无论形势如何变化，中国将始终坚持多边主义，支持联合国在国际事务中发挥核心作用，同国际社会一 道推动构建更加公正合理的全球治理体系。 来源｜央视新闻 编辑 ｜ 钉钉 1月8日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者问，据报道，美国白宫近日发表声明称，特朗普 指示美国退出"不符合该国利益"的66个国际组织，停止资助把全球议程置于美优先议程之上的组织。 中方对此有何评论？ 毛宁表示，美国"退群"已经不是什么新闻，事实上国际组织和多边机构存在的意义就在于不代表任何 一个国家的私利，而是维护成员国的共同利益。正是因为如此，以联合国为核心的国际体系，80多年 来维护了世界的和平与稳定，促进了经济社会发展，保障了各国的平等权益。 当前国际形势再次证明，多边体系有效运行，才能防止"丛林法则"蔓延，才能让国际秩序不被"强权即 真理、武力即正义"主导，这是当前大多数国家，特别是小国弱国最需要的。 ...

毛宁表示，美国"退群"已经不是什么新闻，事实上国际组织和多边机构存在的意义就在于不代表任何一 个国家的私利，而是维护成员国的共同利益。正是因为如此，以联合国为核心的国际体系80多年来维护 了世界的和平与稳定，促进了经济社会发展，保障了各国的平等权益。 毛宁说，当前国际形势再次证明，多边体系有效运行才能防止丛林法则蔓延，才能让国际秩序不被强权 即真理、武力即正义主导。这是当前大多数国家特别是小国、弱国最需要的。无论形势如何变化，中国 将始终坚持多边主义，支持联合国在国际事务中发挥核心作用，同国际社会一道推动构建更加公正合理 的全球治理体系。 中国外交部发言人毛宁8日主持例行记者会。 白宫7日发表声明说，美国总统特朗普当天签署总统备忘录，指示美国退出66个"不再符合美国利益"的 国际组织，包括31个联合国实体和35个非联合国组织。有记者就此事在记者会上提问。 （文章来源：中国新闻网） ...

特朗普指示美国退出66个国际组织 中方：美国"退群"已不是什么新闻 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：万可义 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 中新网北京1月8日电 (记者 郭超凯 曾玥)中国外交部发言人毛宁8日主持例行记者会。 白宫7日发表声明说，美国总统特朗普当天签署总统备忘录，指示美国退出66个"不再符合美国利益"的 国际组织，包括31个联合国实体和35个非联合国组织。有记者就此事在记者会上提问。 毛宁表示，美国"退群"已经不是什么新闻，事实上国际组织和多边机构存在的意义就在于不代表任何一 个国家的私利，而是维护成员国的共同利益。正是因为如此，以联合国为核心的国际体系80多年来维护 了世界的和平与稳定，促进了经济社会发展，保障了各国的平等权益。 毛宁说，当前国际形势再次证明，多边体系有效运行才能防止丛林法则蔓延，才能让国际秩序不被强权 即真理、武力即正义主导。这是当前大多数国家特别是小国、弱国最需要的。无论形势如 ...

责任编辑：何俊熹 1月8日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者问，据报道，美国白宫近日发表声明称，特朗普指 示美国退出"不符合该国利益"的66个国际组织，停止资助把全球议程置于美优先议程之上的组织。中方 对此有何评论？ 毛宁表示，美国"退群"已经不是什么新闻，事实上国际组织和多边机构存在的意义就在于不代表任何一 个国家的私利，而是维护成员国的共同利益。正是因为如此，以联合国为核心的国际体系，80多年来维 护了世界的和平与稳定，促进了经济社会发展，保障了各国的平等权益。 当前国际形势再次证明，多边体系有效运行，才能防止"丛林法则"蔓延，才能让国际秩序不被"强权即 真理、武力即正义"主导，这是当前大多数国家，特别是小国弱国最需要的。 无论形势如何变化，中国将始终坚持多边主义，支持联合国在国际事务中发挥核心作用，同国际社会一 道推动构建更加公正合理的全球治理体系。 当前国际形势再次证明，多边体系有效运行，才能防止"丛林法则"蔓延，才能让国际秩序不被"强权即 真理、武力即正义"主导，这是当前大多数国家，特别是小国弱国最需要的。 无论形势如何变化，中国将始终坚持多边主义，支持联合国在国际事务中发挥核心作用，同国际社 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration's decision to withdraw from numerous international organizations signifies a further retreat from global cooperation, impacting various global issues such as climate change, labor, and immigration [2][3]. Group 1: Withdrawal from International Organizations - The Trump administration has announced the suspension of U.S. support for 66 international organizations, including several UN-related agencies, citing issues like redundancy, inefficiency, and misalignment with U.S. interests [2][3]. - This withdrawal includes significant organizations such as the United Nations Population Fund and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which are crucial for addressing global challenges [5][7]. - The U.S. has previously halted support for other international bodies, including the World Health Organization and the UN Human Rights Council, indicating a consistent pattern of disengagement from multilateralism [3][4]. Group 2: Implications for Global Cooperation - The U.S. exit from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change is a critical move that undermines international climate cooperation, as the U.S. is one of the largest carbon emitters [5][6]. - Experts warn that the U.S. withdrawal could hinder global greenhouse gas reduction efforts, providing other nations with excuses to delay their commitments [6]. - The decision reflects a broader trend of the U.S. prioritizing national interests over collaborative global efforts, which may lead to increased challenges in addressing transnational issues [3][4]. Group 3: Future Funding Strategies - Despite the withdrawal, U.S. officials claim to recognize the potential value of the UN, planning to focus taxpayer funds on organizations that align with U.S. interests, particularly in sectors where competition with China is prominent [4]. - This strategy indicates a shift towards selective engagement, where funding is directed only to those organizations that meet specific U.S. policy goals [3].

Core Insights - Ireland supports free trade and multilateralism, serving as a model for EU-China cooperation, particularly in trade, investment, and education [1][3] - The bilateral trade volume between China and Ireland is projected to reach $23.42 billion in 2024, with a significant increase since the establishment of the strategic partnership in 2012 [1][5] - China is Ireland's fourth-largest trading partner, with Ireland maintaining a trade surplus with China for several years [4][5] Trade and Investment - In 2023, China's direct investment in Ireland was $380 million, with a total stock of $2.04 billion by the end of the year, creating approximately 5,000 jobs [2][6] - The trade structure between China and Ireland is highly complementary, with Ireland exporting high-value, knowledge-intensive products to China and importing machinery and textiles [1][5] - Ireland is a stable investment destination for Chinese companies, encouraging them to leverage its EU membership for localizing supply chains and accessing the European market [2][10] Economic Cooperation - The visit of the Irish Prime Minister to China is expected to deepen political, cultural, and economic ties, with discussions on investment and trade opportunities [3][4] - Ireland's favorable business environment, including a low corporate tax rate of 12.5%, attracts foreign investment and supports R&D initiatives [7][9] - The country has a strong talent pool and a robust educational system, contributing to its appeal as an investment location [8][9] Future Prospects - The bilateral trade volume between China and the EU is expected to approach $800 billion in 2024, highlighting the vast potential for cooperation in areas like green transition and digital governance [1][3] - Ireland's role as a gateway to the EU market is reinforced by its unique position as the only English-speaking country in the Eurozone, making it an attractive base for Chinese enterprises [7][10]

Group 1: Core Insights - The meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Irish Prime Minister Martin was constructive and aims to enhance political and economic relations between Ireland and China [1] - Martin's visit marks his first official trip to China as Prime Minister, highlighting the importance of Ireland as a gateway for Chinese companies entering the European market [1] - Since the establishment of the mutually beneficial strategic partnership in 2012, bilateral trade has quadrupled, with China becoming Ireland's largest trading partner in Asia [1] Group 2: Economic Cooperation - Recent cooperation between Ireland and China has expanded from traditional sectors like agriculture and food to emerging fields such as artificial intelligence, digital economy, and healthcare [2] - A specific collaboration in stem cell research between an Irish biopharmaceutical company and Chinese enterprises showcases the potential in life sciences [2] - Renewable energy, particularly offshore wind projects, is a new highlight in the cooperation, with both countries encouraged to collaborate in green energy and digital economy [2] Group 3: Cultural and Educational Exchange - Cultural exchanges between Ireland and China are increasing, with initiatives like including Chinese in the Irish high school curriculum and ongoing educational collaborations [2] - Direct flight routes between Dublin and Beijing have been established, facilitating greater cultural interaction [2] - There is a strong emphasis on welcoming more Chinese students to study in Ireland, further enhancing mutual understanding [2] Group 4: Political Context and Global Relations - Ireland will assume the EU presidency in the second half of the year, advocating for stronger EU-China relations to alleviate global tensions [3] - The focus on industrial resilience and economic security is crucial for both parties, emphasizing the need for rational handling of differences [3] - Martin highlighted the importance of multilateralism and the role of international organizations in maintaining global order and promoting free trade [3]

Group 1 - The core investment narrative for 2025 is not the strong performance of the US stock market, but rather the significant changes in currency values and the global shift in asset allocation, with gold emerging as the true winner [3][6] - The US stock market recorded an 18% return in USD terms, but this is largely attributed to the depreciation of fiat currencies, creating a "valuation illusion" [6][8] - The dollar depreciated by 39% against gold, while the return from going long on gold (in USD terms) reached 65%. When measured in gold, the S&P 500 index actually declined by 28% [6][14] Group 2 - There is a notable shift of funds towards non-US markets, with the overall return from emerging markets reaching 34%, significantly outperforming US stocks [7][19] - The valuation of US stocks appears to have peaked, with equity risk premium being extremely low and the expected long-term return on equities (4.7%) falling below that of bonds (4.9%) [7][22] - The political and systemic transformation driven by inflation is causing dissatisfaction among the lower 60% of the population, leading to predictions of intense political conflict between extreme left and right forces in the US by 2027-2028 [7][28] Group 3 - The collective weakening of fiat currencies has established gold as a primary reserve asset, with the dollar depreciating against several currencies, including a 13% drop against the Swiss franc and a 12% drop against the euro [8][12] - The structural imbalance in the US stock market is evident, where profit growth is driven by a few major companies, while the distribution of profits remains heavily skewed towards capital owners rather than workers [9][21] - Non-liquid markets such as venture capital and private equity are under pressure, facing significant debt extension challenges and a potential rise in liquidity premiums [10][26] Group 4 - The geopolitical landscape is shifting from multilateralism to unilateralism, increasing military spending and sanctions, which diminishes the attractiveness of dollar-denominated assets [11][35] - The affordability crisis, stemming from currency value issues, is becoming a central political conflict, with the wealth gap between the top 10% and the bottom 60% exacerbating social tensions [11][28] - The current political climate, influenced by the Trump administration's policies, is expected to lead to significant market and economic impacts, particularly regarding wealth distribution and inflation concerns [11][27]

中韩元首外交释放积极信号，在国际与地区形势发生深刻复杂变化背景下，为两国以及地区和平发展带 来了利好 中韩是搬不走的重要近邻、分不开的合作伙伴，双方多走动、常来往、勤沟通有利于两国关系健康发 展。两个多月前，习近平主席对韩国进行国事访问，就开辟中韩关系新局面提出4点建议，引领中韩战 略合作伙伴关系实现再确认。在北京，习近平主席同李在明总统会谈时指出，中方始终将中韩关系置于 周边外交重要位置，对韩政策保持连续性、稳定性。李在明总统在新年伊始首访中国，充分展现了韩方 发展对华关系的积极意愿。着眼未来，只要中韩坚持"以和为贵""和而不同"，超越社会制度和意识形态 差异，就能实现相互成就、共同发展。 200多名韩国企业家组成经济代表团随同李在明总统访华，国际社会从中解读韩国工商界把握中国机遇 的热情和信心。中韩经济联系紧密，产业链供应链深度互嵌，合作互惠互利。近年来，中韩经贸关系内 涵发生新变化，但双方利益交融的基本现实没有变，双方经贸合作互利共赢的本质没有变。中方始终本 着"成就邻居就是帮助自己"的理念，致力于同韩方加强发展战略对接和政策协调，做大共同利益蛋糕。 中共二十届四中全会审议通过"十五五"规划建议，为未来 ...

Group 1 - The core investment narrative for 2025 is not the strong performance of US stocks, but rather the significant changes in currency values and the global shift in asset allocation, with gold emerging as the true winner [1][4][12] - US stocks recorded an 18% return in USD terms, but this is largely attributed to the devaluation of fiat currencies, creating a "valuation illusion" [5][12] - The S&P 500 index, when priced in gold, actually declined by 28%, highlighting the disparity in performance when considering different currencies [5][12] Group 2 - The US stock market significantly underperformed compared to non-US markets, with European, Chinese, and Japanese stocks outperforming US stocks by 23%, 21%, and 10% respectively [18][20] - Emerging markets showed an overall return of 34%, indicating a substantial capital shift away from US assets [19][20] - The interest of foreign investors in USD-denominated assets is waning, as evidenced by the negative returns of US Treasuries when priced in gold, which saw a -34% return [5][6] Group 3 - The valuation of US stocks appears to have peaked, with long-term equity expected returns at 4.7%, which is lower than the 4.9% return on bonds, indicating a low equity risk premium [23][24] - The disparity in profit distribution, where capitalists benefit more than workers, is raising concerns among leftist political forces, potentially impacting future profit margins [7][22][23] Group 4 - The political landscape is shifting towards extreme left and right forces due to affordability crises driven by inflation, which is expected to lead to significant conflicts by 2027-2028 [5][9][35] - The transition from multilateralism to unilateralism is increasing military spending and sanctions, further diminishing the attractiveness of USD assets [9][35][36] Group 5 - Non-liquid markets such as venture capital, private equity, and real estate are under pressure, facing significant debt rollover challenges and a potential rise in liquidity premiums [8][26] - The current low liquidity premium in these markets may lead to a decline in value relative to liquid assets, indicating a potential liquidity trap for investors [8][26]