Core Viewpoint - Changchai Co., Ltd. plans to establish a private equity investment fund focusing on advanced manufacturing and strategic emerging industries, with a total scale of 70 million yuan [1] Group 1: Fund Establishment - Changchai Co., Ltd. will invest 30 million yuan through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Changzhou Housheng Investment Co., Ltd., as a limited partner in the Changzhou Changtou Xinhui No. 1 Private Equity Investment Fund [1] - The fund will be jointly initiated with its controlling shareholder, Changzhou Investment Group Co., Ltd., and Changzhou Xinhui Private Fund Management Co., Ltd. [1] Group 2: Investment Focus - The fund will primarily invest in advanced manufacturing projects, with a focus on high-end manufacturing, smart agricultural machinery, new energy, and new power [1]

Core Viewpoint - The departure of fund manager Yuan Zuodong from Xingyin Fund marks a significant change in the company's equity investment team, with implications for its fund management strategy and performance [2][8]. Group 1: Manager Departure - Yuan Zuodong announced his resignation due to personal reasons, effective October 28, impacting eight funds he managed [2]. - Yuan had a management scale of 2.039 billion yuan, with all funds under his management achieving positive returns during his tenure [2][6]. - His departure follows a trend of increasing managerial changes within Xingyin Fund, indicating potential instability in the management team [8][13]. Group 2: Fund Performance and Structure - Under Yuan's management, the Xingyin Fund's performance was notable, with the Xingyin Yield Enhancement Fund returning 48.06% from February 19, 2020, to his departure [2]. - The company currently manages 113 funds, with a total public fund scale of 102.739 billion yuan, where bond funds dominate the portfolio [5][6]. - The largest fund, Xingyin Cash Growth, reached 17.3 billion yuan, while many funds have low individual scales, indicating a concentration of assets in a few products [6]. Group 3: Management Changes and Strategy - Xingyin Fund has experienced significant management turnover since 2021, with multiple high-level positions changing hands, including the chairman and general manager [8][10][12]. - The company aims to enhance its equity investment capabilities and adapt to regulatory changes, focusing on product precision and deep customer engagement [14]. - The recent appointment of a new management team is expected to maintain the company's investment philosophy and product strategy despite the changes [2][14].

Core Viewpoint - Suchang Chai A announced the establishment of a new equity investment fund, focusing on advanced manufacturing and strategic emerging industries [1] Group 1: Fund Establishment - The company plans to set up the Changzhou Changtou Xinhui No. 1 Equity Investment Fund (Limited Partnership) with a total scale of 70 million yuan [1] - Changzhou Housheng Investment Co., Ltd. will act as a limited partner, contributing 30 million yuan alongside the controlling shareholder, Changzhou Investment Group Co., Ltd., and Changzhou Xinhui Private Equity Fund Management Co., Ltd. [1] Group 2: Investment Focus - The fund will invest in advanced manufacturing projects, with a particular emphasis on high-end manufacturing, intelligent agricultural machinery, new energy, and new power [1]

Group 1: Optimizing Risk-Return Ratio - The management of "fixed income +" products requires a balance between risk and return, with a focus on understanding client expectations and market volatility [4][5][6] - A diverse team approach enhances research depth and breadth, allowing for better asset allocation and risk management [6] - Implementing a three-tiered drawdown warning mechanism helps in controlling risks while aiming for returns [6][9] Group 2: Preserving Returns - In challenging equity markets, maintaining a flexible investment style and adapting to market trends is crucial for preserving returns in "fixed income +" products [11] - Continuous learning from equity fund managers can provide insights into long-term asset value analysis [11] Group 3: Pursuing Absolute Returns - Achieving absolute return targets has become increasingly difficult due to declining bond yields, necessitating exceptional trading and timing skills [13] - Risk budget management is essential, with a focus on maintaining a portion of risk exposure within the bounds of market conditions [13] Group 4: Risk Control and Opportunities in Growth Style - A dual approach of macroeconomic risk identification and sector-specific investment can help mitigate risks associated with high-volatility assets [16][17] - Focusing on industries with clear trends and improving profit expectations can yield positive returns in a non-systemic risk environment [17] Group 5: Market Evolution and Adaptation - The capital market has seen a systematic decline in asset yields, necessitating a broader research focus that includes global markets and various asset classes [19][20] - Adapting to changes in market structure and investor behavior is vital for maintaining effective investment strategies [20] Group 6: Dynamic Rebalancing - Dynamic rebalancing strategies are employed to manage asset volatility and ensure stable returns, particularly in fluctuating market conditions [23] Group 7: Growth Style "Fixed Income +" - The growth style in "fixed income +" products aims to capture societal development benefits while providing stable returns through fixed income assets [25] Group 8: Combining Active and Quantitative Approaches - Integrating quantitative tools with fundamental research enhances the investment management process, allowing for more efficient decision-making [27] Group 9: Insights and Compounding - Identifying companies with long-term growth potential requires a clear understanding of investment objectives and continuous industry learning [29][30] Group 10: Forward-Looking Technology Layout - Early investments in technology sectors, particularly AI, are based on recognizing transformative trends and potential for long-term growth [33][34]

Core Insights - On November 5, a total of $797 million was withdrawn from U.S. Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs during a market downturn, indicating a significant shift in institutional holdings [1] Group 1: Market Movements - The net outflow from spot Bitcoin ETFs reached $577.74 million, marking the largest single-day outflow since August 1 [1] - Fidelity's FBTC fund experienced an outflow of $356.6 million, while ARK and 21Shares' ARKB saw a withdrawal of $128 million, and Grayscale's GBTC had an outflow of $48.9 million [1] Group 2: Institutional Behavior - The continuous outflow over five days signifies a decisive change in institutional positions, reflecting a portfolio rebalancing [1] - The revaluation of risk assets is closely tied to the performance of technology stocks, which are currently putting pressure on cryptocurrencies [1] Group 3: Market Correlation - The excessive expansion of AI trading could lead to a decline in industry valuations, potentially impacting the cryptocurrency market through its correlation with the Nasdaq [1]

在11,2020-02-20 17:57:25 17:10:00:00:00:00:00 11:00:00:00:00:00:00 11:12:50:00 2:00:00:50 21:00:10:00:50 11:01:10:00 11 场。媒体馆得在印度全身到调度和关。意愿平是林树对中国工程师团群和较小步行变。给意分世的话看他不更上流动用品事变平成贯流进展事的时间占议。体验分位处置示用时管案。他们分位是同步加拿出市 83/4号或陆续费显纪录332.2.9705年11月4日。福生用登通新社济依数发布分为20年8月8日)，可查调查位记原社四30年8月1月21日起。促生科生报像发布分为7000年7月7日:中证商能责任,辽生保合师资源 图 经历为2017年6月22日，可贵调体值记录日立2017年1月29日起:中证意取通互联网推重发布日为2021年1月11日:中证股股资消费主题部数发布日为2000年3月4日, 注?银行。互联网平台等税又销售机构提供可联外投资的ETF联接基金 流):但费事产品,具管理费等0.155/年。托管费率0.00%/年。 今日港股走势分化，科技股整体回调，医药股局部活跃，南向资金全天净买入超10 ...

ETF Industry News - The three major indices collectively rose, with the Shanghai Composite Index increasing by 0.23%, the Shenzhen Component Index by 0.37%, and the ChiNext Index by 1.03. Multiple ETFs in the power equipment sector saw significant gains, including the leading photovoltaic ETF (560980.SH) which rose by 5.59%, the grid equipment ETF (159326.SZ) by 5.31%, and the innovative new energy ETF (588830.SH) by 5.18% [1][3][10]. Cross-Border Investment - Recent enthusiasm for cross-border investments is evident as two Brazil-focused ETFs experienced a surge in demand, with subscription scales quickly surpassing their fundraising limits. The proportion of allocation confirmed for the China Asset Management Brazil ETF was approximately 11.5%, while the E Fund Brazil ETF was about 11.8%, indicating strong investor interest in emerging market investment products [2]. Market Overview - On November 5, the A-share market and major overseas indices showed positive performance, with the Shanghai Composite Index closing at 3969.25 points, the Shenzhen Component Index at 13223.56 points, and the ChiNext Index at 3166.23 points. The ChiNext Index, CSI 1000, and CSI 500 ranked highest in daily performance, with respective daily increases of 1.03%, 0.39%, and 0.26% [3]. Sector Performance - In the sector performance analysis, the power equipment, coal, and retail sectors ranked highest with daily increases of 3.4%, 1.39%, and 1.22%, respectively. Conversely, the computer, non-bank financials, and telecommunications sectors lagged behind with declines of -0.97%, -0.49%, and -0.43% [6]. ETF Market Performance - The overall performance of ETFs was categorized by investment type, with stock-based scale index ETFs showing the best average daily increase of 0.27%, while cross-border ETFs had the worst performance with an average decline of -0.56% [8]. Top Performing ETFs - The top three performing stock ETFs for the day were the leading photovoltaic ETF (560980.SH) with a gain of 5.59%, the grid equipment ETF (159326.SZ) with a gain of 5.31%, and the innovative new energy ETF (588830.SH) with a gain of 5.18% [10][11]. Trading Volume of Different ETF Categories - The trading volume for ETFs was led by stock ETFs, with the top three being A500 ETF (512050.SH) at 5.308 billion yuan, CSI A500 ETF (159338.SZ) at 4.310 billion yuan, and A500 ETF Southern (159352.SZ) at 4.195 billion yuan [13][14].

导读： 备案指引3号自2023年发布实施后，实操环节遇到了一些障碍和困难，基金业协会对这些情况及 时进行了跟踪和研究，并形成了有效的解决方案，通过修订备案指引3号的方式予以实施。这一 点也跟最近几年协会加强行业沟通，尊重一线实践，健全行业规范，化解存量风险的工作方式息 息相关。 作者｜汪澍 来源｜VC小乒乓的窝 2025年10月24日，基金业协会修订并发布了《私募投资基金备案指引第3号——私募投资基金变更 管理人》（以下简称"备案指引3号"），对2023年版本的备案指引3号进行了大幅的修订。 协会在《修订说明》中对本次备案指引3号的修订工作进行了详细解释，简言之可以整理为以下几 个方面的内容： 一是尊重合同约定，增加"生前预嘱"要求。过往的规则要求过于刚性，修改后充分尊重意思自治， 投资人和管理人可以在基金合同中明确约定变更管理人的表决机制和表决比例，并在表决方式上也 可以灵活选择，除现场表决以外，书面表决、通讯表决等方式均被接受。而考虑到合同自治优先原 则对合同的完备性有较高要求，因此增加了"生前预嘱"要求，在基金备案时，基金合同中应当明确 约定在管理人失能情况下，决议变更管理人等事项的具体议事方式。 二是 ...

Core Viewpoint - The release of the "Guidelines for Performance Comparison Benchmarks of Publicly Raised Securities Investment Funds (Draft for Comments)" and the "Operational Details for Performance Comparison Benchmarks of Publicly Raised Securities Investment Funds (Draft for Comments)" marks a significant step in enhancing the accountability of fund managers and promoting high-quality development in the public fund industry, aiming to standardize investment behavior and prevent style drift [3][5][24]. Summary by Sections 1. Performance Benchmark Usage and Management - The guidelines clarify the norms for selecting and using performance benchmarks, emphasizing their representational role [4][6]. - Fund managers are required to embed benchmark management throughout the product lifecycle, establishing a comprehensive internal control mechanism [7][8]. - External supervision is strengthened by activating the roles of custodians, sales institutions, and evaluation agencies, creating a multi-party check-and-balance ecosystem [9]. - A one-year transition period is set for existing products to adjust benchmarks, ensuring market stability [10]. 2. Implementation and Impact - Traditional broad-based indices remain the mainstream benchmark choice for newly launched products, reflecting market recognition and maturity [13][14]. - Changes in benchmarks accurately reflect product positioning and investment styles, with many funds adjusting their benchmarks to align with their investment strategies [16][17]. - The bond fund sector shows a high concentration in benchmark selection, primarily using the "China Bond Comprehensive Price Index" [20][21]. 3. Future Policies and Long-term Effects - The new regulations aim to enhance the clarity and transparency of risk-return characteristics of fund products, ultimately serving to protect investors' fundamental interests [24][25]. - Future measures will include revising fund manager compensation assessment rules to link performance benchmarks with management evaluations, promoting a focus on long-term, risk-adjusted excess returns [24]. - The new rules significantly improve information transparency and investor rights protection, fostering a shift from absolute to relative return assessments among investors [25].

Report Summary 1. Market Overview - On November 5, 2025, the Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.23% to 3969.25 points, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 0.37% to 13223.56 points, and the ChiNext Index rose 1.03% to 3166.23 points. The trading volume of A - shares in the two markets was 18946 billion yuan. The top - performing sectors were power equipment (3.40%), coal (1.39%), and commercial and retail (1.22%), while the under - performing sectors were computer (-0.97%), non - bank finance (-0.49%), and communication (-0.43%) [2][6]. 2. Stock ETFs - The top - trading - volume stock ETFs were Huaxia CSI A500 ETF (up 0.09% with a premium rate of 0.16%), Guotai CSI A500 ETF (unchanged with a premium rate of 0.05%), and Southern CSI A500 ETF (up 0.08% with a premium rate of 0.14%) [3][7]. - The top ten trading - volume stock ETFs included details such as price, return, tracking index return, IOPV, premium rate, trading volume, and latest share reference [8]. 3. Bond ETFs - The top - trading - volume bond ETFs were Haifutong CSI Short - Term Financing ETF (up 0.01% with a premium rate of 0.01%), Huatianfu CSI AAA Sci - tech Bond ETF (up 0.01% with a premium rate of - 0.21%), and Boshi CSI Convertible and Exchangeable Bond ETF (up 0.48% with a premium rate of 0.54%) [4][9]. - The top five trading - volume bond ETFs' information including price, return, premium rate, and trading volume was provided [10]. 4. Gold ETFs - Gold AU9999 fell 0.71% and Shanghai Gold fell 0.35%. The top - trading - volume gold ETFs were Huaan Gold ETF (down 0.35% with a premium rate of - 0.69%), Boshi Gold ETF (down 0.33% with a premium rate of - 0.70%), and E Fund Gold ETF (down 0.34% with a premium rate of - 0.69%) [12]. - The top five trading - volume gold ETFs' details were presented [13]. 5. Commodity Futures ETFs - Huaxia Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF rose 1.64% with a premium rate of 1.97%, Dacheng Non - ferrous Metals Futures ETF fell 0.33% with a premium rate of - 0.65%, and Jianxin Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF rose 0.24% with a premium rate of 0.33% [13][14]. 6. Cross - border ETFs - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.53%, the Nasdaq fell 2.04%, the S&P 500 fell 1.17%, and the German DAX fell 0.76%. On this day, the Hang Seng Index fell 0.07% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index fell 0.11%. The top - trading - volume cross - border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (down 0.69% with a premium rate of 0.43%), GF CSI Hong Kong Innovative Drugs ETF (down 0.37% with a premium rate of 0.92%), and Huatai - Peregrine Hang Seng Technology ETF (down 1.03% with a premium rate of - 0.04%) [15]. - The top five trading - volume cross - border ETFs' information was given [16]. 7. Money ETFs - The top - trading - volume money ETFs were Yin Hua Ri Li ETF, Hua Bao Tian Yi ETF, and Money ETF Jian Xin Tian Yi [17][18].