写在文章前的声明：在本文之前的说明：本文中所列的投资信息，只是一个对基金资产净值进行排行的客观描述，并无主观倾向性，也不是投资建议，纯属 娱乐性质。 | 基金简称 PK | | | 人民新闻播放台官方法律师 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 招商中证白 ... A | 0.7243 | 1.71% | | | 161725 | 2026-2-2 | | | 2 | 招商中证白 ... C | 0.7210 | 1.71% | | | 012414 | 2026-2-2 | | | 3 | 服装:星C | 0.5626 | 1.64% | | | 012043 | 2026-2-2 | | | 4 | 鹏华酒A | 0.3413 | 1.64% | | | 160632 | 2026-2-2 | | | 5 | 中欧甄选3个 ... C | 1.0101 | 1.47% | | | 013382 | 2026-1-29 | | | 6 | 中欧甄选3个... A | 1.0451 | 1.47% | | | 013381 | 2026-1-29 | | | 7 | 汇安丰融混合 ...

在过去的一周里，港股恒生指数逆市上扬，成功突破去年10月阶段性高点，并接连创出近四年 来指数新高。 在港股升温的交易日里，多家公募基金也紧锣密鼓地布局港股主题产品，当前无论是主题基金的 申报、发行，还是发行时的屡屡提前结募，都体现出资金对于港股投资方面的一致看多。 展望后市，因长期存在的估值优势，"性价比"成为基金经理看多港股的一大因素。此外，有基金 经理认为，随着全球资本的涌入以及"科技牛"的辐射效应，港股科技板块或将与政策主线共振， 长期价值重估有望加速。 港股主题基金密集申报 据证监会官网披露，1月30日，易方达精选策略系列-易方达(香港)中国股票股息基金进入申报环 节，1月23日，易方达基金、招商基金和富国基金旗下也各有港股主题产品申报。 这也是近期各家基金集中申报港股主题基金的缩影，仅在2026年年内申报的基金中，就有39只港 股主题基金（名称中包含了"恒生""港股"等），基金类型有ETF、ETF联接基金以及主动权益类产 品，主题方面，包括恒生科技、港股通红利、港股通消费以及港股通医疗等概念。 值得一提的是，近期随着有色、化工板块的崛起，港股主题基金也将布局方向聚焦于相关板块， 如永赢基金申报了港股 ...

周一开盘，金银价格继续大幅下挫，市场陷入一片恐慌。美国总统特朗普提名凯文·沃什出任美联储主席的消息如同重磅炸弹，瞬间引爆 市场对鹰派政策的强烈预期，贵金属市场因此遭到恐慌性抛售。受此影响，商品黄金相关ETF甚至以跌停开盘，这一罕见景象让投资者 措手不及。 沃什的提名意味着什么？他向来以鹰派立场著称，主张紧缩货币政策。市场普遍预期，一旦他正式执掌美联储，加息步伐可能会加快， 这对黄金这一不生息资产来说无疑是重大利空。黄金价格应声暴跌，创下了近期的新低。 对于许多黄金投资者而言，这个周一无疑是"黑色星期一"。黄金ETF的跌停开盘让无数投资者措手不及，尤其是那些刚刚在高位买入的投 资者，面临着巨大的账面亏损。市场情绪极度恐慌，抛售潮此起彼伏。 黄金ETF的跌停开盘在历史上都较为罕见，这充分反映了市场对美联储政策转向的担忧。投资者们纷纷抛售黄金，转而寻求更为安全的 资产，或者干脆暂时离场观望。这种恐慌情绪的蔓延，进一步加剧了黄金价格的下跌。 凯文·沃什的提名之所以引发如此大的市场震动，主要是因为他长期以来一直被视为鹰派人物。他在担任美联储理事期间曾多次投票支持 加息，对通胀保持高度警惕。他的政策理念与现任主席鲍威尔有 ...

在港股升温的交易日里，多家公募基金也紧锣密鼓地布局港股主题产品，当前无论是主题基金的申报、发行， 还是发行时的屡屡提前结募，都体现出资金对于港股投资方面的一致看多。 展望后市，因长期存在的估值优势，"性价比"成为基金经理看多港股的一大因素。此外，有基金经理认为，随 着全球资本的涌入以及"科技牛"的辐射效应，港股科技板块或将与政策主线共振，长期价值重估有望加速。 港股主题基金密集申报 据证监会官网披露，1月30日，易方达精选策略系列-易方达(香港)中国股票股息基金进入申报环节，1月23日， 易方达基金、招商基金和富国基金旗下也各有港股主题产品申报。 这也是近期各家基金集中申报港股主题基金的缩影，仅在2026年年内申报的基金中，就有39只港股主题基金 （名称中包含了"恒生""港股"等），基金类型有ETF、有ETF联接基金以及主动权益类产品，主题方面，包括 恒生科技、港股通红利、港股通消费以及港股通医疗等概念。 在过去的一周里，港股恒生指数逆市上扬，成功突破去年10月阶段性高点，并接连刷新近四年来指数新 高。 值得一提的是，近期随着有色、化工板块的鹊起，港股主题基金也将布局方向聚焦于相关板块，如永赢基金申 报了港股 ...

1月29日，国际金价继续大涨。继1月26日突破每盎司5000美元后，现货与期货黄金价格一路狂飙，1月 29日早盘双双站上5500美元/盎司。 在金价拉升的过程中，公募基金领域的相关产品也迎来"黄金时刻"。黄金主题ETF规模迅速增长。然 而，在"金光灿灿"的净值曲线背后，是机构对后市判断的分歧，以及投资者"既怕卖飞又怕接盘"的复杂 心态。有投资者表示："车里的人和没上车的人都很难受"。 金价飙升下的投资群像 谁推高了金价 对于普通投资者而言，这轮行情带来的更多是煎熬。投资者小朱的经历颇具代表性："我观察黄金许久 了不敢买，现在买不进去了。太疯狂了，现在就没有上车的机会。" 这种焦虑感在踏空者中弥漫。王女士向记者坦言，去年朋友推荐黄金股时，她因谨慎未入手，如今只能 看着别人赚得"盆满钵满"。今天早上，她还在纠结是否要买入。 已持仓的投资者同样面临抉择困境。一直坚信长期主义的小刘，在本周金价突破5500美元后反而"心里 不踏实"了，他在"赶紧下车"和"怕卖飞"的焦虑中反复挣扎。 罗女士则已清仓离场。她戏称自己是"买在无人问津时，卖在人声鼎沸处"。当被问及原因时，她给出了 一个简单而深刻的回答："赚够了要去买更便宜的 ...

首先，黄金作为传统价值存储工具，在当前国际环境不确定性依然较大的背景下，具备较好支撑。 在建信基金28日举办的策略会上，建信上海金ETF基金经理朱金钰分享了对黄金后市行情的观点，他认 为结合黄金资产多重属性看，其长期支撑依然坚实，继续看好黄金的趋势性行情及配置价值。 此外，从资产配置角度出发，大类资产配置的核心价值体现在各类资产间的低相关性，黄金与股票、债 券等其他传统资产类别的相关性较低，有望分散组合风险、改善收益风险比。 其次，从黄金的金融属性看，金价紧跟美国实际利率，二者呈现较为显著的负相关关系。当前，美联储 已开启降息周期，叠加中长期美国经济压力上行，有利于黄金表现。数据显示，在过去六轮美联储降息 周期中，伦敦金现价平均涨幅为24.55%。 2026年开年以来，黄金价格不断走强，持续刷新历史新高。数据显示，截至2026年1月27日，海外伦敦 金现价、国内上海金价突破5000美元/盎司、1100元/克，自2025年以来累计涨幅分别达到97.41%、 85.61%。 再者，从黄金的货币属性看，黄金是全球央行储备资产中不可或缺的部分。近年来美债利率持续高企， 美元信用受损，"去美元化"进程加快，全球央行持续 ...

近年来，在资产价格轮动、产品结构转型、居民财富管理需求提升的多重推动下，公募基金行业正迎来 深刻变革。在建信基金28日举办的策略会上，建信基金FOF投资及投顾负责人孙悦萌分享了2026年FOF 投资思路，她认为公募FOF凭借其多元配置、风险分散的独特优势，逐渐成为投资者资产配置的重要工 具之一。 建设银行于2026年初推出龙盈计划，通过定制化FOF的形式，为投资者提供一站式全流程资产配置服 务。目前，建信基金已在龙盈计划上线中波方案建信福泽安泰FOF和低波方案建信泓泰多元配置3个月 持有FOF。 针对以上FOF产品，建信基金FOF团队通过宏观大类资产配置、中观风格行业轮动、微观基金精选、绝 对收益策略四层筛选，在债券为主的基础上，精选A股中证红利、美股标普500和黄金三类资产力争增 强组合收益，致力于为广大投资者提供更加普适的资产配置解决方案。 孙悦萌认为，增长分化、政策调整与信用重构或是全球宏观环境的主旋律。在此背景下，美股的表现可 能转向由盈利驱动，行情或由少数AI巨头驱动转向普涨，标普500正是盈利驱动的重要配置之一。其 次，黄金是信用重构时代的"战略资产"，当前全球去美元化进程加速，各国央行持续购金以 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent collective termination of public REITs applications is significantly influenced by the decline in underlying asset valuations, marking a critical shift in the regulatory landscape and market dynamics [1][10][12]. Group 1: Termination of REITs Applications - On January 23, 2026, both the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges announced the termination or withdrawal of five public infrastructure REITs applications, marking the first instance of such a collective termination since the pilot program began [2]. - The terminated projects include various types of underlying assets such as rental housing, industrial parks, logistics, new energy, and water treatment, all structured as "public funds + infrastructure asset-backed securities" [5][6]. - The termination is attributed to the new regulatory guidelines effective December 31, 2025, which stipulate that applications not responding to feedback within a specified timeframe will be automatically terminated [10]. Group 2: Underlying Asset Challenges - The underlying assets of the terminated REITs face structural challenges that hinder compliance with regulatory requirements, such as the need for stable cash flows and operational stability [11][12]. - For instance, the rental housing REIT faced issues related to compliance verification and operational stability, leading to a lack of response to inquiries for over a year [5][11]. - The logistics REIT encountered declining rental prices and high tenant concentration, complicating its ability to demonstrate operational stability [12]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Regulatory Changes - The public REITs market has grown significantly, with over 78 products launched and a cumulative financing scale exceeding 210 billion yuan, positioning it as the largest in Asia and the second largest globally [15]. - However, the market is now transitioning from a focus on quantity of issuance to an emphasis on the quality of underlying assets and the stability of cash flows [3][15]. - The decline in asset valuations, particularly in the real estate sector, has led to increased reluctance among original equity holders to proceed with applications, as they may not find the valuations acceptable [13][16]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The termination of these applications is viewed as a necessary phase for the high-quality development of public REITs, with expectations that the market will optimize and enhance resilience amid ongoing challenges [17]. - The introduction of commercial real estate REITs, which do not require approval from the National Development and Reform Commission, is anticipated to accelerate the approval process and improve market conditions [16][17].

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges announced the termination or withdrawal of five public infrastructure REITs applications, marking the first occurrence of such terminations since the pilot program began in 2021 [1][2]. Group 1: Termination of REITs Applications - Five REITs projects have been terminated, including those focused on rental housing, industrial parks, logistics, and renewable energy, with the aim of achieving stable cash flow for dividends [1][3]. - The terminated projects include: - Jianxin Jianrong Rental Housing REIT - Chuangjin Hexin Electronic City Industrial Park REIT - Huaxia Wanwei Logistics REIT - Jianxin Jinfeng Renewable Energy REIT - Fuguo Shouchuang Water REIT [1][5]. - The termination is attributed to the projects not responding to regulatory feedback within the required timeframe, as per the new guidelines effective from December 31, 2025 [6][11]. Group 2: Market Context and Regulatory Changes - The public REITs market has surpassed 200 billion yuan in scale, transitioning to a phase of normalized development, with a shift in regulatory focus from quantity to the quality of underlying assets and cash flow stability [2][10]. - The new regulatory guidelines introduced a "termination" mechanism for applications that do not meet response deadlines, aiming to enhance market efficiency and quality [6][11]. Group 3: Challenges Faced by Terminated Projects - The terminated projects faced various structural challenges, such as compliance issues, rental stability, and cash flow predictability, which hindered their ability to meet regulatory requirements [7][8]. - Specific issues included: - Jianxin Jianrong Rental Housing REIT struggled with compliance for non-residential housing conversions and high short-term rental ratios [7]. - Chuangjin Hexin Electronic City Industrial Park REIT had concerns regarding tenant stability and lease renewal risks [7]. - Huaxia Wanwei Logistics REIT faced declining rental prices and high tenant concentration [7]. - Jianxin Jinfeng Renewable Energy REIT was impacted by subsidy reductions affecting cash flow [7][8]. Group 4: Future Outlook for REITs Market - The termination of these projects is seen as a necessary phase for the high-quality development of public REITs, with expectations for structural optimization and resilience in the market as commercial real estate REITs trials deepen [12]. - However, the market still faces challenges related to the stability of underlying assets and macroeconomic cycles [12].

Group 1: Fundraising and Project Adjustments - The company announced a change in fundraising strategy, terminating the "Expansion of Large-Sized Light Guide Plate Project" to enhance the efficiency of fund usage [1] - Remaining funds will be redirected to the TAC film project at Anhui Jiguang and the reflective polarizing film project at Suzhou Yijia [1] - The company aims to extend its business from light guide plates to adjacent fields, establishing a second growth curve through these optical films [1] Group 2: Market Analysis and Competitive Landscape - The demand for TAC film is projected to reach 1.229 billion square meters by 2025, with over 70% of panel production capacity located in mainland China [2] - TAC film constitutes over 50% of the cost of polarizing film materials, significantly impacting the profitability of polarizing film manufacturers [2] - Currently, the TFT-grade TAC film used in mainland China is heavily reliant on imports, with Japanese suppliers holding approximately 75% of the global market share [2] Group 3: Project Progress and Development - Anhui Jiguang obtained the construction permit for its factory in June 2025, with steady progress in construction [2] - Major equipment for the TAC film project is expected to be delivered and tested in the first half of this year [2] - Initial test results of trial films sent to downstream polarizing film and panel manufacturers show no significant discrepancies from internal testing results [2]