证券代码：600030 证券简称：中信证券 公告编号：临2026-002 中信证券股份有限公司 关于间接子公司发行中期票据 并由全资子公司提供担保的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 担保对象及基本情况 | | 被担保人名称 | | 本次担保金额 | 实际为其提供的担保余额 | 是否在前期 | 本次担保是 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | （不含本次担保金额） | 预计额度内 | 否有反担保 | | CSI MTN | | Limited | 1亿港元 | 28.66亿美元 | 是 | 否 | 1 （二） 内部决策程序 经公司第八届董事会第二十二次会议预审，经公司2023年度股东大会批准并 再次授权公司发行境内外公司债务融资工具。本次担保在上述授权范围之内。 | 被担保人类型 | 法人 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 被担保人名称 | CSI MTN Limited | | | | ...

Core Viewpoint - Dize Pharmaceutical (688192.SH) has announced a projected net loss for the year 2025, despite an expected significant increase in revenue compared to the previous year. Financial Performance - The company anticipates a revenue of approximately 800 million yuan for 2025, which represents an increase of about 440.1 million yuan or 122.28% year-on-year [1] - The projected net loss attributable to shareholders is around 770 million yuan, a reduction of approximately 75.96 million yuan or 8.98% compared to the previous year [1] - The expected net loss after deducting non-recurring gains and losses is about 850 million yuan, which is a decrease of around 48.89 million yuan or 5.44% year-on-year [1] Historical Financial Data - From 2019 to 2024, the company's revenue figures were 41.02 million yuan, 27.76 million yuan, 10.29 million yuan, 0 yuan, 91.29 million yuan, and 360 million yuan respectively [2] - The net profit attributable to shareholders during the same period was -446 million yuan, -587 million yuan, -670 million yuan, -736 million yuan, -1.108 billion yuan, and -846 million yuan [2] - The net profit after deducting non-recurring gains and losses was -449 million yuan, -393 million yuan, -682 million yuan, -785 million yuan, -1.161 billion yuan, and -899 million yuan [2] - The net cash flow from operating activities was -366 million yuan, -410 million yuan, -492 million yuan, -603 million yuan, -968 million yuan, and -651 million yuan [2] Fundraising Activities - Dize Pharmaceutical was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Sci-Tech Innovation Board on December 10, 2021, issuing 40.01 million shares at a price of 52.58 yuan per share [3] - The total amount raised from the initial public offering was 2.103 billion yuan, with a net amount of 1.987 billion yuan after deducting issuance costs [3] - The company raised a total of 3.899 billion yuan from two fundraising activities [5]

Core Viewpoint - The merger of Guotai Junan and Haitong Securities marks a turning point in valuation improvement, with the potential for enhanced performance and market positioning in the brokerage industry [1] Group 1: Merger Impact - The merger is the first major case of a top-tier brokerage consolidation post the "924" policy, gaining recognition from regulators and stakeholders [1] - The combined entity is expected to catch up with CITIC Securities in terms of fundamentals, with some static indicators already surpassing CITIC Securities [1] Group 2: Performance Expectations - The company has adjusted its self-operated investment return rate assumption from 3.5% to 3.3% for Q4 2025, leading to a downward revision of the 2025 profit forecast [1] - For 2026-2027, the company is optimistic about improving efficiency in asset utilization and has raised market share assumptions for brokerage and investment banking businesses, resulting in an upward revision of performance forecasts [1] Group 3: Market Conditions - Under the current environment of external factors such as the relocation of household deposits and the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts, Guotai Haitong is expected to exhibit better elasticity [1] - The combination of Haitong's balance sheet with Guotai's capital utilization efficiency is anticipated to yield a multiplier effect on performance [1] Group 4: Investment Rating - The company maintains a "Buy" rating for Guotai Haitong, with a target valuation indicating a potential upside of 28% from current levels [1]

Core Insights - The IPO market is experiencing significant changes in underwriting and advisory fee structures due to new regulations and market conditions, with a notable shift from the previously dominant tiered fee model to a mixed fee model that includes fixed rates and minimum or maximum fee clauses [4][5] Fee Structures - The tiered fee model, which was prevalent in 2023 with 38% of cases, has drastically decreased to 6% by 2025, with most remaining cases adopting a decreasing fee percentage [3][4] - The traditional model of "actual fundraising amount × fixed rate" is now used by 33% of IPOs in 2025, with underwriting fees typically ranging from 5% to 9% [4] - A new model combining fixed rates with limit conditions has gained traction, with 49% of IPOs in 2025 utilizing this approach, up from 25% in 2023, primarily due to changing fundraising expectations [5] - The "one-price" fee model has been adopted by 12% of IPOs in 2025, focusing on direct pricing for online offerings [5] Market Trends - The average underwriting fee for the Sci-Tech Innovation Board reached 1.22 billion yuan in 2025, a significant increase from the previous average of 957.98 million yuan [7] - Conversely, the average underwriting fees for the main board and the ChiNext board have decreased, with the main board averaging 65.31 million yuan and the ChiNext board at 46.58 million yuan, reflecting a decline of over 30% for the ChiNext board compared to previous years [7][8] - The Beijing Stock Exchange has seen a notable increase in IPO fees, with an average of 20.80 million yuan in 2025, up 43% from the previous average of 14.56 million yuan [8] Market Concentration - The IPO underwriting market continues to exhibit a "head effect," with a small number of securities firms capturing the majority of market share, as only 13 firms generated over 100 million yuan in IPO revenue in the past year [9] - CITIC Securities leads the market with nearly 1.1 billion yuan in underwriting fees, followed by CITIC Construction Investment and Guotai Junan, indicating a concentration of high-quality projects among top firms [9]

Core Insights - The A-share and Hong Kong IPO markets have shown signs of recovery in 2025, leading to discussions about a potential "IPO boom" [1] - The last significant IPO year for both markets was in 2021, marking a peak in IPO numbers and fundraising [2] A-share Market Summary - In 2025, the number of new A-share listings increased to 116, with total fundraising reaching 131.8 billion yuan, nearly doubling year-on-year [3] - The average fundraising amount per IPO rose significantly to 11.36 million yuan, with average underwriting fees for brokers increasing to 0.58 million yuan [7] - The focus has shifted from quantity to quality, with a notable increase in the "value" of individual projects [7] - The largest IPOs in recent years have transitioned from traditional sectors to technology-driven companies, particularly in semiconductors and renewable energy [11] - Leading brokers like CICC and CITIC Securities have maintained their competitive edge, with CICC involved in three of the largest IPOs in the past five years [12][13] Broker Competition in A-share Market - The competition among brokers has evolved, with CITIC Securities and CICC dominating the top spots in underwriting [13][14] - In 2025, the merger of Haitong Securities and Guotai Junan created a new leader in underwriting volume, while the competition in the lower tiers has intensified [14] - CITIC Securities has consistently led in underwriting revenue, with significant contributions from high-quality projects [15][16] Hong Kong Market Summary - The Hong Kong IPO market has experienced a "V-shaped" recovery, with total fundraising in 2025 exceeding 285.8 billion HKD, reclaiming the top position globally [20] - The average fundraising amount per IPO surged to 24.43 million HKD in 2025, driven by large projects from leading companies [20][22] - The narrative of the Hong Kong IPO market has shifted from internet-driven stories to technology and manufacturing innovations [22] Broker Competition in Hong Kong Market - Foreign investment banks like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs continue to hold key positions in large IPO projects, while Chinese brokers are increasing their participation [23][24] - The rise of Chinese brokers, particularly in joint underwriting roles, reflects their growing influence in the Hong Kong market [24][25] - Futu Securities has consistently led in the number of IPOs underwritten, while traditional bank-affiliated brokers are also making significant contributions [25][28] Future Outlook - The consensus indicates a more active IPO market in 2026, but challenges related to supply and market absorption capacity are anticipated [29] - The ability of brokers to price assets and manage project depth will be crucial for success in the upcoming years [29]

Group 1 - The A-share and Hong Kong IPO markets have shown signs of recovery in 2025, with A-shares seeing 116 new listings and total fundraising reaching 131.8 billion yuan, nearly doubling year-on-year [1][3] - The Hong Kong market raised over 285.8 billion HKD in IPO funds, reclaiming the top position globally after several years [1][16] - The average fundraising amount per IPO in A-shares increased significantly to 11.36 million yuan, while the average underwriting fee for brokers rose to 0.58 million yuan [3][12] Group 2 - The quality of IPO projects has improved, with a shift from quantity to quality and value in market pricing [4][6] - The leading IPOs in 2025 were dominated by semiconductor and new energy companies, indicating a shift in industry focus from traditional sectors to high-tech fields [6][18] - Major brokers like CICC and CITIC Securities maintained their competitive edge, with CICC involved in three of the largest IPOs in the past five years [7][12] Group 3 - The underwriting landscape has changed, with the merger of Haitong Securities and Guotai Junan creating Guotai Haitong, which took the lead in underwriting numbers in 2025 [10][21] - The competition among brokers has intensified, especially in the lower ranks of the underwriting list, with several firms showing fluctuating positions [10][12] - CITIC Securities has consistently ranked first in underwriting revenue for five consecutive years, highlighting its strong market position [11][12] Group 4 - The Hong Kong IPO market has experienced a "V-shaped" recovery, with significant fundraising in 2025 driven by large projects from leading companies [16][18] - The average fundraising amount in Hong Kong IPOs rebounded to 24.43 million HKD in 2025, reflecting a shift in market dynamics [16][18] - The narrative of the Hong Kong IPO market has transitioned from internet-driven stories to technology innovation and manufacturing upgrades [18][20] Group 5 - Chinese brokers are increasingly participating in Hong Kong IPOs, often in collaboration with foreign firms, indicating a growing influence in the market [19][20] - Futu Securities has emerged as a leader in the number of IPOs underwritten in Hong Kong, leveraging its extensive retail client network [22][24] - Despite leading in the number of projects, internet brokers and bank-affiliated investment banks face challenges in large project competitiveness [24][25]

在论坛上，宁波市人工智能局王青燕副局长详细解读宁波市人工智能创新发展行动方案，特邀嘉宾均胜 电子（600699）雷雄博士分享了企业在技术创新、全球化布局方面的实践经验，协同单位中信银行国际 业务部许晓阳副处长介绍了跨境金融综合解决方案。 三场平行分论坛同时召开，分别围绕"中资企业出海及服务""具身智能""新材料"三大主题，邀请中信证 券研究部行业分析师和投行华东一部，中信证券国际财富管理（香港），合作企业华立集团、立昂微 （605358）、美湖股份（603319）、华翔启源、兆丰股份（300695）、博威合金（601137）等上市公 司，嘉御资本、尚颀资本、中信金石等股权投资机构，展开行业相关专题研讨。 此次论坛作为"十五五"开篇之年中信协同举办的重要活动，进一步提升了"中信联合舰队"在区域市场的 品牌知名度与市场影响力。下一步，中信证券浙江分公司将持续发挥中信协同优势，以优质金融服务赋 能浙江经济高质量发展，为企业出海贡献坚实的中信力量。 1月8日，中信证券（600030）浙江分公司及中信银行（601998）宁波分行成功举办科技产业与出海主题 论坛。论坛以"AI 赋能产业升级'甬'拓出海启新征程"为主题，聚 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the report is that the recent surge in the A-share market, with the Shanghai Composite Index surpassing 4100 points, is driven by a concentration of funds entering the market due to a "bullish sentiment" among investors [1] - The current market heat is high based on volume and price indicators, but there are no signs of weakening sentiment indicators yet [1] - The rotation and fluctuation of thematic and small-cap stocks are expected to continue until around the Two Sessions, after which the market will likely return to being driven by fundamentals [1] - For allocation-focused funds, the current market excitement is not the right time to chase hot stocks, with a critical structural adjustment decision window expected from late March to April [1] - It is essential to consider where sustainable "big money" (allocation-focused funds) will flow, and to hold or increase allocations during market volatility [1] Group 2 - The report suggests enhancing allocations in sectors with improved pricing power in resources and traditional manufacturing, while also considering non-bank financials that align with consensus [1] - The firm maintains a strategy focused on "earning from performance rather than expecting valuation gains," favoring industries such as chemicals, non-ferrous metals, power equipment, new energy, and engineering machinery under the logic of improved pricing power [1] - Additionally, the report is optimistic about the insurance and brokerage sectors, given the backdrop of RMB appreciation, improved supply dynamics, and potential for globalization [1]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing the transformation of the Chinese economy, highlighting that the rapid development over the past two to three decades has been the biggest investment beta [1] - It discusses the shift in industrial structure, noting that the market capitalization of the electronics industry increased from 3.7% in 2016 to 11.3% in 2025, while the banking sector's share decreased from a peak of 15.8% to 12.8%, reflecting the transition from factor-driven to innovation-driven growth in China [1] - The article points out the changing demographic structure, stating that people are the core variable in all trends [1] Group 2 - The article outlines key investment insights, including that one can never earn beyond their level of understanding, and that money made by luck will eventually be lost through lack of skill [2] - It emphasizes that the core of investing is not about how much one earns, but rather about surviving extreme situations, with risk control and position management being crucial for realizing compound returns [2] - The article states that risk and return are generally symmetrical, and to achieve higher returns, one must accept greater volatility and drawdowns [2] Group 3 - The article suggests that with economic and technological progress, equity assets will inevitably trend upwards over the long term, serving as the core vehicle for sharing value growth [2] - It highlights that the certainty in investing is not about the probability of making money, but rather about reducing vulnerability when risks materialize [2] - The article asserts that stock prices will fluctuate around their intrinsic value but will ultimately converge towards it over the long term [2] Group 4 - The article provides actionable advice, recommending that investors choose investment methods they can tolerate, referencing Nobel laureate Markowitz's assertion that diversification is the only free lunch in investing [2] - It encourages finding investment products that one can manage effectively [2]

Core Viewpoint - The integration of insurance products into brokerage apps signifies a potential transformation in wealth management, indicating a shift towards a more comprehensive financial service model [1][3]. Group 1: Insurance Product Integration - Major brokerages like CITIC Securities, China Merchants Securities, and others have introduced dedicated insurance purchase sections in their apps, showcasing a variety of insurance products [3][4]. - The types of insurance products available include health insurance, accident insurance, and various life insurance options, with some brokerages offering nearly 20 different products [3][5]. - The move to include insurance in brokerage apps reflects a growing recognition of insurance as a critical component of wealth management, especially as the demand for diversified financial services increases among consumers [3][11]. Group 2: Historical Context and Regulatory Changes - The practice of brokerages selling insurance is not new, having begun over two decades ago, but it has gained momentum only recently due to regulatory changes that allowed for broader participation [4][5]. - The 2012 regulations by the China Securities Regulatory Commission opened the door for brokerages to sell insurance products, yet progress has been slow due to limited participation from qualified firms [5][6]. Group 3: Comparison with Banking Channels - Unlike banks, which have a well-established and mature insurance sales model, brokerages are still in the early stages of developing their insurance offerings, leading to a less comprehensive product range [6][8]. - Banks have a significant advantage in customer trust and service infrastructure, making them more effective in selling insurance products compared to brokerages, which primarily focus on securities trading [8][9]. Group 4: Market Opportunities and Challenges - The entry of brokerages into the insurance market presents new opportunities for diversification and revenue growth, particularly as they seek to enhance customer engagement through integrated financial services [11][12]. - However, challenges remain, including the need for brokerages to build expertise in insurance sales and establish strong partnerships with insurance companies to ensure quality service [13].