方便面

Search documents
“多半” 商标引争议 白象食品品牌声誉与业绩受考验
Xin Lang Zheng Quan· 2025-06-13 09:11
Core Viewpoint - White Elephant Food is facing public scrutiny due to trademark issues related to its "Half Bag Noodles" and "Half Bucket Noodles" products, which mislead consumers regarding the actual weight of the products [1][2] Group 1: Trademark Controversy - The packaging of "Half Bag Noodles" and "Half Bucket Noodles" claims "large quantity, double satisfaction," leading consumers to believe the products contain significantly more than standard offerings [1] - Actual weight comparisons show that the "Half Bag Noodles" only contain 25 grams more than the regular version, which is a 1/5 to 1/4 increase, contrary to consumer expectations [1] Group 2: Company Response - White Elephant's customer service confirmed that "Half" is a trademark and that the actual weight is as stated on the packaging, acknowledging the public's perception of "playing with words" [2] - The company issued an apology and announced plans to rename the products to "Noodle Cake 120g" and "Noodle Cake 110g," ceasing production of the original packaging within the month [2] Group 3: Company Performance and Market Position - White Elephant Food has experienced significant fluctuations in its market presence, initially gaining popularity with its 1 yuan bone soup noodles in 2003 but later facing competition from brands like Jinmailang [3] - The company rebounded after the "soil pit pickled cabbage" incident in 2022, which improved its brand image and led to a surge in sales, reaching 9.175 billion yuan in 2023, surpassing Jinmailang to become the third in the industry [3] - Despite revenue growth, White Elephant is criticized for its over-reliance on online channels and an imbalanced development between online and offline sales [3]
白象,被“流量”反噬
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-11 11:04
Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding the "Duoban" product from White Elephant Foods highlights the challenges faced by the company in maintaining consumer trust while navigating its brand identity and product offerings [1][2]. Group 1: Company Performance - White Elephant Foods achieved a revenue of 9.175 billion yuan in 2023, nearing the 10 billion yuan mark, with a projected growth of over 20% in 2024, aiming for approximately 12 billion yuan in revenue [2][4]. - The company has surpassed Uni-President in the instant noodle market, positioning itself as the second-largest player after Kang Shifu [2][5]. Group 2: Brand Reputation and Marketing - The brand's reputation significantly improved following its humanitarian efforts during the 2021 floods in Henan, which included donations of food and water [4][5]. - White Elephant's proactive response to the "土坑酸菜" scandal in 2022 further enhanced consumer trust, leading to increased brand visibility and sales [5][6]. Group 3: Market Strategy and Challenges - The instant noodle market is shifting towards premium, healthy, and unique products, with competitors like Kang Shifu and Uni-President launching high-end lines [7][9]. - White Elephant has attempted to enter the high-end market with collaborations and new product lines, but has faced challenges in consumer acceptance and brand positioning [9][10]. - The company is expanding its production capacity in southern China to enhance its market presence and diversify its product offerings [11][13]. Group 4: Distribution and Channel Issues - Despite its online success, White Elephant struggles with channel imbalance, as the majority of instant noodle sales still occur through offline channels [13][14]. - The company's aggressive online marketing strategy has led to a decline in profitability for offline distributors, creating a challenging environment for maintaining a balanced distribution network [14][15].
“多半”更名:一个行业的集体“困境”与白象的突围
经济观察报· 2025-06-10 11:40
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rapid response of White Elephant Food Co., Ltd. to consumer concerns regarding the renaming and discontinuation of its "Duoban" and "Duoyiban" product lines, highlighting the company's commitment to consumer sovereignty and transparency in the digital economy [2][10][20]. Group 1: Company Actions - On June 6, White Elephant announced the renaming of its "Duoban" series to "Noodle Cake 120g" and "Duoyiban" to "Noodle Cake 110g," and will cease production of the original packaging within the month [2][9]. - The decision to change the product names and packaging was made within 48 hours, showcasing the company's ability to respond quickly to consumer feedback and market dynamics [5][9][10]. - The company acknowledged that the "Duoban" trademark was intended to differentiate larger portion products from standard sizes, but consumer perception led to significant backlash [8][12]. Group 2: Industry Context - The controversy surrounding the "Duoban" trademark reflects broader challenges within the convenience food industry, where similar naming conventions are prevalent [11][12]. - The convenience food sector has experienced fluctuating growth, with a reported industry size of 102.2 billion yuan in 2020, followed by a decline in 2021 and a rebound in 2022, indicating ongoing market volatility [12][13]. - Many brands in the industry are resorting to marketing tactics focused on weight and packaging to attract price-sensitive consumers, highlighting a lack of innovation and differentiation [13][15]. Group 3: Consumer Trust and Transparency - The article emphasizes the importance of transparency in the digital economy, where consumers demand clear and honest communication regarding product specifications [10][20]. - White Elephant's decision to clearly label the weight of its products is seen as a direct response to consumer expectations for transparency and integrity [10][15]. - The company's proactive approach to gathering consumer feedback and incorporating it into product development is a key strategy for maintaining trust and relevance in a competitive market [20].
任正非说不去想困难干就完了!苹果WWDC发布规模最大设计更新!一人坠亡,康师傅被罚!燃气公司招北大毕业生当抄表工!中概股大涨!
新浪财经· 2025-06-10 01:08
Group 1 - Huawei's CEO Ren Zhengfei emphasized the importance of focusing on action rather than difficulties, stating that thinking about challenges is unproductive and that progress should be made step by step [4][5][6] - Ren acknowledged that while Huawei is one of many Chinese companies in the chip industry, it still lags behind the U.S. by a generation in single-chip technology, but is working to overcome this through innovative approaches [5][7] - He highlighted the potential for Chinese companies in mid-to-low-end chips and the opportunities in compound semiconductors, asserting that the future will see a multitude of operating systems supporting various sectors in China [6][7] Group 2 - The Apple WWDC 25 event focused solely on software updates across its platforms, with no new hardware announced, marking a significant design update termed "Liquid Glass" that enhances the user interface [8][9][10] - The new design language is built on Apple's advancements in hardware, chips, and graphics technology, indicating a shift towards more sophisticated software capabilities [10] Group 3 - A tragic workplace accident at Master Kong (Chongqing) resulted in a fine of 525,000 yuan due to safety violations, highlighting the importance of strict adherence to safety regulations in the food production industry [11][12][14] - The incident involved a worker's fatal fall during operations, leading to scrutiny over the company's safety management practices and compliance with the Safety Production Law [12][14] Group 4 - In a surprising recruitment move, Sichuan Luzhou Huaren Xinglu Gas Co., Ltd. is hiring graduates from prestigious universities for the position of meter reader, sparking discussions about job qualifications in the gas industry [15][16][17] - The company is looking for candidates with a college degree and relevant experience, indicating a trend towards higher educational requirements in traditionally lower-skilled positions [16][17] Group 5 - Chinese concept stocks saw a significant rise, with the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index increasing by over 2%, reflecting positive market sentiment towards Chinese companies listed in the U.S. [20]
风波中的白象,不止商标一个“麻烦”
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-06-09 14:48
Core Viewpoint - White Elephant is facing multiple challenges, including a trademark controversy and issues with its pricing strategy, which have led to a trust crisis among consumers and distributors [1][3][4]. Trademark Controversy - The packaging of White Elephant's "Duoban" series still displays "Duoban" as a registered trademark, despite consumer concerns about potential misleading advertising [3][4]. - White Elephant issued an apology and explained that the "Duoban" products were intended to differentiate larger portion sizes from regular ones, but acknowledged the confusion caused [3][4]. - The company announced plans to rename the "Duoban" series and cease production of the original packaging within the month [3][4]. Pricing Issues - There is a discrepancy between online retail prices and offline distributor prices, with some distributors reporting losses due to identical pricing [5][6]. - A distributor noted that the costs associated with logistics and storage often lead to losses for offline distributors, although not all distributors are affected [5][6]. - Analysts suggest that the lack of a balanced pricing strategy between online and offline channels could harm distributor relationships and market stability [6][8]. Channel Strategy - White Elephant has shifted its focus towards online sales, which previously accounted for less than 5% of revenue in 2019, but has since become a priority [7][8]. - The company established an independent e-commerce entity and has been actively engaging in various online platforms to enhance its digital presence [7][8]. - Despite the growth in online sales, balancing the pricing strategy between online and offline channels remains a critical issue for the company's future [8].
白象“多半”商标致歉背后:市场竞争困境与品牌信任危机
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-09 14:05
Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding the "Duoban" trademark by White Elephant Food highlights the challenges the company faces in maintaining brand reputation amidst intense market competition and consumer misunderstandings [2][9]. Company Summary - White Elephant Food's official response clarified that "Duoban" is a registered trademark and not an indication of increased product quantity, with the actual weight specified on the packaging [3]. - The company has introduced larger portion products, such as the 110-120g noodles based on the original 70g, to differentiate from standard offerings [3]. - White Elephant has registered multiple trademarks related to "Duoban" from 2018 to 2024, with some successfully registered while others were rejected [5]. Industry Summary - The instant noodle industry is experiencing downward pressure, with competitors like Kang Shifu and Uni-President facing revenue challenges, indicating a shrinking market [7]. - New food categories such as self-heating hot pots and ready-to-eat noodles are emerging, further squeezing the consumption scenarios for traditional instant noodles [7]. - White Elephant's beverage business is struggling due to a lack of experience among its noodle distributors, making it difficult to establish a strong presence in the beverage market [7]. - Consumer complaints against White Elephant have reached 1,681, primarily concerning product quality issues, which negatively impact the brand's reputation [7].
白象食品“多半”商标玩文字游戏翻车 销售超百亿难掩渠道失衡终端渗透不足
Chang Jiang Shang Bao· 2025-06-08 23:09
Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the "Duoban" trademark has put White Elephant Food Co., Ltd. in an awkward position, raising questions about consumer perception and brand integrity [1][4][12]. Group 1: Trademark Controversy - The "Duoban" trademark was intended to differentiate products from regular portion sizes, but it has led to consumer confusion regarding the actual quantity [3][12]. - White Elephant's apology for the misunderstanding has been met with skepticism, as many believe the company is playing word games [4][13]. - The "Duoban" series products have been criticized for misleading packaging, which emphasizes terms like "Duoban" and "Duoban bag," leading consumers to think they are getting more than they actually are [10][11]. Group 2: Sales Performance - In 2023, White Elephant's total sales reached 9.175 billion yuan, surpassing Jinmailang to become the third-largest player in the industry with a market share of 12% [6][19]. - Projections for 2024 indicate that sales revenue could exceed 10 billion yuan, potentially elevating the company to the second position in the industry, surpassing Unification [7][19]. Group 3: Operational Challenges - The trademark issue has exposed underlying problems such as channel imbalance, insufficient terminal penetration, and low internal collaboration efficiency [8][20][22]. - Compared to competitors like Master Kong and Unification, White Elephant has lower visibility in supermarkets, particularly in regions like Anhui and eastern Henan, where sales performance is reported as poor [20]. - The company faces a chaotic pricing system, with discrepancies between online promotional prices and offline wholesale prices [21].
白象,不老实
凤凰网财经· 2025-06-07 12:53
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent controversy surrounding the "Duoban" noodle product from Baixiang, highlighting the implications of marketing strategies and consumer perceptions in the competitive instant noodle market. Group 1: Product Controversy - Baixiang's "Duoban" noodle was found to be a trademark name rather than indicating a larger quantity, with only a 25g increase from the base product, leading to consumer backlash and accusations of misleading marketing [2][4] - Following the controversy, Baixiang announced a rebranding of the "Duoban" series to "Noodle 120g" and "Noodle 110g" to clarify the product's weight and avoid further consumer confusion [4][6] Group 2: Market Position and Growth - Baixiang's sales reached 9.175 billion yuan in 2023, closing in on the 9.849 billion yuan sales of its competitor, Uni-President [6][22] - The brand has gained significant market share, with reports suggesting it may have surpassed Uni-President in 2024, although this has not been officially confirmed [6][22] Group 3: Brand Evolution - Baixiang has transformed from a low-end market player to a leading brand, leveraging crises in the industry to position itself as a "national treasure" and appealing to consumer sentiment [8][13] - The brand's marketing strategy has included innovative product launches and a strong presence on social media platforms, contributing to its rapid growth [18][22] Group 4: Challenges Ahead - Despite impressive growth, Baixiang faces challenges such as reliance on marketing strategies that may not sustain long-term growth, and potential issues with pricing strategies affecting profitability [23][29] - The overall instant noodle market in China is experiencing stagnation, with a decline in consumption from 463.6 billion servings in 2020 to an estimated 438 billion servings in 2024, intensifying competition among brands [25][28]
白象回应:“多半”系列产品更名为“面饼120克”
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-06-07 10:21
Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the trademark controversy regarding "Duoban" and "Duoyiban" products, leading to the company's decision to rename these products and cease production of the original packaging within the month [1] - The company emphasized its commitment to consumer feedback and its principle of prioritizing consumer interests, resulting in the renaming of "Duoban" to "Mianbing 120g" and "Duoyiban" to "Mianbing 110g" [1] - The public response to the company's decision has been overwhelmingly positive, indicating strong consumer support for the brand's actions [1] Group 2 - The trademark issues are not isolated, as similar situations have been reported in the industry, with competitors like Kang Shifu and Jinmailang facing trademark registration challenges [4] - Recent product launches by the company, such as spicy noodle snacks and a cilantro-flavored noodle, have gained significant popularity, particularly among younger consumers, highlighting the brand's ability to tap into current trends [4] - The industry faces a common challenge of balancing consumer engagement with the need for careful brand management, as domestic products attract attention while also facing scrutiny from consumers [4]
白象,不老实
盐财经· 2025-06-07 09:58
作者 | 李含章 钟宸(实习生) 编辑 | 宝珠 视觉 | 诺言 继"千禾0"酱油,"壹号土"猪肉之后,消费者又迎来了"多半"袋面,而这次的文字游戏的主角,是有 着"国货之光"滤镜的白象。 6月初,有消费者发现,白象"多半袋面"的"多半"为商标名称,而非"更多分量",其面饼仅比基础款多25 克(增幅29%),与"多一半"的常识认知相差甚远。 消息一出,马上登上热搜第一。不少网友对此评价"跟消费者抖机灵""不老实",但也有人表示谅解,认 为"差不多就行了"。 白象随即发布声明,表示"多半"系列产品是基于原70克面饼基础上推出的110-120克面饼的大分量产 品,"多一半"系列是基于原60克面饼推出的100克面饼产品。"多半"商标申请的初心是为了与常规分量产 品做出区分。 白象发表声明 不过,有记者发现,白象经典款的大骨面、猪骨面系列,面饼重量在60-75克之间,而康师傅、统一等没 有加重的经典款,面饼重量分别为80-85克与82.5克,且价格相差无几。 商标争议并非偶然。天眼查数据显示,白象自2018年起系统布局"多半袋""一半袋"等擦边商标。商标虽 注册成功,但组合"袋/桶"使用时被律师指出存在风险。 有律师 ...