（原标题：首届巴西—印度数字对话在巴西利亚举行） 巴西媒体11月26日综合报道，首届巴西—印度数字对话在巴西利亚召开，两国政府各部门官员、专 家和代表出席，体现双方在数字领域合作全面性和战略性。双方讨论了数字化转型的关键议题，包括人 工智能治理、公共数字基础设施、有效互联互通、高性能计算、半导体、科技创新、数据保护以及多边 场合协作等。双方将扩大双边协调，通过联合倡议、技术交流和定期磋商等方式在数字问题上建立更紧 密伙伴关系。双方重申，数字化转型必须建立在技术主权和包容性可持续发展的基础上。巴西欢迎印度 于 2026年2月在新德里主办人工智能影响力峰会（India AI Impact Summit 2026），届时巴方将派代表参 加。 ...

俄罗斯的未来图景应当如何描绘？面对外部地缘政治挑战与严峻的制裁压力，俄罗斯应如何实现经济持 续发展？近日，在俄罗斯联邦政府财政金融大学举办的"俄罗斯：未来形象"国际论坛上，联邦政府官 员、国家杜马代表、高校及智库专家齐聚一堂，围绕全球转型背景下的国家发展战略展开讨论，试图从 技术、经济和社会多个维度勾勒出俄罗斯的未来轮廓。 全球治理格局转变 俄方认为，当前世界格局正在经历深刻调整，以金砖国家为代表的新兴经济体迅速崛起，部分新兴经济 体的居民收入与生活水平已不逊于，甚至在某种程度上超过了一些发达国家。俄罗斯财政部长西卢安诺 夫指出，传统的"发达—发展中"二元分类逐渐弱化，新兴经济体加速上升，而发达经济体则表现出强烈 的抵触情绪，不愿放弃原有的中心地位。 西卢安诺夫认为，这种抵触体现在技术竞争、贸易壁垒、制裁手段等多个领域。制裁不仅针对俄罗斯， 也广泛用于打压其他国家，意图延缓其技术进步，从而维持过去几十年由西方主导的经济秩序。他强 调，新兴经济体的发展势头不可阻挡，俄罗斯主张新兴经济体应在所有国际机构与组织中持续扩大份额 和话语权。"我坚信，无论某些人是否愿意，这种结构性转变终将发生——这是世界经济的根本趋 势 ...

（来源：电脑报少年派） 百辆豪车突成废铁 11月28日以来，莫斯科、圣彼得堡、克拉斯诺达尔和彼尔姆等多个俄罗斯城市的保时捷车主陆续报告车辆突发性瘫痪。 故障如瘟疫般在俄罗斯蔓延。从首都莫斯科的三环主干道，到圣彼得堡的河畔停车场，再到克拉斯诺达尔的商场车库，大量保时捷车主遭遇了相同的噩 梦。有车主在披萨店取餐后回到车内，发现车辆毫无反应，仪表盘黑屏；有维修技师自己的保时捷仅启动两秒便瞬间熄火，检查后却发现所有硬件部件均 无异常。 更令人担忧的是，这种故障在高速行驶中也可能发生。莫斯科一位车主伊万在80公里/小时的车速下突然遭遇动力中断，险些引发严重交通事故。 俄罗斯最大的汽车经销商罗尔夫（Rolf）证实，仅登记在册的待修保时捷就超过300辆，其服务网点已拖走超过40辆瘫痪车辆。 故障影响范围并非仅限于保时捷，部分奔驰、奥迪和大众车型也报告了类似问题。所有受影响车辆都有一个共同点：均为2013年之后生产，并搭载了保时 捷原厂的VTS（Vehicle Tracking System）卫星安防系统。 VTS系统何以成为"电子手铐" VTS系统本是保时捷引以为傲的"防盗神器"。它通过卫星信号实现车辆实时定位，一旦系统检 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chilean government, in collaboration with industry and academic institutions, has launched a "National Drone Program" aimed at promoting the development of a fully autonomous design, manufacturing, and validation industry chain to achieve technological sovereignty [1] Group 1: Project Overview - The initiative will be applied in various fields including security, rescue, and logistics [1] - Two prototype models, one aerial and one underwater, are currently in the development phase to reduce reliance on imports [1] Group 2: Market Context - Official data indicates that the import volume of drones in Chile exceeded 32,000 units in the first ten months of 2025 [1]

Group 1 - The largest IT forum in Russia, "Digital Solutions," was held in Moscow, focusing on AI development and information system protection measures [1] - AI is widely applied in various sectors, including phone fraud detection, banking optimization in remote areas, and logistics efficiency [1] - The Russian government is committed to supporting the IT industry, which contributes 6% to GDP with total revenue around 13 trillion rubles [2] Group 2 - The Russian government provides significant funding for AI research projects, amounting to 350 million rubles, with 13 research centers already receiving support [3] - There is a growing demand for cloud infrastructure, with Russian companies adopting domestic cloud solutions for data analysis and project management [3] - The government aims to increase the proportion of domestic software in key industries and is establishing national capability centers for developing enterprise solutions [2][3] Group 3 - The IT industry in Russia has added approximately 100,000 new professionals this year, bringing the total workforce to over 1.1 million [4] - Successful cases of government-enterprise cooperation were highlighted, emphasizing the importance of a "white list" for ensuring communication services in restricted environments [5] - The telecommunications sector faces challenges with increasing network load and limited revenue growth, despite having one of the lowest communication fees globally [5] Group 4 - Russian companies must promote technology research and develop competitive business models to compete in the global digital economy, which they currently occupy only about 2% of [6] - The government has made significant progress in supporting education, including digital classrooms and projects for primary and secondary education [6] - The main task is to develop software that meets the needs of the real economy, enhancing efficiency and promoting technological development [6]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes that the technology industry is entering a more pragmatic and complex phase as the initial hype around generative AI subsides, with a focus on scaling applications through data governance, system integration, and compliance [2][3]. Group 1: AI Development and Market Dynamics - By 2026, the focus of AI development will shift significantly towards "inference," with two-thirds of global computing power dedicated to running AI models, surpassing the power used for model training [3]. - The rise of "passive" usage of generative AI embedded in existing applications will lead to a user base far exceeding that of standalone tools like ChatGPT, with AI-generated summaries in search engines expected to be used three times more frequently than independent Gen AI tools by 2026 [3]. Group 2: Enterprise Transformation and AI Agents - The core of enterprise transformation will be "Agentic AI," with a predicted market size of $45 billion by 2030 if interoperability and governance challenges are effectively addressed [4]. - Traditional SaaS models are expected to be disrupted, moving towards mixed pricing models based on outcomes or usage [4]. Group 3: Geopolitical Trends and Semiconductor Supply Chains - Technology sovereignty has become a central policy issue for governments, leading to accelerated efforts to establish independent digital infrastructures, particularly in AI computing power and semiconductors [5]. - Key technology trade restrictions are tightening, creating new supply chain bottlenecks, particularly around advanced manufacturing tools and technologies, which could impact a $300 billion AI chip market [5]. Group 4: Media and Content Production Trends - The media and entertainment industry is being reshaped by short videos and generative AI, with the rise of "micro-dramas" expected to double in revenue to $7.8 billion by 2026 [7]. - Video podcasts are projected to generate $5 billion in global advertising revenue by 2026, combining audio storytelling with visual elements [7]. Group 5: Telecommunications and Consumer Engagement - In developed markets, the marginal effects of technology upgrades are diminishing, leading to a shift in customer retention strategies from technical performance to brand value and service experience [6]. - By 2026, promotional strategies like free offers may prove more effective in retaining customers than emphasizing network performance [6].

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission is exploring measures to force member states to remove Huawei and ZTE equipment from telecom networks, potentially pressuring non-EU countries by withholding funding for projects using Huawei technology [1][3]. Group 1: EU's Actions and Proposals - The European Commission's Executive Vice President, Margrethe Vestager, aims to upgrade the 2020 recommendation to stop using "high-risk suppliers" into legally binding regulations [1]. - If the proposal becomes law, non-compliance by member states could lead to infringement lawsuits and economic penalties [1][4]. - The EU is increasingly focused on the risks posed by Chinese telecom equipment manufacturers amid rising tensions in trade and politics with China [3]. Group 2: Industry Reactions and Implications - Following the news, shares of Nokia and Ericsson saw significant increases, with Nokia rising by 5% and Ericsson by 3.7% [4]. - There is a growing trend in Europe to impose stricter restrictions on Chinese suppliers, with countries like Germany and Finland considering similar measures [4]. - The inconsistency in EU member states' approaches to Huawei creates significant security risks, according to hawkish voices within the EU [4]. Group 3: Counterarguments and Responses - China has strongly opposed the EU's claims of security risks associated with Huawei and ZTE, arguing that these companies have operated in Europe for years without compromising security [5][9]. - Spain has defended its contract with Huawei, stating it poses no security risks and complies with national security standards [8][9]. - Huawei criticized the EU's designation of it as a "high-risk supplier," claiming it lacks legal basis and violates free trade principles [9].

Core Points - The ongoing conflict between ASML China and the Dutch government highlights a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape regarding technology and trust [1][10] - The Dutch government invoked a 72-year-old law to take control of ASML, citing national security concerns, which has raised alarms about the predictability of Western markets [1][5][10] Company Overview - ASML was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Nijmegen, Netherlands, producing semiconductors for various sectors including automotive and consumer electronics, employing over 14,000 people globally [3] - The company was acquired by China's Wingtech Technology for approximately $3.6 billion in 2018, making it one of the few large chip manufacturers in Europe under Chinese control [3] Legal and Regulatory Context - The Dutch government applied the "Goods Availability Act" to ASML, a law originally designed for wartime resource management, indicating a redefinition of what constitutes critical infrastructure [5][6] - This law allows the government to intervene in private companies when the availability of key products is at risk, now extending to the semiconductor industry [5][6] Geopolitical Implications - The actions taken by the Dutch government are closely coordinated with Washington, indicating a broader strategy to control advanced technology and its production locations [6][7] - The political environment has shifted from efficiency to security, impacting global manufacturing, particularly in the automotive sector [7][9] Economic Consequences - China's response to the Dutch decision includes restrictions on low-end and automotive-grade chip exports to Europe, affecting ASML's operations and the broader supply chain [9][10] - The situation has led to significant operational challenges for ASML, with its factories in China unable to ship products and European management under government oversight [9][10] Broader Trends - The ASML case illustrates a structural transformation in global trade, where the free flow of capital and technology is increasingly influenced by political considerations [10][11] - The incident signifies a new threshold in China-Europe relations, with both sides facing heightened anxieties over technological dependencies and market access [10][11]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing tensions surrounding Nexperia, a subsidiary of Wingtech Technology, have prompted the company to urge the Dutch government to reconsider its stance and remove unfounded allegations of technology theft [2][3]. Group 1: Company Actions and Responses - Wingtech Technology has stated that any agreement to restart exports from Nexperia must include the reinstatement of the company's former CEO [2][12]. - Following the Dutch government's intervention, Wingtech accused the government of geopolitical bias and excessive interference rather than a factual risk assessment [3][7]. - The Dutch government has cited "serious governance deficiencies" at Nexperia as the reason for its actions, claiming it aims to prevent potential supply risks in emergencies [3][4]. Group 2: Industry Impact and Reactions - The intervention has raised concerns in the European automotive industry about potential production line disruptions and supply chain interruptions [3][4]. - The situation has led to warnings from automotive manufacturers in Europe, the U.S., and Japan regarding possible production issues due to chip shortages [12]. - The ongoing geopolitical tensions have intensified the chip supply chain dispute, with the Dutch government's actions likely to exacerbate supply chain disruptions and impact related industries [4][11]. Group 3: Historical Context and Developments - Wingtech acquired Nexperia in a phased approach from 2018 to 2020, with the acquisition proving successful as Nexperia became a major profit source for Wingtech [6][7]. - The U.S. Department of Commerce placed Wingtech on an entity list in December 2024, suspecting the company of potentially transferring technology to the Chinese military, which subsequently affected Nexperia due to its ownership structure [5][6]. - The Dutch government's recent actions are seen as a response to U.S. pressure, highlighting the influence of U.S.-China tensions on the technology sector [10][11].

Core Insights - The article highlights a significant technological revolution in cross-border remittances facilitated by blockchain technology, which has drastically reduced transaction times and fees in Kyrgyzstan [1][4][10] - The success of Xiang Lingyun's team in implementing a blockchain-based remittance system demonstrates a shift from traditional academic achievements to practical problem-solving in developing economies [6][9][12] Group 1: Economic Impact - In Kyrgyzstan, remittances accounted for 31% of GDP in 2024, indicating a heavy reliance on funds sent by overseas workers [4] - The traditional remittance process involved multiple intermediaries, taking an average of 3 days and incurring fees as high as 15%, while the new system reduces this to 10 minutes and fees below 4% [4][10] - The World Bank reported that the average global remittance cost is 6.3%, with Central Asia being the most expensive region for remittances due to weak financial infrastructure [4][8] Group 2: Shift in Academic Evaluation - Xiang Lingyun's recognition as a lifelong academician reflects a growing trend where practical solutions are valued over traditional academic metrics like publication counts [9][12] - The collaboration model emphasizes problem-solving capabilities rather than theoretical knowledge, reshaping the academic evaluation landscape [6][9] - The demand for "applied scholars" has surged by 217% globally, indicating a shift towards valuing practical applications of research [12] Group 3: Technological Soft Power - China's experience in digital economy practices has positioned its scholars as leaders in providing practical solutions to developing countries [8][11] - The modular approach of the blockchain solution allows for targeted interventions in local financial systems, enhancing the effectiveness of technology transfer [8][10] - The collaboration with Chinese teams is seen as a "safe option" for developing countries, focusing on technical parameters rather than political conditions [11] Group 4: Future of Academic Competition - The article suggests that the future of academic competition will hinge on the ability to translate laboratory breakthroughs into real-world applications [12] - The integration of AI and blockchain technologies aims to address practical issues faced by workers in Central Asia, showcasing a grounded approach to technological development [12][13] - The emphasis on solving real problems rather than theoretical discussions is becoming a new standard for academic value [13]