Group 1 - The global bond market is experiencing increased volatility, with investors highly sensitive to any changes in the Federal Reserve's interest rate cut expectations, making information asymmetry a crucial profit source in modern bond investing [1][2] - U.S. Treasury yields reversed a three-day decline, with the 10-year benchmark yield dropping to 4.30%, driven by an 80% probability of a Fed rate cut in September, influenced by signs of a cooling job market [2][11] - The Chinese bond market is showing similar trends, with government bond futures closing higher and a notable drop in yields, creating investment opportunities for savvy investors [2][11] Group 2 - The speed and quality of information acquisition directly impact investment success in the rapidly changing bond market, making timely information a core competitive advantage for investors [3] - The Sina Finance APP offers significant advantages in this information competition, providing real-time updates and monitoring tools for bond market dynamics [4][6] - The APP's features include a "bond anomaly monitoring" function that alerts investors to unusual price movements within three seconds, enabling them to seize trading opportunities [5][6] Group 3 - The APP provides comprehensive bond market coverage, including over 300 types of bonds, and offers professional analytical tools such as yield curve analysis and credit spread monitoring [6][9] - It includes intelligent decision support features, such as ESG scoring and financial data access for new bond issuances, enhancing the investment decision-making process [7][8] - The APP also supports cross-border investment with tools for currency hedging and real-time analysis of international bond markets, helping investors navigate global trends [9] Group 4 - The APP emphasizes financial education, offering over 200 video courses and a simulated trading platform to help novice investors improve their trading skills [10] - For advanced users, the APP provides customized services, allowing users to create personalized bond portfolios and monitoring metrics [10] - In the current market environment, characterized by fluctuating risk preferences, the APP aims to democratize access to institutional-level data tools for individual investors [11]

风险提示：本产品由鹏扬基金管理有限公司发行与管理，销售机构不承担产品的投资、兑付和风险管理 责任。基金管理人承诺以诚实信用、勤勉尽责的原则管理和运用基金资产，但不保证基金一定盈利，也 不保证最低收益。基金的过往业绩并不预示其未来表现，本公司管理的其他基金的业绩并不构成对本基 金业绩表现的预示和保证。投资者在投资基金前应认真阅读基金合同、招募说明书和基金产品资料概要 等基金法律文件，全面认识基金产品的风险收益特征，在了解产品情况及销售机构适当性意见的基础 上，根据自身的风险承受能力、投资期限和投资目标，对基金投资作出独立决策，选择合适的基金产 品。基金有风险，投资需谨慎。 以上内容与数据，与有连云立场无关，不构成投资建议。据此操作，风险自担。 南华期货权益与固收研究分析师认为，在股市波动较大的情况下，债券的稳定性能够为投资组合提供一 定的保护，降低组合的整体风险。从这一角度来看，债券仍具备一定的配置价值。 浙商固收在研报中指出，反内卷政策核心或旨在破除地方政府无序竞争问题，或反映出短期稳增长与长 期高质量发展的权衡。伴随反内卷政策持续推进，供给驱动的经济增长模式逐步转型，短期投资与信贷 需求收缩或为正常现象，价 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that insurance companies' investment funds have surpassed 36 trillion yuan, showing a year-on-year growth of 17.4%, driven by strong savings demand and a recovering stock and bond market [1] - As of the end of Q2 this year, the investment fund balance for life insurance companies reached 32.60 trillion yuan, while property insurance companies had 2.35 trillion yuan [1] - The increasing allocation to stock investments is notable, with life insurance companies investing 2.87 trillion yuan in stocks, accounting for 8.81% of their total investments, an increase of 1.8 percentage points from the previous year [3] Group 2 - Bond investments remain the mainstay for insurance funds, with a total investment balance of 17.87 trillion yuan in bonds, reflecting a growth of 1.94 trillion yuan since the beginning of the year [5] - Life insurance companies hold 16.92 trillion yuan in bonds, making up 51.90% of their total investments, while property insurance companies have 9.455 trillion yuan, accounting for 40.29% [5] - The recent tax policy changes regarding bond interest income may lead to a shift in investment strategies, with a potential increase in high-dividend stocks to mitigate the impact of the new tax on bond investments [5]

Core Viewpoint - The insurance industry in China has seen a significant increase in fund utilization, with the total balance surpassing 36 trillion yuan as of Q2 2025, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 17.4% [2]. Group 1: Fund Utilization Overview - As of Q2 2025, the fund utilization balance of property insurance companies reached 2.35 trillion yuan, while life insurance companies held 32.6 trillion yuan [2]. - The total investment in stocks and securities investment funds by both life and property insurance companies amounted to 4.73 trillion yuan, marking a 25% increase compared to the same period in 2024 [3][4]. Group 2: Equity Investment Trends - The proportion of equity investments has been steadily increasing, with life insurance companies investing 4.35 trillion yuan in stocks and securities investment funds, a 25.7% increase year-on-year, representing 13.34% of their total fund utilization [4]. - Property insurance companies invested 379.2 billion yuan in stocks and securities investment funds, accounting for 16.16% of their total fund utilization, showing a significant increase [4]. - The rise in equity investment is attributed to several factors, including stock market gains, a low-interest-rate environment, and regulatory policies encouraging long-term investments [5]. Group 3: Bond Investment Dynamics - The total balance of bond investments by both life and property insurance companies reached 17.87 trillion yuan, a substantial increase of 1.9 trillion yuan from the end of 2024, making it the largest investment category [8]. - Life insurance companies held 16.92 trillion yuan in bonds, representing 51.90% of their total fund utilization, while property insurance companies held 945.5 billion yuan, accounting for 40.29% [8]. - The recent tax policy changes regarding bond interest income are not expected to alter the fundamental role of bonds as a stable investment for insurance funds [9]. Group 4: Decline in Bank Deposits - The proportion of investments in bank deposits has been declining, with life insurance companies holding 8.02% and property insurance companies holding 17.24% of their total fund utilization in bank deposits as of Q2 2025 [9]. Group 5: Future Investment Outlook - Analysts suggest that insurance funds may shift towards investments with better tax advantages or higher returns, with a continued emphasis on equity investments in the long term [10].

Group 1 - The trading activity of 30-year Treasury futures has significantly declined due to dual impacts of capital migration and supply pressure, with a notable drop in trading volume since mid-July as stock markets and commodities see increased activity and risk appetite rises [1] - Analysts suggest that if stock market sentiment cools or expectations for interest rate cuts increase, long-term bonds may experience a temporary rebound, although the overall bond market is likely to remain in a volatile state due to rising local government bond supply and weak institutional buying [1] - Short-term interest rate trends indicate two possible scenarios: either rates will fluctuate weakly at high levels with opportunities for slight rebounds, or rates will continue to rise but quickly retreat [1] Group 2 - As of August 15, 2025, the National Development Bank Bond ETF (159651) has seen a slight increase of 0.02%, with a latest price of 106.33 yuan, and a cumulative increase of 1.75% over the past year [1] - The National Development Bank Bond ETF has a turnover rate of 4.67% during trading, with a transaction volume of 26.5156 million yuan, and an average daily transaction volume of 5.23 billion yuan over the past year [2] - The ETF has shown a net value increase of 0.61% over the past six months, with a historical performance of 100% profitability over two years and a maximum drawdown of 0.21% in the last six months, which is the lowest among comparable funds [2]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report Considering that the absolute return of ultra - long credit bonds remains at a low level and the direction of the bond market is unclear, trading opportunities for this bond type still need to be awaited [5]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1存量市场特征 - Ultra - long credit bond yields fluctuate within a narrow range. From August 4th to August 8th, 2025, information affecting bond pricing was still complex, and the bond market sentiment was cautious. Compared with the previous week, the yields of existing ultra - long credit bonds declined slightly, with the yield center maintaining between 2.1% and 2.3% [2][13]. 3.2一级发行情况 - The subscription sentiment for new ultra - long industrial bonds rebounded. The total issuance scale of new ultra - long credit bonds this week was 19.7 billion yuan. Although the supply increased to some extent, its proportion in the total issuance scale of credit bonds for the week continued to decline. The average issuance interest rate of new ultra - long industrial bonds continued to rise and has now reached over 2.3%. Due to the increase in the coupon rate of ultra - long industrial bonds and the low - level hovering of the initial - month capital interest rate, investors' participation in subscribing for ultra - long credit bonds strengthened [3]. 3.3二级成交表现 - The pricing of the ultra - long credit bond index was basically the same as last week. Against the backdrop of increased difficulty in bond market forecasting, the performance of ultra - long credit bonds was inferior to mainstream bond assets. This week, the index trends of treasury bonds over 10 years, medium - term notes from 3 - 5 years, and secondary bonds of national - owned and joint - stock banks from 3 - 5 years were all better than that of the ultra - long credit bond index [4]. - The number of ultra - long credit bond transactions decreased significantly. Since July, ultra - long credit bonds have lacked floating profits. In an unstable bond market, the drawback of difficult - to - control drawdowns led to a significant weakening of the trading demand for this bond type. The total number of transactions of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds with a term of 7 years and above decreased from 515 last week to 389 this week. In terms of transaction returns, the average transaction yield of the most active 7 - 10 - year industrial bonds marginally recovered, and the spread with 20 - 30 - year treasury bonds compressed to 22bp, but the yields of general credit bond varieties over 10 years were still rising [4]. - Correspondingly, the low - valuation transaction margin of ultra - long credit bonds narrowed significantly this week, and the trading form of some long - term bond varieties changed to high - valuation. In terms of buying sentiment, the proportion of TKN transactions of 7 - 10 - year credit bonds with good liquidity dropped below 70% [4]. - Regarding the investor structure, insurance companies' willingness to hold ultra - long credit bonds was strong. This week, insurance companies' net purchase of credit bonds over 7 years reached 4.55 billion yuan. Funds, which had significantly reduced their holdings of ultra - long credit bonds in the previous two weeks, increased their holdings of 7 - 20 - year varieties to some extent this week. It is possible that as the assessment time approaches, some fund investors are extending the duration to increase returns [4].

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core View of the Report This week, the overall share of bond ETFs continued to expand, driven by credit - bond and convertible - bond ETFs, and the net values of various types generally increased. Convertible - bond ETFs led the growth in terms of net value increase and capital inflow [3][24]. Summary by Directory 1.1 各类债券 ETF 份额走势 - As of August 8, 2025, the shares of treasury - bond, policy - financial - bond, local - bond, credit - bond, and convertible - bond ETFs were 517.93 million, 501.07 million, 81.38 million, 3060.38 million, and 4433.45 million respectively, with a total of 8594.20 million shares. Compared with August 1, 2025, the changes were - 9.06 million, - 3.05 million, 1.20 million, 140.96 million, and 196.70 million respectively, and the total change was 326.75 million shares. Compared with the end of last month, the total change was 387.50 million shares [3][6]. 1.2 主要债券 ETF 份额走势 - The share performance of major bond ETFs was differentiated, with urban - investment - bond and convertible - bond ETFs being the main growth drivers. As of August 8, 2025, the shares of selected leading bond ETFs changed by - 3.95 million, - 3.86 million, no change, 105.00 million, and 127.50 million respectively compared with last week [3][7]. - The shares of credit - bond ETFs slightly increased. As of August 8, 2025, the shares of 8 existing credit - bond ETFs changed to varying degrees compared with August 1, 2025 [3][11]. - The shares of science - innovation - bond ETFs generally increased. As of August 8, 2025, the shares of 10 existing science - innovation - bond ETFs changed to varying degrees compared with last week [3][14]. 1.3 主要债券 ETF 净值走势 - This week, the net values of major bond ETFs maintained an upward trend, with convertible - bond ETFs ending their decline and leading the increase. As of August 8, 2025, the net values of selected leading bond ETFs changed by 0.11%, 0.01%, 0.03%, 0.09%, and 2.28% respectively compared with last week [3][16]. - The net values of credit - bond ETFs all increased. As of August 8, 2025, the net values of 8 credit - bond ETFs changed by 0.09%, 0.09%, 0.09%, 0.09%, 0.06%, 0.08%, 0.09%, and 0.09% respectively compared with last week [3][18]. - The net values of science - innovation - bond ETFs showed a steady upward trend. As of August 8, 2025, the net values of 10 science - innovation - bond ETFs changed by 0.11%, 0.12%, 0.09%, 0.09%, 0.12%, 0.12%, 0.11%, 0.10%, 0.10%, and 0.09% respectively compared with August 1, 2025 [3][22]. 1.4 部分债券 ETF 净流入情况 - Convertible - bond ETFs had the highest cumulative net inflow this week and this month. In the weekly view, the top three bond ETFs with cumulative net inflows were convertible - bond ETF, urban - investment - bond ETF, and Shanghai - Stock - Exchange convertible - bond ETF, with net inflow amounts of 166.30 million yuan, 150.61 million yuan, and 84.95 million yuan respectively. In the monthly view, the top three were the same, with net inflow amounts of 240.12 million yuan, 161.80 million yuan, and 78.81 million yuan respectively. In terms of cumulative trading - day inflows, convertible - bond ETFs also ranked first in the past 10 and 20 trading days [3][24].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - Maintains the view that August - October is a headwind period for the bond market. Currently, it has entered the starting point of the second stage of the bond market's three - step process in the second half of the year. August is regarded as an oscillatory adjustment period after redemption, but the market has not shown a trend improvement in the quarterly dimension [26]. - In the short term, there may be a small - band long - trading window in the first half of August. New bond issuance pressure is low, the VAT policy still benefits old bonds, large banks' bond - allocation power is strong, funds are loose, upcoming weak financial data may provide a profit - taking window, and historically, policy windows usually occur in the second half of August [28]. - For trading portfolios, seize the sentiment - repair period in the first half of August for small - band trading. Take profit at around 1.65% and pay attention to spread opportunities brought by the VAT policy [45]. - For allocation portfolios, wait for new bonds to adjust to more suitable positions, and consider old bonds at curve convex points, such as 6y CDB, 7y ADBC, 10y CDB, and 15y treasury bonds [48]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Value - added Tax New Rule: One - week Market Conditions - **Emotional Impact Stage (August 1st, 4th)**: The "old - new cut - off" of the VAT policy led to tax - exemption advantages for old bonds. Institutions rushed to buy old bonds, with the yield of the 10y treasury active bond dropping from 1.715% to 1.68%, then rising back to around 1.7% due to profit - taking and a strong stock market [13]. - **Bank Bond - buying Stage (August 5th - 7th)**: Banks continued to buy bonds, with the intensity weakening. On August 6th, the Agricultural Development Bank and the Export - Import Bank rushed to issue tax - exempt bonds. The auction results started to price in negative factors as investors awaited higher - yielding new bonds [16][19]. - **New Bond Issuance Stage (August 8th)**: The first batch of local bonds in Hebei and Hubei were auctioned. The adjustment of Hebei bonds was large, attracting more investors to Hubei bonds. The overall impact of VAT on new bonds was controllable, with the adjustment range mostly within the 3 - 6% tax rate [22][24]. 3.2 Bond Market Strategy - **Quarterly Dimension**: Maintains that August - October is a headwind period for the bond market. The bond market is in a difficult trading situation, and accounts need to gradually increase liquidity [26]. - **Short - term (First Half of August)**: There may be a small - band long - trading window. New bond issuance pressure is low, funds are loose, weak financial data may provide a profit - taking window, and policy windows usually occur in the second half of August [28]. - **Trading Portfolios**: Seize the sentiment - repair period in the first half of August. Take profit at around 1.65% and pay attention to spread opportunities [45]. - **Allocation Portfolios**: Wait for new bonds to adjust and consider old bonds at curve convex points [48]. 3.3 Interest - rate Bond Market Review - **Overall Situation**: The central bank's support and the VAT new policy had limited impact. Long - term bonds fluctuated within a narrow range. The yield curve steepened, with the 1y treasury active bond yield down 1.5BP, the 10y down 0.4BP, and the 30y up 1.8BP [9]. - **Funding**: The central bank's OMO had a large - scale net withdrawal, but the funding was balanced and loose. DR001 and DR007 were at low levels, and the central bank's front - loaded 3M term repurchase operations showed a supportive attitude [10]. - **Primary Issuance**: Net financing of treasury bonds, policy - financial bonds, and inter - bank certificates of deposit increased, while that of local bonds decreased [69]. - **Benchmark Changes**: The term spreads of treasury bonds and CDB bonds widened. Short - term bond yields performed better than long - term ones [63].

在当今瞬息万变的债券市场中，专业及时的信息已成为投资者最核心的竞争力。国债收益率的微妙波 动、企业债信用利差的跳涨、央行政策的突然转向——每一条信息的领先获取，都可能意味着巨大的收 益机会或风险规避。面对市场上纷繁复杂的财经资讯平台，专业投资者如何选择高效工具？本文将深度 解析新浪财经APP稳居榜首的核心优势。 | | 中美利差 | | 2 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 中美利差(左) -252bp | | ■ 中债 +1.710% ■ 美债 | +4.231% | | 153 | | | 4.91% | | 36 | | | 1.0229 | | -80 | | 177 | 3.13% | | -196 | | | 2.23% | | 1/313 2021-11-26 | | | 34% 2025-08-05 | | 最后更新:2025-08-06 02:36:33 | | | | | 期限 | 中国 | 美国 | 利差 | | 1年 | 1.340 | 3.934 | -259bp | | 2年 | 1.410 | 3.733 | -232bp | | 3年 | 1.440 ...

国开行发行1年期债券，规模60亿元，发行利率1.3600%，预期1.3700%，投标倍数3.70倍，边际倍数 1.58倍；国开行发行3年期债券，规模50亿元，发行利率1.6662%，预期1.6500%，投标倍数3.41倍，边 际倍数1.68倍。数据来源：qeubee终端 截至8月4日，国开债券ETF近2年净值上涨4.45%。从收益能力看，截至2025年8月4日，国开债券ETF自 成立以来，最长连涨月数为15个月，最长连涨涨幅为3.90%，涨跌月数比为29/5，年盈利百分比为 100.00%，月盈利概率为88.08%，历史持有2年盈利概率为100.00%。 回撤方面，截至2025年8月4日，国开债券ETF近半年最大回撤0.41%，相对基准回撤0.31%。回撤后修复 天数为61天。 费率方面，国开债券ETF管理费率为0.15%，托管费率为0.05%，费率在可比基金中最低。 跟踪精度方面，截至2025年8月4日，国开债券ETF近2月跟踪误差为0.014%，在可比基金中跟踪精度最 高。 国开债券ETF紧密跟踪中债-0-3年国开行债券指数(总值)财富指数，中债-0-3 年国开行债券指数隶属于 中债总指数族分类，该指数成 ...