Workflow
泥鳅
icon
Search documents
重庆市铜梁区市场监督管理局关于262批次食品安全抽检情况的通告(2025年第4号)
Core Points - The Chongqing Tongliang District Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, testing 262 samples across various categories, with 254 passing and 8 failing the safety standards [1]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 262 samples were tested, with 254 samples deemed compliant and 8 samples identified as non-compliant [1]. - The non-compliant products were subjected to legal actions as per the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, including recall and removal from shelves [1]. Group 2: Non-compliant Products - Specific non-compliant products included items with pesticide residues exceeding the permissible limits, such as: - Imidacloprid at 0.244 mg/kg (limit ≤0.05 mg/kg) [1] - Cadmium at 0.493 mg/kg (limit ≤0.05 mg/kg) [1] - Enrofloxacin at 157 µg/kg (limit ≤100 µg/kg) [1] - The inspection revealed multiple instances of pesticide and heavy metal residues in various food products, indicating potential health risks [1].
农业农村部发文推进稻渔种养高质量发展,广东清远连南大坪镇积极响应
Nan Fang Nong Cun Bao· 2025-07-23 02:06
7月21日,农业 农村部印发《关 于稳步推进稻渔 综合种养产业高 质量发展的通 知》,提出"力 争用三到五年时 间,实现种养模 式更加高效,种 养生产更加绿 色,质量安全更 有保障,联农带 农共富典型更多 涌现"的目标。 农业农村部发文 推进稻渔种养高 质量发展,广东 清远连南大坪镇 积极响应_南方 +_南方plus 近日,广东清远 连南瑶族自治县 大坪镇迅速响应 筛选效益优化的 模式示范推广。 此次试验选取5 亩示范田,分别 投放中华鳖200 只、澳洲淡水小 龙虾5000尾、罗 氏沼虾10000 尾、虎纹蛙1000 只及泥鳅20000 尾,构建以本地 禾花鲤为主体的 多物种共作体 系。 据了解,"稻田 鱼+N"模式是以 当地稻田鱼禾花 鲤为主体,多元 化引入中华鳖、 罗氏沼虾、澳洲 淡水小龙虾、虎 纹蛙、泥鳅等不 同养殖品种进行 稻田共作试验, 政策,启动"稻 田鱼+N"多元化 种养模式试验, 为稻渔产业高质 量发展提供基层 实践样本。 在大坪镇军寮村 瑶山水有机稻基 地,仲恺农业工 程学院科技特派 员团队联合当地 政府,成功完成 中华鳖、罗氏沼 虾等5个品种的 苗种放养。 "这是对农业农 村部稳步推进推 ...
放生之谜:民间放生四处“打游击”,正规点位鲜有人去,为啥?
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing issue of unauthorized fish release activities in Beijing, despite the establishment of designated release platforms and regulations aimed at standardizing these activities [1][7]. Group 1: Unauthorized Release Activities - Citizens frequently engage in unauthorized fish release, often changing locations to evade inspections, with reports of individuals releasing fish in various rivers such as the Yongding River and the Chaobai River [2][3]. - Fish vendors in local markets openly sell fish for release without requiring inspection or quarantine certificates, indicating a lack of regulatory enforcement [2][3]. - Many individuals involved in these activities are unaware of the designated release platforms established by the government, suggesting a gap in public awareness and communication [3][4]. Group 2: Designated Release Platforms - In May 2023, Beijing identified four designated fish release platforms: Jinhai Lake, Xishuiyu Reservoir, Koutou Reservoir, and Yuanbo Lake, but access to these sites is often complicated and not user-friendly [7][11]. - The management of these platforms varies, with some locations lacking clear signage and guidance for citizens wishing to release fish, leading to confusion and non-compliance with regulations [10][11]. - At Yuanbo Lake, while there are some regulatory measures in place, enforcement is lax, with inspections failing to adequately verify the source of fish being released [14][15]. Group 3: Regulatory Challenges - The complexity of obtaining necessary permits and certificates for fish release contributes to the prevalence of unauthorized activities, as many individuals find the process cumbersome and opt to bypass it [15]. - Citizens have suggested that authorities improve the convenience of designated release points, enhance signage, and streamline the process for obtaining necessary documentation to encourage compliance [15].
广东惠州大亚湾经济技术开发区管理委员会市场监督管理局2025年第三期(第二批)食品监督抽检结果公示
Core Viewpoint - The Huizhou Daya Bay Economic and Technological Development Zone Management Committee's Market Supervision Administration has conducted food safety supervision and sampling inspections, revealing that out of 150 batches tested, 3 batches were found to be non-compliant with safety standards [3]. Summary by Category Food Safety Inspection Results - A total of 150 batches of food were inspected as part of the 2025 food sampling plan, with 3 batches failing to meet safety standards [3]. - The results are being publicly disclosed in accordance with government information disclosure regulations [3]. Specific Findings - The inspection covered various food categories, including dining utensils, condiments, and processed meat products, among others [4][5][6]. - Specific products that failed included items such as flavored condiments and processed meat products, indicating potential issues in food safety compliance [4][5][6]. Regulatory Compliance - The public disclosure of inspection results aligns with the government's commitment to transparency and consumer safety in food products [3].
上海市青浦区市场监督管理局2025年第8期食品安全监督抽检信息
Summary of Food Safety Supervision and Inspection Information - The recent food safety supervision and inspection revealed a total of 153 batches, with 142 passing and 11 failing the tests [2] - The inspection was conducted in accordance with the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China and the Shanghai Food Safety Regulations [2] Inspection Results - The inspection identified 11 batches of non-compliant products, which have been addressed by the relevant authorities [2] - Specific non-compliance issues included pesticide residues and microbial contamination, with examples such as: - Pesticide residue (Chlorpyrifos) found in imported bananas at 0.0493 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 0.02 mg/kg [2] - Detection of coliform bacteria in food containers [2] - Residual levels of sulfur dioxide in longan at 0.320 g/kg, exceeding the permissible limit of 0.05 g/kg [2] Compliance Information - A total of 142 batches were found to be compliant, indicating a high level of food safety among the inspected products [2] - The compliant products included various food items such as fresh vegetables, fruits, and processed foods from multiple vendors in the Qingpu District [3][4][5][6]
重庆市铜梁区市场监督管理局关于109批次食品安全抽检情况的通告(2025年第2号)
Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The Chongqing Tongliang District Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection of 109 batches of edible agricultural products, revealing that 107 batches passed while 2 batches failed the safety standards [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 109 samples were tested, with 107 passing and 2 failing the safety standards [2]. - The specific failures included one sample of loach with enrofloxacin residue at 276 μg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 100 μg/kg [2]. - Another failure involved longan with a sulfur dioxide residue of 0.181 g/kg, surpassing the permissible limit of 0.05 g/kg [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The local market supervision authority initiated legal actions against the non-compliant products as per the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China [2]. - Risk control measures were implemented, including tracing the product flow, recalling, and removing the non-compliant products from the market [2]. - The authorities are also analyzing the causes of the failures and enforcing corrective actions [2].
陕西省 渭南市市场监督管理局关于15批次食品不合格的通告(2025年第6期)
Core Viewpoint - The Weinan Market Supervision Administration announced that 15 out of 145 food samples tested were found to be non-compliant with national food safety standards, highlighting issues such as pesticide residue, excessive use of food additives, and microbial contamination [3][11]. Summary by Category Non-compliant Products - Celery sold by Fuhai Jialiyuan Self-service Supermarket in Chengcheng County had a pesticide residue (Thiacloprid) level of 0.16 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.04 mg/kg [3]. - Ginger sold by Yangguang Life Shopping Plaza in Pucheng County had a Thiacloprid level of 3.1 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.2 mg/kg [4]. - Mango sold by Zanduoduo Supermarket in Pucheng County had a pesticide residue (Pyraclostrobin) level of 0.082 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.05 mg/kg [5]. - Banana sold by Zanduoduo Supermarket in Pucheng County had a pesticide residue (Thiacloprid) level of 0.037 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.02 mg/kg [6]. - Bean sprouts sold by Yang Gaitao's vegetable shop in Fuping County had a residue of 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid (as 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid) at 53.4 μg/kg, which is not permitted [7]. - Ginger sold by Weinan Fenghui Honest Man Commercial Development Co., Ltd. had a Thiacloprid level of 0.55 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.2 mg/kg [8]. - Plates used by Zhang Yongliang's restaurant in Tongguan County had an anionic synthetic detergent (as Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate) level of 0.0144 mg/100 cm², which is not permitted [8]. - Vegetable buckets used by the same restaurant had both anionic synthetic detergent (as Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate) and coliform bacteria detected, which are not permitted [8]. - Green peppers sold by Cheng Meng's dried vegetable distribution store in Tongguan County had a Thiacloprid level of 0.67 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.05 mg/kg [9]. - Celery sold by Kangmei Vegetable Distribution Store in Tongguan County had a Thiacloprid level of 0.072 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.04 mg/kg [10]. - Rice noodles sold by Weinan High-tech Zone South North Alley Dried Vegetable Condiment Store had aluminum residue (dry sample, as Al) at 358 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 200 mg/kg [10]. - Green bean sprouts sold by Weinan High-tech Zone Runhe Family Life Supermarket had a residue of 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid (as 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid) at 17.0 μg/kg, which is not permitted [10]. - Licorice apricot meat sold by the same supermarket had a sulfur dioxide residue level of 0.538 g/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.35 g/kg [10]. - Green bean sprouts sold by Shaanxi Meilian Society Discount Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. had a residue of 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid (as 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid) at 25.7 μg/kg, which is not permitted [11]. - White angelica sold by Shaanxi Jinhui Shangyue Lejia Trading Co., Ltd. had a sulfur dioxide residue level of 1.04 g/kg, which is not permitted [11]. Regulatory Actions - The Weinan Market Supervision Administration has instructed local market supervision departments to conduct investigations and take risk control measures such as product recalls and removals from shelves for the non-compliant products [11].
广东省中山市市场监督管理局食品监督抽检信息通告(2025年第13期)
Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The Zhongshan Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, testing 127 batches of various food products, with 122 passing and 5 failing the safety standards [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 127 food samples were tested, with 122 samples deemed qualified and 5 samples found to be unqualified [2]. - The inspection covered six categories of food: catering food, condiments, pastries, edible agricultural products, vegetable products, and beverages [2]. Group 2: Non-compliance Details - Specific non-compliance issues included the detection of coliform bacteria in a food sample, which should not exceed 50 cm² [2]. - Another sample showed a sweetener (sweetening agent) level of 0.982 g/kg, exceeding the permissible limit [2]. - A sample of red pepper powder contained a sulfur dioxide residue of 1.27 g/kg, which is also above the allowed level [2]. Group 3: Consumer Engagement - The administration encourages consumers to participate in food safety supervision and report any harmful food products or illegal activities by calling the complaint hotline [2].