Risk Management Philosophy - Traditional risk management focusing solely on avoiding losses is insufficient [1] - The industry should consider strategies to profit even when investments underperform [1] - A proactive approach to risk management fundamentally changes investment selection [1]

#crypto既然没有 DeFi 佬愿意在风控上花一分钱，那就要各凭本事了🤷 ...

Core Viewpoint - Under the reshuffling of commercial banks, city commercial banks are gaining momentum, increasing growth anxiety for lagging joint-stock banks like Huaxia Bank [1][2]. Group 1: Financial Performance - Huaxia Bank reported a revenue of 64.881 billion and a net profit of 17.982 billion for the first three quarters, representing declines of 8.79% and 2.86% year-on-year, respectively [1][6]. - Among 42 listed banks in A-shares, Huaxia Bank ranked 40th and 37th in revenue and net profit growth rates, indicating a significant lag behind most banks [2]. - In the third quarter, Huaxia Bank experienced a revenue decline of 15.02% but a net profit increase of 7.62%, marking a V-shaped reversal in profit growth [7][9]. Group 2: Asset Quality and Risk Management - As of the end of the third quarter, Huaxia Bank's non-performing loan ratio stood at 1.58%, the worst among A-share joint-stock banks [4][14]. - The bank faces a dilemma between sacrificing risk control for growth or tightening risk management and potentially losing market share to aggressive city commercial banks [5][16]. - The bank's management has undergone significant changes, including the appointment of a new chairman and several key executives, aimed at addressing long-standing governance and risk management issues [18][19]. Group 3: Strategic Adjustments - Huaxia Bank is implementing a "cutting inward" strategy to optimize its organizational structure and improve operational efficiency [20][21]. - The bank's focus is shifting towards retail transformation and digital risk control, with an emphasis on supporting technological innovation and green finance [29]. - The bank's capital adequacy ratio is at 12.63%, which, while above the regulatory requirement, is still at the lower end compared to peers, indicating a weak capacity to absorb risks [14][23]. Group 4: Competitive Landscape - Huaxia Bank's profits have been surpassed by five city commercial banks, which are experiencing higher growth rates, intensifying competitive pressure [25][26]. - The bank's main markets, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Yangtze River Delta regions, are also the battlegrounds for these aggressive city commercial banks [28].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights three companies—Bohai Leasing, Shaanxi Guotou A, and CITIC Securities—that are successfully offering high salaries in a challenging financial environment, attributing their success to resource management rather than traditional business strategies [2][21]. Group 1: Bohai Leasing - Bohai Leasing has consistently ranked at the top of the A-share salary list, with an average salary close to 2 million yuan, primarily focusing on aircraft and container leasing [4][24]. - Despite facing significant losses of 10.9 billion yuan over three years due to the pandemic, the company maintained an average salary between 1.6 million and 1.9 million yuan [6][9]. - The surge in container demand during the pandemic, with shipping costs skyrocketing from 1,500 to 25,000 USD, allowed Bohai Leasing to thrive while others struggled [7][9]. - The majority of high salaries are concentrated among 487 overseas employees, averaging 1.96 million yuan, while domestic employees earn significantly less at 630,000 yuan [9][24]. - Recruitment is highly selective, with most employees coming through internal referrals, making it difficult for outsiders to join the company [9][22]. Group 2: Shaanxi Guotou A - Shaanxi Guotou A has achieved an average salary exceeding 1 million yuan, positioning itself as a stable player in the trust industry amidst widespread failures [11][14]. - The company has avoided high-risk investments, focusing instead on risk management, which has allowed it to maintain steady profit growth and reach a revenue of 2.928 billion yuan in 2024 [14][16]. - Unlike its competitors, Shaanxi Guotou A has prioritized capital preservation over aggressive profit-seeking, which has proven beneficial in a volatile market [14][21]. Group 3: CITIC Securities - CITIC Securities, with 26,000 employees, ranks among the top in average salary in the A-share market, utilizing a precise employment strategy to maintain high compensation levels [16][24]. - The company primarily hires for IT positions at market rates, while core departments like investment banking and research, which are crucial for generating revenue, are less visible in recruitment efforts [19][21]. - The hiring process for core positions is highly competitive, focusing on candidates who can bring in business and resources, rather than just academic qualifications [19][22]. Group 4: Industry Insights - The high salary stories of these companies illustrate a harsh reality in the financial sector: resources are more critical than individual capabilities [21][22]. - The ability to leverage unique resources, whether through internal networks or risk management, is essential for success in today's financial landscape [22][26].

RT Yuyue (@yuyue_chris)不要总觉得自己是强者，是幸运儿。币圈高度达尔文主义，意味着你以为自己是强者的时候总有人比你更强。巨鲸之上有更大的鲸鱼、黑客、漏洞攻击者、交易所，甚至威权组织觉得自己是强者看着无所谓啊，有这种心态也真的要更谨慎一点。遇上这种级别的问题稍有疏忽都容易直接归零，哪怕老手也总有疏忽，善游者溺于水的道理。普通新手和平时风控就不太好的人更得小点心能保持程序上合理正义已经是万幸，这事我觉得最后还是没什么结果，能处理到这一步一边夸一边骂已经达到效果了。很明显领导不觉得这事有问题，不像空投这种事，大手一挥多分出点小钱也就是领导被哄开心了一句话的事，这次的关键在于如果真认错了就等于认下管理系统里存在漏洞可能不如对家的系统了，更不用说如果真的要赔那得赔多少呢？不太可能了只能说很多事很难评，想回本都只能买强的币。亏了的大概率只能认赔，收拾收拾心情钱还是得赚，自己做好风控严格管理仓位守住本金才是最要紧的，任何人和组织都没可能为你的身家性命负责 ...

Core Viewpoint - The discussion revolves around the concept of computing power bubbles, highlighting the cyclical nature of projects in this field and the importance of continuous due diligence and risk management [1][13][20]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The computing power bubble has gained public attention since early 2023, although the issues may have originated earlier [15][17]. - There is a significant information lag in the industry, where problems may be recognized by insiders long before they become apparent to the public [18][19]. - The narrative of computing power often involves creating fictitious market demands and leveraging information asymmetry to attract investments [24][38]. Group 2: Business Models and Revenue Sources - The core focus should be on the underlying assets, revenue sources, and the rationality of the business model [22]. - The profitability of computing power centers relies on providing computing services and leasing computing power [33]. - The pricing of computing power has experienced significant fluctuations, indicating potential market volatility and information gaps [35][37]. Group 3: Risks and Fraudulent Practices - Many projects in the computing power sector may engage in deceptive practices, such as fabricating revenue sources and inflating asset values [30][41]. - The existence of contracts does not guarantee genuine demand; the underlying need may be fabricated [84]. - The operational integrity of computing power centers is crucial, as discrepancies in reported capabilities can lead to significant financial losses [67][71]. Group 4: Due Diligence Recommendations - Due diligence should extend beyond the immediate business model to encompass the entire supply chain and market dynamics [85][93]. - Understanding the actual demand and the capabilities of downstream clients is essential to assess the viability of investments in computing power [87][90]. - A comprehensive approach to due diligence can help identify potential risks and prevent falling victim to common industry scams [79][94].

不要总觉得自己是强者，是幸运儿。币圈高度达尔文主义，意味着你以为自己是强者的时候总有人比你更强。巨鲸之上有更大的鲸鱼、黑客、漏洞攻击者、交易所，甚至威权组织觉得自己是强者看着无所谓啊，有这种心态也真的要更谨慎一点。遇上这种级别的问题稍有疏忽都容易直接归零，哪怕老手也总有疏忽，善游者溺于水的道理。普通新手和平时风控就不太好的人更得小点心能保持程序上合理正义已经是万幸，这事我觉得最后还是没什么结果，能处理到这一步一边夸一边骂已经达到效果了。很明显领导不觉得这事有问题，不像空投这种事，大手一挥多分出点小钱也就是领导被哄开心了一句话的事，这次的关键在于如果真认错了就等于认下管理系统里存在漏洞可能不如对家的系统了，更不用说如果真的要赔那得赔多少呢？不太可能了只能说很多事很难评，想回本都只能买强的币。亏了的大概率只能认赔，收拾收拾心情钱还是得赚，自己做好风控严格管理仓位守住本金才是最要紧的，任何人和组织都没可能为你的身家性命负责 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident of credit card fraud involving Shanghai Pudong Development Bank's "Red Sand Card" has raised significant concerns about consumer safety and the responsibilities of banks and cardholders in protecting financial rights [2][3][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Multiple cardholders reported unauthorized transactions occurring in Brazil while they were physically in China, with losses ranging from 10,000 to 20,000 RMB [2][3]. - The fraud pattern typically involved small test transactions followed by larger unauthorized charges, with many users experiencing similar transaction sequences [3]. - As of September 16, over 350 users had joined a social media group to discuss their experiences with the fraud, indicating a widespread issue [3]. Group 2: Bank Response and Legal Framework - Shanghai Pudong Development Bank and Mastercard have initiated emergency responses to protect cardholders from bearing losses, committing to uphold customer rights [2][3][7]. - According to a 2021 Supreme People's Court ruling, banks are obligated to compensate cardholders for unauthorized transactions if they can prove the transactions were fraudulent [6][7]. Group 3: Consumer Protection and Risk Management - The incident highlights the need for improved risk management and consumer education regarding credit card safety, as the bank has faced a high volume of complaints related to credit card fraud [8]. - Legal experts emphasize that cardholders must also take responsibility for safeguarding their personal information to avoid potential losses [10]. - Recommendations for consumers include regularly monitoring transactions, enabling real-time alerts, and being cautious with card usage, especially in unfamiliar settings [11].

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident of credit card fraud involving Shanghai Pudong Development Bank's "Red Sand Card" has raised significant concerns about consumer safety and the responsibilities of banks in protecting their clients' financial interests [2][3][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Multiple holders of the "Red Sand Card" reported unauthorized transactions occurring in Brazil, despite being in China, with losses ranging from 10,000 to 20,000 RMB [2][3]. - The fraudulent transactions typically began with small test purchases of around 3 RMB, followed by larger transactions, often under 5,000 Brazilian Reais (approximately 6,000 RMB) [3]. - As of September 16, over 350 users had joined a social media group to discuss their experiences with the fraud, indicating a widespread issue [3]. Group 2: Bank Response and Legal Framework - Shanghai Pudong Development Bank and Mastercard have committed to ensuring that affected customers do not bear the financial losses from these unauthorized transactions [2][3][6]. - According to a 2021 ruling by the Supreme People's Court, banks are obligated to compensate customers for losses incurred from unauthorized transactions, provided that the fraud is determined to be a result of card skimming or network fraud [5][6]. Group 3: Consumer Protection and Risk Management - The incident highlights the need for improved risk management and consumer education regarding credit card safety, especially as Shanghai Pudong Development Bank has faced a high volume of complaints related to credit card issues [7][8]. - Experts recommend that consumers regularly monitor their transactions, set transaction limits, and utilize security features available through banking apps to mitigate the risk of fraud [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of common sense logic over formal documentation in due diligence and risk assessment, advocating for early risk identification to maintain control in investment decisions [1][2][3]. Group 1 - The current work logic often overemphasizes formal documentation, which can obscure understanding [3][4]. - Trusting one's judgment, intuition, and questioning the motives behind actions is crucial in investment analysis [5][6][8]. - When evaluating business financing, it is essential to consider why a company would seek external funding if its business model is performing well [9][10]. Group 2 - The article highlights that quality projects are competitive and not easily accessible, indicating that good investments require thorough understanding and risk assessment [14][17]. - A notable example discussed is the "fake gold" incident, where a company pledged non-existent gold as collateral, leading to significant financial repercussions [18][20][36]. - The author critiques the financial industry for often utilizing low-quality underlying assets to create investment products, which can lead to widespread financial instability [30][31][37]. Group 3 - The article stresses the need for skepticism and critical thinking in financial dealings, advising to always question the underlying motives and the authenticity of presented assets [39][41]. - A strong knowledge base and experience are necessary to discern the complexities and potential pitfalls in financial transactions [42].