根据特斯拉中国官网最新更新的价格信息显示，搭载此次全新星钻黑车漆的Model S起售价为85.59万 元，而同样配备星钻黑车漆的Model X起售价则为89.59万元。 凤凰网科技讯 11月21日，特斯拉中国官方今日对旗下旗舰车型Model S及Model X进行了产品更新。此 次调整主要集中在外观配色、内饰细节及驾驶硬件的优化上，并未涉及动力总成的重大变更。在外观方 面，新车增加了冰霜蓝与星钻黑两种全新车漆选择，同时配备了全新设计的轮毂样式。 在座舱与驾驶体验层面，升级后的车型引入了动态氛围灯，试图通过光效提升车内的交互感。针对此前 用户关注的驾乘质感问题，特斯拉对此番改款车型的悬架系统进行了重新调校，并针对车身静谧性做出 了优化处理，以期提供更舒适的乘坐反馈。数据显示，新车型在CLTC工况下的续航里程为715公里。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The new national standard proposed by the Ministry of Public Security aims to address safety concerns related to the rapid acceleration of electric vehicles, requiring that passenger cars have a default acceleration time of no less than 5 seconds for 0 to 100 km/h after each power-up [2]. Group 1: New National Standard - The proposed national standard, titled "Technical Conditions for the Safe Operation of Motor Vehicles," is currently open for public consultation [2]. - The standard specifically targets the issue of loss of control in electric vehicles due to excessive acceleration [2]. Group 2: Current Market Impact - At least 19 models of electric vehicles currently on sale have an official acceleration time of less than 5 seconds for 0 to 100 km/h [2]. - The following are some of the models with their respective acceleration times and starting prices: - Li Auto i6 AWD: 4.5 seconds, starting at 249,800 CNY - Xpeng G9 680: 4.2 seconds, starting at 278,800 CNY - EMEYA 600: 4.15 seconds, starting at 538,000 CNY - NIO ET5: 4 seconds, starting at 298,000 CNY - BYD Tang L EV: 3.9 seconds, starting at 239,800 CNY - Tesla Model X: 3.9 seconds, starting at 704,900 CNY - Denza N8 L: 3.9 seconds, starting at 299,800 CNY - Xpeng P7 750: 3.7 seconds, starting at 259,800 CNY - Arcfox Alpha S5: 3.7 seconds, starting at 127,800 CNY - Geely Geometry X: 3.69 seconds, starting at 155,800 CNY - Tesla Model S: 3.2 seconds, starting at 647,300 CNY [3].

Core Insights - The project manager for Tesla Model Y, Emmanuel Ramakiya, announced his departure on LinkedIn, coinciding with the departure of the Cybertruck project head on the same day [1] - Tesla Model Y has been the best-selling vehicle globally in both 2023 and 2024 [1] - Over the past year, several key project leaders at Tesla have left, including those for Model 3, Model S, and Model X [1]

（文章来源：第一财经） 今日消息，特斯拉Model Y的项目经理埃马纽埃尔·拉马基亚在领英宣布离职。特斯拉Model Y在2023年 和2024年蝉联全球最畅销车型。就在拉马基亚离职的同一天，特斯拉Cybertruck项目负责人也宣布离 职。 过去一年中，特斯拉汽车项目负责人接连离职，还包括Model 3项目经理，以及Model S及Model X项目 经理。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The CEO of WeRide, Han Xu, emphasizes that once people experience Fully Self-Driving (FSD) technology, they will demand it, similar to the transition from Nokia to smartphones [1]. Group 1: Company Expansion and Operations - WeRide's autonomous driving technology has been implemented in 11 countries and over 30 cities globally. Recently, the company launched Robotaxi public operations in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in collaboration with Uber [1]. - In China, WeRide has established services in major cities, including Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, with 24-hour coverage in core urban areas [1]. Group 2: Safety and Public Perception - Han Xu notes that society tends to scrutinize new technologies, especially in the context of accidents involving autonomous vehicles, contrasting it with human-driven incidents that often go unnoticed [2]. - He draws a parallel to the Wright brothers' journey in aviation, highlighting that public acceptance of new inventions often takes longer than their development [2]. Group 3: Cost and Market Viability - The cost of manufacturing a WeRide autonomous vehicle is slightly above $40,000, significantly lower than the Tesla Model X, thanks to China's robust electric vehicle supply chain [4]. - Han Xu outlines a pricing rule for the Robotaxi market: if taxi fares exceed $1 per kilometer, the market is favorable; between $0.5 and $1, optimization is needed; below $0.5 indicates significant challenges [4]. Group 4: Future of Autonomous Driving - The technology is rapidly penetrating the market, but further advancements are necessary, and the integration with consumers will take time. Analysts predict that the reduction in accidents due to autonomous vehicles could lower insurance costs by over 50% in the next 15 years [4]. - Han Xu believes that within ten years, Level 5 autonomous driving capabilities will match those of the best human drivers [4].

Key Points - The rumor regarding Midea being fined 5 million by JD.com has been confirmed as false, indicating possible platform manipulation [4] - Xiaomi has made significant organizational adjustments, with Lei Jun leading a new automotive department and Chen Kai taking over Xiaomi Home [8][9] - The 2025 Q3 earnings report for Xiaomi is anticipated to show a profit of 722 million yuan for its electric vehicle segment, with another institution predicting a profit of 1 billion yuan [9] - Zhong Shanshan has regained the title of China's richest person with a wealth increase of 190 billion yuan, while Lei Jun's wealth surged by 196 billion yuan due to Xiaomi's automotive growth [11] - Meta's AI department has undergone major layoffs, with around 600 employees affected, attributed to the underperformance of the Llama4 model against Chinese competitors [30][31] - Apple's service revenue is projected to exceed 100 billion USD for the first time in fiscal year 2025, driven by strong growth in services like iCloud and Apple Pay [31][32] - The European new car market saw a 10.7% year-on-year increase in September, with BYD's sales skyrocketing by 398%, while Tesla's market share declined [36] - Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) subscription rate is only 12%, with related revenue down compared to the previous year, highlighting challenges in customer adoption [37]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of the automotive market, highlighting the significant penetration of new energy vehicles (NEVs) while also noting the continued popularity of fuel vehicles among certain consumer demographics. The article features interviews with five fuel vehicle owners, revealing their perspectives on the transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and their reasons for sticking with traditional fuel cars [6]. Group 1: Market Trends - In September, the penetration rate of new energy vehicles in the passenger car market reached 57.8%, indicating that for every two new cars sold, one is an NEV [6]. - Despite the rise of electric vehicles, fuel vehicle sales have shown positive growth, with approximately 945,000 fuel passenger cars sold in September, marking four consecutive months of growth [6]. Group 2: Consumer Perspectives - A 58-year-old restaurant owner expressed skepticism about electric vehicles, citing their simpler structure and lack of traditional components like engines, which he believes diminishes their value [10]. - The same owner mentioned a preference for the sound and performance of fuel vehicles, stating that the quietness of electric cars could lead to drowsiness during long drives [11]. - Another interviewee, a 57-year-old employee from a state-owned enterprise, highlighted safety concerns regarding electric vehicles, particularly the risk of battery explosions and the perceived lack of robustness compared to fuel vehicles [22]. - A 25-year-old NEV salesperson shared that while she works in the electric vehicle industry, she chose to buy a fuel vehicle due to reliability and convenience, reflecting a generational divide in vehicle preferences [25]. - A 44-year-old internet professional noted that while he acknowledges the advancements in electric vehicles, he remains concerned about charging convenience and battery safety, preferring the established reliability of fuel vehicles [30]. Group 3: Economic Considerations - The article indicates that fuel vehicles are perceived as more economical in the long run, with lower maintenance costs and better resale value compared to electric vehicles [36]. - One respondent mentioned that their monthly fuel expenses amount to approximately 700 yuan, which they believe is more cost-effective than the expenses associated with electric vehicles, including charging and potential battery replacements [23].

Core Viewpoint - The automotive market is at a crossroads between traditional fuel vehicles and electric vehicles (EVs), with a significant penetration of EVs but a persistent demand for fuel vehicles. In September, the penetration rate of new energy vehicles in the passenger car market reached 57.8%, indicating that for every two new cars sold, one is an EV. However, fuel vehicle sales also saw a positive growth trend, with approximately 945,000 units sold in September, marking four consecutive months of growth [1]. Group 1: Consumer Perspectives on Fuel Vehicles - Many consumers express a strong attachment to fuel vehicles, citing nostalgia and a preference for the driving experience they offer. For instance, one consumer mentioned that they would opt for a second-hand fuel vehicle if all new fuel vehicles were discontinued [2]. - Older drivers often find it difficult to adapt to the quietness of electric vehicles, preferring the sound and performance characteristics of fuel vehicles. They appreciate the mechanical feel and craftsmanship of traditional cars, which they believe are superior to many electric models [3][5]. - Concerns about the safety and reliability of electric vehicles are prevalent among fuel vehicle owners. Issues such as battery safety and the risk of electric vehicle fires are frequently mentioned, alongside doubts about the long-term value retention of electric vehicles compared to fuel vehicles [10][12]. Group 2: Market Trends and Consumer Behavior - The increasing presence of electric vehicles on the roads is noted, with a significant rise in their numbers in residential areas. This shift is partially attributed to rising fuel prices, which have increased from 6 yuan to 8 yuan per liter for 92-octane gasoline [6]. - Younger consumers show a growing interest in electric vehicles, but many still prefer fuel vehicles for their reliability and convenience. The availability of charging stations and the practicality of long-distance travel remain significant concerns for potential electric vehicle buyers [15][21]. - The competitive landscape for electric vehicles is intensifying, with consumers increasingly aware of the technological advancements in the sector. However, many still prioritize the established reliability and performance of fuel vehicles over the newer electric options [19][27].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding hidden door handles in electric vehicles, emphasizing the need for a rational analysis of their design and safety implications rather than emotional reactions to accidents involving these vehicles [1]. Group 1: Origin and Current Status of Hidden Door Handles - Hidden door handles have a history dating back to the 1950s, initially seen in high-performance cars like the Mercedes-Benz 300SL, focusing on design aesthetics and aerodynamics [2]. - Tesla popularized hidden door handles with its electric models, making them synonymous with technological advancement, leading to widespread adoption among various automakers [2][4]. Group 2: Sales and Adoption Rates - Over 3 million vehicles equipped with hidden door handles have been sold in China, with brands like Li Auto, NIO, and Xpeng also adopting this design [4]. - By 2025, it is projected that 38.9% of new energy vehicles will feature non-mechanical door handles, with 21.5% of new SUV models already incorporating electric door handles [4]. Group 3: Cost Analysis - The claim that hidden door handles are a cost-saving measure is debunked, as traditional mechanical handles cost between 30-50 yuan, while electric systems can range from 300-600 yuan, and even exceed 1000 yuan in high-end models [4]. Group 4: Safety Concerns - The main safety concern regarding hidden door handles is their functionality in the event of a collision that causes power failure, particularly for electric lock designs [6][8]. - Despite concerns, Tesla's vehicles with electric door handles have performed well in crash tests, indicating that these designs are not inherently more dangerous than traditional handles [8][10]. Group 5: Regulatory Developments - A new national standard requires that all car doors must have a mechanical release function, which poses challenges for designs like Tesla's that rely solely on electric unlocking [13]. - Some new energy vehicle manufacturers are proactively addressing safety concerns by incorporating mechanical unlocking systems alongside electric ones, ensuring compliance with upcoming regulations [15]. Group 6: Future Outlook - The evolution of hidden door handles reflects a balance between design innovation and safety, with ongoing technological advancements expected to enhance their functionality [19]. - The automotive industry is encouraged to prioritize user safety while continuing to innovate, ensuring that technological progress does not compromise reliability [19].

Core Viewpoint - Tesla is potentially eliminating the standard inclusion of physical key cards for new vehicles, shifting to mobile app-only access for unlocking and starting cars, which has sparked mixed reactions among users [6][11][12]. Group 1: Changes in Key Features - The latest version of Tesla's owner manual no longer mentions the provision of key cards, indicating a move towards app-based vehicle access [4][6]. - Since 2017, key cards have been a standard accessory for Tesla vehicles, allowing users to unlock and start their cars without a mobile device [7][9]. - The change appears to coincide with the upcoming launch of a more streamlined version of Model 3/Y, suggesting that future models may not include key cards at all [6][11]. Group 2: User Reactions and Implications - User opinions are divided; some find key cards unnecessary, while others emphasize their importance for situations like phone battery depletion or temporary vehicle access for others [12][18]. - The removal of key cards could lead to inconvenience for users who may find themselves locked out of their vehicles if their phones are unavailable [9][11]. - Tesla's history of reducing features for cost-saving aligns with this decision, as the company has previously eliminated other components deemed less frequently used [20][22]. Group 3: Cost Considerations - The cost of producing key cards is relatively low, estimated at no more than $20 each, but for a company with annual sales in the millions and significant profits, these savings can accumulate [20]. - The decision to eliminate physical keys is part of Tesla's broader strategy to streamline features and reduce costs, which has been a hallmark of its operational approach [20][22]. Group 4: Future Possibilities - While key cards may not be standard, they can still be purchased separately by users who desire them, priced at 209 yuan per set [24]. - If user demand for physical keys remains high, Tesla may reconsider and reintroduce them as standard equipment in future models [25].