Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of social media accounts that exploit the experiences of food delivery riders to create viral content, leading to concerns about authenticity and the potential for malicious marketing practices [1][4][23] Group 1: Incident Overview - A video featuring a food delivery rider criticizing food safety practices went viral, prompting discussions about the integrity of food delivery services [1] - The rider, known as "博哥," has a history of creating similar content, raising questions about the authenticity of his claims [4][5] - Another account, "苏星颜," has been identified as producing similar content, suggesting a coordinated effort to generate sympathy and attention [5][11] Group 2: Content Creation and Monetization - "博哥" and "苏星颜" utilize a strategy of sharing personal hardships to attract viewers, which is then followed by promotional content aimed at monetizing their audience through courses [7][11][23] - The accounts have shown a pattern of creating videos that resonate with viewers' emotions, leading to increased engagement and potential financial gain [7][23] - Similar accounts, such as "林晚尚," have been identified, indicating a trend of using scripted narratives to exploit viewer sentiment for profit [11][23] Group 3: Company Response and Actions - The company has taken a firm stance against these practices, emphasizing a zero-tolerance policy towards malicious marketing and misinformation [23] - Evidence of the accounts' activities has been documented and reported to relevant authorities for further action [23] - The company has previously collaborated with law enforcement to address over 30 cases of similar misconduct, highlighting its commitment to maintaining integrity within the delivery service industry [23]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of several short video accounts that exploit the image of food delivery riders to create sensational content, leading to concerns about food safety and the working conditions of delivery personnel, ultimately resulting in the suspension of these accounts by the company [1][5][11]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A video featuring a delivery rider criticizing food safety practices went viral, prompting discussions on social media about the quality of food delivery services [1]. - The original video was found to be part of a trend where multiple accounts share similar narratives about the hardships faced by delivery riders, raising questions about their authenticity [6][11]. Group 2: Account Investigations - The company identified that the rider known as "博哥" had fabricated stories about his experiences, leading to his permanent ban from the platform for spreading false information [5]. - Another account, "苏星颜," was found to have registered as a delivery rider but had minimal actual delivery activity, suggesting that the account was primarily used for creating sensational content [6][11]. Group 3: Monetization Tactics - The accounts have been observed to use a strategy of creating viral content to attract viewers, followed by attempts to monetize through selling courses on video creation [8][11]. - Similar patterns were noted among other accounts, indicating a coordinated effort to exploit the platform for financial gain through misleading narratives [11][16]. Group 4: Company Response - The company has expressed a commitment to combating these deceptive practices and has reported multiple cases of such misconduct to relevant authorities for further action [16]. - Since the beginning of the year, the company has collaborated with law enforcement to address over 30 cases related to fraudulent activities by these accounts [16].

Core Viewpoint - The increasing use of AI-generated images for restaurant storefronts on food delivery platforms raises concerns about misleading advertising and consumer rights [1][20]. Group 1: AI-Generated Images in Food Delivery - Many restaurants are using AI-generated images that appear to show bustling dining environments, which may not reflect the actual conditions of the establishments [1][19]. - A random investigation of four restaurants in Shanghai revealed discrepancies between their online images and real-life appearances, with some establishments not even offering dine-in options [1][3][19]. Group 2: Platform Regulations and Responses - Meituan has established a special task force to address the use of misleading AI-generated images, emphasizing that such images can mislead consumers [2][20]. - Ele.me has also formed a task force to tackle the issue, focusing on improving rules and technology to identify and rectify misleading storefront images [2][20]. Group 3: Legal Perspectives on Misleading Advertising - Legal experts suggest that the key issue is whether consumers can reasonably identify AI-generated images as not representing the actual business premises [20][21]. - If storefront images are found to be misleading or fraudulent, the restaurants could face civil and administrative liabilities, and the platforms may also bear responsibility for not adequately vetting their merchants [22][24]. Group 4: Consumer Perception and Acceptance - Consumers generally accept some level of exaggeration in food advertising, but storefront images are expected to accurately represent the business, as they directly influence purchasing decisions [23][24]. - The introduction of regulations regarding AI-generated content will require businesses to disclose the use of such images, effective from September 1 [24].

靴子，终于落地。 日前，最高法发布司法解释，无论双方协商还是劳动者单方承诺，任何"不缴社保"的约定都是无效的，将于9月1日实施。 这其实不是新规，而是对社保强制缴纳的重申，但种种信号表明，"全民强制社保"时代，真的要来了。 强制交社保，关乎公平，关乎福利，更关乎养老金总盘子。 一、强制交社保，不是新鲜事 社保具有强制性，并非始于今天，而是一以贯之，10多年前法律法规就已明确。 无论是《劳动法》还是《社会保险法》，均有直接规定： "用人单位和劳动者必须依法参加社会保险，缴纳社会保险费"。 "必须"两个字，奠定了社保"强制性"的基调，这一强制性面向的不只是企业，还有劳动者。 无论是公务员、企业职工，还是个体户，乃至灵活就业人员，都有缴纳社保的义务。 从一开始，就不存在"自愿不自愿"之说。 过去，由于经济上行期的增长需要、人口红利的存在以及执法力度问题，社保征收存在弹性空间。 一些中小企业选择规避，部分劳动者也主动放弃，灵活就业人员则长期处于灰色地带。 然而，2019年以来，随着社保征收改制，从社保经办部门划转到税务部门统一征收，监管能力全方位提升。 这一次，最高法专门出台司法解释，重申"不缴社保的约定无效"，再次 ...

8月7日晚，美团外卖官方微博发文宣布今年"秋天的第一杯奶茶"活动如期结束。 文章称，今年立秋，美团共请客300万名骑手提前喝上了秋天第一杯奶茶，邀请了超过2万名奶茶店员按 摩，同时，还联合了100家茶饮品牌及25万家门店携手发布新品等。 此外，美团还为小商家送去了秋天的第一份助力金。年内，美团还将继续为10万家餐饮小店发放最高5 万元的助力金，助力他们稳定经营。 立秋前夕,美团骑手养老保险补贴推向全国,不区 分骑手类型,不限制参保地点,不规定时长卑量。 今天,全国所有遵守交通规则,不闯红灯的骑手将 额外获得家人分享券。今年以来,我们为骑手设置 了"等灯等灯奖",每单可额外获得1-1.5元现金 激励。 昨天,超过300万名骑手接受我们的邀请,提前喝 上了秋天第一杯奶茶。超过2万名奶茶店员在一天 的繁忙工作后,领到了美团发放的免费按摩券。我 们也为美团的所有的同事们,都送上了一杯奶茶。 在全国37个城市,我们提前铺设了3万个环保回收 点,用户参与回收即可获赠神券。 我们的城市经理也为在补贴大战中备受压力的川商 家们,送去了秋天的第一份助力金。年内,我们还 将继续为10万家餐饮川店发放最高5万元的助力 金,助力他们 ...

"工会爱心餐"参与方式：第一步，打开饿了么APP，在首页点击"工会爱心餐"进入项目会场（如有 爱心餐补贴红包，可以点击领取，支付时会扣减相应红包金额）。 第二步，选择商家和菜品，进行下单和支付。 自2025年8月7日至2025年12月31日，在享受一口价优惠餐品基础上，不定期通过饿了么平台"工会 爱心餐"界面，限量发放"工会爱心餐"无门槛券。（记者 单杉） 项目首批线上定向投放餐补券1万余张，常态化、长效化为新就业形态劳动者提供优惠、便捷、健 康的专属餐饮服务。为让"爱心餐"真正成为职工满意的"放心餐""舒心餐"，工会还将动态摸排新就业形 态劳动者集中区域，优化服务站点布局，让大家就近能及、方便获取；联合市场监管等部门建立全流程 监管机制，从食材采购到餐品配送严格把关，让职工吃得安全、吃得安心；长效化推进，完善"工会补 贴为主、企业让利为辅、社会捐助补充"的可持续模式，让爱心持续传递、温暖不断延伸。 均价10元的爱心餐，是温暖的载体，更是社会文明的刻度。骑手代表李海龙负责苏宁附近派送服 务，他说："我们会在骑手群里进行宣传，爱心餐项目不仅为大家省钱，更增加了骑手心里的归属感。" 市新工联办公室相关负责人介绍， ...

8月7日晚11点，美团外卖官方微博发文宣布今年"秋天的第一杯奶茶"活动结束，但并未发布任何订单数 字。美团称，"不会发布连续三天超越1亿单这种战报"，"不会用100%的补贴率制造1元购、1毛购、1分 购"，"不想向奶茶注入更多泡沫"。 美团公布的数据显示，今年立秋美团共邀请300万名骑手喝上秋天的第一杯奶茶，邀请超2万名奶茶店员 接受免费按摩，并联合100家茶饮品牌及25万家门店发布新品。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing challenges faced by delivery riders in accessing certain residential complexes in Shanghai, specifically the Renheng Park Century community, which has strict entry regulations that significantly delay delivery times and impact riders' earnings [5][10]. Group 1: Delivery Challenges - The Renheng Park Century community has enforced a policy for over seven years that requires delivery riders to be accompanied by security personnel in a shuttle vehicle, leading to delays of 10 to 40 minutes for deliveries [7][8]. - Riders experience dual pressure during peak hours, as orders from this community not only take longer to deliver but also cause them to miss out on other potential orders, resulting in reduced daily earnings [8][9]. - The community's management has refused to change its delivery policy, citing contractual obligations with residents, which complicates the situation for delivery platforms and riders [7][10]. Group 2: Industry Response - Delivery platforms are actively seeking solutions to the entry difficulties faced by riders, including partnerships with local governments to develop "entry codes" that streamline access to residential areas [10]. - Other residential complexes have implemented alternative delivery methods, such as designated drop-off points for riders, which the Renheng Park Century community has rejected due to concerns over potential delivery errors [9][10]. - The article indicates that the issue of restricted access for delivery riders is not unique to Shanghai, with similar challenges reported in other cities, highlighting a broader industry concern [10].

Core Viewpoint - The news highlights the issue of fake short video accounts on social media that exploit the experiences of delivery riders to gain attention and monetize their content through emotional manipulation and false narratives [1][2][3]. Group 1: Fake Accounts and Their Activities - The short video account "博哥" became a delivery rider in November 2022 and later registered as a crowd-sourced rider in March 2024, posting videos about food safety and rider treatment, which were found to be false [1]. - Another account, "苏星颜," has been posting videos since June 14, 2023, portraying a sob story about the hardships of being a delivery rider, but has only completed 10 deliveries since registering in March 2023 [2]. - A third account, "林晚尚," also engages in similar tactics by creating emotional content to attract viewers and then monetizing through selling short video courses [3]. Group 2: Company Response and Actions - The company has identified a pattern of these accounts fabricating tragic stories to generate views and subsequently sell courses, indicating a systematic approach to content creation [3]. - The company emphasizes a "zero tolerance" policy towards such malicious marketing practices and has collected evidence to report these violations to regulatory authorities for accountability [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article promotes various discount coupons and offers related to food delivery services, specifically targeting users of mobile banking and credit cards from China Construction Bank. Group 1: Promotional Offers - Users can receive WeChat discounts ranging from 10 to 100 yuan upon registering for mobile banking [1] - The promotional period for certain offers is from July 1, 2025, to August 31, 2025, with discounts starting as low as 3 yuan [5] - Weekly coupons for food delivery services like Ele.me and Meituan are available, with specific minimum order amounts required to use the discounts [6][10][11] Group 2: Coupon Details - Ele.me coupons can be used for orders over 38 yuan, and they can be claimed weekly [6] - Meituan offers include discounts for orders over 25 yuan, with specific validity periods for each coupon [10][11][12] - Users can enjoy up to 90% off on certain items when using points for Meituan orders [13] Group 3: Points and Payment - Users can redeem points for discounts on food delivery, with a maximum single transaction limit of 100 yuan and a monthly cap of 500 yuan for Meituan [14] - For Ele.me, users can redeem points for up to 50% off, with a single transaction limit of 5 yuan and the same monthly cap of 500 yuan [14] - The article emphasizes the benefits of using Dragon Pay and Construction Bank credit cards for additional discounts and points accumulation [17][19]