为维护国内相关产业利益，中方有关部门根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》等有关规定，对涉及美 国旗、美国造、美国公司拥有、参股或经营等美国元素的船舶收取特别港务费。上述措施将于10月14日 美方针对中国相关船舶征收港口费的措施实施同时正式实施。 中方强调，相关反制措施旨在维护国际航运和造船市场的公平竞争环境，是"正当防卫"行为。希望美方 慎重考虑，纠正错误做法，与中方相向而行，通过平等磋商与合作找到解决问题的办法。 责任编辑：刘万里 SF014 商务部新闻发言人就中方宣布针对美对华造船等行业301调查限制措施实施反制答记者问 问：我们注意到交通运输部等发布公告，就美国对中国采取海事、物流和造船业301调查限制措施采取 反制措施，能否介绍相关情况？ 答：美东时间4月17日，美国贸易代表办公室宣布对中国海事、物流和造船领域301调查的最终措施。其 中针对中国相关船舶征收港口费的措施将于10月14日正式实施。美方措施是典型单边主义行为，具有明 显歧视性色彩，严重损害中国企业利益。中方对此强烈不满，一再申明坚决反对的立场。 ...

交通运输部新闻发言人就拟对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费答记者问 问：中方宣布将对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费，有何考虑？ 一、对上述船舶，按航次计收船舶特别港务费，分阶段实施，具体收取标准如下（不足1净吨的按1净吨计）。 （一）自2025年10月14日起靠泊中国港口的，按每净吨400元人民币计收； 答：2025年4月，美国贸易代表办公室宣布了对中国海事、物流和造船领域301调查最终措施，10月14日起，对中国公司拥有或运营的船舶、中国造船舶、 中国籍船舶加收港口服务费。美国的做法罔顾事实，充分暴露出其单边主义、保护主义本质，具有明显的歧视性色彩，严重损害中国海运业的正当利益， 严重扰乱全球供应链稳定，严重破坏国际经贸秩序。中方将对美国错误做法依法坚决采取反制措施，推动构建公平正义的国际海运市场秩序，维护国际物 流供应链安全稳定。 根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》，我部发布《关于对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费的公告》，决定将于10月14日起对涉美船舶收取船舶特别港务费， 这是我们维护中国海运企业合法权益的正当举措。我们敦促美方立即纠正错误做法，停止对中国海运业的无理打压。 2025年4月17日，美国贸易代表办公室发布关于 ...

交 通运输部10月10日发布关于对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费的公告 来源：交通运输部 交通运输部新闻发言人就拟对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费答记者问 问： 中方宣布将对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费，有何考虑？ 答： 2025年4月，美国贸易代表办公室宣布了对中国海事、物流和造船领域301调查最终措施，10 月14日起，对中国公司拥有或运营的船舶、中国造船舶、中国籍船舶加收港口服务费。美国的做法 罔顾事实，充分暴露出其单边主义、保护主义本质，具有明显的歧视性色彩，严重损害中国海运业 的正当利益，严重扰乱全球供应链稳定，严重破坏国际经贸秩序。 中方将对美国错误做法依法坚决 采取反制措施，推动构建公平正义的国际海运市场秩序，维护国际物流供应链安全稳定。 根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》，我部发布《关于对美船舶收取船舶特别港务费的公告》， 决定将于10月14日起对涉美船舶收取船舶特别港务费，这是我们维护中国海运企业合法权益的正当 举措。 我们敦促美方立即纠正错误做法，停止对中国海运业的无理打压。 三、我部将制定具体实施办法。 突发！中美，大消 息！ （一）自2025年10月14日起靠泊中国港口的，按每净吨400元人民币计收； ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Transport of China announced the implementation of a special port service fee for U.S. vessels starting from October 14, 2025, as a countermeasure against the U.S. imposition of similar fees on Chinese vessels, which is seen as a violation of international trade principles and damaging to Sino-U.S. maritime trade [2][4]. Summary by Sections Announcement Details - The special port service fee will apply to U.S. owned or operated vessels, including those with 25% or more ownership by U.S. entities, U.S.-flagged vessels, and vessels built in the U.S. [2][5] - The fee will be charged per voyage, with the following rates: - 400 RMB per net ton starting October 14, 2025 - 640 RMB per net ton starting April 17, 2026 - 880 RMB per net ton starting April 17, 2027 - 1120 RMB per net ton starting April 17, 2028 [2][3] Fee Collection Rules - For vessels calling at multiple Chinese ports in the same voyage, the fee will only be collected at the first port of call, with a maximum of five voyages per vessel per year subject to the fee [3][5]. Rationale Behind the Decision - The decision is framed as a legitimate measure to protect the rights of Chinese shipping companies in response to the U.S. actions, which are characterized as unilateral and discriminatory, disrupting global supply chains and international trade order [4][5].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Transport announced the implementation of special port service fees for U.S. vessels starting October 14, 2025, in response to the U.S. Trade Representative's unilateral measures against China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries, which are seen as discriminatory and damaging to China's maritime interests [1][2]. Summary by Sections Announcement of Special Port Service Fees - Starting from October 14, 2025, special port service fees will be charged for U.S.-owned or operated vessels, including those with 25% or more U.S. ownership, vessels flying the U.S. flag, and those built in the U.S. The fees will be collected by the maritime management authority at the port of call [1]. - The fee structure is as follows: - From October 14, 2025: 400 RMB per net ton - From April 17, 2026: 640 RMB per net ton - From April 17, 2027: 880 RMB per net ton - From April 17, 2028: 1120 RMB per net ton [1]. Rationale Behind the Decision - The Ministry of Transport emphasized that the U.S. actions are unilateral and protectionist, severely disrupting global supply chains and international trade order. The decision to impose fees is a legitimate measure to protect the rights of Chinese maritime enterprises [2]. Implementation Details - For vessels calling at multiple Chinese ports in the same voyage, the special port service fee will only be charged at the first port of call, with a maximum of five voyages per vessel per year subject to the fee [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Transport of China announced the implementation of a special port service fee for U.S. vessels starting from October 14, 2025, as a countermeasure against the U.S. imposition of port service fees on Chinese vessels, which is seen as a violation of international trade principles and agreements [1][2][5]. Summary by Sections Announcement of Special Port Service Fee - Starting from October 14, 2025, a special port service fee will be charged for U.S.-owned or operated vessels, including those with 25% or more U.S. ownership, U.S.-flagged vessels, and vessels built in the U.S. [1][2][5]. - The fee will be collected by the maritime management authority at the port of call in China [2]. Fee Structure - The fee will be charged per net ton, with the following phased implementation: - From October 14, 2025: 400 RMB per net ton - From April 17, 2026: 640 RMB per net ton - From April 17, 2027: 880 RMB per net ton - From April 17, 2028: 1120 RMB per net ton - For vessels calling at multiple Chinese ports in the same voyage, the fee will only be charged at the first port of call, with a maximum of five voyages per vessel per year subject to the fee [2][3]. Rationale Behind the Decision - The decision is a response to the U.S. Trade Representative's announcement of additional port service fees on Chinese vessels, which is viewed as unilateral and discriminatory, disrupting global supply chains and international trade order [5]. - The Ministry of Transport emphasizes that this measure is a legitimate action to protect the rights of Chinese shipping companies and calls for the U.S. to correct its actions [5].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has announced a new fee policy for Chinese vessels, effective from October 14, which imposes three different fee structures, exempting only LNG carriers. This policy is expected to significantly increase shipping costs and impact global shipping dynamics, particularly affecting U.S.-China trade relations [1][6]. Fee Structure - The new fee policy includes three categories: - Category I: $50 per net ton for vessels owned or operated by Chinese entities - Category II: $18 per net ton or $120 per unloaded container for vessels built in China, whichever is higher - Category III: $14 per net ton for car carriers or roll-on/roll-off vessels [1]. - Shipping operators must pay these fees through the U.S. Treasury's Pay.gov platform three business days before arrival, or they will be denied loading or unloading [1]. Impact on Shipping Costs - According to Alphaliner, the policy will impose an additional annual cost of $3.2 billion on the world's top ten shipping companies, with COSCO and OOCL bearing $1.53 billion, nearly half of the total [2]. - For a 10,000 TEU container ship, the cost to dock at a U.S. port will be approximately $5 million, which is equivalent to an additional 4% tariff on U.S.-China trade [6]. Effects on U.S. Ports and Shipping Dynamics - The dual fee structure may lead shipping companies to adjust their vessel deployments, potentially reducing cargo throughput at major U.S. ports. A report indicates that the Port of Los Angeles may see a 12% month-over-month decline in throughput [7]. - The U.S. shipbuilding industry faces a significant cost disadvantage, with construction costs five times higher than in China, which may lead to job losses in U.S. port logistics and delays in infrastructure updates [7]. Response Strategies - China has revised its International Shipping Regulations to establish countermeasures against discriminatory practices, including reciprocal fees for U.S. vessels [8]. - Shipping companies are optimizing their fleets and adjusting routes to mitigate costs, with some transferring Chinese-built vessels to non-U.S. routes [8]. - The China Shipbuilding Industry Association is advocating for technological advancements and market diversification to counterbalance risks from the U.S. market [8]. Alternative Logistics Solutions - The China-Europe Railway Express is increasingly serving as an alternative logistics solution, with a 34% year-on-year increase in operations in the first three quarters of this year [9]. - New cross-border infrastructure projects are being developed to create a "land-sea linkage" trade logistics network, reducing reliance on single maritime routes [9].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. soybean industry is facing an unprecedented sales crisis, primarily due to the absence of orders from China, which has historically been a major buyer [1][3]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - China accounted for a significant portion of U.S. soybean exports, with 6.5 million tons of contracts signed at the same time last year, while this year the order volume is zero [3]. - The speed of market shift is alarming, with China importing 66 million tons of soybeans from Brazil in the first eight months of this year, representing 75% of Brazil's total exports [3]. - U.S. soybean exports have plummeted by over 60% year-on-year due to China's imposition of a 23% punitive tariff on U.S. soybeans, making U.S. prices nearly $100 per ton higher than South American soybeans [3]. Group 2: Economic Impact on Farmers - The cost of planting soybeans is $450 per acre, while market prices only cover $300, leading to significant financial strain on farmers [5]. - Brazilian port expansions and Argentina's cancellation of soybean export taxes are expected to further enhance price competitiveness against U.S. soybeans [5]. Group 3: Structural Weaknesses - The soybean market is highly seasonal, and missing the sales window forces farmers to sell at lower prices [7]. - China's shift towards diversified supply sources has reduced its dependency on U.S. soybeans from 85% to 80%, while U.S. soybean exports still rely 60% on China [9]. - The U.S. government is facing internal divisions regarding trade negotiations, with agricultural leaders advocating for urgent talks while trade representatives maintain a hardline stance [7]. Group 4: Political Ramifications - The upcoming midterm elections are causing concern among Republican lawmakers in agricultural states, as each unsold shipment of soybeans could translate to a loss of votes [9]. - The Trump administration's $12 billion agricultural subsidy is viewed as insufficient, covering only 30% of farmers' losses [7].

Group 1 - Canada has shifted its diplomatic stance towards China, seeking dialogue and reconciliation after experiencing economic repercussions from its previous hardline policies [1][15] - The Canadian government, under Prime Minister Carney, intensified trade sanctions against China, including imposing punitive tariffs of up to 100% on electric vehicles and 25% on steel and aluminum products [4][5] - The true motivation behind Canada's tariffs was to leverage its position for better access to the U.S. agricultural market, sacrificing its trade relationship with China [7] Group 2 - China's response to Canada's tariffs was swift and targeted, imposing 100% tariffs on Canadian canola oil and peas, and 25% on seafood and pork, significantly impacting Canadian exports [8][9] - The second round of Chinese countermeasures included a ruling on dumping, requiring Canadian companies to pay a deposit of 75.8% to continue exporting canola to China, leading to a complete halt in orders [9][11] - The agricultural sector in Canada faced severe consequences, with farmers in Saskatchewan suffering losses exceeding $30,000 each, and many processing companies going bankrupt due to the loss of orders [11][13] Group 3 - The political fallout from the economic crisis led to pressure on the Canadian federal government from provincial leaders and businesses to change its trade policies towards China [13] - The U.S. maintained high tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum while threatening additional tariffs on Canadian lumber and dairy products, exacerbating Canada's economic challenges [13] - The Canadian government's recent overtures to China are seen as a desperate attempt to find a way out of the economic turmoil caused by its previous policies [15]

Group 1 - Mexico's President announced a significant trade policy adjustment, raising import tariffs on automobiles and certain industrial products to 50%, which observers link to U.S. trade pressures [1] - China's Ministry of Commerce responded with anti-dumping investigations on pecans from Mexico and the U.S., potentially impacting exports significantly if dumping is confirmed [2] - China is also conducting a comprehensive review of Mexico's recent trade protection measures, which could lead to retaliatory tariffs and affect investor confidence in Mexico [2] Group 2 - Analysts note that Mexico's economic growth has been driven by its geographical advantage and low labor costs, but current government policies may undermine these benefits by sacrificing relationships with other trade partners [3] - The Mexican government is facing consequences for its policy choices, including a decline in its business environment rating and warnings from economists about the risks of unilateral protectionism [4] - Amidst these trade policy challenges, the U.S. has intensified immigration controls, highlighting Mexico's precarious position as a subordinate ally in U.S. strategic interests [6]