Group 1 - The China Electromechanical Products Import and Export Chamber advocates for photovoltaic companies to resist unfair competition, emphasizing adherence to fair competition principles and legal operations [1] - The chamber calls for reasonable control of capacity expansion based on global market demand and orderly elimination of outdated capacity [1] - The initiative aims to shift the photovoltaic industry from a focus on "scale advantage" to "quality advantage," promoting sustainable development [1] Group 2 - The Inner Mongolia Bayannur City government reports that the carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) project has injected over 70,000 tons of carbon dioxide, marking the establishment of a large-scale carbon utilization and storage base [2] - This development is significant for promoting carbon reduction and achieving a green low-carbon transition, providing a demonstration for carbon capture technology application at both regional and national levels [2] Group 3 - Yujing Co., Ltd. announced that its controlling shareholder and chairman, Yang Yuhong, reduced his shareholding by 1.7872 million shares, representing 0.88% of the total share capital after excluding repurchased shares [3] - Following this reduction, Yang Yuhong and his concerted parties' shareholding percentage decreased from 39.39% to 38.51% [3] - This share reduction may impact market confidence in the company's future development, necessitating attention to its effects on stock price and operations [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Catering Industry Association has issued a proposal to jointly resist "involution-style" competition to maintain fair market order, emphasizing that such competition disrupts market order, harms consumer rights, squeezes reasonable profit margins, and undermines sustainable industry development [1] Group 1: Resisting Irrational Competition - Companies are urged to adhere to pricing and subsidy norms, avoiding predatory pricing below cost and coercive trading practices [2] - There is a call to ensure quality and service by complying with national laws and standards, avoiding misleading practices such as false advertising and hidden fees [2] - The proposal emphasizes the importance of maintaining business reputation and integrity, resisting malicious actions that damage the industry's image [2] Group 2: Enhancing Core Competitiveness - Companies are encouraged to abandon short-sighted price competition and focus on maintaining reasonable profit margins [3] - The emphasis is on value creation and innovation, directing resources towards technology development, product upgrades, and service optimization [3] - Building differentiated competitive advantages through precise market positioning and enhancing user experience is highlighted as a key strategy [3] Group 3: Strengthening Self-Discipline - Companies should conduct regular compliance self-checks against relevant laws and industry standards to identify and rectify potential risks [4] - Establishing a robust internal compliance management system and providing employee training on compliance is recommended [4] - There is a call for companies to voluntarily accept social supervision and enhance operational transparency [4] Group 4: Collaborative Governance - The proposal advocates for maintaining symbiotic relationships within the supply chain, ensuring fair transactions and timely payments [5] - Companies are encouraged to fulfill social responsibilities by providing safe working conditions and promoting sustainable practices [5] - Participation in industry self-regulation and standard enhancement activities is encouraged to elevate overall industry quality [6]

下半年如何反"内卷式"竞争？ 7月30日召开的中共中央政治局会议释放了清晰的政策信号：在纵深推进全国统一大市场建设的背景 下，聚焦治理企业低价无序竞争、推进重点行业产能治理、规范地方招商引资行为。 可以看到，在深入推进"反内卷"行动中，地方政府也成了核心关注的对象。其招商引资行为因何成为治 理重点？破除"内卷式"竞争，如何规范政府行为？南都·反垄断前沿就此采访了多位业内专家。 8月1日，国家发改委在一场新闻发布会上进一步回应了下半年将如何"反内卷"。国家发改委体制改革综 合司司长王任飞表示，当前，一些行业、领域出现"内卷"、无序竞争、市场失序等问题。下一步，要努 力将有效市场和有为政府这"两只手"作用结合得更好，发挥好两者的优势。统一政府行为尺度，进一步 明确招商引资鼓励和禁止的具体行为，治理和防范有碍统一市场和公平竞争的各种行为和做法。 在王先林看来，"内卷式"竞争的原因非常复杂，地方政府在微观经济领域的不当干预，无疑是其中的一 个重要方面。地方政府在"内卷式"竞争中扮演了复杂的角色，既是市场秩序的维护者，也可能成为恶性 竞争的推手。这种双重性源于政绩考核压力、财政分权制度与市场机制的深层矛盾。 梳理政策变 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for regulating low-price disorderly competition to correct market failures and establish a fair competitive environment for various business entities in the national unified market [1][2] - Major food delivery platforms, including Meituan, Ele.me, and JD.com, have publicly committed to adhering to relevant laws and resisting unfair competition practices [1][2] - The recent surge in promotional activities like "0 yuan purchase" and "1 cent grab" reflects the intense competition among platforms for user traffic and market share in local life services [1][2] Group 2 - Disorderly competition is detrimental not only to the industry's healthy development but also to the platforms themselves, potentially distorting market consumption structures and impacting normal business operations [2] - Rational competition is essential for creating greater value, as irrational competition leads to a lose-lose situation, while rational competition can enhance overall productivity and benefit both consumers and businesses [2] - The new Anti-Unfair Competition Law, effective from October 15, prohibits platform operators from forcing or indirectly compelling merchants to sell products below cost, aiming to maintain market order [3]

Core Viewpoint - The three major food delivery platforms in China have called for the regulation of industry competition to correct market failures and establish a fair competitive environment for all business entities [1] Industry Summary - The article emphasizes that disorderly competition is detrimental to both industry health and the platforms themselves, advocating for a return to rational competition to create greater value [1] - It highlights that irrational competition leads to a lose-lose situation, while rational competition can enhance total factor productivity, benefiting consumers and ensuring companies can innovate [1] - Regulatory bodies are encouraged to guide platforms away from price wars towards improving internal capabilities and creating new value through innovation and service upgrades [1] Market Potential - With a population of over 1.4 billion, the Chinese market is large enough to accommodate fair competition among multiple platforms [1] - The article suggests that platforms should leverage their strengths and collaborate to expand the market, creating a better ecosystem for consumers, merchants, and delivery personnel [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for regulating low-price disorderly competition to correct market failures and establish a fair competitive environment for various business entities in a unified national market [1][2] - Major food delivery platforms, including Meituan, Ele.me, and JD.com, have collectively called for the standardization of industry competition, pledging to adhere to relevant laws and eliminate unfair competition practices [1][2] - The recent surge in promotional activities like "0 yuan purchase" and "1 cent grab" reflects the intense competition among platforms for user traffic and market share in the local life service sector [1][2] Group 2 - Disorderly competition is detrimental not only to the healthy development of the industry but also to the platforms themselves, potentially distorting market consumption structures and impacting normal business operations [2] - Rational competition is essential for creating greater value, as irrational competition leads to a lose-lose situation, while rational competition can enhance overall productivity and benefit both consumers and businesses [2] - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law will take effect on October 15, explicitly prohibiting platform operators from forcing or indirectly forcing merchants to sell products below cost, thereby disrupting market order [3]

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the "Guidelines for Compliance with Charging Behavior of Online Trading Platforms" aims to regulate the charging practices of platforms, ensuring fair competition and protecting the rights of operators within the platform economy [1][2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The guidelines prohibit platforms from charging operators multiple times and from forcing operators to purchase services or participate in promotional activities [1]. - The guidelines require platforms to publicly solicit opinions when modifying charging rules, enhancing the bargaining power of operators and reducing their operational cost pressures [2]. Group 2: Impact on Competition - The guidelines promote fair competition by eliminating price discrimination and mandatory promotional fees, allowing quality merchants to thrive without excessive cost burdens [2]. - By standardizing charging practices for operators under similar trading conditions, the guidelines level the playing field for all operators [2]. Group 3: Economic Ecosystem - The implementation of the guidelines is expected to alleviate the issue of "involution" in the platform economy, allowing operators to focus on product differentiation and service upgrades rather than solely on low-price strategies [3]. - The guidelines signify a shift towards a more refined and standardized governance of the platform economy, correcting existing irregularities and ensuring long-term healthy development [3]. Group 4: Enforcement and Compliance - Regulatory bodies are urged to monitor and penalize platforms that engage in evasive practices such as "repeated charging under different names" and "price hikes after initial reductions" [4]. - There is a need to lower the cost of rights protection for operators and establish a rapid response mechanism for complaints to ensure that small merchants do not abandon their rights due to high costs [4].

Core Viewpoint - Major food delivery platforms, including Meituan, Ele.me, and Taobao Flash Purchase, have publicly announced their intention to resist "involution-style" competition, emphasizing the need for fair and orderly industry practices [1] Group 1: Company Actions - Meituan has expressed its commitment to regulate promotional activities and eliminate unfair competition, aiming to establish a fair and orderly industry environment that promotes mutual benefits [1] - Ele.me and Taobao Flash Purchase have also committed to enhancing the integration of physical and service consumption, while promoting technological upgrades and business innovation [1] Group 2: Industry Goals - The companies collectively aim to build a fair and transparent mechanism that ensures profitability for merchants and avoids irrational promotional activities such as large-scale "zero-yuan purchases" [1]

公平竞争是市场经济的基本原则。"向上取整"的做法，其本质是以格式条款将不公平、不合理的规则强 加于消费者，将粗放的计量方式作为获取额外利润的手段。长此以往，不仅会损害消费者的信任，还会 形成"劣币驱逐良币"效应，对公平竞争的市场秩序带来破坏——既然"向上取整"能挣得更多，那么又何 必精准计量和公平收费呢？ 消费者权益保护法规定，经营者不得设定不公平、不合理的交易条件，不得强制交易。价格法明确，经 营者应当明码标价，不得利用虚假或使人误解的价格手段诱骗消费者。根据民法典，格式条款违反法 律、行政法规强制性规定的无效。然而，现实中"向上取整"往往以"行业惯例"为挡箭牌，游走在法律边 缘牟利。对此，应以法治之力加以治理。 完善相关制度，厘清"向上取整"边界。目前，相关规章制度对"向上取整"缺乏足够清晰界定，导致部分 企业钻空子。应进一步明确何种情况下允许合理取整、何种情况属于变相加价，让执法更有据可依。国 家邮政局的此次整治就是很好的范例，通过优化完善快递行业计重规则，也为其他领域整治类似问题提 供借鉴。 加强市场监管，提高违法成本。相关行业主管部门应主动作为，对利用"向上取整"变相涨价的商家进行 约谈、处罚，并建 ...

完善相关制度，厘清"向上取整"边界。目前，相关规章制度对"向上取整"缺乏足够清晰界定，导致部分 企业钻空子。应进一步明确何种情况下允许合理取整、何种情况属于变相加价，让执法更有据可依。国 家邮政局的此次整治就是很好的范例，通过优化完善快递行业计重规则，也为其他领域整治类似问题提 供借鉴。 加强市场监管，提高违法成本。相关行业主管部门应主动作为，对利用"向上取整"变相涨价的商家进行 约谈、处罚，并建立黑名单制度等，让违规者付出代价。同时畅通消费者投诉渠道，激活社会监督，形 成惩戒机制。 近日，国家邮政局就部分快递企业在计重收费中存在"向上取整"行为作出回应，指导相关企业参照《快 递服务》国家标准，优化完善服务收费计重规则。目前，相关企业普遍优化了计重收费规则，计费重量 以千克为单位，保留小数点后至少1位。 推动行业自律，倡导诚信经营。行业协会应制定行业规范，引导企业合法合规计量定价，杜绝隐性收 费。企业也应认识到，短期的"小聪明"可能带来一时的利润，但长远来看，只有诚信计量公平交易，才 能赢得消费者长久支持。 所谓"向上取整"，即在计价时只要零头超过"1"的都往上加到下一个整数，如有的快递企业"即便1.1公斤 ...