刚刚过去的2025年，对债市投资机构而言，无疑是充满挑战的一年。 一位基金公司债券投资总监王锐（化名）向记者表示称："去年算是债券资产高波动的一年，无论是政策边际倾向、外部环境变动还是'隔壁'权益类的资产表 现的影响，幅度都比以往要更为剧烈。" 同样，"小作文"带来的短期情绪比基本面更能拉动行情，其影响也比现实因素来得更为直接即时，机构盘中的交易风向比长期宏观基本面似乎更为紧密地 牵动着市场神经。 在他看来，这一趋势背后，是日趋白热化的机构博弈、从业者们持续攀升的收益获取压力的现实反映。 回顾2025年的债市走向，wind数据显示，10年期国债收益率自年初1.6%的低位经历了一轮极速走高，3月触及阶段高点；二季度自高位回落，在低位持续震 荡，市场情绪趋于谨慎，配置力量与政策预期相互博弈；下半年自7月起重拾升势，9月冲高触及1.92%左右，经济修复预期升温、资金面收敛及供给压力共 同推动利率中枢上移；四季度自高点小幅回调后维持高位震荡，年末交投趋于平稳。 尤其，个别券种在急速调整期经常出现单日上行超3bp的情况，其间一度令交易员们直呼"措手不及"。 即便时间来到年末，行情也并未停歇，2025年12月债市呈现分化 ...

固收-债市年度策略 20251229 摘要 2026 年可转债市场面临净退出规模 1,000 亿至 1,500 亿，市场面值或 收缩至 4,000 亿以内，高等级转债占比下降，剩余期限压缩，A 股波动 率低，对转债定价构成压力。 可转债市场需求端呈现产品化和被动化趋势，公募 ETF 增持显著，对市 场估值形成支撑，但降低了定价效率。二级债基保持一定比例可转债仓 位以维持产品特色。 当前市场估值处于 2021-2023 年高位，需注意交易策略和仓位控制。 转债弹性与 A 股牛市机会和稀缺性相关，若无主升浪，或仅为高位震荡。 2026 年超越转债指数难度加大，大盘转债价格已贵，结构选择应聚焦 少数标的，如价格下限较高且具弹性的标的，或聚焦科技类、反内卷方 向。 2025 年债市机会较少，长债表现不佳，信用债市场呈牛市状态，信用 利差收窄。2026 年需关注海外因素、国内通胀和资产荒演绎对债市定 价的影响。 Q&A 2026 年可转债市场的供需矛盾情况如何？ 股票和纯债的组合能否复制转债的优势？从估值角度来看，当前市场情况如何？ 股票和纯债的组合很难复制转债的凸性或其夏普比率的优势。要实现这一点， 只有通过择时策略 ...

Core Viewpoint - The central viewpoint indicates that the central bank is expected to maintain stability in the bond market as the year-end approaches, likely increasing the scale of government bond purchases and enhancing net liquidity injections into commercial banks, which suggests that a significant downturn in the bond market similar to August and September is unlikely [1] Group 1: Bond Market Outlook - The bond market is anticipated to avoid a one-sided decline, with a favorable environment for medium to short-term interest rate bonds due to a loose monetary market [1] - Long-term interest rate bonds still hold trading value, but the likelihood of a significant decline in long-term and ultra-long-term bond yields is low, with expectations of a range-bound market instead [1] - The yield curve is expected to continue steepening, indicating a potential increase in the difference between short-term and long-term interest rates [1] Group 2: Credit Bonds and Duration Strategy - In terms of credit bonds, the fourth quarter is not seen as a time for institutions to significantly increase their holdings, leading to expectations that credit spreads will not compress significantly [1] - For duration selection, it is suggested that a core allocation could include medium-term government bonds and large bank secondary capital bonds, while leveraging positions could involve trading long-term and ultra-long-term bonds with appropriate stop-loss and take-profit strategies [1]

Summary of Conference Call Records Industry Overview - The conference call discusses the macroeconomic environment in China, focusing on the performance of the stock and bond markets, as well as the implications of macro liquidity and risk preferences on investment strategies [1][2][3]. Key Points and Arguments 1. **Macroeconomic Liquidity Trends** - In October, there was a slight easing of liquidity, but the probability of macro liquidity convergence is increasing, favoring bonds over equities [1][4]. - The current profit cycle has been declining since 2011, with expectations of low-level fluctuations entering Q4 2024 [1][11]. 2. **Private Sector Debt Growth** - The growth rate of private sector debt fell to 3.9% in September 2025, indicating a low-level fluctuation in profitability, with limited further decline expected [1][15][16]. - This trend reflects a continuous decline in profitability since 2011, with the current state being a low-level narrow fluctuation [15][17]. 3. **Investment Strategy Recommendations** - It is advised to construct a portfolio consisting of long-term bonds and value-oriented equity assets, with a focus on dividend indices and the Shanghai Composite Index [1][5]. - The highest proportion in the dividend index is currently from the banking sector [5]. 4. **Impact of International Capital Flows** - International capital flows significantly influence Chinese asset prices and the RMB exchange rate, with appreciation dependent on the performance of the real economy relative to the U.S. [1][18]. - The Chinese government has maintained a stable macro leverage ratio and other policy goals since 2016 [18][19]. 5. **Risk Preference Dynamics** - Risk preference is an endogenous variable that stabilizes when profitability does not decline further. Since August 29, there has been no significant increase in risk preference, indicating limited upward potential [1][8][24]. - The overall risk preference has shown a slight decline, necessitating a focus on value styles rather than growth styles in the current environment [24]. 6. **Policy Implications** - Domestic policies play a crucial role in economic and market dynamics, with the effectiveness of easing policies dependent on their ability to stimulate economic growth [10][20]. - In a deflationary context, there is a conflict between expansionary policies and debt reduction goals, requiring careful management of asset positions [21][22]. 7. **Future Economic Outlook** - The expectation is for macro liquidity to exhibit a converging trend towards the end of the year, with a focus on value styles unless there are signs of improvement in macro liquidity or risk preference [26]. - Continuous monitoring of data changes is essential for timely adjustments to investment strategies [26]. Other Important Insights - The relationship between the profit cycle and demographic structure suggests that significant improvements in the profit cycle are unlikely without substantial demographic changes [17]. - The analysis of private sector debt growth serves as a critical indicator for observing profitability trends, reflecting broader economic expectations [14][15]. - The distinction between "volume-price" relationships in market conditions highlights the importance of understanding market dynamics for investment strategies [22]. This summary encapsulates the key insights from the conference call, providing a comprehensive overview of the current economic landscape and investment strategies in the context of China's market.

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Treasury's increased issuance of short-term debt may be necessary to sustain the current bull market, as historical patterns indicate that high net issuance of medium to long-term debt correlates with stock market stagnation or decline [1][2][5]. Group 1: Current Market Conditions - The net issuance of medium to long-term debt is approaching 100% of the fiscal deficit, with long-term debt net issuance accounting for 80% [2][5]. - The combination of high net issuance and slowing growth in total debt issuance is creating a challenging environment for the stock market, as the liquidity squeeze from medium to long-term debt issuance is undermining upward momentum [2][5]. Group 2: Historical Context - Historical data shows that when net issuance of medium to long-term debt exceeds 85% of the fiscal deficit and total issuance growth declines, the S&P 500's performance over the next 1-12 months is significantly below average [5][7]. Group 3: Short-Term Debt as a Solution - In 2023, the former U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen successfully revitalized the market by significantly increasing short-term debt issuance, which helped to draw down over $2 trillion in idle funds from the Federal Reserve's reverse repo (RRP) tool [10]. - Simon White suggests that to prevent a market collapse, the Treasury must reduce the net issuance of long-term debt and restart total issuance growth, implying a substantial increase in short-term debt issuance [11]. Group 4: Repo Market Dynamics - The relationship between short-term debt and the stock market is closely tied to the explosive growth of the repo market, which has become increasingly liquid and resembles a "near-money" asset [12][13]. - The growth in government debt issuance, particularly as repo collateral, has a positive correlation with stock market performance, but this relationship is more pronounced in total issuance rather than net issuance [13][14]. Group 5: Potential Challenges - Restarting short-term debt issuance may not be without consequences, as it could raise interest costs and inflation risks, complicating the Treasury's fiscal management [15]. - The current interest expenditure on U.S. debt has surpassed $1 trillion annually, and further shortening the average debt maturity could exacerbate inflationary pressures [15][17].

Group 1 - The overall trend in government bond futures since early April has been characterized by "long strong, short weak," with short-term bonds experiencing significant declines after mid-April, while long-term bonds have maintained a volatile pattern [1] - The market's expectations for interest rate cuts remain, with short-term yields appearing relatively appropriate after previous increases, indicating that the prior rise has exhausted policy space [1][2] - Concerns about the economic outlook persist, particularly regarding real estate and external demand, making long-term bonds more attractive compared to short-term bonds [1][2] Group 2 - The short-term bond market has shown signs of overvaluation, with the yield spread between short-term government bonds and funding rates at historical lows, leading to concerns about the sustainability of short-term bond prices [2] - The basic economic fundamentals are more favorable for long-term bonds, as April's economic data indicates a general decline, making long-term bonds more sensitive to these fundamentals [2] - Investors should closely monitor changes in external demand and monetary policy, particularly regarding the central bank's potential resumption of secondary market government bond transactions, which could impact bond yields [4] Group 3 - The upcoming economic performance, changes in funding conditions, and developments in US-China trade negotiations will significantly influence the bond market in June [3] - The pressure on external demand is expected to gradually affect domestic demand, which could enhance the driving force for a stronger bond market [4] - As of the end of April, foreign investors' holdings of domestic bonds reached 29,781.5 billion yuan, reflecting an increase and indicating a growing interest in Chinese assets amid global market shifts [4]

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No investment rating information is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints - Standing at the end of April and looking forward to May, investors' preference for long - term and ultra - long - term bonds has increased, while their attention to credit products has decreased month - on - month, but there may be a characteristic of "being bullish but not taking action" [1][10]. - According to the bond market survey questionnaire results released at the end of April, six mainstream expectations of investors for the May bond market are summarized: preference for long - term and ultra - long - term bonds has increased significantly; Trump's tariff policy may promote the early implementation of reserve requirement ratio (RRR) and interest rate cut policies, and the positive impact on the bond market can continue; the current expectation of monetary easing is still strong, with most investors expecting an RRR cut in May - June and an interest rate cut more likely in the third quarter; most investors believe that the bond market will strengthen overall in May, and the probability of a bull - flattening curve is high; most investors' judgments on the operating ranges of 10 - year and 30 - year Treasury bond yields are narrow, and the market is expected to be mainly volatile; in terms of operations, most investors are neutral in practice and prefer to keep their positions basically stable, possibly showing "being bullish but not taking action" [1][10]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Survey Background - A bond market questionnaire "What to expect from the May bond market?" was released on April 25, 2025, targeting the main concerns of the May 2025 bond market. As of 24:00 on April 27, a total of 331 valid questionnaires were received, covering various institutional investors such as bank self - operation, securities firm self - operation, public funds/special accounts, and individual investors [8]. 3.2 Expectations for Treasury Bond Yields - **10 - year Treasury Bond Yields**: 48% of investors think the lower limit of the 10 - year Treasury bond rate is below 1.60%, and 45% think it is between 1.60% - 1.70% (inclusive). 76% of investors believe the upper limit of the 10 - year Treasury bond rate may be within 1.80%, and 11% think it may be between 1.80% - 1.85% (inclusive). Most investors expect the bond market in May to trade around the tariff policy, and the 10 - year Treasury bond rate is unlikely to return to the previous high in April [11]. - **30 - year Treasury Bond Yields**: 41% of investors think the lower limit of the 30 - year Treasury bond operating range in May will be less than 1.8%, and 43% think it is between 1.80% - 1.85% (inclusive). 53% of investors believe the upper limit of the 30 - year Treasury bond operating range in May is between 1.90% - 2.00% (inclusive), and 31% think it is within 1.90%. The overall bond market in May may be volatile and slightly stronger [14]. 3.3 Expectations for the Second - Quarter Economic Trend - 62% of investors think the economic trend in the second quarter will be "both year - on - year and month - on - month weakening", a significant increase compared with the April questionnaire results. 22% of investors think it will show the characteristic of "year - on - year recovery but month - on - month weaker than the seasonal level". 10% of investors think it will be "year - on - year recovery and month - on - month in line with the seasonal level", and 5% think it will be "year - on - year recovery and month - on - month exceeding the seasonal level", a significant decrease compared with the April questionnaire results. The deviation between the economic fundamental expectation and the reality needs a certain verification period [19]. 3.4 Expectations for RRR and Interest Rate Cuts - **RRR Cut**: 66% of investors think an RRR cut will occur in May - June, and 17% think it will be in the third quarter. Investors have a high expectation for an RRR cut and expect it to happen earlier [21]. - **Interest Rate Cut**: 49% of investors think an interest rate cut will occur in the third quarter, 31% think it will be in May - June. 12% of investors think there will be no interest rate cut in 2025. Investors' expectation for an interest rate cut has further strengthened, and the proportion of those who think there will be no interest rate cut in 2025 has decreased significantly [21]. 3.5 Impact of Trump's Tariff Policy on the Bond Market - 46% of investors think it may promote the early implementation of RRR and interest rate cut policies, and the positive impact on the bond market can continue. 27% think the subsequent focus will be on the expectation of tariff policy cooling, and the positive impact on the bond market has ended. 15% think it may trigger non - US countries to impose tariffs on China, and the positive impact on the bond market can continue. 12% think it may strengthen the policy - makers' determination to stabilize the capital market, and the positive impact on the bond market has ended. Overall, investors generally think the subsequent impact of Trump's tariff policy on the bond market is still positive [23]. 3.6 Expectations for the May Bond Market行情 - 27% of investors think the interest rate curve will strengthen overall and show a bull - flattening trend in May. 26% think it will strengthen overall and show a bull - steepening trend. 16% think it is difficult to judge the trend of the interest rate curve in May. 10% think the short - end of the interest rate curve will be strong and the long - end will be weak, and 10% think the short - end will be weak and the long - end will be strong. Overall, more investors are optimistic about the May bond market, but there is some divergence between the expectations of a bull - flattening and a bull - steepening curve [25]. 3.7 Bond Market Operation Suggestions - 49% of investors think they should keep their positions basically stable. 23% think they should hold cash and wait, and then add positions after the market回调 to the expected level. 13% think they can start adding positions. 11% think they should take appropriate profits and reduce positions. 4% think they should reduce the duration to control risks. Most investors are neutral in practice, and keeping positions stable is the mainstream view [29]. 3.8 Preferred Bond Varieties in May - 18% and 17% of investors think the opportunities for long - term and ultra - long - term interest - rate bonds are relatively certain. 15%, 10%, and 10% of investors are more optimistic about medium - short - term interest - rate bonds, inter - bank certificates of deposit, and local government bonds respectively. About 9% of investors prefer medium - low - grade urban investment bonds. Investors have a higher preference for interest - rate products such as interest - rate bonds, certificates of deposit, and government bonds, and their preference for credit products has decreased month - on - month. The preferred varieties have shifted from the short - end to the long - end and ultra - long - end [32]. 3.9 Main Logic of Bond Market Pricing in May - 31% of investors think the central bank's monetary policy attitude and the trend of the capital market are still the main pricing logics for the May bond market. 16% and 15% of investors think fiscal stimulus, government bond issuance, and fundamental data such as real estate and PMI are the main pricing logics. 13% of investors think the implementation of the US tariff policy is the main pricing logic. The central bank's monetary policy attitude and the trend of the capital market are still the most concerned factors for investors [34].