昨天，发生了哪些财经大事？ 特朗普称美对华关税 或将大幅下降， 我外交部回应 4月23日，外交部举行例行记者会。有记者问，据报道，美国总统特朗普对记者称，对华 145%关税确实很高，协议达成后美对华关税将大幅下降，但不会降至零。中方对此有何评 论？ 对此，郭嘉昆表示， 中方早就指出，关税战、贸易战没有赢家，保护主义没有出路，"脱钩 断链"只会孤立自己 。对于美国发动的关税战，中方的态度很明确， 我们不愿打，也不怕 打。打，奉陪到底；谈， 大门敞 开。 如果美方真的想通过对话谈判解决问题，就应该停 止威胁讹诈，在平等、尊重、互惠的基础上同中方对话。一边说要同中方达成协议，一边不 断搞极限施压，这不是同中方打交道的正确方式，也是行不通的。 华裔CEO上任才1个月， 美国芯片巨头被曝大裁员 4月23日，据多家外媒报道，英特尔计划在本周宣布裁员超过20%的计划。这将是该公司自 1968年成立以来规模最大的一次组织调整。同时也是新任CEO陈立武（Lip-Bu Tan）上 任后推动的首次重大重组。截至2024年底，英特尔全球员工总数为10.89万人，若按20% 比例计算，裁员规模将超过2.18万人。此前，当地时间3月12 ...

Group 1 - Xi Jinping held a ceremony to welcome Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev during his state visit to China [7] - Xi Jinping and President Aliyev announced the establishment of a comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Azerbaijan [8] - Xi Jinping emphasized the importance of military-civilian unity and the "double support" work, highlighting the need for reform and innovation in this area [9] Group 2 - Premier Li Qiang met with both Azerbaijani President Aliyev and Kenyan President William Ruto during their state visits [12][13] - Zhao Leji, Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, also met with Presidents Aliyev and Ruto [14] Group 3 - The Shenzhou-20 manned spacecraft launch window has been confirmed, with the crew of three astronauts revealed [18] - The 137th Canton Fair's second phase has commenced, focusing on quality home furnishings and showcasing over 100 new product releases [24] - The 2025 Shanghai International Auto Show opened with nearly 1,000 exhibitors, highlighting the latest developments in electric and intelligent vehicles [25]

Core Viewpoint - The trade relationship between Japan and the United States is significantly impacted by the recent tariff policies initiated by the Trump administration, leading to widespread concern among Japanese industries about the negative effects of "reciprocal tariffs" [1][6]. Industry Impact - Over half (52.3%) of surveyed companies reported that "reciprocal tariffs" have a "negative" impact, with only 1.3% indicating a "positive" effect [2]. - The manufacturing sector is the most affected, with 64.4% of manufacturing companies reporting negative impacts, followed by wholesale (56.4%), transportation (51.5%), and agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and mining (51.2%) [2][3]. - Among the 5,314 surveyed companies, 46.2% stated that the tariffs would have no impact, while 30.3% felt there would be slight negative effects, and 22.0% anticipated significant negative impacts [2]. Specific Industry Responses - The manufacturing industry, particularly the automotive sector, is identified as a "disaster zone" due to the high negative impact from tariffs [3]. - In the manufacturing sector, non-ferrous metal manufacturing reported the highest negative impact at 83.3%, followed by steel (79.4%) and rubber products (79.1%) [3]. - The retail sector had the highest percentage of companies reporting a positive impact at 3.6%, with other sectors like real estate and wholesale showing minimal positive responses [4]. Company Strategies - A significant portion (65.1%) of companies reported having "no special" countermeasures in response to the tariffs, indicating a lack of immediate strategic planning [5]. - Among those considering responses, 9.7% plan to reduce inventory, and 9.0% may cancel or reduce capital investments [5]. - Companies are primarily focused on assessing the impact of tariffs rather than implementing proactive measures [5]. Policy Concerns - The highest concern among surveyed companies is the tariff policy, with 54.7% indicating it as a primary focus, particularly among larger enterprises [6]. - The construction, manufacturing, and financial sectors show the highest levels of concern regarding tariff policies [6]. Government Response - The Japanese government, represented by the economic revitalization minister, emphasizes the urgency of addressing the tariff situation, labeling it a "national crisis" [7].

不仅如此，转向加拿大采购原油并非没有挑战。首先，运输成本和时间仍然是需要考虑的重要因素。尽管跨山管道扩建 项目的投入使用提高了运输效率，但长途运输仍然不可避免地增加了成本。此外，加拿大的环境政策和市场监管也可能 对原油开采和出口产生影响，这些因素都需要中国企业在采购时认真评估。此外，全球能源市场的波动性也让这一转变 充满不确定性。国际油价的变化、地缘政治的影响以及其他国家的市场动态，都可能对中加之间的原油交易产生影响。 加拿大地理位置特殊，又是美国盟友，这让它在地缘政治中角色比较复杂，作为邻居，加拿大的日子也不好过，有时还 会受美国的"欺负"。尤其是在特朗普执政时期，虽然有人说"吞并加拿大"听起来很离谱，但也让加拿大的安全感降低了不 少，毕竟离得近，又不得不考虑自身利益。加拿大和美国的关系挺微妙，既要合作，又要小心翼翼维护自己的独立性， 这种不安全感，让加拿大对包括中国在内的其他国家产生了戒备心理。 面对加拿大的多次政治挑衅，中国展现出成熟大国的克制与智慧，在贸易领域，中方对加拿大农产品加征关税时，特意 避开关键矿产领域，既警示加方又为谈判留有余地，中方致力于和平发展，中国不会干涉其他国家的内政，也不会让其 ...

金十数据4月22日讯，4月21日，商务部副部长兼国际贸易谈判副代表凌激会见捷克工业和贸易部副部长 弗雷利赫。凌激表示，中方愿扩大进口捷优势产品，并拓展双方在绿色、数字和智能制造等领域投资合 作。中方愿同捷方、欧方一道，加强对话交流，扩大合作清单，共同维护以规则为基础的多边贸易体 制，反对保护主义、单边主义。弗雷利赫表示，捷克重视发展对华经贸关系，捷在机械制造、机床加工 等产业有传统优势，愿继续加大对华合作。捷支持自由贸易，主张维护多边贸易体制。捷方支持中欧加 强沟通，推动中欧经贸关系稳定发展。 （商务部） 凌激副部长兼国际贸易谈判副代表会见捷克工业和贸易部副部长弗雷利赫 ...

文章指出，近期多家媒体报道称，美国政府计划利用正在进行的关税谈判，向其贸易伙伴施压，要求各 方限制与中国的贸易往来，以换取美方的关税豁免。4月21日，中国商务部在答记者问中表示，"绥靖换 不来和平，妥协也得不到尊重""以损害别人利益来换取所谓豁免是与虎谋皮，最终只能是两头落空，损 人不利己"。若哪一方以牺牲中国利益的方式向美国递"投名状"，中国绝不答应。中国欢迎各方继续搭 乘发展快车，但并不意味着可以让渡核心利益。向单边主义、保护主义举白旗的做法，不仅破坏多边贸 易体系，更将动摇全球经济秩序的根基。 ...

美国是全球贸易体系的受益者，尤其是在服务贸易领域。近日，世贸组织总干事伊维拉指出，2023 年美国服务贸易出口额超1万亿美元，占全球服务贸易总额的13%，2024年美国服务贸易顺差总额近 3000亿美元。对美国而言，"贸易吃亏论"是站不住脚的。 "关税带回利益和就业"只是利益集团转移视线的又一种话术。当然，也不耽误他们顺手"割一把韭 菜"。就在美国大豆协会主席雷格兰为50万名大豆种植者的生计，呼吁与中国达成协议时，一位美国富 豪因一则推文在几小时内净赚25亿美元。到头来，富豪们的财富更多了，普通民众的账单却更长了。 是谁为了一己私利，把千百万美国民众的正常生活押上赌桌？朝令夕改的关税"闹剧"到底肥了谁的 腰包？美国老百姓不能再被"割韭菜"，更不能当"炮灰"！ 最近美国政府连续挥舞关税大棒，大搞单边主义和保护主义，在全世界面前再次表演了一出反复无 常的闹剧，生动演绎了什么叫霸凌行径，什么是损人害己。美方称美国长期被外国人掠夺，加征关税将 推动制造业回流，提振就业和经济，这背后的逻辑根本站不住脚。 为什么美国老百姓生活水平没有提升，反倒越来越"穷"了呢？根源在美国国内，在美国的社会分配 制度。 美联储最新数据显示 ...

中新社柏林4月19日电维也纳消息：联合国工业发展组织(工发组织)18日在其网站发表文章，就美国滥 施关税对全球贸易、经济增长的消极影响阐明看法。 文章指出，美方滥施关税的做法是错误的，将对世界经济增长和产业发展带来巨大风险，削弱发展中国 家和最不发达国家充分参与全球贸易的潜力，抵消这些国家工业现代化和经济多元化努力。 文章表示，最新估计显示，约有4.5亿人在全球供应链中工作。发达国家保护主义抬头将减少就业岗位 和经济机会，减缓工业化进程，阻碍减贫努力。关税上升所带来的负面影响不仅会波及那些本就脆弱的 国家，也会影响实施关税的国家自身，加剧地缘政治紧张局势和不确定性。 工发组织指出，美国加征关税并非基于事实，也不会取得预期效果。加征关税将推高工业生产成本，降 低经济效率，抵消贸易红利，削弱竞争能力，最终危及全球就业，并且会给经济最脆弱的国家带来最沉 重打击。 工发组织总干事穆勒在文章中表示，各国应致力于建立更加公平和可持续的全球经济体系，而非设置贸 易壁垒。美国退出发展合作、经济合作、拒绝承担共同责任，已经引发危险的连锁反应。包括美国在内 的所有工业化国家应同发展中国家共创互利共赢，构建更加公平、更可持续的全球 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the trade war and tariff policies initiated by the U.S. have no winners and are detrimental to all parties involved, urging the U.S. to abandon its extreme pressure tactics and resolve issues through dialogue based on equality and mutual respect [2][6]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policies - The U.S. has implemented a tariff policy that includes both exemptions and additional tariffs, which has been criticized as harmful and counterproductive [2]. - The Chinese government asserts that the U.S. is using tariffs as a weapon for unilateralism and economic bullying, which undermines global interests, including those of China and the EU [6]. Group 2: China-Latin America Relations - China maintains that its cooperation with Latin American and Caribbean countries is based on mutual support and does not involve geopolitical calculations, contrasting with U.S. actions that are seen as attempts to control the region [5]. - The article highlights that the U.S. has been accused of using tariffs and other means to exert pressure on Latin American countries, which is viewed as a form of neo-Monroeism [8]. Group 3: China-EU Coordination - China and the EU, as major global economies, are coordinating their responses to U.S. tariff policies, emphasizing the need for stability and certainty in the global economy [6]. - Both parties advocate for a multilateral trading system centered around the World Trade Organization (WTO) and aim to maintain healthy and stable global trade relations [6].