrust and professional setbacks [8][12]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Considerations - The legal framework surrounding AI-generated content is still evolving, with courts facing challenges in determining liability and the nature of AI's role in content generation [20][21]. - Experts suggest that while some argue for leniency towards AI errors to foster innovation, others advocate for stricter accountability measures for tech companies to protect individual rights [21][22]. - The need for improved governance and verification processes for AI-generated information is emphasized, particularly for sensitive content that could harm reputations [22][23].

Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI-generated content has led to a significant identity crisis for public figures, exemplified by actress Wen Zhengrong, who faces challenges in proving her authenticity amidst widespread AI impersonation and fake live streams [1][2]. Group 1: AI Impersonation and Its Impact - Multiple instances of AI-generated fake live streams featuring Wen Zhengrong have emerged, causing confusion among viewers and raising concerns about the authenticity of online content [1][3]. - The technology enabling such impersonation has become more accessible, allowing individuals to create convincing fake content using AI tools with minimal effort [3][5]. - The proliferation of these fake accounts has led to a trust crisis, as even well-known figures struggle to prove their legitimacy, leaving ordinary individuals at a disadvantage [3][4]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Responses - Legal experts indicate that creating fake content using AI without consent constitutes an infringement of portrait rights and may involve false advertising if the impersonated individual has not endorsed the products [4][6]. - Regulatory bodies have begun implementing measures to combat AI-generated impersonation, including guidelines that require clear labeling of AI-generated content [6]. - The effectiveness of these regulations relies on a combination of technological solutions and management strategies to prevent the spread of false information [6].

Group 1 - Bubble Mart confirmed a live streaming incident occurred and is under investigation, but no employees involved will be dismissed [2] - The company reported a gross margin of 70.3% in the first half of 2025, comparable to Hermes and significantly higher than major competitors like Apple and LVMH [18] Group 2 - WeChat is exploring the possibility of allowing the same account to be logged in on multiple devices, currently in a testing phase [3] - Bilibili announced a change in management with Chen Rui stepping down as general manager, but his core management role remains unchanged [3] Group 3 - Forbes released the 2025 China Rich List, with notable wealth increases among billionaires, including Lei Jun ranking seventh, surpassing Jack Ma [4] - The Chinese government provided 1.1 trillion yuan in subsidies to support pension payments in the first half of the year [4] Group 4 - China Life Insurance has become the largest life insurance company globally, with reserves of $798.07 billion [5] - Xiaomi is set to open end-to-end assisted driving experiences for its vehicles, enhancing user experience [6] Group 5 - Ant Group has restructured its organization, establishing a new health business group to accelerate its healthcare initiatives [8] - The first domestic nuclear drug has been approved for market release, providing new treatment options for advanced prostate cancer patients [11] Group 6 - The Chinese central bank has increased its gold reserves for the 12th consecutive month, reaching approximately 2304.457 tons [12] - Honda is recalling over 400,000 vehicles in the U.S. due to a manufacturing defect that could cause wheels to detach [12]

Group 1 - Major Japanese content companies, including Bandai Namco, Square Enix, and Toei Animation, have formed the Content Overseas Distribution Association (CODA) to address concerns over AI-generated content using their intellectual property [1][3] - CODA has issued a statement demanding OpenAI to cease using its members' creative works for training the Sora 2 video generation model, which can create videos resembling iconic Japanese anime and game characters [1][3] - The association claims that the default training mechanism of Sora 2 poses legal issues, as it uses copyrighted works without prior permission, violating Japanese copyright law [3] Group 2 - CODA consists of 36 leading Japanese companies in gaming, anime, publishing, and film, representing a significant portion of Japan's cultural industry market value [3] - Bandai Namco reported a 31% year-on-year increase in gaming revenue for the first half of the 2024-2025 fiscal year, but its operating profit fell by 73.7% due to rising costs associated with AI infringement [4]

Group 1 - The news discusses the unverified claim that Olympic champion Quan Hongchan's family is building a new house, which has gained attention on social media [1] - Multiple accounts have emerged on social media using AI-generated voices of Quan Hongchan and her family to promote the house construction, aiming to attract traffic [1] - The AI-generated videos include links to various products such as camel milk powder and local eggs, leading to instances of users being scammed into making purchases [4] Group 2 - Quan Hongchan's parents rely on fruit farming for their livelihood, and her brother, Quan Jinhua, is a rural live-streaming host promoting local agricultural products [6] - Quan Jinhua aims to support local farmers and address issues of fruit oversupply and market fluctuations through his social media efforts [6][7] - In 2024, Quan Jinhua has publicly urged people to identify and report fake accounts on social media [7] Group 3 - Several celebrities have previously been victims of AI-generated impersonations, raising concerns about the misuse of technology [10] - Legal experts highlight that unauthorized use of someone's likeness or voice through AI constitutes an infringement of rights under Chinese law [11] - Recent regulations require clear identification of AI-generated content to prevent the spread of misleading information [12]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and strategies in protecting intellectual property (IP) in the gaming industry, highlighting the increasing sophistication of infringement methods and the need for collaborative efforts among industry stakeholders to combat these issues [1][2]. Group 1: Intellectual Property Protection Strategies - The gaming industry has seen a rise in various forms of infringement, including private servers and unauthorized adaptations, which disrupt market order and harm companies' interests [1]. - Shengqu Games has extensive experience in combating private servers through civil, criminal, and administrative measures, claiming that there are no significant technical barriers left to overcome [2]. - The company has developed a strategy to increase the cost of infringement, such as repeatedly reporting and banning accounts promoting private servers on platforms like Douyin [6]. Group 2: Legal Trends and Case Studies - The "Network Game Litigation Blue Book (2014-2024)" indicates a unique judicial evolution in China, with 52 cases involving mobile games as rights holders and 74 cases as defendants [3]. - A notable case in 2023 involved the protection of game screen consistency as a new standard for infringement recognition, marking a breakthrough in judicial practice [2]. - The compensation amounts in IP infringement cases have significantly increased, with a record compensation of 30 million yuan awarded in a 2022 case [9]. Group 3: Emerging Challenges - New forms of infringement have emerged, such as card blind boxes and AI-generated content, which present challenges in terms of evidence collection and legal enforcement [10]. - The gaming music copyright area is particularly contentious, as it is deeply tied to the game's IP, and the company aims to assert higher compensation based on the music's contribution to the overall game [10]. - The rise of AI technology has introduced new risks, prompting the company to focus on preventing infringement through AI tools and addressing the commercialization potential of AI-generated works [10]. Group 4: Community and Player Engagement - Player education is crucial, as many players have developed a consensus against private servers, understanding the risks associated with them [8]. - The company emphasizes the importance of maintaining a healthy official game ecosystem, which aligns with players' interests and encourages them to report private servers [8]. - The long-term value of classic IPs is rooted in respecting their content, and the company advocates for a collaborative approach among enterprises, players, platforms, and judicial authorities to effectively combat infringement [11].