将视野投向"十五五"时期的金融发展，吴晓求对"金融高质量服务实体经济"进行了立体化阐释。他认 为，这一内涵远不止于服务企业融资，更要满足居民部门日益多元化的金融需求。他特别指出，随着中 国迈向高收入国家，留住规模庞大的高净值客户的存量财富至关重要，这要求金融业能提供如财富管 理、家族信托等复杂且安全的金融服务，否则资本将会外流。而满足这些需求，必然要求金融创新。他 同时强调，创新必须与有效监管并行。 11月19日，2025（第十一届）湾区金融年会在深圳盛大启幕。本届年会由南方都市报社、湾财社、深圳 市财富管理协会联合主办，作为2025深圳国际金融大会平行论坛，同步联动第十九届深圳国际金融博览 会（金博会），以"AI新浪潮 金融新生态"为核心主题，汇聚顶尖专家学者与行业领袖，共探"AI+金 融"融合趋势，献智金融高质量发展的"湾区方案"。 在主题分享环节，中国人民大学原副校长、国家金融研究院院长、国家一级教授吴晓求从经济转型背景 切入，深刻剖析了中国经济与金融面临的历史性转变与未来改革方向。他指出，中国经济已从"短缺经 济"全面进入"过剩经济"，同时在以智能化为代表的第四次工业革命背景下，研究中国经济问题的理论 ...

Core Insights - Shanghai Trust has evolved from a historical financial site to a leading entity in the trust industry, reflecting the transformation of China's trust sector from rapid growth to a focus on sustainable development [1][2] Historical Context - The trust industry in China has a history dating back to the 1930s, initially serving as a financial witness and participant alongside banks and insurance [1] - Shanghai Trust, established after the reform and opening-up, has played a crucial role in financing local government projects and infrastructure development [2] Development Phases - The first phase of the trust industry lasted from the early 1980s to 2007, primarily serving local government financing needs, with a significant reduction in the number of institutions from over 2000 to 68 [2] - The second phase, from 2008 to 2019, marked rapid growth, with the asset management scale soaring from approximately 1 trillion yuan in 2008 to over 20 trillion yuan by 2019, driven by real estate and government financing [2][4] Risk Management - Risk management and compliance are emphasized as fundamental to the trust industry's development, with Shanghai Trust maintaining a cautious approach and independent decision-making in project evaluations [3][4] Transformation and Innovation - The introduction of new regulations has prompted the trust industry to shift from reliance on financing trusts to exploring asset service trusts and other lighter asset models [4][5] - Shanghai Trust has reduced its dependence on traditional financing models, with its asset management scale reaching 1.3 trillion yuan, focusing on wealth management and innovative trust products [4][5] Social Responsibility and Philanthropy - Shanghai Trust has engaged in various charitable initiatives, including medical training and educational support, benefiting thousands across multiple provinces [6][7] - The company has raised 200 million yuan for charitable projects, establishing over 150 initiatives that directly benefit more than 14,000 individuals [7]

Core Viewpoint - Shanghai International Trust Co., Ltd. has established a new technology company, Shanghai Bund Golden Key Economic Development Co., Ltd., focusing on various artificial intelligence (AI) businesses [1][2]. Company Overview - Shanghai Bund Golden Key was registered on November 10, with a registered capital of 50 million yuan. The legal representative is Chen Meng [2][3]. - The shareholders include Shanghai Huangpu Science and Technology Innovation Group Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Trust [2]. - The company's business scope includes technology intermediary services, AI innovation and entrepreneurship service platforms, AI public data platforms, and AI industry application system integration services, among others [2][3]. Strategic Initiatives - The establishment of Bund Golden Key is part of Shanghai Trust's strategy to enhance its financial technology ecosystem and align with Shanghai's goal of becoming a global financial technology center [4]. - Shanghai Trust has also participated in setting up several other investment funds and companies in the tech sector, indicating a strong commitment to investing in emerging technologies [4][5]. - The total scale of Shanghai Trust's equity investment in technology innovation has approached 40 billion yuan, with its specialized platform managing nearly 3 billion yuan in funds [5]. Industry Context - The focus on AI and technology services aligns with Shanghai Trust's core business of wealth management and cross-border finance, potentially enhancing its family trust and asset securitization services [5]. - The collaboration with the broader strategy of the parent company, Pudong Development Bank, emphasizes a coordinated approach to digital transformation and financial technology [5].

Group 1 - The eighth China International Import Expo (CIIE) was held in Shanghai, where the Bank of China Shandong Branch organized a visit for over 40 distinguished entrepreneurs from Shandong, focusing on the theme "Lu Rhythm and Financial Empowerment for the Future" [1][2] - The event provided a platform for entrepreneurs to experience the expo's charm and successfully held a signing ceremony for the "Entrepreneur Office" and "Family Trust" services, marking a new phase in comprehensive financial services for Shandong entrepreneurs [1][3] Group 2 - Entrepreneurs engaged with various exhibition areas, including technology equipment, medical devices, and consumer goods, broadening their international perspective and capturing the latest industry trends and market opportunities [2][4] - The signing of service agreements for the "Entrepreneur Office" and "Family Trust" services aims to provide a one-stop solution for personal wealth, family inheritance, and corporate development, ensuring asset growth and orderly succession for entrepreneurs [3][4] Group 3 - The delegation participated in the GBIC conference, which aimed to build an open and win-win financial ecosystem, where entrepreneurs gained valuable insights on financing, risk management, and industry collaboration [4] - A highlight of the visit was the tour of SenseTime, an artificial intelligence company, where entrepreneurs experienced cutting-edge technologies in various fields, inspiring innovative thinking for industry upgrades [5]

北京商报讯（记者 刘四红）金融科技领域再添新势力。11月11日，北京商报记者注意到，上海外滩金科经济发展有限公司（以下 简称"外滩金科"）于11月10日成立，法定代表人陈萌，注册资本5000万元人民币，地址位于上海市黄浦区九江路。 天眼查显示，外滩金科由上海黄浦科创集团有限公司、上海国际信托有限公司（以下简称"上海信托"）共同持股。经营范围包括 创业空间服务，科技中介服务，人工智能双创服务平台，人工智能公共数据平台，人工智能行业应用系统集成服务，技术服务、 技术开发、技术咨询、技术交流、技术转让、技术推广，知识产权服务等。 上海信托成立于1981年，是国内最早成立的信托公司之一，公司注册资本50亿元人民币，主要从事资产管理、家族及财富管理业 务，为高净值客户提供专业的理财方案与服务，业务领域主要涵盖股权债权融资、证券投资、另类投资、工商受托、公益信托、 投行服务、家族传承等范围。 盘和林认为，外滩金科经营范围聚焦人工智能双创平台、公共数据平台等，对标上海信托的"财富管理+跨境金融"主业。通过子公 司专业化运营AI技术，可反哺母公司的家族信托、跨境资产证券化等业务，例如利用AI优化客户画像、提升供应链金融风控效 ...

Core Viewpoint - The trust industry is focusing on high-quality development during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, leveraging its institutional advantages to support sectors like advanced manufacturing and technology innovation [2][3]. Group 1: Trust Industry Practices - The trust industry is utilizing its unique advantages such as bankruptcy isolation and direct property registration to support advanced manufacturing and technology innovation [2]. - Three main paths have been established: 1. Equity investment and fund operation, with trust companies setting up private equity and venture capital funds targeting high-end manufacturing and strategic emerging industries [2]. 2. Empowering industrial chains through asset securitization, enhancing liquidity for manufacturing and technology enterprises [2]. 3. Exploring intellectual property trusts to manage and operate patents and trademarks as trust assets, addressing the challenges faced by asset-light tech companies [2]. Group 2: Supporting Key Technologies - Trust companies are innovating in supporting critical technology breakthroughs through: 1. Establishing special trust plans targeting specific "bottleneck" technologies, attracting long-term capital for cutting-edge research [3]. 2. Creating a collaborative model involving scientists, entrepreneurs, and financiers to clarify rights and obligations in technology development [3]. 3. Providing initial R&D loans with the option to convert to equity or profit-sharing upon project success, and exploring partnerships with government risk compensation funds [3]. Group 3: Rural Revitalization - The trust industry is leveraging charitable trusts to support rural revitalization, developing unique service models such as: 1. "Industry empowerment + charitable trust" model to support local agricultural branding and rural tourism infrastructure [4]. 2. "Rural revitalization + talent cultivation" model to fund youth entrepreneurship and vocational training [4]. 3. "Cultural preservation + ecological trust" model for protecting cultural heritage and environmental management in villages [4]. Group 4: Consumer Finance - Trust companies are advised to reposition themselves in consumer finance, focusing on: 1. New consumption areas like green, digital, and health-related services, creating flexible financial products [5]. 2. Collaborating with major dealers in traditional large-scale consumption sectors to provide flexible financing solutions [5]. 3. Addressing the needs of underserved consumer groups, such as migrant workers and graduates, with small, convenient credit support [5]. 4. Developing financial products tailored for rural markets to stimulate consumption [5]. Group 5: Wealth Management and Social Services - The trust industry is seeing significant growth in family trusts and insurance trusts, with total scales exceeding several hundred billion [7]. - Innovative models like prepaid fund management trusts are emerging to enhance social governance, reflecting the trust's social service capabilities [7]. - Future opportunities include: 1. Deeply customized family trusts offering comprehensive solutions for wealth transfer and family governance [8]. 2. Making family and insurance trusts more accessible to middle-class families [8]. 3. Safeguarding consumer rights through independent management of prepaid funds in various sectors [8]. 4. Establishing trusts for vulnerable groups to ensure long-term support for their needs [8].

Core Insights - Wealth inheritance in China faces significant challenges, often resulting in the phenomenon of "wealth not lasting beyond three generations" [1][4][26] Historical Context - The cyclical nature of family wealth decline is illustrated through the story of the Jia family in "Dream of the Red Chamber," reflecting a broader historical trend in Chinese families [3][4] - Since the Song and Ming dynasties, many prominent families have failed to sustain wealth across generations due to inherent flaws in family systems, wealth concepts, and social structures [4][6] Cultural and Institutional Challenges - The agrarian economy's focus on fixed assets like land and property limits wealth mobility and is vulnerable to external shocks, hindering long-term wealth transmission [6] - Traditional Chinese culture emphasizes family and state unity, where family authority often overshadows individual property rights, leading to a lack of systematic wealth management [9][10] - The equal distribution of inheritance leads to wealth dilution across generations, contrasting with Western practices that favor primogeniture for capital concentration [10] Modern Structural Challenges - Despite rapid wealth accumulation post-reform, issues of wealth inheritance remain acute, with modern wealth being more complex and requiring specialized planning [12][13] - Many private enterprises lack governance structures, leading to conflicts in management and ownership during transitions, with over 60% of firms unprepared for succession [14] - Generational value differences create conflicts in wealth management, with younger generations often favoring consumption over prudent financial stewardship [15] Comparative Analysis - Western wealth inheritance mechanisms are grounded in legal frameworks that protect individual property rights, contrasting with China's reliance on familial and moral constraints [17][18] Pathways to Solutions - Establishing modern family governance structures is essential for effective wealth transmission, including family charters and professional family offices [21][22] - Strengthening legal frameworks and inheritance planning tools can provide necessary protections and flexibility for wealth distribution [23] - Promoting wealth education and shared family values across generations is crucial for ensuring that wealth is not only preserved but also aligned with family missions [24]

Core Viewpoint - The recent draft of the "Asset Management Trust Management Measures" marks a shift towards a more refined regulatory framework for the trust industry, addressing the need for updated regulations after 18 years of existing rules, and emphasizing the importance of returning to the core functions of trust services [1][2] Regulatory Framework - The draft further clarifies the boundaries of asset management trusts, emphasizing private asset management characteristics, limiting investor numbers to a maximum of 200, and enforcing stricter qualifications for high-risk products [2] - It prohibits any form of guaranteed returns, mandating that sellers are responsible for their actions and buyers bear their own risks, thus breaking the previous rigid repayment structure [2] - The draft also bans channel business and fund pool operations, requiring trust companies to manage assets actively and transparently [2] Challenges in Non-standard Assets - The draft imposes strict limitations on non-standard asset investments, which may lead to a decrease in financing trusts and pressure on companies reliant on non-standard business models [3] - Trust companies are urged to enhance their research capabilities and operational structures to meet the new demands for standardized products and net asset value management [3] Opportunities for Growth - The draft opens avenues for high-quality development in the trust industry, with standardized trusts expected to become a key focus area [4] - Trust companies can leverage regulatory flexibility to create differentiated products, such as family trusts and insurance fund mandates, to compete with public funds and securities asset management products [4] - The asset securitization sector presents significant potential, with trusts benefiting from bankruptcy isolation features in areas like REITs and supply chain ABS [4] Service Trusts as a Growth Driver - Service trusts, including family trusts and charitable trusts, are anticipated to become a growth area, as they do not rely on capital consumption and can attract high-net-worth clients [5] - The regulatory authority will monitor the progress of asset management trust business rectifications, encouraging companies to reduce existing business volumes and transition into professional investment management [5]

Core Viewpoint - The recent draft of the "Asset Management Trust Management Measures" by the Financial Regulatory Bureau signifies a shift towards a more refined regulatory framework for the trust industry, addressing the need for updated regulations after 18 years of existing rules [1][2] Regulatory Framework - The draft enhances the regulatory chain for the trust industry, following previous regulations that clarified business boundaries and strengthened full-process supervision [1][2] - It emphasizes the private equity nature of asset management trusts, limiting investor numbers to a maximum of 200 and imposing stricter qualifications for high-risk products [2] Business Challenges - The draft imposes strict limitations on non-standard asset investments, which may lead to a decrease in financing trusts and pressure on companies reliant on non-standard business [2][3] - Trust companies are required to enhance their operational capabilities, including building comprehensive research systems and improving IT infrastructure for daily valuation and net asset value disclosures [3] Growth Opportunities - The draft opens avenues for high-quality development in the trust industry, with a focus on standardized trust products becoming a core area of competition [3][4] - Trust companies can leverage their institutional flexibility to create differentiated products, such as family trusts and asset allocation services, to compete with public funds and securities asset management products [4] Long-term Development - The regulatory body will monitor the progress of asset management trust business rectifications, urging companies to reduce existing business steadily [4] - The industry is expected to achieve sustainable development only by genuinely transforming into professional investment management institutions [4]

Core Insights - Family trusts are not an infallible wealth "safe haven" and can become "wealth traps" if misused or misunderstood [2][13] - The case of Xu Jiayin's family trust illustrates the potential pitfalls and legal vulnerabilities associated with family trusts [3][13] Group 1: Family Trust Functions - Family trusts serve three main functions: wealth transfer and planning, risk isolation and asset protection, and tax planning and privacy protection [1] - They are designed to clarify asset distribution rules, protect family wealth from disputes, and optimize cross-border tax costs [1] Group 2: Xu Jiayin's Family Trust Case - Xu Jiayin established a $2.3 billion family trust before the Evergrande debt crisis, which was seen as a key strategy for wealth preservation [3] - The trust was funded by over 50 billion RMB in dividends from Evergrande between 2009 and 2022, with the intention of ensuring long-term family wealth stability [3] Group 3: Legal Vulnerabilities - The Hong Kong High Court ruled that the family trust was invalid due to fraudulent asset transfer aimed at evading creditors [4] - The court found that the trust was established under suspicious motives, particularly to avoid debt obligations, which led to its legal nullification [4] Group 4: Key Legal Principles - The legitimacy of a family trust relies on the lawful source of its assets; if the funds are deemed illegitimate, the trust can be invalidated [5][8] - The independence of the trust is crucial; if the grantor retains control over the assets, the trust's protective function is compromised [6][7] Group 5: Risks Associated with Family Trusts - Five major risks associated with family trusts include: 1. Legitimacy of fund sources [8] 2. Lack of independence [9] 3. Illegitimate motives for establishment [10] 4. Cross-jurisdictional legal conflicts [11] 5. Risks from third-party management [12] Group 6: Conclusion and Recommendations - The Xu Jiayin case highlights that the protective functions of family trusts are relative and can be undermined by flaws in motivation, funding sources, or independence [13] - Effective family wealth management should focus on legal compliance and sound institutional frameworks rather than solely relying on trust structures [13]