Core Insights - The monthly active users (MAU) of mobile banking apps in China have stabilized between 648 million and 739 million, indicating that user growth has reached a ceiling, marking the end of a decade-long traffic dividend period [2] - User behavior has shifted significantly, with average session duration decreasing from 4.9 minutes in 2023 to approximately 2.7 minutes by mid-2025, reflecting a preference for high-frequency, short-duration, and function-oriented usage [2] - Major state-owned banks have solidified their market dominance, with all six major state-owned banks ranking in the top ten for MAU, led by Agricultural Bank of China with 249 million MAU [2] Industry Dynamics - The core competitive advantage of state-owned banks lies in their "full-scenario integration" capabilities, providing financial services deeply embedded in public services such as government, social security, healthcare, and education [3] - Joint-stock banks are adopting specialized development strategies, with China Merchants Bank leading its peers with 71.85 million MAU, while Ping An Bank and Citic Bank are leveraging AI technology to enhance service processes and maintain user engagement [3] - Local banks are experiencing polarization, with some city commercial banks maintaining MAU above 3 million due to their deep understanding of local markets, while private banks like WeBank and MYbank have fallen out of the top 50 due to challenges in customer acquisition and retention [3] Future Trends - As the industry standard for single-session usage time becomes 3 minutes, banks must rethink their value creation strategies [4] - AI-driven service process optimization, real-time risk control systems, and multi-device collaboration within ecosystems are reshaping the competitive landscape [4] - Key factors for institutional success in the future will include precise user insights, prudent risk management, and robust ecosystem integration capabilities [4]

Core Insights - The report by iResearch indicates that the monthly active users (MAU) of mobile banking apps in China have stabilized after fluctuating between 648 million and 739 million, signaling a ceiling in user growth and a shift from acquiring new users to enhancing existing user engagement [2] - User behavior is undergoing a structural reversal, with the effective daily usage time per device dropping from 4.9 minutes in 2023 to around 2.7 minutes by mid-2025, leading to a focus on high-frequency, short-duration, and functional usage [2] - Financial institutions are compelled to streamline operations and focus resources on core transaction scenarios to survive in this competitive landscape, where efficiency and precision are paramount [2] Mobile Banking Market Overview - The top three banks in terms of MAU are Agricultural Bank of China (2.49 billion), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1.94 billion), and China Construction Bank (1.09 billion), with all six major state-owned banks ranking in the top ten [3][5][6] - Private banks, represented by WeBank and MYbank, have faced significant setbacks, with many dropping out of the top 50 MAU rankings by 2025 [4] Competitive Landscape - State-owned banks are solidifying their dominance through extensive customer bases and integrated ecosystems, leveraging services embedded in high-frequency life scenarios such as government services and healthcare [7] - Joint-stock commercial banks are adopting a "specialized and precise" survival strategy, with China Merchants Bank leading among them with 71.85 million MAU, focusing on wealth management and intelligent interaction [8][10] - Regional banks are thriving by deeply engaging with local markets, while private banks struggle due to high customer acquisition costs and lack of local ecosystem support [13][14] Future Outlook - The mobile banking market is transitioning from a phase of scale expansion to one of value cultivation, with state-owned banks building moats through ecosystems, joint-stock banks seeking niches through specialization, and regional banks solidifying their local roots [14] - The ability to create irreplaceable value in a limited user engagement environment will be crucial, with technology applications such as AI reshaping service processes and enhancing risk management [15][16]

声明：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI基于第三方数据生成，仅供参考，不构成个人投资建议。 来源：市场资讯 国家知识产权局信息显示，平安银行股份有限公司取得一项名为"一种多渠道的分期产品配置方法、装 置和终端设备"的专利，授权公告号CN115797040B，申请日期为2022年12月。 天眼查资料显示，平安银行股份有限公司，成立于1987年，位于深圳市，是一家以从事货币金融服务为 主的企业。企业注册资本1142489.4787万人民币。通过天眼查大数据分析，平安银行股份有限公司共对 外投资了11家企业，参与招投标项目1146次，财产线索方面有商标信息497条，专利信息4652条，此外 企业还拥有行政许可71个。 ...

天眼查资料显示，平安银行股份有限公司，成立于1987年，位于深圳市，是一家以从事货币金融服务为 主的企业。企业注册资本1142489.4787万人民币。通过天眼查大数据分析，平安银行股份有限公司共对 外投资了11家企业，参与招投标项目1146次，财产线索方面有商标信息497条，专利信息4652条，此外 企业还拥有行政许可71个。 国家知识产权局信息显示，平安银行股份有限公司取得一项名为"行为数据分析方法、装置、设备及存 储介质"的专利，授权公告号CN114936237B，申请日期为2022年5月。 声明：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI基于第三方数据生成，仅供参考，不构成个人投资建议。 来源：市场资讯 ...

Group 1: Gold Market Prices - As of February 16, 2026, the domestic gold market shows a mixed trend with a real-time trading price of 1119 CNY per gram and a basic gold price set at 1125 CNY per gram [1] - The price range for jewelry brand gold products is between 1300-1579 CNY per gram, with major brands like Chow Tai Fook and Luk Fook uniformly priced at 1529 CNY per gram, while Lao Feng Xiang is slightly higher at 1548 CNY per gram [2] - The Shanghai Gold Exchange reports that the AuT D contract price is 1108.50 CNY per gram, down 1.47% from the previous day, and the Au9999 contract is at 1109.00 CNY per gram, with a decline of 1.20% [2] Group 2: Bank Gold Bar Pricing - Major banks are quoting investment gold bars in the range of 1121-1145 CNY per gram, with differences attributed to handling fees and brand premiums [4] - Among state-owned banks, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China is at 1143.43 CNY per gram, and China Construction Bank at 1141.30 CNY per gram, while joint-stock banks are slightly lower [5] - China Gold and Cai Bai Jewelry report prices of 1139 CNY per gram and 1137 CNY per gram respectively, while jewelry brands like Chow Tai Fook and Lao Feng Xiang have gold bar prices reaching 1342-1403 CNY per gram, exceeding bank channel prices [6] Group 3: Investment Case Studies - Investor Xue Di, with a strategy of gradual accumulation since 2023, turned an initial capital of 2.8 million CNY into over 5.6 million CNY by January 2026, emphasizing gold's value preservation [8] - In contrast, investor Shi Yue faced losses after buying at a high of 1200 CNY per gram, leading to an average cost of 1185.73 CNY per gram and a significant weekly loss [8] - Investor Tian Rui missed the opportunity to purchase gold at 553 CNY per gram in 2023, now facing much higher prices, highlighting the importance of timing in investment success [8] Group 4: Pricing Power Shift and Supply Variables - Since 2025, the pricing logic of gold has undergone structural changes, moving from a negative correlation with U.S. Treasury real interest rates to a new model influenced by global debt levels and central bank gold purchases [9] - In 2025, global gold demand reached a record high of 5002 tons, with central bank purchases of 863 tons stabilizing the market, indicating a shift in the pricing system towards a tripartite structure involving Asian demand, North American demand, and central bank purchases [9] - Supply dynamics are also changing, as seen in Ghana, where gold production reached a record 6 million ounces in 2025, with artisanal mining surpassing large commercial mines, indicating a surge in informal supply channels [10] Group 5: Consumer Awareness and Investment Strategies - Consumers are advised to be cautious of "one-price" gold products that may not clearly indicate weight, potentially leading to high per-gram prices upon resale [12] - For genuine investors, transparency is crucial, with institutions like China Construction Bank and Agricultural Bank of China offering gold bars at only a slight premium over market prices, making them preferable for risk-averse investments [12] - The strategic reserve demand from global central banks, alongside U.S. monetary policy expectations and geopolitical risk factors, supports high gold prices, emphasizing the distinction between jewelry and investment-grade gold [12]

Investment Rating - The industry rating is "Buy" [6] Core Insights - The overall social financing growth slightly declined to 8.2% in January, while M1 and M2 growth rates significantly rebounded, with M1 growing by 4.9% and M2 by 9.0% [6][16] - Government net financing increased significantly by 2,831 billion yuan year-on-year, contributing to the overall social financing growth [6][17] - The report indicates a shift in deposit structure due to accelerated deposit migration, impacting M1 negatively while having limited effect on M2 [6][16] Summary by Sections Overall Situation - Social financing growth decreased slightly to 8.2%, while M1 and M2 growth rates increased significantly [15][16] - M1 and M2 growth rates rose by 1.1 percentage points and 0.5 percentage points respectively compared to the previous month [6][16] Government Sector - Fiscal strength showed a year-on-year decline, impacting overall financing dynamics [39] Household Sector - Demand remained stable year-on-year, with short-term loan demand increasing [39] Corporate Sector - Short-term loan demand increased year-on-year, while bill financing saw a significant reduction [39] Non-Bank Sector - The acceleration of deposit migration was noted, with non-bank deposits increasing by 1.45 trillion yuan year-on-year [6][39]

Group 1 - The People's Bank of China and the National Financial Regulatory Administration have conducted an assessment for the 2025 systemically important banks, identifying 21 domestic banks as systemically important, including 6 state-owned commercial banks, 10 joint-stock commercial banks, and 5 city commercial banks [1][3] - The list aims to establish a comprehensive macro-prudential management system and strengthen the regulation of systemically important financial institutions [2] Group 2 - Systemically important banks in China are categorized into five groups based on their importance scores, with the first group consisting of 11 banks, the second group having 4 banks, the third group with 2 banks, the fourth group containing 4 banks, and no banks in the fifth group [3] - The People's Bank of China plans to enhance the combined effect of macro-prudential management and micro-prudential regulation, continuing to solidify additional supervision for systemically important banks to promote their safe and sound operation and better serve the high-quality development of the real economy [3]

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China has conducted an assessment of systemically important banks for 2025, identifying 21 domestic banks categorized into five groups based on their systemic importance scores [1] Group 1: Assessment Overview - The assessment is part of a broader effort to establish a comprehensive macro-prudential management system and strengthen the regulation of systemically important financial institutions [1] - The evaluation was carried out in collaboration with the National Financial Regulatory Administration [1] Group 2: Classification of Banks - A total of 21 banks were recognized as systemically important, including 6 state-owned commercial banks, 10 joint-stock commercial banks, and 5 city commercial banks [1] - The banks are divided into five groups based on their systemic importance scores: - Group 1: 11 banks including China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Ningbo Bank, Jiangsu Bank, Beijing Bank, Nanjing Bank, Guangfa Bank, Zheshang Bank, and Shanghai Bank [1] - Group 2: 4 banks including Industrial Bank, China CITIC Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, and China Postal Savings Bank [1] - Group 3: 2 banks including Bank of Communications and China Merchants Bank [1] - Group 4: 4 banks including Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China [1] - Group 5: No banks were classified in this group [1]

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China and the National Financial Regulatory Administration have conducted an assessment of systemically important banks for 2025, identifying 21 domestic banks categorized into five groups based on their systemic importance scores [1]. Group 1: Assessment of Systemically Important Banks - A total of 21 banks have been recognized as systemically important, including 6 state-owned commercial banks, 10 joint-stock commercial banks, and 5 city commercial banks [1]. - The banks are divided into five groups based on their systemic importance scores, with the first group containing 11 banks, the second group 4 banks, the third group 2 banks, the fourth group 4 banks, and the fifth group having no banks [1]. Group 2: Breakdown of Banks by Group - **First Group (11 banks)**: Includes China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Ningbo Bank, Jiangsu Bank, Beijing Bank, Nanjing Bank, Guangfa Bank, Zheshang Bank, and Shanghai Bank [1]. - **Second Group (4 banks)**: Includes Industrial Bank, China CITIC Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, and China Postal Savings Bank [1]. - **Third Group (2 banks)**: Includes Bank of Communications and China Merchants Bank [1]. - **Fourth Group (4 banks)**: Includes Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China [1]. - **Fifth Group**: No banks are included in this group [1]. Group 3: Future Regulatory Actions - The People's Bank of China and the National Financial Regulatory Administration will implement additional regulatory measures for systemically important banks according to the "Regulations on Additional Supervision of Systemically Important Banks (Trial)" [1]. - The aim is to enhance the synergy between macro-prudential management and micro-prudential supervision, ensuring the safe and sound operation of systemically important banks and better supporting the high-quality development of the real economy [1].

Group 1 - The People's Bank of China and the National Financial Regulatory Administration have conducted an assessment for the 2025 systemically important banks, identifying 21 domestic banks, including 6 state-owned commercial banks, 10 joint-stock commercial banks, and 5 city commercial banks [3][4]. - The list aims to establish a comprehensive macro-prudential management system and strengthen the regulation of systemically important financial institutions [4]. - Systemically important banks are categorized into five groups based on their importance scores, with the first group including 11 banks such as China Minsheng Bank and China Everbright Bank, and the fourth group including major banks like Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Bank of China [5]. Group 2 - The People's Bank of China and the National Financial Regulatory Administration will enhance the combined efforts of macro-prudential management and micro-prudential regulation to solidify additional supervision of systemically important banks, promoting their safe and sound operation to better serve the high-quality development of the real economy [5].