交通运输部关于对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费的公告 2025年4月17日，美国贸易代表办公室发布关于对中国海事、物流及造船业301调查措施，自2025年10月14日 起，将对中国企业拥有或经营的船舶、中国籍船舶及中国造船舶加收港口服务费，严重违背了国际贸易相关原 则和中美海运协定，对中美间海运贸易造成严重破坏。 交通运输部 2025年10月10日 根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》等法律法规和国际法基本原则，经国务院批准，自2025年10月14日起， 对美国的企业、其他组织和个人拥有船舶所有权的船舶；美国的企业、其他组织和个人运营的船舶；美国的企 业、其他组织和个人直接或间接持有25%及以上股权（表决权、董事会席位）的企业、其他组织拥有或运营的 船舶；悬挂美国旗的船舶；在美国建造的船舶，由船舶挂靠港口所在地海事管理机构负责收取船舶特别港务 费。有关事项公告如下： 一、对上述船舶，按航次计收船舶特别港务费，分阶段实施，具体收取标准如下（不足1净吨的按1净吨计）。 （一）自2025年10月14日起靠泊中国港口的，按每净吨400元人民币计收； （二）自2026年4月17日起靠泊中国港口的，按每净吨640元人民币计收； ...

10月10日，交通运输部发布关于对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费的公告。 公告称，根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》等法律法规和国际法基本原则，经国务院批准，自2025年10月14日起，对美国的企业、其他组织和个人拥有 船舶所有权的船舶；美国的企业、其他组织和个人运营的船舶；美国的企业、其他组织和个人直接或间接持有25%及以上股权（表决权、董事会席位）的企 业、其他组织拥有或运营的船舶；悬挂美国旗的船舶；在美国建造的船舶，由船舶挂靠港口所在地海事管理机构负责收取船舶特别港务费。 公告还称，船舶在同一航次挂靠多个中国港口的，仅在首个挂靠港缴纳船舶特别港务费，后续的挂靠港不再收取。同一艘船舶，一年内收取船舶特别港务费 不超过5个航次。 原文如下： 交通运输部关于对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费的公告 2025年4月17日，美国贸易代表办公室发布关于对中国海事、物流及造船业301调查措施，自2025年10月14日起，将对中国企业拥有或经营的船舶、中国籍 船舶及中国造船舶加收港口服务费，严重违背了国际贸易相关原则和中美海运协定，对中美间海运贸易造成严重破坏。 根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》等法律法规和国际法基本原则，经国务院 ...

日前，美国海关与边境保护局（CBP）正式发布CSMS #66427144号公告，宣布自10月14日起对中国船舶实施新的收费政策。针对中国拥有、运 营或建造的船舶设立三重收费标准，液化天然气（LNG）运输船为唯一豁免品类。 根据公告，收费分为三个附件类别：附件I规定中国实体拥有或运营的船舶按每净吨50美元收费；附件II明确中国建造的船舶按"每净吨18美 元"或"每卸货集装箱120美元"孰高原则计费；附件III对汽车运输船或滚装船按每净吨14美元收取费用。船舶运营方需在抵港前三个工作日通过 美国财政部Pay.gov平台完成缴费，未提供缴费凭证的船舶将被拒绝装卸作业或不予放行。 中国船舶工业行业协会与中国船东协会当日联合发表声明，指出美方措施基于虚假指控，严重违背WTO非歧视原则。中国国务院已于9月29日 修订《国际海运条例》，新增反制条款，明确对采取歧视性措施的国家可实施对等收费、港口限制等反制手段。 航运成本激增 10万吨级货轮单次靠港多付500万美元 据航运咨询机构Alphaliner测算，该政策将给全球前十大班轮公司带来每年32亿美元的额外成本。其中中远海运与OOCL合计承担15.3亿美元， 占比近五成；以 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. soybean industry is facing an unprecedented sales crisis, primarily due to the absence of orders from China, which has historically been a major buyer [1][3]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - China accounted for a significant portion of U.S. soybean exports, with 6.5 million tons of contracts signed at the same time last year, while this year the order volume is zero [3]. - The speed of market shift is alarming, with China importing 66 million tons of soybeans from Brazil in the first eight months of this year, representing 75% of Brazil's total exports [3]. - U.S. soybean exports have plummeted by over 60% year-on-year due to China's imposition of a 23% punitive tariff on U.S. soybeans, making U.S. prices nearly $100 per ton higher than South American soybeans [3]. Group 2: Economic Impact on Farmers - The cost of planting soybeans is $450 per acre, while market prices only cover $300, leading to significant financial strain on farmers [5]. - Brazilian port expansions and Argentina's cancellation of soybean export taxes are expected to further enhance price competitiveness against U.S. soybeans [5]. Group 3: Structural Weaknesses - The soybean market is highly seasonal, and missing the sales window forces farmers to sell at lower prices [7]. - China's shift towards diversified supply sources has reduced its dependency on U.S. soybeans from 85% to 80%, while U.S. soybean exports still rely 60% on China [9]. - The U.S. government is facing internal divisions regarding trade negotiations, with agricultural leaders advocating for urgent talks while trade representatives maintain a hardline stance [7]. Group 4: Political Ramifications - The upcoming midterm elections are causing concern among Republican lawmakers in agricultural states, as each unsold shipment of soybeans could translate to a loss of votes [9]. - The Trump administration's $12 billion agricultural subsidy is viewed as insufficient, covering only 30% of farmers' losses [7].

Group 1 - Canada has shifted its diplomatic stance towards China, seeking dialogue and reconciliation after experiencing economic repercussions from its previous hardline policies [1][15] - The Canadian government, under Prime Minister Carney, intensified trade sanctions against China, including imposing punitive tariffs of up to 100% on electric vehicles and 25% on steel and aluminum products [4][5] - The true motivation behind Canada's tariffs was to leverage its position for better access to the U.S. agricultural market, sacrificing its trade relationship with China [7] Group 2 - China's response to Canada's tariffs was swift and targeted, imposing 100% tariffs on Canadian canola oil and peas, and 25% on seafood and pork, significantly impacting Canadian exports [8][9] - The second round of Chinese countermeasures included a ruling on dumping, requiring Canadian companies to pay a deposit of 75.8% to continue exporting canola to China, leading to a complete halt in orders [9][11] - The agricultural sector in Canada faced severe consequences, with farmers in Saskatchewan suffering losses exceeding $30,000 each, and many processing companies going bankrupt due to the loss of orders [11][13] Group 3 - The political fallout from the economic crisis led to pressure on the Canadian federal government from provincial leaders and businesses to change its trade policies towards China [13] - The U.S. maintained high tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum while threatening additional tariffs on Canadian lumber and dairy products, exacerbating Canada's economic challenges [13] - The Canadian government's recent overtures to China are seen as a desperate attempt to find a way out of the economic turmoil caused by its previous policies [15]

Group 1 - Mexico's President announced a significant trade policy adjustment, raising import tariffs on automobiles and certain industrial products to 50%, which observers link to U.S. trade pressures [1] - China's Ministry of Commerce responded with anti-dumping investigations on pecans from Mexico and the U.S., potentially impacting exports significantly if dumping is confirmed [2] - China is also conducting a comprehensive review of Mexico's recent trade protection measures, which could lead to retaliatory tariffs and affect investor confidence in Mexico [2] Group 2 - Analysts note that Mexico's economic growth has been driven by its geographical advantage and low labor costs, but current government policies may undermine these benefits by sacrificing relationships with other trade partners [3] - The Mexican government is facing consequences for its policy choices, including a decline in its business environment rating and warnings from economists about the risks of unilateral protectionism [4] - Amidst these trade policy challenges, the U.S. has intensified immigration controls, highlighting Mexico's precarious position as a subordinate ally in U.S. strategic interests [6]

Group 1 - The Chinese government has imposed a preliminary anti-dumping tax of 62.4% on European pork imports, significantly impacting the European pork industry [1][3] - The tax rates vary by country, with Spain at 15.6%, Denmark at 31.3%, and the Netherlands at 32.7%, while non-compliant companies face the full 62.4% [3] - The restriction on pork imports from China, which accounts for a quarter of the EU's pork export market, has led to a surplus of pork in Europe, signaling a potential industry downturn [3][6] Group 2 - European by-products such as pig ears, noses, and offal, which have low local demand, are highly sought after in China, creating a significant market dependency [6] - The increase in tariffs has resulted in a loss of the primary buyer for these by-products, leading to a cash flow crisis for European producers as both primary and secondary products become unsellable [6] - The European stance towards China is characterized by a conflict between following U.S. pressure and the necessity of maintaining access to the Chinese market [8][11] Group 3 - Europe is heavily reliant on China as a major trade partner, particularly in sectors like automotive, machinery, and luxury goods, making the current situation critical for its economy [8] - The U.S. is pressuring Europe to align with its policies against China, which could exacerbate Europe's economic challenges while benefiting U.S. interests [9][11] - The European dilemma involves balancing the need to maintain economic ties with China while managing the geopolitical pressures from the U.S. [11]

Group 1 - China's export control on rare earth elements has significantly impacted the EU's high-tech industries, particularly in electric vehicles and renewable energy sectors, with 92% of the EU's rare earth permanent magnets relying on imports from China [2][11] - The EU's attempt to impose high tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles led to a retaliatory reduction of 80% in China's rare earth export quotas, which has severely affected European automotive manufacturers [9][7] - The EU's dependency on China for rare earth elements has been highlighted as a critical vulnerability, especially as the EU faces rising industrial electricity costs and a lack of alternative sources [4][11] Group 2 - The EU has proposed a plan for lunar mining to alleviate its resource dependency, aiming to extract rare earth elements and helium-3 from the moon, which has sparked skepticism from the international community [13][15] - The timeline for the EU's lunar mining initiative includes launching a lunar probe by 2030 and establishing a small lunar base by 2040, which is a significant acceleration from previous deep space exploration plans [19] - However, the technical, economic, and legal challenges of lunar mining are substantial, with current costs for lunar mining projected to be significantly higher than terrestrial mining [21][23][25] Group 3 - The lunar mining initiative reflects a broader geopolitical struggle for resource control, with the US seeking to influence the rules of space resource utilization through the Artemis Accords, while Russia and China oppose the privatization of lunar resources [29][31] - China's strategy includes strengthening its rare earth processing capabilities and expanding its presence in the European renewable energy market, which undermines the effectiveness of EU trade protection measures [31][33] - The EU's reliance on lunar mining as a solution to its immediate resource crisis indicates a strategic anxiety, as the demand for rare earth elements is expected to triple in the next five years, with no viable alternative supply chains established by 2030 [33]

Group 1: Strategic Art and Diplomatic Engagement - China is showcasing its strategic capabilities through hosting major international events while simultaneously implementing precise countermeasures against countries attempting to isolate it diplomatically [1][3] - The gathering of over twenty national leaders in Beijing to commemorate the victory over fascism demonstrates China's strong international relationships and its ability to counter isolation attempts [3] - The visit of a former Japanese Prime Minister, who previously apologized for historical invasions, serves as a diplomatic highlight, exposing the hypocrisy of countries that attempt to isolate China while maintaining double standards [3] Group 2: Tariff Measures and Economic Sovereignty - China’s Ministry of Commerce announced significant anti-dumping tariffs on phenol products from the US, EU, South Korea, Japan, and Thailand, with some rates exceeding 100% [4][5] - The imposition of tariffs on phenol, a critical raw material for various industries, reflects China's commitment to protecting its domestic industries and economic security [4][8] - The response from affected countries varies, with some expressing disappointment while others remain cautious, indicating the importance of the Chinese market and the potential impact of these countermeasures [7] Group 3: Global Supply Chain and Industry Protection - The competition over phenol is not just about market prices but also concerns the control over the global supply chain [8] - China's investigation into low-priced phenol imports highlights the disruption to domestic market order and the need to protect local production to maintain economic stability [8] - The exclusion of the UK from the extended tariff list signals a targeted approach, indicating that countries cooperating with China may benefit while those provoking it will face consequences [8] Group 4: Combination of Soft and Hard Power - The simultaneous occurrence of diplomatic events and tariff announcements reflects a well-thought-out strategy combining soft and hard power [9] - China is demonstrating a new model of international relations, balancing assertiveness in defending its interests with diplomatic engagement [9][10] - Specific examples include China's response to the US trade war by significantly increasing tariffs and controlling rare earth exports to maintain leverage in high-tech sectors [10][11] Group 5: Redefining Global Power Dynamics - China is reshaping the rules of global power dynamics, emphasizing strategic precision and economic interconnections to influence international politics [13][15] - The approach is not about seeking hegemony but dismantling existing hegemonic structures, indicating a shift in how global power is perceived and exercised [15][17] - The message is clear: countries attempting to maintain outdated power dynamics must reconsider their strategies in light of China's assertive stance [17]

Group 1 - The trade tensions between China and the US have seen a shift after six months, with Trump realizing that confrontation has not yielded expected results, leading to concessions such as extending tariff exemptions on certain Chinese goods [1][3] - China's recent announcements targeting the EU, Canada, and Japan have raised confusion among Western media, as these actions seem contradictory to the easing of US-China relations [5] - Canada faces significant economic challenges due to China's imposition of a 75.8% deposit on canola seed imports, effectively closing its market, which previously accounted for $5 billion in exports [7][9] Group 2 - China's strategic choice to target the canola seed industry stems from Canada's alignment with US policies, particularly in response to tariffs on steel and aluminum [9] - The EU has also been impacted, with China retaliating against sanctions imposed on its financial institutions by blacklisting two banks from Lithuania, showcasing a more assertive legal approach [11] - Japan is experiencing increased scrutiny on its automotive parts exports to China, prompting companies to seek alternative production lines in Southeast Asia to reduce dependency [14] Group 3 - The events highlight the reality that there are no true allies in trade, as the EU and Japan's support for US policies has led to targeted retaliatory measures from China [16] - China's actions serve as a reminder to countries attempting to exploit trade relationships, emphasizing the potential consequences of their decisions [18] - The repercussions of these trade dynamics are evident, with Canadian farmers facing market losses, Japanese companies adjusting supply chains, and EU banks losing clients, illustrating the complexities of international trade relationships [19]