在PCEP的框架下，中国对东盟的出口额已经暴涨到了1100亿美元。甚至美国的一些盟友国家，也无视美国的关税战，选择降低中国商品的关税，中欧贸易 额直线飚升，已经快要冲破8000亿欧元的大关。 中国在多元化贸易格局下，基本上已经将美国贸易战所带来的负面影响给分化掉了。美国却还在"单边主义"思维下，认为中国必须依赖美国，这显然是错误 的。 美媒都承认输了，华尔街却还有人在嘴硬，称中国赢不了，时间在美国一边。事实真相真的如此？留给美国的时间不多了！ 随着时间的推移，特朗普的关税政策的弊端逐渐显露。美国的内部正在承受着巨大的压力，而与压力同时产生的就是矛盾。一方面支持特朗普；一方面抵制 特朗普，可以说目前美国的内部正在逐渐割裂。 前几天，美国媒体从多角度分析，认为美国最终会输掉这场自己引发的贸易战。而眼看着媒体大肆鼓吹这一说法，华尔街的人坐不住了，其对冲基金的巨头 比尔·艾克曼是特朗普的背后金主之一，他的观点认为中国不可能在这场贸易战中胜出，因为时间站在美国这一边。随着关税政策的持续，中国会有越来越 多的企业开始流失出去。 只能说，比尔·艾克曼和特朗普一样，都太狭隘了。在"霸权主义"思维的误导下，感觉世界都需要依赖美 ...

"国际风云变幻，美国碰了一鼻子灰！"最近，美国试图逼迫日本签订一份关税协议，结果却遭遇了日本方面的强硬拒绝，这一事件在国际舞台上掀起了不小 的波澜。 美国此次提出的关税协议，简直就是一副"空手套白狼"的丑恶嘴脸。它妄图将日本价值1万亿美元的国债，一下子变成100年无息国债，而且还得让日本每年 支付利息。这哪里是什么正常的贸易协定，分明就是赤裸裸的抢劫！日本要是签了，那1万亿美元的财富瞬间就会像流水一样消失，比当年的广场协议还要 狠辣数倍。 面对美国的霸道行径，日本首相石破茂展现出了罕见的强硬态度。他深知这份协议的危害，一旦签署，日本的经济将陷入万劫不复的深渊。所以，他宁可自 己下台，也绝不在这份丧权辱国的协议上签字，直接把锅甩给了下一任。这种"宁为玉碎，不为瓦全"的做法，虽然看似冒险，但也体现了日本在关键时刻捍 卫国家利益的决心。 值得一提的是，日本并非孤军奋战。越南、韩国、泰国等国家也都纷纷拒绝了美国类似的关税协议。看来，美国的如意算盘这次是彻底落空了。美国一直以 来都习惯了对其他国家发号施令，利用自己的经济和军事优势进行霸权掠夺。但如今，世界各国都学精了，不再轻易被美国的花言巧语所迷惑。 日本此次拒签事件 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the U.S. military's aggressive posture in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly through the establishment of large military warehouses in the Philippines, which is seen as a threat to regional peace and stability [1][2][4] - The U.S. claims that these military actions are aimed at solving logistical issues for military exercises, but the increased troop deployments and advanced weapon systems suggest a more aggressive intent to provoke tensions in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea [1][2] - The articles argue that the U.S. military's actions are disguised as efforts to maintain regional stability, but they are fundamentally driven by the interests of the military-industrial complex, which stands to gain financially from potential conflicts [1][2][3] Group 2 - The articles express concern that the U.S. military's actions are escalating tensions in the Asia-Pacific, leading to a potential arms race and increased risk of military conflict among nations in the region [2][3] - The narrative suggests that the U.S. is attempting to encircle China and exert strategic pressure, which could destabilize the already fragile U.S.-China relations and lead to broader global unrest [2][3] - The Philippines is portrayed as being caught in a dangerous gamble by aligning too closely with U.S. military strategies, risking the safety of its citizens and sovereignty [3][4] Group 3 - The articles emphasize that the peace and prosperity of the Asia-Pacific region are hard-won achievements that should not be undermined by U.S. military provocations [4] - There is a call for the U.S. to cease its military buildup in the region and for the Philippines to reconsider its alignment with U.S. strategies, as this could lead to dire consequences [4]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing debate surrounding the sale of Panama Canal port assets by CK Hutchison Holdings highlights the tension between corporate interests and national security, emphasizing that businesses should consider the broader implications of their actions on national development and global stability [3][4][6]. Group 1: Corporate Actions and National Interests - CK Hutchison's decision to sell port operations is viewed as short-sighted, potentially exacerbating U.S. hegemony and undermining global stability [3][4][6]. - The sale of critical infrastructure like ports is not merely a business transaction; it poses significant risks to national interests and security [6][8]. - The actions of CK Hutchison could negatively impact China's global port strategy, raising concerns about the long-term implications for national development [4][6]. Group 2: Economic and Geopolitical Implications - The port operations are crucial for global trade, with approximately 80-90% of goods relying on maritime logistics, making the Panama Canal's role vital [8]. - The potential "Americanization" of the Panama Canal could lead to increased logistical costs and instability in supply chains for China [7][8]. - The current geopolitical climate, particularly U.S.-China tensions, necessitates that businesses align their strategies with national interests to avoid detrimental outcomes [7][8]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Reactions - There is widespread public criticism of the notion of "business without borders," with many arguing that it is naive in the context of current geopolitical realities [4][7]. - Social media reactions reflect a strong sentiment against the sale, with calls for CK Hutchison to reconsider its decision due to potential long-term consequences [8]. - The narrative surrounding the sale has sparked discussions about the responsibilities of businesses in safeguarding national interests amidst external pressures [3][6].

商务部部长王文涛3月6日在十四届全国人大三次会议经济主题记者会上发言，回应中美贸易战是否会 升级。 王文涛表示，芬太尼问题，美方必须尊重事实，首先自身要采取积极行动，不能指向中国，甩锅推责。如 果以这个为由对华加征关税更是混淆是非、颠倒黑白。贸易战没有赢家，保护主义没有出路。 王文涛表示，美方单边主义和霸权主义逆潮流而动，引起国际社会广泛担忧和普遍反馈，中国的传统教育 是敬人者，人也敬之，不敬人者，当以其人之道，还治其人之身。胁迫、要挟，对中国行不通，也吓不到 中国。如果美方在错误的道路上越行越远，我们将奉陪到底。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes END 点击关键字可查看 潜望系列深度报道丨 股事会专栏 丨 投资小红书 丨 e公司调查 丨 时报会客厅 丨 十大明星私募访谈 丨 刚刚，吴清发声！ 丨 潘功胜：择机降准降息！与证监会探索常态化制度安排！ 丨 5000亿元！ 10.34万亿元！刚刚，财政部发声："持续用力、更加给力"！ 丨 重磅！郑栅洁：将设立国家创业投资 引导基金！ 丨 一夜封神？国产AI智能体，刷屏！ 丨 涉及A股！重大调整，两周后生效 丨 今日，大 涨 ...