格隆汇7月31日丨中通快递-W(02057.HK)宣布，董事会将于2025年8月19日(星期二)(北京时间)举行董事 会会议，以(其中包括)批准(i)公司截至2025年6月30日止第二季度的未经审计财务业绩及其发布；及(ii) 公司截至2025年6月30日止的未经审计中期业绩及其发布。 公司将于2025年8月20日(星期三)(北京时间)于香港联交所开市前发布公司截至2025年6月30日止第二季 度及截至2025年6月30日止六个月的未经审计财务业绩。 ...

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示概不會就本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚賴 該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 根據不同投票權架構，我們的股本包括A類普通股及B類普通股。對於需要股東投票的所有事 項，A類普通股持有人每股可投1票，而B類普通股持有人則每股可投10票。股東及有意投資者 務請留意投資不同投票權架構公司的潛在風險。我們的美國存託股（每股美國存託股代表一股A 類普通股）於美國紐約證券交易所上市，代碼為ZTO。 （股份代號：2057） 董事會會議召開日期 中通快遞（開曼）有限公司（「本公司」）董事會（「董事會」）謹此宣佈，董事會將於 2025年8月19日（星期二）（北京時間）舉行董事會會議，以（其中包括）批准(i)本公 司截至2025年6月30日止第二季度的未經審計財務業績及其發佈；及(ii)本公司截 至2025年6月30日止的未經審計中期業績及其發佈。 本公司將於2025年8月20日（星期三）（北京時間）於香港聯合交易所有限公司開市 前發佈本公司截至2025年6月30日止第二季度及截至2025年6月30日止 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the performance of the China Securities Hong Kong 100 Industrial Index, which has seen significant increases over various time frames, including a 21.24% rise in the past month and a 25.30% rise in the past three months [1] - The index is categorized based on the China Securities industry classification standards, with a base date of December 31, 2004, and a base point of 1000.0 [1] - The index is fully composed of securities listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with the largest sector being express delivery, accounting for 57.94% of the index [1] Group 2 - The index samples are adjusted biannually, specifically on the next trading day following the second Friday of June and December [2] - Weight factors are generally fixed until the next scheduled adjustment, with provisions for temporary adjustments under special circumstances [2] - Adjustments to the index occur in response to changes in the parent index samples or significant events affecting sample companies, such as mergers or delistings [2]

| 36 | | 阿里巴巴 | 2799.92 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 4 | | 小米集团-W | 1763.96 | | | 5 | | 拼多多 | 1603.06 | | | | 網易 | 网易 | 825.18 | 11 | | 7 | | 东方财富 | 520.85 | II | | 8 | | 中芯国际 | 516.85 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 9 | | 京东 | 457.68 | | | 10 | | 快手-W | 409.34 | | | II | | 腾讯音乐 | 326.82 | | | 12 | Bal Car | 目度 | 295.44 | | | 13 | | 理想汽车 | 283.13 | | | 14 | | 贝壳 | 221.36 | | | 15 | | 同花顺 | 218.78 | | | 16 | | 小鹏汽车 | 171.87 | | | 17 | | 中通快递 | 159.79 | | | 18 | | 科大讯飞 | 157.13 | | | 19 | | 蔚来 ...

| 25 | | 金蝶国际 | 77.06 | 1 4 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 26 | | 新东方 | 76.45 | 1 1 | | 27 | | 万国数据 | 75.02 | 11 | | 28 | | 用友网络 | 71.64 | 1 t | | 29 | | 巨人网络 | 65.55 | 1 t | | 30 | m | 美图公司 | 63.41 | 1 1 | | 31 | | 金山软件 | 62.27 | 2 t | | 32 | | 昆仑万维 | 62.24 | 2 1 | | 33 | | 中国软件 | 62.24 | -1 - | | 34 | | 好未来 | 62.22 | | | 35 | | 同程旅行 | 61.28 | 11 | | 36 | | 深信服 | 59.74 | 1 1 | | 37 | | 润和软件 | 59.69 | -2 1 | | 38 | | 恺英网络 | 56.34 | 11 | | 39 | | 拓维信息 | 55.83 | -1 | | 40 | | 柏楚电子 | 54.06 | | | 41 | 3) | ...

本文源自：智通财经网 消息面上，据国家邮政局消息，7月29日，国家邮政局召开快递企业座谈会，就依法依规治理行业"内卷 式"竞争，强化农村地区领取快件违规收费等突出问题整治，促进行业高质量发展进行座谈交流。国信 证券认为，未来在"反内卷"和高质量发展政策指导下，快递行业的无序竞争有望实现边际好转，从而促 使监管、竞争、盈利和质量达成新的平衡，今年四季度旺季行业的价格和盈利表现仍然值得期待。 智通财经获悉，中通快递-W(02057)涨近4%，截至发稿，涨3.78%，报161.9港元，成交额1.07亿港元。 ...

中通快递-W(02057)涨近4%，截至发稿，涨3.78%，报161.9港元，成交额1.07亿港元。 消息面上，据国家邮政局消息，7月29日，国家邮政局召开快递企业座谈会，就依法依规治理行业"内卷 式"竞争，强化农村地区领取快件违规收费等突出问题整治，促进行业高质量发展进行座谈交流。国信 证券认为，未来在"反内卷"和高质量发展政策指导下，快递行业的无序竞争有望实现边际好转，从而促 使监管、竞争、盈利和质量达成新的平衡，今年四季度旺季行业的价格和盈利表现仍然值得期待。 ...

Core Viewpoint - ZTO Express (02057) has seen a nearly 4% increase in stock price, currently trading at 161.9 HKD with a transaction volume of 107 million HKD, indicating positive market sentiment towards the company [1]. Industry Summary - The State Post Bureau held a meeting on July 29 to address issues of "involution" competition within the express delivery industry, focusing on the regulation of illegal charges in rural areas and promoting high-quality development [1]. - Guosen Securities believes that under the guidance of policies aimed at "anti-involution" and high-quality development, the chaotic competition in the express delivery industry is expected to improve marginally, leading to a new balance among regulation, competition, profitability, and quality [1]. - The price and profitability performance of the industry during the peak season in the fourth quarter of this year is still anticipated to be promising [1].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the express delivery industry [1] Core Insights - The express delivery industry is experiencing a trend of "anti-involution," leading to a revaluation of its value [3] - The report emphasizes the importance of regulatory actions in stabilizing the industry and improving profitability [3] - Short-term price improvements are expected, with potential for further increases during peak seasons [3] Summary by Sections 1. Review of 2021's "Anti-Involution" - In 2021, the express delivery industry saw a significant policy push to protect courier rights, leading to price increases and improved profitability [3][19] - The average price per ticket for the "Tongda" system increased by approximately 0.6 yuan from the low point in August 2021 to January 2022 [3] - By Q4 2021, YTO Express reported a net profit of 1.15 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 202% [3] 2. Current Industry Dynamics - After 2023, the industry has re-entered a phase of price competition due to increased capacity and market share strategies, leading to profitability nearing historical lows [3][39] - The National Postal Administration has clearly opposed "involution-style" competition, indicating a regulatory environment similar to that of 2021 [3][65] - The report suggests monitoring regulatory developments in key production areas like Yiwu and Guangdong for potential price adjustments [3] 3. Short-term and Long-term Outlook - Short-term price improvements are anticipated, particularly in traditionally low-price cities, with potential for broader price increases in peak seasons [3][69] - The report forecasts a shift from price wars to value competition, which could enhance long-term profitability for leading express companies [3][69] - Investment recommendations include focusing on A-shares such as Shentong Express, YTO Express, and Yunda Express, as well as H-shares like Jitu Express and ZTO Express [3] 4. Financial Performance Metrics - In Q1 2025, the net profit per ticket for major companies like Zhongtong, YTO, Yunda, and Shentong fell close to or below historical lows [50] - The report highlights significant cash flow pressures, with some companies experiencing cash flow performance worse than the bottom of 2021 [50] - The report provides elasticity calculations indicating that price increases could significantly enhance profitability for express companies [70]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "rounding up" charges in various sectors such as express delivery, parking, and shared services, which has raised public concern regarding fairness and transparency in pricing practices [1][14]. Express Delivery Sector - Several express delivery companies have been reported to engage in unfair "rounding up" practices, where the weight of packages is inflated for charging purposes [2][4]. - For instance, YTO Express marked a 2.7 kg package as 4 kg, increasing the charge by nearly 50%, while Jitu Express charged for a 3 kg weight for a 2.1 kg package [3][4]. - A significant number of express delivery companies (about half) have been found to have similar issues in their weight charging practices [4]. - The new regulations effective from April 1, 2024, stipulate that billing weight must be in kilograms and retain at least one decimal place, making the "rounding up" practices clearly illegal [5][17]. Parking Sector - Parking fees are often charged based on a minimum time unit, leading to situations where even a slight delay results in significantly higher charges [7][10]. - For example, a consumer was charged for 45 minutes despite only using 30 minutes and 7 seconds of parking time, highlighting the unfairness in the billing system [9][11]. - The article notes that this practice is widespread and often seen as a "hidden rule" in many parking facilities [8][10]. Shared Services Sector - Similar "rounding up" practices are observed in shared services like charging stations, where consumers are charged for longer durations than they actually used [12][13]. - A case was mentioned where a consumer was charged for 30 minutes of charging despite only using 5 minutes, which was deemed unreasonable [13][19]. - The article emphasizes that such practices infringe upon consumers' rights to fair transactions as outlined in consumer protection laws [18][20]. Regulatory Response - The National Postal Administration has taken notice of the express delivery sector's "rounding up" practices and has initiated investigations, urging companies to comply with national standards for weight billing [17]. - The article calls for similar scrutiny and reform in the parking and shared services sectors to ensure fair pricing practices [23].